Damien

[Archived] S20 Hearthstone Priest Fatigue Control GvG

Sign in to follow this  

26 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Grinder Priest Deck for GvG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see the reason to include the shredder and gilblin stalker in this deck. They both seem to not play in this deck very well. I have been playing this deck for about 15 games now and i do not think they really fit the deck but I may just not be using them correctly. I got demoted from 6 full stars to 7 1 star and i was wondering why they are included.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gilblin is to facilitate the early game curve into Velen's Chosen, by having that extra sticky card in your deck to play early, you really increase your chances of being able to get a Velen's in play on curve.

Shredder is just a super powerful card, and is included in most decks right now just because of how much value it represents. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reassurance, Savjz is currently playing this deck in one of the biggest tournaments of the year, and he's even running two Gilblins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lightbomb is really important, since its insurance for your Deathlord. You play Deathlord when you have a Lightbomb in hand, and then just get extra value once their minion drops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sottle, this deck is super challenging to play.  Responding as to my own experiences playing this deck,

 

Gilbins:  Really good card for this deck.  Its sticky and makes a great Velen's target and when it falls into curve makes the transition to mid game much smoother.

 

Sylvanas:  Simple answer is no, but if you have two mind controls you can take advantage of Sylvanas' deathrattle ability.  This is very very suboptimal.  When in doubt, substitute Dr. Boom (if you have one) or Emperor Thaurissan.

 

The explanations about this deck emphasize the importance of landing on curve with your early minions.  This can't be over emphasized.  The deck suffers heavily against aggro decks with a slow start.  I substituted Emperor out of Blackrock for one of the Cabal Priests.  While mileage always varies, Thoughtsteals, Northshire Clerics and Emperor Thaurissan give you a ton of synergy and can give you a ton of mid to late game horsepower.

 

This deck is new.  Consider Emperor Thaurissan and Grim Patron if your transition to late game feels less than stellar 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In reference to a sub for Sylvanas;

 

The ONLY substitute I can think of would be Vol'Jin. You can run a giblin into the affected minion afterwards, light bomb, or holy nova combo. It serves many of the same purposes as Sylvanas with much more reliance on having cards to work off of your initial Vol'jin play

 

It's a sub par substitution but the best I've come up with.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sottle i just love playing this deck, been playing it for 4 days and im currently 44-28 rank 8, grinding from rank 20.

against druid and hunter (mid range or face) have over 83% wins.

rest of classes are ok 50-60% but the problem for me is paladins and rogues (2-5 and 3-4 so far, thank god i dont get many of them).

also, i dont have sylvanas and swapped her for loatheb (because reasons xD ).

Sottle i know the sylvanas is powerful etc etc , but do you think i can replace her for something better than loatheb?

last thing, i added crazed alchemist and another gilblin for the zombie chows and im quite happy with this swap, the alchemist already won me some games and the battlecry can really turn the game allowing you for (even more) crazy combos.

sry for long post xD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely would not replace Sylvanas in this deck, or any Priest deck for that matter.

Glad you're having success with it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gone 6-2 with this deck in casual so far, with only one opponent having a pretty sub-optimal deck.  I find it a welcome relief from normal priest control and have won those matches in a variety of ways (speaking to the descriptions of the deck being quite flexible).  I do not have the lightbombs right now so I'm running an extra Sludge Belcher and Shrinkmiester since it gives me another combo option, even though obviously niether really replaces Lightbomb.

The biggest relief has been against aggro.  Aside from one match with a horrible starting hand (nothing but spells even after mulligan) I've dealt with Face Hunter and a Midrange Pally surprisingly well and a zoolock managed to keep things close with me.

Anyways, fun deck, glad it was posted, and I'm working on getting those Lightbombs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck just is not working against ANY aggro decks.  Especially mech mages and agro druids. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck just is not working against ANY aggro decks.  Especially mech mages and agro druids. 

 

Then you are likely misplaying, this deck is favoured in both of those matchups.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why this deck doesn't run Resurrection?

 

Because the cards included are of higher value than a card that can simply resummon a 1 Mana card for 2 Mana. This deck doesn't even run Injured Blademaster, which is one of the strongest cards with Resurrect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

need a little bit help :)

so, with this deck i rushed rank5 really fast, even crafted sylvanas 2 days after my last post.

the problem now is im facing 80%+ warlocks aaaand its a pain. in theory i know the lightbombs and deaths are good vs handlock, but the amount of big drops is unreal when lord jaraxxus hits the board. i have no problems downing them to <5 hp but after that im not able to do even 1 damage to the face lol. i find myself only winning vs lock when i get good thoughtsteals like 2 hellfires or jaraxxus to finish them off.

any tweaks i can do to improve or do i just embrace that priest is somewhat unable to deal with this? (i may be missplaying ofc..)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have played over 100 games with this deck and I love it! It beats most Hunters and Mages in current meta and its pretty strong against other classes too.

 

I have tested Emperor Thaurissan, Loatheb and Auchenai Soulpriest (or Dr. gg) instead of Gilbin Stalker and two Piloted Shredders. Those cards are mixing curve a bit but I have had better success against Druid, Warrior and Warlock.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck is not valid. I've been testing it extensively for two weeks now. The times that it worked were few and based on a huge dose of luck. Almost every class/player I've played against had little trouble removing my Deathlord early on with almost no consequence for them. It happened way too often that my opponent pulls a free Shredder or Sludge Belcher, which is hard to remove so early on. A huge setback.

 

The times it did work were scarce, but when it did.. it was magical. Not anything that can get you consistent wins though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you are probably playing it poorly, I assure you this deck is still valid. It was used recently by a good friend of mine to qualify through a huge open bracket for the Gfinity Masters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you take requests? I'd love to see you play a couple of rounds on Twitch with this deck. I honestly don't think I can play this deck any better/more effective. I'm playing it exactly as intended, yet I can't compete with it rank 10 and up. The 'sticky' early minions are wiped away too easily.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.