L0rinda

Hearthstone: Ben Brode on Deck Slots and Barrier to Entry

Sign in to follow this  

8 posts in this topic

15009-hearthstone-ben-brode-on-deck-slot

Hearthstone lead designer Ben Brode has addressed a few issues raised on Reddit, to do with beginners and barrier to entry. He explains that the design team has to cater for new and old players alike, as much as is possible. He also clarifies that they are actively working on more deck slots.


Blizzard Icon Ben Brode


I just wanted to pop in and hopefully clear up a couple things.

We don't focus only on beginners, it's just that we bring them up a lot because many vocal players are already representing the other major group (engaged players). Most of what we do is for engaged players. In fact, just releasing any kind of content is pretty bad for new players. You've identified the fact that we are making the game worse (higher barrier to entry) for new players despite our apparent focus on them. That's because we really are trying to focus on everyone, impossible though it may be.

Also, I agree we do need to do something about the barrier to entry. I'm not sure it's catastrophic right now, but it won't take too many more expansions before it is. I made a video about this recently, you can check it out here.


We are pretty close to having some actual plans to share with everyone about this. Sorry I can't share more right now - still hammering out some details.

A couple more clarifications:

Deck Slots - we are actively working on this.
No alt art card rewards - this is more to benefit engaged players than new players. The game is somewhat more fun when you don't have to read your opponent's cards, and you just let the art inform the gameplay because you've just memorized it over time.
No Weekly balancing - this also isn't for new players. Made a video about this, you can check it out here:

(source)


This is further evidence of Brode following up on his desire to communicate with the player base more. We have seen regular tweets, Reddit posts, and videos for several months now.

It will be interesting to see what the future plans to lower barrier to entry turn out to be, and we'll let you know as soon as we find out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deck Slots - we are actively working on this.

 

 

Really?  They say they've been working for months on something an average programmer who has worked with unity before could implement within one or 2 hours? Or do they actually think something so simple requires this much design and testing? Something simple like giving us 3 deck slots per class would be more than enough.

 

To say that it is "too complex for the average hearthstone player" is just insulting our intelligence.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deck Slots - we are actively working on this.

 

 

Really?  They say they've been working for months on something an average programmer who has worked with unity before could implement within one or 2 hours? Or do they actually think something so simple requires this much design and testing? Something simple like giving us 3 deck slots per class would be more than enough.

 

To say that it is "too complex for the average hearthstone player" is just insulting our intelligence.

My thoughts exactly. I've always thought they should make 3 slots per class so we can have different styles of one class without eating the rest of our slots in the process. But honestly I would settle for another page of 9. Either or is not complicated to program in nor would it hurt the game play moving forward in my opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, we are told that more deck slots would be too complicated, yet we were given "Decks Assemble!" brawl? That is just straight-up nonsense. I guess Blizzard just wants to save space on their servers, but I think they should tell us directly the reason why we won't have more deck slots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, we are told that more deck slots would be too complicated, yet we were given "Decks Assemble!" brawl? That is just straight-up nonsense. I guess Blizzard just wants to save space on their servers, but I think they should tell us directly the reason why we won't have more deck slots.

This is just retarded. The amount of space it would take to have 27 deck slots for each account is negligible. We are talking about a few card ID's and the name/class of the deck itself(essentially a couple of bytes for each player,probably not even 1KB, assuming they have optimized things well enough, and knowing blizzard they probably have). Compared to all the data they need to store on their WoW servers this is just laughable.

 

Plus think about it from a consumer quality of service, the amount of effort they would need to put into this compared to how it would improve the game is just ridiculously low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, we are told that more deck slots would be too complicated, yet we were given "Decks Assemble!" brawl? That is just straight-up nonsense. I guess Blizzard just wants to save space on their servers, but I think they should tell us directly the reason why we won't have more deck slots.

This is just retarded. The amount of space it would take to have 27 deck slots for each account is negligible. We are talking about a few card ID's and the name/class of the deck itself(essentially a couple of bytes for each player,probably not even 1KB, assuming they have optimized things well enough, and knowing blizzard they probably have). Compared to all the data they need to store on their WoW servers this is just laughable.

 

Plus think about it from a consumer quality of service, the amount of effort they would need to put into this compared to how it would improve the game is just ridiculously low.

I think we have seen Blizzard being a bit greedy about their servers (brawl is up = unplayable hearthstone).

But why do you think they don't want to give us more slots? This was the "most reasonable" think to pop up in my head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've been honest about server stuff before. They admit that Reno Jackson doesn't turn yellow because of server load for instance!

 

I actually believe that they think newer players will get confused. Remember that just by visiting a site about the game, you're all in the top few percent of players. What I don't understand is why they don't fix it quicker now that it's obviously a huge issue for many people.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

So, we are told that more deck slots would be too complicated, yet we were given "Decks Assemble!" brawl? That is just straight-up nonsense. I guess Blizzard just wants to save space on their servers, but I think they should tell us directly the reason why we won't have more deck slots.

This is just retarded. The amount of space it would take to have 27 deck slots for each account is negligible. We are talking about a few card ID's and the name/class of the deck itself(essentially a couple of bytes for each player,probably not even 1KB, assuming they have optimized things well enough, and knowing blizzard they probably have). Compared to all the data they need to store on their WoW servers this is just laughable.

 

Plus think about it from a consumer quality of service, the amount of effort they would need to put into this compared to how it would improve the game is just ridiculously low.

 

I think we have seen Blizzard being a bit greedy about their servers (brawl is up = unplayable hearthstone).

But why do you think they don't want to give us more slots? This was the "most reasonable" think to pop up in my head.

 

Your guess is as good as mine, but if it's actually due to server load, this is just pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco

      Click on the gift tab in Battle.net to claim one free Hearthstone: Classic pack!
      Blizzard is giving away one free Hearthstone: Classic pack as a way to show off the "Gift" tab, a brand new feature in the Battle.net client. To claim your pack, simply click on the gift notification in the upper-right corner of the client then click on the big blue "Claim" button which pops up.

      Hearthstone fans from outside of North America may need to update to the beta version of the Battle.net client before being able to view the gift notification. To do this, click on the Blizzard logo in the upper-left corner of the Battle.net client to bring up the main menu, then click on Settings. Here you should see a "Beta" tab at the very bottom of the Settings list where you should be able to switch to the Beta version of the client.
      Thanks to the new Gifts tab Battle.net users are now able to buy items from the Shop (such as Hearthstone packs) as gifts for their friends. You can view the Gifts tab even if you don't have a current gift notification by clicking on your name and following the drop down menu to "View Gifts".
    • By Aleco

      Ike's surprising Freeze Mage deck played a huge role in his perfect tournament run.
      Hot off of a top 8 finish at the HCT Americas Summer Championships, Mark "Ike" Eichner blew through the competition at DreamHack Denver to finish the tournament with a perfect 13-0 record. He capped off the tournament by defeating DrJikininki, the DreamHack Atlanta 2017 champion, 3-2 in the finals. An incredibly impressive accomplishment for his first ever DreamHack, Ike will be taking home $7500 and 15 HCT points for his victory.
      Ike's powerful tournament lineup featured the three unquestioned kings of the current tournament meta, Highlander Priest, Jade Druid, and Tempo Rogue. However, his unique Freeze Mage deck was the all-star of the tournament. Ike called the deck his top performer on Twitter and noted that it received the most bans in the top 16.
      You can check out his deck lists for the tournament (including his Freeze Mage list) here on Twitter.
    • By Aleco

      In episode number four of "What's the Move?" a fun OTK deck finds a creative way to handle a threat.
      I've been having way too much fun with a Stonetusk Boar OTK (One Turn Kill) deck on the ladder these past few days. It's been performing surprisingly well against both of the two most popular decks in the current metagame, Highlander Priest and Tempo Rogue, but the real reason to play it is because of how much variety it has to offer from game to game. It's incredibly difficult to pilot and never fails to create interesting situations - just like the one we'll be discussing today!
      Once again, I took some of the feedback from the previous episode to heart and did my best to incorporate it into this one. As this series is still young and in the process of honing on it's ideal set of parameters (such as the length of the video, the amount of depth it should go into, and the kinds of situations it analyzes), please feel free to let us know in the comment section how this episode compares its predecessors.
      - Aleco
    • By Zadina

      The Ukrainian player is now part of G2.
      Lifecoach's spot had been empty for a while and someone had to fill in the gap, in order for the Fantastic Four of the Hearthstone division of G2 Esports to be remade. This person turned out to be Neirea, formerly of Team Liquid, who will join RDU, Thijs and Lothar. In fact, Neirea is already competing with his new team in the second week of the Trinity Series.
      Eugene "Neira" Shumilin has consistently ranked high in various major competitions since 2014. His breakout performance happened this year with team Ukraine placing 2nd in the Hearthstone Global Games and Neirea qualifying for the World Championship during the Spring Championship.
      We wish him the very best of luck!
    • By Zadina

      Shadowreaper Anduin can machinegun his enemies down at a proper speed.
      Patch 9.2, which went live yesterday, broke poor Shadowreaper Anduin, causing a huge delay when refreshing his Hero Power. This bug was quickly fixed today with a hotfix that can be donwloaded to your Hearthstone client:
      mdonais
      We are currently deploying a Hotfix to fix the speed of Shadowreaper Anduin's hero power.
      It slowed down in the patch yesterday. I don't know exactly why since I am not one of the engineers that fixed it but it sounds like it is a side effects of the unity upgrade we did. We have to rebuild a some things when we do a unity upgrade.
      Thanks!
      Mike. (source)