L0rinda

Hearthstone: Standard Rotational Format Announced

28 posts in this topic

Blizzard have announced that the game will now have a new format, and nine new deck slots.

15749-hearthstone-standard-rotational-fo

Ben Brode has released a video announcing that Hearthstone will now have two formats; Standard and Wild. Alongside having a new format, there will now be space for eighteen deck slots.


The new, Standard format, will use cards from the last two years of sets, Basic cards and Classic cards. This will allow the designers to have more impact on the meta with new cards, and also allow new players to catch up with their collections. The Wild format will allow players to use any card from their collection, which is the format we currently play. Players will have a different ranking for each format and will be able to choose which one to queue up for. The official format will be Standard, and is the format that will carry Hearthstone Championship Tour points for 2016.

There is also the announcement of the Hearthstone Zodiac. The first year of which will be "The Year of the Kraken"
 

According to the accompanying blog entry and FAQ, the Standard format will arrive in Spring. The rules mean that as soon as the first expansion of this year is released, Curse of Naxxramas and Goblins vs Gnomes will rotate out of the format, and will not be legal in Standard. When an adventure rotates out, it will no longer be available for purchase, but you will instead be able to dust the cards from it.

This is not a new concept in card games. Hearthstone have tended to steer away from things that were done in other games, but introducing formats is a logical step and should make the game more accessible and interesting.

Feel free to comment below on whether you think this will change things for the better.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soooo, let me get this right in my mind. I spend a lot of money and time to build a solid collection of cards, and now i'm being told that about a third of those are no longer worth a crap. BUT, I can buy new cards, adventures, and expansions to REPLACE those cards with and what they do. OH, and don't forget, that at MAX, they have a 2 year shelf life. Why do I feel like I'm being asked to drop my drawers and bend over a barrel and SMILE? I'm sorry, but this "easier for new players" bit just doesn't cut it. I'll give you a good analogy. Get cable tv, first year is a great deal. Then prices start to go WAY up. BUT new people can get great deals. No appreciation for being loyal and sticking with the company. I understand that something had to be done, but THIS?? There has to have been a better way to have done this. Sorry but this is horrible.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soooo, let me get this right in my mind. I spend a lot of money and time to build a solid collection of cards, and now i'm being told that about a third of those are no longer worth a crap. BUT, I can buy new cards, adventures, and expansions to REPLACE those cards with and what they do. OH, and don't forget, that at MAX, they have a 2 year shelf life. Why do I feel like I'm being asked to drop my drawers and bend over a barrel and SMILE? I'm sorry, but this "easier for new players" bit just doesn't cut it. I'll give you a good analogy. Get cable tv, first year is a great deal. Then prices start to go WAY up. BUT new people can get great deals. No appreciation for being loyal and sticking with the company. I understand that something had to be done, but THIS?? There has to have been a better way to have done this. Sorry but this is horrible.

 

What is your suggestion on preventing a meta to stall and be not scary for new players to join with tons of cards? You practically lose nothing with this; it's not like the cards you collected are removed entirely out of the game. If you play competitively then you will see why this was necessary and how benefitial it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soooo, let me get this right in my mind. I spend a lot of money and time to build a solid collection of cards, and now i'm being told that about a third of those are no longer worth a crap. BUT, I can buy new cards, adventures, and expansions to REPLACE those cards with and what they do. OH, and don't forget, that at MAX, they have a 2 year shelf life. Why do I feel like I'm being asked to drop my drawers and bend over a barrel and SMILE? I'm sorry, but this "easier for new players" bit just doesn't cut it. I'll give you a good analogy. Get cable tv, first year is a great deal. Then prices start to go WAY up. BUT new people can get great deals. No appreciation for being loyal and sticking with the company. I understand that something had to be done, but THIS?? There has to have been a better way to have done this. Sorry but this is horrible.

 

You can still play on WIld mode with maxed set, it’ll be the format where anyfin can happen :-)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Adventures and Expansions that are not part of the Standard format will no longer be available for purchase from the Shop" -Blizzard 2k16

Are they serious? We will have to spend dust on GvG and Naxx cards that we don't own to have them instead of buying an adventure wing or a few packs? That's just a greedy decision. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Adventures and Expansions that are not part of the Standard format will no longer be available for purchase from the Shop" -Blizzard 2k16

Are they serious? We will have to spend dust on GvG and Naxx cards that we don't own to have them instead of buying an adventure wing or a few packs? That's just a greedy decision. 

 

I can agree about that - I don't like that we'll have to craft any cards we're missing, as opposed to buying packs/adventure.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me being a newish player I am not opposed to what is happening with the standard game mode. Because of new cards being inserted the game will be evolving with every expansion. I think this is a good thing for the game and I am looking forward to having standard in Hearthstone. I guess I am one of the lucky ones being that I never bought NAXX. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this include classic cards, because they are the base of all hearthstone decks. Freeze Mage for instance. The deck will be eliminated if this happens. Also, I think both wild and standard should count for tournament points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this include classic cards, because they are the base of all hearthstone decks. Freeze Mage for instance. The deck will be eliminated if this happens. Also, I think both wild and standard should count for tournament points.

Classic cards will be available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New player problem: Having to grind a lot to get adventures, various cards from classic and new sets to face off against older players.

 

Solution: Ban everything in between original cards and latest 4 expansions.

 

Result:  Wont it still be hard for new players? By the time they get their classic collection and adventures done, begin to buy the latest expansion, a new expansion rolls in making something the player bought obsolete. So If i get into hearthstone in spring, I begin by buying classic cards. Older players already have these but MMR saves me for a while. After amassing enough classic, I choose between BRM, TGT, New Exp or LOE. BrM and TgT would hold lesser value since by the time I have eough of New Exp and LoE, Newer expansion rolls out making BRM and TgT obsolete. My only option is to have to spend tons of money or play atleast a year of catching up.

 

Real Reason behind the change: TgT was a huge failure. according to an article I was reading something around only 13 of the entire set sees play on a regular basis. Many people simply wont buy it because the existing cards are simply better. This is a failure i think on the design teams part. They did not make cards which could competitively replace or stand up against what blizzard already had.

 

Instead of making auto include cards like piloted shredder, boom, sludge Belcher obsolete, They should nerf them to allow a level playing field and let the new cards shine. Its as unfair/fair to epople who crafted these, as making the card un-usuable in the now primary mode of HS. Or print new cards that synergise with specific unused minions to push them forward. I never saw my gallywix see competitive play. I was hoping a more control oriented rogue may see play out of him one day. I do not see Raptor rogue flourishing if it doesn't have the death rattle minions from Naxx to help him forge a solid deck. Yes yes, there is wild mode, but packs with "wild cards" wont be available anymore. No one is going to spend their dust one getting cards which can only be used in one mode.

 

Another problem with this mode is, new cards can only synergise with classic sets to ensure longevity for 2 cycles, since every other set will be rotated out. So as a very crude example, if a new card is printed for warlock ( 2 mana: 2/3 At the end of your turn, resurrect a death rattle minion that died in this turn and another one 5 mana: 4/4 give your death rattle minions 2+2) They can create a sweet dreadsteed deck. But come next year these two cards stay but dread steed is gone.  Or for instance paladin gets new mediocre secrets  to make up for ones they lost, but next year Mysterious challenger is out and the secret is again an un-used card...

 

Sorry if this sounds ranty. I try to keep things as logical and explanatory as possible. feel free to show me to convince me to get behind this decision.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ability to craft adventure cards and actual card rotation is incredibly healthy for the game, fixing numerous problems like power creep, meta game diversity etc. You can't print a new card for Standard without having it to compete with other, for example.

Actually opening cards you need in packs takes a ton of luck, and adventures are often end up in such way that you need that 1 card that is 3 blocks down, so keep farming that 2100 gold.

Grinding cards and new-player entry barrier would always exist and having Standard can make it a bit easier.

Big thing: Literally nobody is forcing you to play Standard, and that's the whole beauty of Blizzard's decision about how it's going to look like.

I've seen this model in Magic: The Gathering for many, many years and thus far it was both commercially and game-wise sucsessful. All it takes is to make a good set and not some crap.

Defining "good" and creating "good sets" are pieces where, I am afraid, Blizzard could struggle without 20+ years of experience like of M:TG devs. Thus far we've seen downs and ups in expansions and adventures and that may be just ending up it reducing aforementioned diversity in Standard instead of promoting it. I repeat - nobody is forcing you to play Standard(unless you are heading for HSWC or something) and if things go ugly Wild can become a real headliner of future Hearthstone.

Either way, we got to see some actual changes implemented before crying about them. I know that's our primary job as a gaming community but frankly speaking it makes little sense.

GL&HF!

Edited by Paracel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very least, a new player coming into the game after the new expansion hits, will have two less adventure / expansion cards to worry about and consider if he needs them to be competitive. A new player starting after a year from now, will have more sets that he needn't worry about. So, in that way it makes it bit easier for them. Ultimately, anyway starting late, will have some catching up to do - be it grinding or paying. This makes it comparatively easier for them. 

 

Similarly, devs would only need to worry about a much more limited set of cards and their interactions to balance for competitive play, thereby giving them so more room to be creative or at the very least, more time to iterate on changes with a smaller subset of cards. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very least, a new player coming into the game after the new expansion hits, will have two less adventure / expansion cards to worry about and consider if he needs them to be competitive.

Similarly, devs would only need to worry about a much more limited set of cards and their interactions to balance for competitive play, thereby giving them so more room to be creative or at the very least, more time to iterate on changes with a smaller subset of cards.

Here is the tricky part: you can't have a cake and eat it too. If Blizzard put new player experience on top of their priorities, it will ultimately hit every other aspect of the game like high-end play or e-sports competitions.

If they will only care about Standard, old players who are keen on Eternal format like Wild would be significantly hurt, because they will feel like their efforts and money is wasted and game designers don't care about them at all, only seeking to make money out of new expansions.

Satisfying all your players is your ultimate goal as a game developer, and - I have expressed my concerns - I am afraid Blizzard might be biting more that they can chew. Balancing things even in Standard so you have a good meta game there and in Wild, where you have to worry about occasionally breaking it with some new cards, is what Blizzard up to face, if they want to have a good game.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Balancing things even in Standard so you have a good meta game there and in Wild, where you have to worry about occasionally breaking it with some new cards, is what Blizzard up to face, if they want to have a good game.

I suspect they won't try too hard to keep Wild particularly balanced, at least within bounds that we're used to. Hence the name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blizzard are known for their proficiency to make games that have something for everybody. I do not believe they are planning to deliver a hit this big to their own player- and fan-base.

Balancing Wild is a thing to be on their list, because unsatisfied players = losing money. And money is what it's always all about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Classic cards will be available.

That is nice. I just opened a Ysera today in fact, and would be disappointed if I was unable to use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@paracel: actually Blizzard is pushing standard to be, well, the new standard. The fact that non-standard decks wont be available to buy anymore, blizzard calling standard the "more balanced" mode and such indicate that wild is just there as a band-aid for non-new players. I myself am not a veteran. But I don't want to see some my first legendaries get limited to a mode which will be highly imbalanced soon.

 

Also Meta is not stale. We had just stabilized after TgT when LoE came in. Yes some classes got more love than others. But if we look at Druid, that class has changed oh so little since classic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

terrible idea. Welcoming new players with open arms while giving the rest of us the middle finger...and laughing at the heaps of money they've collected from people who wanted to own most cards/golden cards (many of which will no longer be playable in ranked/standard).

 

GfuckingG Blizzard...greedy ass motherfuckers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@SithLordOfSnark: I would keep Majordomo for Adventures. You can use him to cheese some bosses.

 

On topic now, I am not sure if I am happy with Standard format. I mean, it's good for new players or old ones that don't play often, but even they have to still keep purchasing the newer packs and adventures. Meanwhile, it's obvious that the format that the game had until now and that is going to be renamed into Wild will not have much priority for the team. The proof of that is that they will be removing the older packs in favour of Standard and that they will also make Standard into the official tournament format. The fact that even the old game format is being named Wild and as Ben Brode said in the video "Wild is going to be crazy" (or something like that) means that they don't intend to balance it very much.

 

Even the balancing of Standard is going to be a hard task. They really need to come up with some seriously good cards for Rogues, for example. Paladins and Priests are getting hit really hard as well and these two classes will also need a lot of help (even though a lot of people hate Paladin atm, just take a look at the cards they will be losing and you will understand that the class is left with almost nothing). As Sottle said, the next expansion is going to be the most crucial in the history of the game.

 

Lastly, I don't understand why they want to remove old adventures. I mean, hasn't the team spent countless hours on them? Are they happy with just removing the product of their work forever? Does it feel rewarding for them? Or is it just an opportunity for them to re-serve Adventure content without no-one realising it's the same boss with a different name? I mean, Hearthstone already had some p2w features, but buying Adventure content, that you consciously know is going to be removed in a couple of years, screams that they just care about profit only.

 

EDIT - OK, they said that they will balance both formats. But I don't think Wild will be more popular than Standard.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very least, a new player coming into the game after the new expansion hits, will have two less adventure / expansion cards to worry about and consider if he needs them to be competitive. A new player starting after a year from now, will have more sets that he needn't worry about. So, in that way it makes it bit easier for them. Ultimately, anyway starting late, will have some catching up to do - be it grinding or paying. This makes it comparatively easier for them. 

 

Similarly, devs would only need to worry about a much more limited set of cards and their interactions to balance for competitive play, thereby giving them so more room to be creative or at the very least, more time to iterate on changes with a smaller subset of cards. 

It's not really that big of a deal with the new players having to care less about the previous adventures/expansions because in the end, you still need 30 cards to make a deck. They won't buy Naxx, but they will have to spend that gold on adventures wings or packs to craft the cards that will be used instead of GvG.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@SithLordOfSnark: I would keep Majordomo for Adventures. You can use him to cheese some bosses.

 

On topic now, I am not sure if I am happy with Standard format. I mean, it's good for new players or old ones that don't play often, but even they have to still keep purchasing the newer packs and adventures. Meanwhile, it's obvious that the format that the game had until now and that is going to be renamed into Wild will not have much priority for the team. The proof of that is that they will be removing the older packs in favour of Standard and that they will also make Standard into the official tournament format. The fact that even the old game format is being named Wild and as Ben Brode said in the video "Wild is going to be crazy" (or something like that) means that they don't intend to balance it very much.

 

Even the balancing of Standard is going to be a hard task. They really need to come up with some seriously good cards for Rogues, for example. Paladins and Priests are getting hit really hard as well and these two classes will also need a lot of help (even though a lot of people hate Paladin atm, just take a look at the cards they will be losing and you will understand that the class is left with almost nothing). As Sottle said, the next expansion is going to be the most crucial in the history of the game.

 

Lastly, I don't understand why they want to remove old adventures. I mean, hasn't the team spent countless hours on them? Are they happy with just removing the product of their work forever? Does it feel rewarding for them? Or is it just an opportunity for them to re-serve Adventure content without no-one realizing it's the same boss with a different name? I mean, Hearthstone already had some p2w features, but buying Adventure content, that you consciously know is going to be removed in a couple of years, screams that they just care about profit only.

 

EDIT - OK, they said that they will balance both formats. But I don't think Wild will be more popular than Standard.

These are all my concerns as well, but you were able to state them in a much more elegant way than I was. I also have a few others as well, but well put. I couldn't agree more. Still feel like I'm being tossed aside for some reason.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wild will lose popularity because people would rather craft something they can use across modes than something they can only use in one mode...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I am happy about for sure:

 

I CAN FINALLY DE THAT PATHETIC MAJORDOMO EXECUTUS THAT I WILL NEVER USE.

Majordomo is a great card, don't question it. Eight life is good against hunter, clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Mind Blast Priest deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina
      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s