Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sepums

Is Naxxramas still worth buying?

13 posts in this topic

Sorry for such a bad first post.

I am a fairly mediocre player who hasn't bought any adventures yet but is eager to, and while I see that loe might be the adventure most worth purchasing for now, I am still interested in buying naxx and brm.

The thing is, with the new way to play coming to hearthstone, seeing that naxx cards will become craftable (correct me if I'm wrong?) I don't exactly need to buy naxx to get the good cards that I want it for.

So, is it worth buying naxxramas for the experience of the adventure, and not having to grind dust for the cards? or should I just ignore naxx (in addition to gvg) and just stick to standard when it comes out?

I feel okay since I haven't spent any money on the game so far and I know that I can simply ignore wild and stick to standard, but wild seems more fun at the moment with all the decks that I have seen but never was able to play because I didn't buy any adventures.

As many people have already stated, we will still need to collect various cards from current and later expansions for standard, and cards from current adventures/expansions will become obsolete as time goes, so I just don't know how I'm supposed to deal with this.

I don't understand the direction with the new way to play, it doesn't make much sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Naxxramas cost 3500 Gold or 25$ and you will be able to disenchant it for 3140 dust.

 

If you buy it for money, it's better dust/$ than you would get from buying packs, so I'd buy it just for the dust. The adventure and any cards you might want to keep are just bonus. (Of course, if you buy packs, you would not disenchant all the cards, so it's not a 100% fair comparison.)

 

If you buy it for gold, you'd get slightly more dust from buying packs (on average, it's about 1 dust per gold), so it's less obvious which choice is better.

 

Personally, I liked the PvE adventure, but everyone is different, so I don't know whether you'd think it's worth it. There are also a lot of great cards in it that would be expensive to craft - e.g. Loatheb. If you are interested in Wild at all, you probably want to buy the adventure now, as it'll be cheaper than getting the dust to craft these cards.

 

If you are only interested in Standard and planing on buying adventures with gold, skip Naxx.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly it depends on your current collection, whether you will play wild or standard. Naxx is really important for the decks out there right now, (and presumably in wild) but once formats roll in it will be obsolete in Standard. If you don't already have a decent collection you will be spending a lot of resources and end up playing catchup in wild. While Standard will be featuring cards from BRM (dragons and thaurassan and possibly even patrons) and LOE (reno, tunnel trogg), you probably wont be as far behind as you would be in wild without naxx. If you plan on spending gold for naxx, classic packs may be a better choice (unless you already have a big classic collection). If later you want to play a particular deck in wild you would be better off crafting those specific cards. More than half the cards in most decks are (as of now) made out of the core set (basic +Classic). The cards which are most used currently are Sludge belcher, loatheb, zombie chow and haunted creeper, with shade of naxx, death's bite, Sometimes kel'thuzzad and [Naxx priest card] used by specific classes. IF you can give an idea of how big your collection is from each set, we could have a better idea.

 

Edit: It might be worth mentioning that naxx was a really creative and fun adventure to play. Whether you factor that in or not is up to you.  

Edited by Valkyr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then I suppose I'll skip naxx and just stick to standard mode, completely ignoring wild.

The last reason I want to play naxx for is the adventure itself, with all the "humor" and stuff, but meh.

I could skip brm as well and just buy loe since brm will become obsolete in a year or so.

In that case, should I also start disenchanting all my GvG cards before they get their dust cost reduced? (as we presume?)

Edited by Sepums

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, ignoring Naxx and GvG is probably the best option now. LoE offers high value and so does BrM. Still, the strongest set are classic cards. Wild is gong to "die out" anyway. However, BrM and LoE will become obsolete at the same time, so don't take into account that BrM is older.

The cost of crafting and the "reward" for disenchanting GvG should stay the same. No need to start disenchanting now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I just want a clearer look at this.

How will BrM and LoE become obsolete at the same time? Wasn't LoE released a year later? Pardon me if I'm wrong.

Anyway, can you also confirm that the reward for disenchanting GvG is going to stay the same? You said "should" which is only a probability.

Sorry if I sound like a dick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I just want a clearer look at this.

How will BrM and LoE become obsolete at the same time? Wasn't LoE released a year later? Pardon me if I'm wrong.

Anyway, can you also confirm that the reward for disenchanting GvG is going to stay the same? You said "should" which is only a probability.

Sorry if I sound like a dick.

Yes, LoE was released after a time period of almost one year, but they were released in the same calendar year of 2015, which is what matters (according to current information "You’ll play Standard using a deck built solely from a pool of cards that were released in the current and previous calendar year, along with a core foundation of the Basic and Classic card sets"). 

I can't find any source to support my statement that GvG will be disenchantable for the price usual cards will be disenchanted. I derived it from the statement that the cards won't be disenchantable for the full crafting price and from the information/values at HearthPwn Innkeeper. I have found information only for Adventures.

Do not worry, as long as you are polite (which you are), I am happy to (try to) help you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get both adventures! Yes, the Naxxramas cards will rotate soon, but adventures are fun to play on their own. I remember the challenge of defeating Heroic Frost Wyrm Lair. Don't forget that some of the coolest card backs come from the adventures!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they are fun to play, they are currently not worth buying for their value, and since a lot of players are F2P, spending 3500 gold on something that will be gone in a few months is not really an option if they want to have better decks.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they are fun to play, they are currently not worth buying for their value, and since a lot of players are F2P, spending 3500 gold on something that will be gone in a few months is not really an option if they want to have better decks.

I suppose so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure you would get the same amount of dust you get from disenchanting GvG post update as you do now. People wanted Blizzard to give them full dust (i.e dust required to craft) from Disenchanting, but blizzard has refused. I did not realize BRM and LOE were same year... So when the new expansion rolls out in 2017 we lose TgT LoE and BRM... Damn. TgT really failed to capture the community...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tgt was pretty meh, I'm not going to miss it at all compared to gvg.

The only cards I'm going to miss are probably Confessor and Gormok, Mukla's champion, and Mogor's champion because he never got a trophy.

Gvg filled many gaps in many classes and introduced so much. (goodbye darkbomb, implosion, malganis, lightbomb, velen's chosen, glaivezooka, snowchugger, crackle, bouncing blade, mech bear cat, tinkmaster's oil, and others I can't remember off the top of my head right now.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely going to miss all Warlock cards from GvG, especially Mal'ganis. In the same vein, I will miss dreadsteed from TgT. I love dreadsteed riverdare mal'ghanis shenanigans. Hopefully it will be viable one day in wild! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      The Hearthstone Championship Tour continues this weekend, with the focus shifting to the Asia-Pacific region. In this article I have introduced some of the players, and listed their deck archetypes.
      The APAC region is often regarded as the weakest region, and with some justification. However, although the region lacks a little in depth, the best players are definitely world class. Not only that, but the rest of the pack is rapidly improving, and it would be very negligent to ignore the region in 2017. Staz, from The Philippines recently won the $150,000 first prize at a stacked WESG, which marked the first major tournament won by the region. The top players will be looking to keep the rest of the world on notice, with some high quality play this weekend.
      Below I have listed a few of the key players, along with notes and deck archetypes.
        CaraCute: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      CaraCute has been touted by both NeilYo and Staz as having a good chance, and since those comments were made, she has come through the Tavern Hero Qualifier to take her place in the main Swiss. She learned her trade at Guildhouse Fireside gatherings, the same Fireside gatherings where caster Jia Dee also rose through the ranks.
        Che0nsu: Jade Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      Che0nsu made his name by first winning the Last Call qualifier, and then building on that to finish top four in the World Championship at BlizzCon. 
        ChongGEr: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Reno Warrior
      ChongGer is one of the most consistent performers in the South-East Asia scene. He came fourth in the Singapore Major, third in the Thai Major, and second in the Malaysia Major, where he lost two matches in the final to a player he had already beaten in the upper bracket! He also placed consistently high in the preliminaries last year. 
         GundamFlame: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      GundanFlame impressed observers in the Japan Summer Championship with his understanding of aggressive play. His understanding of when to ease off the pedal, and when to go all-in, won him the national title. It is no surprise that his lineup for the Playoffs is an aggressive one.

        HandomeGuy (pictured above): Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      HandsomeGuy is regarded as the man to beat whenever he steps foot in an APAC tournament. He finished in second place in the APAC Winter Championship, and that proved to be his worst result, as he went on to win both the Spring and Summer Championships.
        Kranich: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman (shown below), Reno Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      Kranich played in both the 2014, and 2015 World Championships, finishing top four and top eight respectively. Due to this, and the fact that he was a member of Team Dignitas before they withdrew from Hearthstone, he is one of the best known APAC players in the West. He is not scared to put his own stamp on decks, his RenoLock contains Doomguard and Krul the Unshackled, while his Shaman deck is slower than most Aggro Shamans, and leans towards midrange.

        NaviOOT: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      NaviOOT has built a strong reputation on the back of relentless top 100 finishes, and a consistently popular stream. In recent months he has turned his attention more and more to the tournament scene, making the trip to the Malaysia Open, in which he placed top 8. He has also stated that he will be travelling to DreamHack Austin, which is coming up soon. He managed top four at last Winter's APAC Championship, and is a genuine contender in 2017.
       Pinpingho: Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Reno Warlock, Water Warrior
      Pinpingho finished top eight in the 2015 World Championship. He was known for being one of the strongest Shaman players, back before Shaman was regarded as a playable class, so it will be interesting to see how a does now! He qualified for two APAC Championship events in 2016, and so is no stranger to these events.
        Surrender: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      Although he is yet to have a big win, Surrender is highly regarded in the community and has numerous good results. He already had Xixo as a playtest partner, and has recently joined Counter Logic Gaming, along with Xixo and Hoej. He will be as well prepared as anyone for this event.
        Tom60229: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      One of the most accomplished players in the field, Tom60229 has shown consistent results since the dawn of Hearthstone. His most recent tournament win was the Malaysia Major, but also had good success on the 2015 ONOG Tour. His worldwide tournament experience will stand him in good stead in this event.
       
      The event begins at 3am CET on Saturday 25 February, and coverage will be on the official PlayHearthstone Twitch channel.
    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!
    • By L0rinda

      Blizzard have announced that the next update will contain big changes to the way Arena works.
      The newly announced changes will come into force at the same time as the nerfs to Small-Time Buccaneer and Spirit Claws, which we discussed previously.
      The most important change will be that Arena will change from Wild format to Standard. This will help to keep Arena feeling fresh, as well as make sure that card synergies can be drafted more easily.
      Changes have also been made to the distribution of cards. Common and Basic cards will show up less often, and the frequency of spells and class cards being offered has been raised. The full discussion can be found in the announcement link above, but the main reasoning is to allow players to have more opportunities to outdraft and outplay their opponents, rather than just playing the game on curve.
      This philosophy will have some implications in Standard too. If Blizzard are actively trying to reduce the impact of playing on curve in Arena, this could mean that they will carry over the same thoughts into constructed play. I feel that moving away from the style, unaffectionately known as Curvestone, would be good for the game. The changes will almost certainly be welcomed in the Arena community, and it is good to see Blizzard making them now, rather than waiting for the next set to launch.
    • By FreezedIce
      Im making a telegram bot that can send you new decks and news from https://www.icy-veins.com/hearthstone.
      It already can send some decks and filter them by class and deck format.
      Im going to open bot for all users in next few weeks. 
      Any suggestions?
      Pic1 Pic2 Pic3 Pic4


    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kazakus Zoo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard deck.