L0rinda

Heroic Tavern Brawl Announced: Value Analysis for Most Skill Levels

22 posts in this topic

 

elZZgn7.jpg

Blizzard have announced that this week's Tavern Brawl is going to be a competitive Brawl with an entry fee and an Arena style payout structure.

The announcement, which is posted on battle.net, explains that the Brawl will involve making a constructed Standard deck, and then locking in that deck for the duration of the Brawl. In a move away from usual Brawls, this one is highly competitive, with a 1000 gold, or $9.99 entry fee. The Brawl ends when you have lost three matches, or won twelve. This is the same system that is used in Arena. The payout structure is shown below.

4wKot4X.png

I have included a table below, which shows the expected returns. There are a few notes to understand about the methodology. Firstly, Gold is counted as 100 for a pack. Golden Legendaries count as 3200.

Secondly, the model breaks down a little around the extremes, It becomes unstable in the high 60s and low 30s because it doesn't factor in that your 10-0 opponent is also on a very good score. This means it overstates the number of 12s slightly for good players, and 0s for weak players. You can see for yourselves where this starts to occur in the chart.

Thirdly, the average for a 50% player is 2.99, not 3.00. This is correct because if you were going to go 33-2, you never get to finish that run when you are cut off at 12-2. Look up your anticipated win percentage, and read across to the pretty colours to find out your EV.

EHL4UPH.png

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying you can only participate in it for a limited amount of completed runs but they aren't being very specific. I'm assuming one can participate in more than one but for how many more past that I wonder. Also I'm predicting an overflow of Shaman decks in this weeks Brawl

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering that I don't have 1000 gold and would have a much better use than an constructed Arena run for those if I did, I'll pass. No extra pack this week, I guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Keizoku said:

Considering that I don't have 1000 gold and would have a much better use than an constructed Arena run for those if I did, I'll pass. No extra pack this week, I guess...

This Brawl is bad for F2P players, which I am not the happiest about. I myself will pay the $10 to play it once but I understand that a lot of players either can't do that or choose not to (which I respect their decision). I like the idea of this brawl but like I said, I'm not happy about the cost of entry to play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a unique live test run for an eventual new game mode, I'd have nothing against it. But the rewards for a successful run are just so insanely overboard that it will never go live as such. I might be too cynical, but this just looks like a quick money grab to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Keizoku said:

I might be too cynical, but this just looks like a quick money grab to me.

This was exactly my first thought when I looked at the rewards then looked at the entry fee. The real entry fee to this brawl is $10 because we know and they (Blizzard) knows very few players have 1000 gold lying around. But Blizzard is notorious for quick money grabs. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, Idea and concept are fine. But this is the re-run of the season. Constructed arena = Constructed Ranked where everyone starts at zero. Entry fee comparing to the rewards would be fine if there were Rare and Epic cards also in the rewards.

But puting all this aside it looks like Blizzard needs a gold sink. By the way as I understand those are standart packs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Dantalian said:

By the way as I understand those are standart packs.

It shows 50 "Whispers of the Old Gods"  in Blizzard's News article.

 

23 minutes ago, Dantalian said:

Entry fee comparing to the rewards would be fine if there were Rare and Epic cards also in the rewards.

I agree that there should be more Golden card rewards at lower "ranks" given how high the entry fee is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, this feels like a pretty ugly cash grab and/or gold sink on Blizzard's part. For what? To play the same decks you face in ranked. Gonna be a lot of salt over this one.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst Brawl ever because simple is not a Brawl, Arena with a 7x entry fee.

I've the quest Win 5 brawls how I'm supposed to do a quest if i've to pay 10 euro to do it?

If entry fee was at 150 gold or around that would be somewhat acceptable... but 1000 is more than an adventure wing is purely nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be surprised if anyone is able to go 12-2 in order to get the top reward. The only way you're able to do this in Arena is because skill matters in the selection. In standard everyone can go grab a deck from Sottle's lists, read for 5 minutes, and at least be competitive to steal a game or two from the top players. Going on two 6 game win streaks in normal games is really intense. The break even point is also around 5-6 games (depending on how you value dust) Which is REALLY high.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Laragon said:

I'll be surprised if anyone is able to go 12-2 in order to get the top reward. The only way you're able to do this in Arena is because skill matters in the selection. In standard everyone can go grab a deck from Sottle's lists, read for 5 minutes, and at least be competitive to steal a game or two from the top players. Going on two 6 game win streaks in normal games is really intense. The break even point is also around 5-6 games (depending on how you value dust) Which is REALLY high.

There are going to be very few pros hitting the 12 win runs and getting rewards that they honestly don't need. There are pros like Kibbler who have solid gold legend decks and 10's of thousands of gold and dust, so these rewards are and will be a bit wasted on players like him. But sadly with this brawl, the rich get richer. 5 or 6 wins have a pretty good money value seeing how much packs cost, but no one wants nor should have to spend $10 per entry. I could possible see this whole thing treated as an event and the entry fee being for the entire event. Once you pay you get to play as many runs as you want. Still more than it should be but in my opinion more reasonable than what they are offering now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel that I like the idea but not the actual thing. 

EV is bad. Payout is really skewed towards 12 wins. Your chances to make it here with 70 whooping percent winrate are quite low. Also, if you have a consistent 70% Constructed winrate, you probably make enough gold in Arena and your top 100 legend finishes give you so much Twitch followers that you don't care about prizes.

Current Standard meta is weird. It's tuned in a way that there are decks that reward skill, but there are also decks that don't care about any of players doing the right thing at all and they can clutch wins just based on good draws. Or fold to themselves. It balances itself with a big sample, but not in a 15 single deck brackets. 

And the whole single deck idea is as anticlimactic as it could be. There is a reason we have Conquest and LHS as featured tournament formats. It's just more depth and ultimately more skill involved.

Personally, I'm not competing in Heroic Brawl. I'm way too far from my optimal shape(it's a big thing in digital athletics, heh). High-profile players will find this event exciting and they don't mind the investment, and I'm glad for them. It's a good sign that Blizzard are making some content not for their average casual crowd, that path has been filled with ups and downs for more than 20 years. They should have given us an option to play Randomonium instead, though.

And one more thing : in Magic: The Gathering, a 12-3-1 record locks you in a top 8 of the highest profile events - Grand Prix level and Pro Tour. 12-4 can pass depending on tiebreakers. Top 8 is considered a real achievement, you'll pretty much be in the books for the rest of Magic's history, not to mention the paycheck. It's also fairly common to split prizes, because actually playing out the Top 8 matches can go south for both sides. Now think about this and 3 golden Legendaries + 50 packs.

Edited by Paracel
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Laragon said:

I'll be surprised if anyone is able to go 12-2 in order to get the top reward. The only way you're able to do this in Arena is because skill matters in the selection. In standard everyone can go grab a deck from Sottle's lists, read for 5 minutes, and at least be competitive to steal a game or two from the top players. Going on two 6 game win streaks in normal games is really intense. The break even point is also around 5-6 games (depending on how you value dust) Which is REALLY high.

I'm not sure that's true. The top players in constructed have pretty high win-rates. I'm pretty new (started playing in July) and went 61-41 in the climb from Rank 4 to Legend last season. The players who are getting there way before the end of the season must have significantly higher win rates than that. Also in high rank constructed you're facing people with viable decks who know how to play them, that is unlikely to be the case in the first few games of this.

Also, knowing how to play a deck is much more important than knowing how to draft. You can grab a deck from Sottle's lists and be utterly useless with it (e.g. I tried the new Freeze Aggro mage that's been going around recently and won about 25% of my games, Trump has a few vids on YouTube where he played it to Legend with a near 80% win rate). Merps and Adwcta's latest Lightforge has quite a bit of discussion about the importance of draft and playing-skill, they rate the latter as way more impactful than the former.

I do feel this brawl is rather tough on new/weaker players though. Even a 0-3 run in arena returns an average of 122 dust/gold (from my sample of 6 anyway) which is an 81% return. A 0-3 in this gives a 10% return which is going to leave a lot of people feeling pretty disappointed.

Edited by Bozonik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try the brawl for fun. 1k gold won't affect me that much, I already have all the adventures and am able to run arena permanently, so I don't really need gold at this point. I won't even mind getting a 1k gold pack, though I don't think it will be my case. I won't get 12 wins, I probably won't break even, but at least it will be fun (as far as HS can be considered fun). 

So, freeze mage is the best midrange shaman counter? Well, it's time to start getting used to it on ladder :

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With a bit of creativity and some luck, I can see myself being successful here. Let's hope the rules for this brawl are fun yet not too RNG based. If this brawl promotes control, I will do well... if it promotes Aggro, I will fail

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, YourGod said:

With a bit of creativity and some luck, I can see myself being successful here. Let's hope the rules for this brawl are fun yet not too RNG based. If this brawl promotes control, I will do well... if it promotes Aggro, I will fail

 

Based on what is released from Blizzard. It is literally that "Participants will create a Standard deck from their existing card pool and lock it in before their first Heroic Brawl match." It's standard with out the ability to adapt to changes in meta at different levels. There is nothing that will promote control, or aggro, or anything unique. It's the game we all play, just adding a high risk - high reward touch from arena. The problem is it costs more than an entire adventure wing, with possibly little reward.

After some thought. I think they messed up by making the risk-reward too high for what we are already playing. They should have lowered it to around or less than 500 gold and lower rewards to match. Yeah, three gold legendaries is an exciting prospect, but there will be a LOT of people that won't play this. Brawl has always been about goofiness and giving a free pack so people can try and catch up without a huge investment. It's odd to see such a stark change for (hopefully) just one week.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if they delayed it, or made a mistake in the launch, but I just played this week's brawl and it's ShiftCon, with a deck full of Shifter Zerus.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Neuric said:

Not sure if they delayed it, or made a mistake in the launch, but I just played this week's brawl and it's ShiftCon, with a deck full of Shifter Zerus.

Good catch! just signed on to do mine just in case they pull it later like they do a couple times before. I got my free pack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Placeholder for tweet 788437522015588353

They tweeted that the heroic brawl won't be coming this week. It is possible it will be super delayed though, so it drops as close to the start of the next expansion as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/20/2016 at 6:45 AM, positiv2 said:
They tweeted that the heroic brawl won't be coming this week. It is possible it will be super delayed though, so it drops as close to the start of the next expansion as possible.

"Soon"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Ever since the announcement of the Hearthstone Masters system, the details on the final tier - Hearthstone Grandmasters - have been a mystery. However, Tom Matthiesen from Inven Global has released some info on its format, prize pool and invited players.
      According to Inven Global, Hearthstone Grandmasters will have a league structure. It will consist of two seasons per year, with each season lasting eight weeks. Each region will have 16 players, who will be divided into two groups of eight. Europe and the Americas seem to be paired together, while it's not defined how Hearthstone Grandmasters will work for other regions.
      Inven has even acquired the names of 15 European participants and 13 from the Americas. They are all well-known pro players like Bunnyhoppor, Pavel, Thijs, Kolento, RDU, Firebat, Muzzy, Dog, Purple and more! The last four players will be determined by the results of the upcoming World Championship.
      Participants will play twice a week, facing off against each other in a double round-robin system. Hearthstone Grandmasters conclude with global finals. After the two seasons have ended, the two players who performed worst in season 2 in their respective region will be demoted and no longer play in Hearthstone Grandmasters.
      As far as the compensation of the players is concerned, each of them will earn $1,000 per week as an appearance fee. For each match won, another $500 is given to the participating players. The prize pool of the global finals is said to be $500,000. It's highly likely there'll be more rewards per seasonal performance.
      Hearthstone Grandmasters is set to start soon after the Hearthstone World Championships have concluded. Blizzard is expected to share these details sometime next week.
    • By Zadina
      This is a brand new Constructed Tavern Brawl.
      In Battle of the Bans, you pick a class and you initially make a deck of four cards. Your opponent bans one of them and then your deck is filled with copies of the remaining three cards.
      The "ban phase" happens after the mulligan but before turn one, and will show 3 of your opponent's cards plus a mystery card. If you pick the mystery card to ban, it will be revealed to you. If you have copies of the card your opponent chose to ban in your hand, they will be replaced randomly by your 3 other cards.
      To keep things balanced, the following cards have been banned from Battle of Bans: Jade Idol, Ice Block, Time Out!, Patches the Pirate and Whizbang the Wonderful.
      The concept of this Tavern Brawl is very interesting. Not only do you need to pick the proper cards that work well together, you also have to keep into account that one of them will get banned. In turn, you also need to be smart with your ban choice.
      This Brawl is very similar to Top 3: one of the decks that is really consistent in both of these Brawls is Mech Hunter with Metaltooth Leaper. Jade Shaman seems to be doing well as you get to summon even larger men every consecutive turn. Discardlock is reportedly performing very solidly, as well. A really strong counter-deck includes Holy Wrath and Shirvallah, the Tiger.
      As far as bans are concerned, since this Brawl seems to favour aggro decks in general, make sure to ban any taunts your opponent has. Alternatively, you can try a spell-based Mage or Priest deck.
      Feel free to share the decks that worked for you in the comments!
    • By Zadina
      The community card reveals for RIse of Shadows will happen during the next ten days.
      The reveal of the... reveal schedule was done a bit differently this time, since there was no official article. Only the dates and the links for the various community sites and streams were posted on the Rise of Shadows official website.






      The first reveal stream will happen on Monday March 25 at 10 am PDT.
      The final reveal stream, where the entire set is unveiled, should happen during the first week of April. The expansion releases on April 9.
    • By Zadina
      To ensure the integrity of Hearthstone esports, Blizzard has banned the two Taiwanese players who were previously accused of wintrading and stream sniping.
      As a reminder, Roger and Reall were caught wintrading on April 2018. Moreover, the Chinese Taipei team, consisting of 2018 World Champion tom60229, Roger, Shaxy and Reall, was caught streamsniping during the Hearthstone Global Games and were consequently disqualified.
      Due to these events, there were several protests about Roger being crowned Winter Champion a month ago and qualifying for the this year's World Championship. Blizzard feels that Roger earned his Championship spot legitimately.
      However, Roger and Reall will not be allowed to participate in Hearthstone Grandmasters in 2019. The Grandmasters tier is the highest one in the revamped system for Hearthstone esports; it is still not known how exactly Grandmasters is going to work.
      Here is the full message regarding Roger and Reall:
      u/BlizzMilkfat
      Hi all – Sam Braithwaite, Senior Global Franchise Lead for Hearthstone esports here. As we prepare for the 2019 HCT World Championship, I wanted to take the opportunity to address the community’s feedback about one of our professional players, Luo "Roger" Shengyuan, who recently won the HCT Winter Championship.
      In Oct. 2018, during the Hearthstone Global Games, we discovered that team Chinese Taipei, which included Roger, tom60229, Shaxy, and Reall had violated the rules to gain a competitive advantage. In response, we administered the penalty outlined in the rules at the time, and disqualified team Chinese Taipei from the competition.
      But previously, in April 2018, allegations of Roger and Reall participating in win-trading had surfaced. After an investigation, we discovered their involvement in the incident but did not issue any official warning in response to their rule violation due to an internal miscommunication.
      We now realize that our previous rules around these scenarios and our enforcement of them did not meet the standards of our community. We take full responsibility for this. Moving forward, we will be reevaluating our rules for the 2019 season and are committed not only to improving, but also to being more transparent about the way we administer warnings, penalties, and rulings.
      Our failure should not diminish Roger’s accomplishments. He earned his championship at HCT Winter and his spot at the upcoming HCT 2019 World Championship on his own merit and in compliance with the official HCT competition ruleset.
      While Roger and Reall may still compete in Hearthstone Masters Qualifiers and Masters Tour events, due to having two rule violations last year, they will not be invited to the inaugural year of Hearthstone Grandmasters. Grandmasters will be the highest level of competitive Hearthstone, and its competitors will be held to higher standards, not just in performance, but also in conduct.
      Thank you for all your feedback, your support, your patience, and understanding. Hearthstone esports wouldn’t be what it is without you, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts as we prepare to embark on a new chapter of Hearthstone esports in just a few short months.
      (source)
    • By HeavenlyFaucet
      What a tournament lined up for Blizzard at World Cyber Games 2019 in Xi'an.
      They got Hearthstone up and Warcraft 3 is finally back. Too bad Reforged won't be making it back in time. Hopefully when Warcraft 3: Reforged is out we will be seeing more tournaments with Warcraft competitions.
      You can even see the excitement of these games posting the official registrations on their twitter,
      for WC3:
      Hearthstone: https://twitter.com/HSesports/status/1105247640646754304
      Who knows maybe even one day we will get some Diablo tournaments if that is possible. Blizzard can host their own event as well with so many of their games having a great esports scene already.