Zadina

Summary of Ben Brode and Dean Ayala Q&A

15 posts in this topic

27550-developer-qa-on-friday-january-13t

The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.

First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.

Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.

One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.

Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.

The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.

Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.

Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Zadina said:

Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions).

This makes no sense to me. They want to decrease commons, neutral and basic cards (i can only assume this is to make the format more diverse, which sounds like a good idea); but they want to move arena to standard cards only (less diverse).

Can someone explain to me why this is a good idea? I myself have not played arena for a while because i started feeling that every deck i drafted felt the same (within the same class).. taking wild cards out (especially in 2-3 months after rotation) will drastically limit the variation in arena decks. Probably best to shelve the standard arena idea imo.

6 hours ago, Zadina said:

Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, jojobonks said:

This makes no sense to me. They want to decrease commons, neutral and basic cards (i can only assume this is to make the format more diverse, which sounds like a good idea); but they want to move arena to standard cards only (less diverse).

Can someone explain to me why this is a good idea? I myself have not played arena for a while because i started feeling that every deck i drafted felt the same (within the same class).. taking wild cards out (especially in 2-3 months after rotation) will drastically limit the variation in arena decks. Probably best to shelve the standard arena idea imo.

 

Their stated aim was that they want to increase synergies and spells in arena drafts and make it less about picking the best curve minion thirty times over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bozonik said:

Their stated aim was that they want to increase synergies and spells in arena drafts and make it less about picking the best curve minion thirty times over.

This sums the expected result fairly well. The key point here is that their decision - less emphasis in Commons and Basics - is an exact countermeasure to what they are planning to do.

Because, let's face it, the majority of Rares and Epics in this game are totally unplayable or completely busted in the Arena. There is hardly a middle ground. When drafting you can at the very least expect some basics and commons to be there fairly reliably. Not having this backup will result in what Arena is right now - drafting good stuff on curve instead of anything synergistic. As paradoxical as it sounds, more diversity = less diversity here.

What I feel Blizzard starting to realize is that they screwed up this game royally with their Commons and Basics, because some of them for some classes are way too good, especially Basic and Classic sets. And that's a long standing problem they (probably)expect to fix with new cards, which is something that can't happen overnight. Scraping it all and starting from scratch, with limiting Arena to Standard that they have more control of - MSoG is fairly good example how, this set feels a lot like it's about Arena more than Constructed - is what appears to me is their plan. IMO they should reduce Basic and Classic for the Arena, but leave expansion chances same. I don't think they can execute it well enough, to be honest. But at least it's a start.

Magic thrives on having a living Limited that somehow is both same and different each year, that's because their set design is on point most of the time, and, of course, is much bigger. I think if Blizzard borrow these ideas and have the Arena planned out for each season, they can give us, the players, incentives to actually play Arena because it's a fun format, not because it's economical or something.

But one can only dream. Because their updated payouts basically took the last part of why I was even bothering with the Arena - I make literally more gold on going 6-3 in Play Mode, which happens much more reliably, faster and funnier.

Re: Ranked mode revamp 

Fix the lower ranks. Please. That's what the game is desperate about, because new player experience is ridiculous. I'm fairly content with 5-Legend being a grind, because that's a real challenge. And being one of the game's best players of the month is an achievement that should be behind that challenge. With what this game is, all the balance, RNG and stuff, the only real way to determine who is any good is to make them play a shitton of games. 

Edited by Paracel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My main problem with Arena drafting - there are way to many no-brainer decisions. It is simply not fun when you get three choices and the choice is obvious to anyone but total newbie. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they actually make it so you can get to legend with win streaks, that will just screw up the game on a competitive level even further. That would mean you can theoretically reach legend with below 50% win rate, which is just retarded.

I say people should accept it when they are just not good enough to get there, and rather than ask blizzard to feed them on a plate, should actually spend time trying to improve their gameplay. You already get basically all the rewards that matter for getting to rank 5 anyway, so it's not like legend players even get anything above you other than the card back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, JooBatanete said:

If they actually make it so you can get to legend with win streaks, that will just screw up the game on a competitive level even further. That would mean you can theoretically reach legend with below 50% win rate, which is just retarded.

I say people should accept it when they are just not good enough to get there, and rather than ask blizzard to feed them on a plate, should actually spend time trying to improve their gameplay. You already get basically all the rewards that matter for getting to rank 5 anyway, so it's not like legend players even get anything above you other than the card back.

Why get to the trouble when whining eventually will get you what you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are definitely too many pirate aggro decks.  In Casual, if someone pirate-Patches on turn #1, I just quit the match.  It was fun for a couple of weeks, but now it's just boring.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, mimech said:

There are definitely too many pirate aggro decks.  In Casual, if someone pirate-Patches on turn #1, I just quit the match.  It was fun for a couple of weeks, but now it's just boring.  

At least it hasn't reached Grim Patron levels of play. That was just a joke. Every game was just Patron vs Patron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're both overexaggerating.

Patron was quite dominant, but it never was 100% of the meta. It was a magical time when "I can't figure it out, the deck is too hard for me" was a legit reason not to run it. I think the dominance metaphor you're looking for is the Undertaker.

As far as Patches goes, he is abundant but not that dominant. There are fairly viable options that do not include this legendary, but I should admit its presence is strong enough to be called "meta-defining". However beating it is fairly possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15. 1. 2017 at 4:57 PM, JooBatanete said:

That would mean you can theoretically reach legend with below 50% win rate, which is just retarded.

Actually, some sims were run and those sims proved you can reach legend with WR below 50% (even below 45%) anyway. So, the change would mean only that one will achieve it quicker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15/01/2017 at 1:50 PM, Paracel said:

Fix the lower ranks. Please. That's what the game is desperate about, because new player experience is ridiculous. I'm fairly content with 5-Legend being a grind, because that's a real challenge. And being one of the game's best players of the month is an achievement that should be behind that challenge. With what this game is, all the balance, RNG and stuff, the only real way to determine who is any good is to make them play a shitton of games. 

I think making the reset much less of a jump would help the lower ranks a lot. If Legends fell to Rank 6 rather than Rank 16, it'd have much less impact on the lower ranks.

Agree 5-Legend should be a challenge, although personally think the prize for making Legend is a complete joke. If Rank 5 is golden epic, Legend should be golden legendary...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/16/2017 at 6:30 PM, positiv2 said:

Actually, some sims were run and those sims proved you can reach legend with WR below 50% (even below 45%) anyway. So, the change would mean only that one will achieve it quicker.

I have run that sim myself. Here's the number of games you would need to go from rank 5 to legend alone, on average: 2033218.806(tests made with a 1000 test case sample size and a 50% win rate).

Yeah, I don't think that's doable before the universe's collapse, let alone before the end of a season.

Here's how many it would take you with win streaks enabled: 206.485(same test conditions).

Edited by JooBatanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

I have run that sim myself. Here's the number of games you would need to go from rank 5 to legend alone, on average: 2033218.806(tests made with a 1000 test case sample size and a 50% win rate).

Yeah, I don't think that's doable before the universe's collapse, let alone before the end of a season.

Here's how many it would take you with win streaks enabled: 206.485(same test conditions).

Well, if you play 1k games with 45% WR during one season (which should take about 83 hours with a faster deck), you will have around 0.24% chance of hitting legend. This means it's possible to reach legend with 45% WR. [src]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/30/2017 at 1:27 PM, positiv2 said:

Well, if you play 1k games with 45% WR during one season (which should take about 83 hours with a faster deck), you will have around 0.24% chance of hitting legend. This means it's possible to reach legend with 45% WR. [src]

Yes, but there's a difference between being possible and feasible.

And anyway, reaching legend is already quite easy as it is, no need to make it even easier and further messing up HS on the competitive level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      Blizzard posted changes to game mechanics that will be implemented with with the Boomsday Project 12.0 patch.
      Highlights
      Ghostly Charger will no longer have the Beast tag. Ixlid, Fungal Lord is losing the Elemental tag. Shifter Zerus, Molten Blade, and Shifting Scroll will no longer keep any enchantments when they transform. Voodoo Doll's curse will be broken if you transform the minion that's already been cursed by Voodoo Doll. The transformed (formerly cursed) minion will not be killed when Voodoo Doll dies. Shadowboxer will be updated to deal 1 damage to a random enemy, whenever a minion is healed. Players will be able to disenchant the card for its full Arcane Dust value for two weeks after 12.0 goes live. Blizzard (Source)
      Dr. Boom’s bringing more than just mayhem to the Netherstorm. The 12.0 update will also come with several rule changes to Hearthstone’s gameplay. Read on to learn about another minion Type update, the copy a card rule change and the transform rule change.
      More Minion Type Changes
      There was a ton of feedback following the last minion Type update we posted, and after reviewing all of it, we realized that there were a couple more minions that needed changing. Here are our decisions following the full review of your feedback.
      Ghostly Charger

      We made a decision that, at least by default, spectral/undead/ghost/spirit versions of animals are not considered Beasts in Hearthstone. There are quite a lot of these sort of cards, most of which are already not Beasts, and changing them would have extensive balance implications.
      Ghostly Charger is one of those cards. Clearly a ghost in both its name and art, its Beast tag has also not been relevant in any significantly used interaction. As a result, we’re planning to remove the Beast tag in a future update.
      In the much rarer case of spectral/undead/ghost/spirit versions of Dragons, Murlocs, Pirates, and Elementals, they will still remain their Type. There aren’t a whole lot of these cards, but there are a few, and they’re already consistently their type. Examples of these are Ghost Light Angler, Cursed Castaway, Bone Drake.
      Ixlid, Fungal Lord

      World of Warcraft uses a looser definition of Elemental than what we decided to standardize on for Hearthstone. In Hearthstone, an elemental is something that has been brought to life by being inhabited by an elemental spirit, but is otherwise not alive. These are easy to recognize: a Fire Elemental looks like a living creature made out of fire; A Water Elemental looks like a living creature made out of water.
      One of the biggest outliers to this definition are plant creatures. There are a ton of minions in Hearthstone that are some sort of plant. We’ve decided that these do not count as Elementals in Hearthstone. Examples of these include The Voraxx, Fen Creeper, Biteweed, Vilespine Slayer, Rotten Applebaum.
      Ixlid, Fungal Lord, is by this definition, a plant creature. Although we’re committed to consistency, there are also other criteria that we consider when changing card Types. One of them is how often a card’s current Type matters when it comes to interacting with other cards. Ixlid’s Elemental tag is not significantly used in current decks, so we’ve decided to remove it in a future update.
      We also looked at the following minions but decided against making any changes. We’ve included our thought process as to how we came to our decisions with these cards.
      Kindly Grandmother
      Kindly Grandmother/Big Bad Wolf looks like a Worgen (which are not considered Beasts) but is actually some other sort of wolf-like creature that is a Beast. The Beast tag is also extremely relevant to its gameplay, and defines most of the card’s intended usage. With this in mind, we will not be changing Kindly Grandmother’s/Big Bad Wolf’s Type. In the future, we’ll be more careful to make the art clear when it comes to Worgen or similar races.
      Arcane Giant  & Arcane Golem
      On top of Elementals and plant creatures, there’s another category of things that have been brought to life via magical animation. These are creatures like War Golem, Arcane Giant, and Avian Watcher—which are not Elementals.
      Arcane Giant, Arcane Golem, and The Curator are all examples of another sort of creature collectively referred to as Arcane Golems. These mechanical constructs utilize arcane energy as a power source, with The Curator being a Mech Type as part of his character in the One Night in Karazhan Adventure. This is actually subtly different from something like War Golem, which is carved from stone and then magically animated. While the “golem” definition refers to something that has been magically animated and is therefore neither a Mech nor Elemental, both Arcane Giant and Arcane Golem’s card art don’t clearly show them to be one or the other. Since the correct type for these creatures is so unclear, we will be leaving them unchanged for now, but would love to hear what you think.
      Bogshaper
      Bogshaper seems to be the same type of creature as Ixlid or Fen Creeper, and that would logically lead to removal of its Elemental tag. However, as mentioned above, we look at more than just the fantasy of a card when determining if it needs a Type change. While Bogshaper’s fantasy criteria checkbox is filled, it’s currently heavily utilized in the meta, and features in many decks, including that of the 2018 Summer Champion, Bunnyhoppor.
      We are holding off on changing Bogshaper's Type for now, but would love to hear what the community thinks we should do in this case. We’re also considering making this sort of change when a card rotates to Wild.
      Copy A Card Rule Change

      Card copies currently only retain enchantments when both the original card and its copy are in play—think Molten Reflection. In Update 12.0, this rule will be updated to match the one regarding enchantments being retained when a card transitions zones.
      Zones in Hearthstone are defined as areas where cards are hosted: your deck, your hand, in play, and in the graveyard. In Hearthstone, there is a general forward-moving flow through zones. Whenever a card moves forward in that flow (Deck -> Hand, Hand -> Play, Deck -> Play), it retains enchantments. If a card moves backwards in zones (Play -> Hand, Hand -> Deck, Play -> Deck, Play/Hand/Deck -> Graveyard and Graveyard -> Play/Hand/Deck), it loses enchantments.
      With this update, card copies will retain enchantments in the following scenarios.
      Cards that are resurrected currently do not and will continue not to retain any enchantments, unless specifically stated otherwise. If you copy a card from a deck to a deck, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Archbishop Benedictus) If you copy a card from a hand to a hand, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Mind Vision) If you copy a card from play to play, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Molten Reflection) If you copy a card from a deck to a hand, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Thoughtsteal) If you copy a card from a deck to play, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Mindgames) If you copy a card from hand to play, the copy retains enchantments. (eg. Kobold Illusionist) Transform Rule Change
      When transformed, a Hearthstone card typically loses all of its enchantment. Most cards in game already obey this rule. However, there are four cards that we are changing to keep in line with the rule, as part of this consistency pass.

      Shifter Zerus, Molten Blade, and Shifting Scroll all transform in your hand at the start of every turn. Following the 12.0 update, they will no longer keep any enchantments when they transform. This includes things like hand buffs and Emperor Thaurissan mana-cost discounts.

      The impact on Voodoo Doll is a little different with the update. If you transform the minion that’s already been cursed by Voodoo Doll, the curse will be broken, and the transformed (and formerly cursed) minion will not be killed when Voodoo Doll dies. Silencing the cursed minion will also break the curse, in addition to silencing the Voodoo Doll.
      Shadowboxer Update

      Since the creation of the Lifesteal keyword, Shadowboxer has been a high risk card, in that it can trigger off of itself and deal up to 30 damage in one turn if you ever give it Lifesteal. Because of this, we have changed it to: Whenever a minion is healed, deal 1 damage to a random enemy.
      Once Shadowboxer's card change is live with Update 12.0, players will be able to disenchant it for its full Arcane Dust value for two weeks.
      These are all the changes that you’ll see come into effect with Update 12.0, in line with our commitment to consistency within the game. Let us know what you think in the comments below, or via Facebook and Twitter!
    • By Aleco
      Will these three new Treant cards see play in the meta? Or will they come up short like the hand-size cards from The Witchwood?
       
      Three new Treant-themed cards were revealed today by PCGamer:
       

       
      First up we have Dendrologist. The floor on this card is solid, as a 2 Mana 2/3 is passable in a pinch. The ceiling on Dendrologist is higher than you might think, as his Battlecry is quite strong. Druid might have more high-quality spells than any other class in the game (Wild Growth, Nourish, Ultimate Infestation, Branching Paths, Naturalize, and Savage Roar to name a few), which leads me to believe that Dendrologist will be a powerhouse if Druid gets sufficient Treant support in this expansion.
       

       
      3 Mana for 4/4 worth of stats is already a great deal on its own, and the added Treant synergy puts this card over the top. The fact that this card creates two bodies makes it even better in aggro decks that look to go wide and finish with cards like Fungalmancer. This is a very reasonable card to curve into on turn 3, and it hints that the Treant deck will likely be quite aggressive.
       

       
      Finally we get Mulchmuncher, a big fat Mech with Rush and a dangerously tempting Mana reduction effect. We know from experience with Corridor Creeper and Giant cards how strong it can be to play big Minions for low amounts of Mana, but it won't be that easy to reduce Mulchmuncher's cost. If the Mana Treants from Living Mana count as Treants for this card, then I can easily see Mulchmuncher as finisher in an aggressive Treant decks.
      Will these new Treant cards turn Force of Nature and Witchwood Apple into playable cards? Or do you think the Treant cards will fall flat like the hand-size cards from The Witchwood? Let us know in the comment section, and be sure to check out our Boomsday Hub for more spoilers from the upcoming expansion.
    • By Aleco
      The latest Hearthside Chat with Peter Whalen revealed Supercollider, Flobbidinous Floop, and Whizbang the Wonderful from The Boomsday Project.
       
      In the latest Hearthside Chat, Senior Game Designer Peter Whalen explained some of the themes (science) and inspirations (more science) for The Boomsday Project. In doing so, he spoiled three new incredibly exciting cards. If you're interested in watching the video (which is just 4:59 seconds long), you can do so right here:
       
       
      Card Reveals
       

       
      This card gets an "A" for flavor, as I don't think its possible to come up with a better design for a card called "Supercollider" in a science-themed set.
      This Warrior weapon has the potential to be a 2 or 3 for 1, as it can set up trades quite easily if you attack your opponent's largest minion with it. However, attacking your opponent's largest minion means you will also be dealing plenty of face damage to yourself, making high amounts of armor gain a requirement for putting this card in your deck. For that reason, Supercollider plays excellently with Baku the Mooneater, and I expect it to see play in Odd Warrior decks.
       

       
      Next up is another card with an excellent name, Flobbidinous Floop. This guy provides a Faceless Manipulator-style effect for Druid decks for just 4 Mana, which will almost certainly make him a combo piece in a variety of Druid decks. Between Innervate, Twig of the World Tree, and Biology Project, there will almost certainly a few new OTKs with Flobbidinous Floop. He can also be used in Big Druid decks one turn after playing a huge minion, such as Ysera, Hadronox, or The Lich King, to become a 3/4 copy of a card with a powerful effect. Expect to see plenty of Flobbidinious Floop in the new meta!
       

       
      Next we get Whizbang the Wonderful, which is one of the most unique and exciting cards in the history of Hearthstone. What does he do? Let me show you:
       

       
      Whizbang the Wonderful replaces your entire deck. He replaces your hero, and he names your new deck "Whizbang is Wonderful". When you enter a game with this deck, you will be randomly handed 1 of 18 recent deck recipes by Blizzard at the start of the game.
      Will Whizbang be competitively viable? Almost certainly not, but I think that question is almost entirely missing the point. By adding Whizbang to the game, Blizzard has offered new players a way to access 18 different for just 1600 dust! Though its unlikely these 18 premade decks will be 100% meta optimal, they will almost certainly be viable enough for newer players to climb the earlier ranks while playing a wide variety of decks and learning new cards. This is the closest thing that Blizzard will probably ever do to selling pre-constructed decks (something that many other cards games do), which in my eyes is a major step forward. Will tryhards be disappointed when they open Whizbang? Probably. But not every Legendary minion needs to be a home run for the hardcore audience. Whizbang is the new player's best friend, and will surely add much more joy to the game of Hearthstone than he takes away.
      What do you think about today's spoilers? Will Supercollider see play? Can you find any new OTKs with Flobbidinous Floop? And are you as excited about Whizbang the Wonderful as I am? Let us know in the comments what you think about these new cards, and be sure to check out our Boomsday Hub for more spoilers from the upcoming expansion.
    • By Aleco
      A callback to Annoy-o-Tron, this new Mech card could be a serious player in the meta.
       
      Episode 2 of "Enter Boom Labs" has revealed another new Magnetic card from The Boomsday Project, called Annoy-o-Module:
       

       
      A callback to Annoy-o-Tron, this guy gains Magnetic and 1/2 worth of stats for just 2 Mana! The stats and keywords this card instantly adds to another Mech seem quite strong when you compare it to Blessing of Kings, which adds 2 more Attack to a minion but does not add Divine Shield and Taunt. This card isn't awful when played on it's own, and it plays well in a deck with Corpsetaker. Annoy-o-Module checks enough for boxes for me, and I full expect it to see play in the upcoming meta.
      Episode 2 of "Enter Boom Labs" is short but sweet, and you can watch the full video right here:
       
       
      Do you think Annoy-o-Module impact the game as much as Annoy-o-Tron did? Let us know in the comment section, and be sure to check out our Boomsday Hub for more spoilers from the upcoming expansion.
    • By Aleco
      Use Mini-Rag to destroy enemy minions and level up your"Wow!" emote in this week's Tavern Brawl.
       
      In celebration of The Midsummer Fire Festival, this week's Tavern Brawl is all about Ragnaros, Lightlord. Well, Mini-Rag to be more specific:
       

       
      A 2/3 Ragnaros with Immune will start the game on one side of the board. At the end of each turn, Mini-Rag will deal 1 damage to a random target on the other side of the board for each Attack he has, then swap to the other side of the board. Each time he kills an enemy minion he will gain 1 Attack, growing in power as the game progresses.
       

       
      Due to the sudden pressure that Mini-Rag applies to both players, I highly recommend playing an Aggro deck. I used Odd Rogue in my first game to take down an Odd Hunter. You could also play an anti-aggro deck to try and counter all the aggro decks running around, but be sure to play some self-healing such as Branching Paths or Healing Rain.
       

       
      The Tavern Brawl will track how many minion kills that Mini-Rag racks up. After 8, 30, and 60 Minion kills, you will level up the fireworks in your "Wow!" emote. This is a returning Tavern Brawl from last year's festival, and your running total of Mini-Rag kills from last year's festival carries over to this year. Happy hunting!