Zadina

Hearthstone Blue Post Round-Up: September 6

Sign in to follow this  

12 posts in this topic

32856-ben-brode-and-ben-thompson-twitter

Ben Brode answered some questions on Reddit regarding the recently announced balance changes.

The Fiery War Axe nerf was probably the most discussed and disputed one among the other upcoming card nerfs. It was only natural that people questioned the change to one of Warrior's most iconic cards. While Ben Brode didn't address the nerf specifically, he explained that they found the rate of Basic/Classic and Standard cards worrisome. Ideally, a deck should have around 10 "evergreen" cards.

Blizzard Logobbrode

when reading the justification for the change to Fiery War Axe (and, by extension, the Murloc Warleader change).

I just want to make it clear that those are meant to cover some of the thinking behind why we went with option A over option B - not why we decided to make a change to begin with.

In a world where we are looking at making a change, we felt like these changes are slightly less disruptive and that isupside, in a vacuum.

It's not a vacuum, obviously, but the goal here was to reduce power level because the ratio of basic/classic cards in Standard decks is still too high (they represent the biggest percentage of played cards, still).

Commonly, when we mention that we think about a wide variety of players, it can come off like we are focusing on new players at the expense of currently engaged players. That isn't the way we think about it. Usually we look for win-win solutions, where a change is good for the ongoing fun of playing Hearthstone and is also not disruptive to loosely engaged players. We've definitely made changes that are quite disruptive because it's very important to keep Hearthstone fun for engaged players. Just because we prefer non-disruptive changes doesn't mean we are trying to do that at the expense of other types of players.

Specifically, we made these changes for engaged players who are most affected by imbalance (deck diversity goes down the higher rank you are), and who are most likely to want to see the meta change when new sets come out or during the yearly set rotation. (source)

 


 

isn't that the whole point why classic set is evergreen? not only that, basic cards solidify class identity. not a big fan of war axe, innervate, and warleader changes mr brode.

What do you think the right percentage of evergreen cards in decks should be?

I tend to think 10-ish cards might be right. We're way above that right now, and I think it would be better if it were closer to 10. (source)

On the topic of an "evergreen" set, Ben Brode answered that it was never Team 5's plan to leave Basic and Classic cards unchanged. 

Blizzard Logobbrode

Keeping Basic and Classic around with no changes was never the plan. We launched rotation with twelve nerfs, specifically because we knew we couldn't just have evergreen sets as-is. There is value in having evergreen sets, but there is a balance to it. Our Hall of Fame system is similar in some ways to a rotating core set. (source)

In more exciting news, the Hearthstone team plans to announce in the beginning of 2018 something relevant to meta decks being more easily accessed by new players!

Blizzard Logobbrode

bbrode how will you make the game accessible for new players if they cant build matadecks for even longer than now?

Hoping to have something to announce that will help with these problems early next year. We have a lot of work to do on the new player experience, but some of these problems can be mitigated by matchmaking, to some extent. (source)

Lastly, Mike Donais had some clarifications on Hearthstone's copy mechanics.

Blizzard Logomdonais

The rough rule for copying is:

If you copy something that is in play and the copy is in play it keeps stats. (Faceless Manipulator)

If you copy something from other zones it is the base card. (Thoughsteal)

If you copy something in play to another zone it is a base card. (Echoes of Medivh)

If you move something from deck or hand then it is still that exact card so it keeps stats. (Death Grip, Deathlord.)

If something leaves play it loses buffs. (Sap)

We are trying to make this the consistent rule and reviewing existing and future cards with this in mind. (source)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 evergreens feels really low. I don't know if I can keep up with the meta at all if that's the case. It's hard enough as it is.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are so many different decks and every player (or most I guess) likes to more than one good deck. So when I have 2 priest decks and they have more than 10 basic/classic cards in it they still have different cards from the new expansions. Do they really worry that much about ppl buying to less new expansion packs? 

btw, still no date for the nerf patch? 

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 seems about right honestly

I make priest example evergreens:

Shadow Word Death

Shadow Word Pain

Northshire Cleric

Power Word Shield

putting them in 2x is only 8 cards other cards like Velen or Holy Nova are always good but they are included only if required and not by default

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why do they use the word "nerf", when they have to use "kill"? farewell, Innervate, you're just too good to be

farewell, HS. your daddy didn't love you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Hanz39 said:

10 seems about right honestly

I make priest example evergreens:

Shadow Word Death

Shadow Word Pain

Northshire Cleric

Power Word Shield

putting them in 2x is only 8 cards other cards like Velen or Holy Nova are always good but they are included only if required and not by default

That's just priest specific ever greens. What about tech cards from neutral, or all the powerful legendaries there. Ysera, bloodmage Thalnos, blademaster, doomsayer, deathwing.... etc. There are a LOT of ever green cards that make up decks beyond just class cards. Priest is also one of them that has benefited the most from the latest expansions.

What about mage, (mana wyrm, sorcerers apprentice, arcane missiles, frost bolt, ice block, arcane intellect, counterspell, ice barrier, frost nova, mirror entity, water elemental, fire ball, polymorf, (maybe) blizzard or flame strike, and archmage) Most mage decks can easily make it up to 15-20 ever greens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Laragon said:

Most mage decks can easily make it up to 15-20 ever greens.

So what? You still need get cards from the new expansions to create the viable tier 1 decks. This is not done by just buying a handful of card packs. And even with a lot of the basic/classic cards the theme and mechanic of a deck can be totally different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm okay with nerfing more basic and classic cards as long as they make it more accessible for us to get the other sets. More ways to earn gold, or crafting cost nerfs perhaps.

 

But as it stands, I think it's a bit much to both plan on having much less classic/basic cards and not do anything to make new cards more accessible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think even if it's major purpose is the promotion, giving out free packs before a new set goes live, a guaranteed legend in the first 10 packs of a new expansion or getting additional packs for choosing a tournaments champion are things making it a bit easier. But in fact it's not much when you look at the speed of how fast they release new sets now and including more and more expensive cards required for top decks.

Not getting duplicate legends (unless you have all of set) is a good thing as well but with the randomness of cards packs it's not rare that player open 50-100 packs and still miss many crucial cards. I know the concept behind this is ppl pay more and if the game would bring no money they would no longer support it. But that's pretty bad for new players and/or those with limited time and money.

A slight increase in gold gain and/or dust cost for cards reduced and/or increase dust gain for disenchanting would help a lot.

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/7/2017 at 4:40 PM, Caldyrvan said:

Not getting duplicate legends (unless you have all of set) is a good thing as well but with the randomness of cards packs it's not rare that player open 50-100 packs and still miss many crucial cards. I know the concept behind this is ppl pay more and if the game would bring no money they would no longer support it. But that's pretty bad for new players and/or those with limited time and money.

I generally find epics are the biggest issue on my F2P account. They are expensive enough that they are hard to get, but there are enough of them in decks to struggle to get what you need.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the same problem. You can avoid decks which require a legend (well, lately less and less)but epics are essential for many types of decks. And I often get "lucky" instead of getting an epic I want/need I keep getting things like Mindgames.

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Caldyrvan said:

I see the same problem. You can avoid decks which require a legend (well, lately less and less)but epics are essential for many types of decks. And I often get "lucky" instead of getting an epic I want/need I keep getting things like Mindgames.

Exactly. Especially with the fact that you can put 2 of each epic into a deck.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.
    • By Stan
      It's been a while since we last heard of Ben Brode who left Blizzard in April 2018 to form the Second Dinner game development studio. In the latest update, we learn that Brode along with former Hearthstone developers are currently working on a Marvel game and the studio received $30 million in funding from Netease in China.
      Netease is currently co-developing Diablo: Immortal with Activision Blizzard. Here's the latest press release posted on the Second Dinner website. The company now has enough funds to expand and grow beyond its five co-founders.
      They also released a video talking about exciting news in the new office.