Aleco

Whats (not) the Move? #5 - Improving at Hearthstone One Play at a Time

25 posts in this topic

HyfSlV6.jpg

In an episode of what could have just as easily been called "What's Not the Move?", I make a critical mistake which ends up costing me the game. Can you do what I couldn't and find the winning line?

In an episode of what could have just as easily been called "What's Not the Move?", I make a critical mistake which ends up costing me the game. Can you do what I couldn't and find the winning line?

If you're interested in learning more about the concept of "Playing to Outs", check out Part 2 of Legend in the Making here on Icy Veins.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really really like that episode :). It requires balls (or a vagina, just to be fair ^^) to show your own mistakes.

It shows us a very important lesson even though your health was not at a critical point it was not that high either but I think a lot of players would have played like you did.

The alternative to survive was pretty obvious then but still great vid :) Keep it up.

P.S. Something I wanted to mention on earlier vids and now that I know others felt the same, maybe you should talk a bit slower. Maybe you are just used to talk in that speed or you want to make the vid as short as possible, no idea. I am ok with it but I assume a lot of ppl who don't have english as their native language would appreciate it a bit slower :) ... no offense.

Edited by Caldyrvan
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Caldyrvan said:

P.S. Something I wanted to mention on earlier vids and now that I know others felt the same, maybe you should talk a bit slower. Maybe you are just used to talk in that speed or you want to make the vid as short as possible, no idea. I am ok with it but I assume a lot of ppl who don't have english as their native language would appreciate it a bit slower :) ... no offense.

Thanks for the constructive feedback :) I think I might be trying to talk a bit too fast because I'm trying to keep the length of the videos as short as possible, but it's probably a bit more important to be easily understood than it is to be concise. Thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds reasonable. And I doubt you will create monster long videos for talking a bit slower :D maybe a minute or two more at max. English is already a good language to make things short. Be happy not to talk in german :D

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly i would have gone for the exact play you made without giving it a second thought, but this really showed me the mindset you got to have sometimes. very nice episode! Keep it up!

I think the talking speed is absolutely fine, english is not me first language but i have absolutlely no problem understanding you. I think the most important part is not the speed, but a clear articulation (which you have).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem either and the articulation is absolutely perfect, pleasant voice btw, but I have a few friends who are trying but are not the best at english. People from everywhere on the world are visiting Icy veins and that means there must be more ppl who would appreciate it a bit slower, I am sure :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Caldyrvan said:

I have no problem either and the articulation is absolutely perfect, pleasant voice btw, but I have a few friends who are trying but are not the best at english. People from everywhere on the world are visiting Icy veins and that means there must be more ppl who would appreciate it a bit slower, I am sure :)

I created subtitles for the video, so if it is hard to understand what Aleco is saying, you can turn them on. If you have any feedback regarding the subtitles, I would really appreciate it as I had never made any before.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't concentrating properly and went for Priest + Spirit + Shadowstep + Heal, then went you played the Drak I was like, damn, got it wrong. 

Didn't realise I was right before rewatching :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I created an account on the forum just right now to make this comment :D New episode really cool, thank you for that Aleco^^ I agree with Caldyrvan about speed talks because I'm the one who not too good in english so i use "pause" for video all the time. But i really like this vids anyway. I think in general speed talks that is not too big problem for me(yea, i can live with that hehe :D ) but i really appreciate that positiv2 made subtitles for vid. Looks good and totaly better then autosubtitles from YT, so thank you a lot too. :)

5 hours ago, positiv2 said:

I created subtitles for the video, so if it is hard to understand what Aleco is saying, you can turn them on. If you have any feedback regarding the subtitles, I would really appreciate it as I had never made any before.

 

Edited by Lightout
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice vid. Another instructive one, not 100% sure I'd have made the same play without your discussion before the pause but I got this one. My initial instinct was to go for the most fun play of lyra + divine spirit + shadowstep + (see what we get from lyra). It has an outside chance of finding lethal hehe but it became apparent that the only way we can lose was to Leeroy shadowstep shenanigans so I went priest + divine spirit + netherspite + shadowstep +free netherspite + heal self. Slightly different to your solution but same result.

Edited by Bozonik
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27.10.2017 at 8:54 AM, Breadd said:

I think the talking speed is absolutely fine, english is not me first language but i have absolutlely no problem understanding you. I think the most important part is not the speed, but a clear articulation (which you have).

Same here. I am not a native speaker too (and I am WAY more comfortable reading english or writing it then to hear / speak it), and I think you do it really great.

 

To the vid: Great vid again, but one question about it:

Was it the wrong move you made? Ex post: Yes.

But Ex Ante?

You did now know which cards he had - and if the game would have continued one or two rounds longer, would there have been any possibilities that he would have won the game with another card combination and one or two more turns to pull it off?

 

Or with other words: If you make sure a certain combination he has in his hand in this turn can't kill you - do you leave yourself open for another combination in two more turns? (Him being able to clear the board, get control back, things like that. E.g. he uses vanish and plays a 4-cost-minion, later plays a second vanish, all the time doing some points of damage to you - and using the leeroy combo later on.)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great video!

I saw that Leeroy combo coming right away.

I would make the best play a little different -

Trade first both minions > play priest of the fist > shadow step on operative first and then replay it to leave 2 mana free in case it can find something better than divine spirit to play > then assuming you didnt find anything better than divine spirit, play that on priest of the fist to have 12 Hp on a minion that can get me out of range of combo later in the game as well rather than having 13 HP on the drake (8 x 2 = 16 - 3 = 13)

Edited by Mknissan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mknissan said:

I saw that Leeroy combo coming right away.

When playing against Rogue, I feel like you just always assume they have it, because somehow they always do :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I had a game against a rogue, I was at 11 health. He played a Leeroy and a shadow step but I assume he was kinda rushed in mind because he forgot to attack before he shadow stepped it :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Caldyrvan said:

Yesterday I had a game against a rogue, I was at 11 health. He played a Leeroy and a shadow step but I assume he was kinda rushed in mind because he forgot to attack before he shadow stepped it :D

I'm sure he was happy about that :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Caldyrvan said:

I don't think so, in the following turn I played my own Leeroy buffed to 12/8 _D

So, he definitely wasn't happy then :p

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Caldyrvan said:

Yesterday I had a game against a rogue, I was at 11 health. He played a Leeroy and a shadow step but I assume he was kinda rushed in mind because he forgot to attack before he shadow stepped it :D

Two wins away from legend yesterday, I missed lethal because while on the rope counting damage from a Leeroy+Cold Blood+Xaril spells combo I forgot the southsea deckhand in my hand was a 3/2 minion with charge now rather than a 2/1 minion with charge. Bit painful....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Bozonik said:

Two wins away from legend yesterday, I missed lethal because while on the rope counting damage from a Leeroy+Cold Blood+Xaril spells combo I forgot the southsea deckhand in my hand was a 3/2 minion with charge now rather than a 2/1 minion with charge. Bit painful....

At least it wasn't the game to get to legend!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 28/10/2017 at 11:07 AM, WedgeAntilles said:

Or with other words: If you make sure a certain combination he has in his hand in this turn can't kill you - do you leave yourself open for another combination in two more turns? (Him being able to clear the board, get control back, things like that. E.g. he uses vanish and plays a 4-cost-minion, later plays a second vanish, all the time doing some points of damage to you - and using the leeroy combo later on.)

That is something you have to consider when making this decision. In this case though, I can't see any realistic way in which you can lose after making the play in the answer. It avoids any one-turn lethal, so the priest of the feast must be dealt with before they go for any lethal. (And from the cards they've already played we can be near certain it's not a deck that runs vanish). I imagine it's possible some weird sequence of play from random card generation effects from swashburglar etc could fluke a win but it's very unlikely. So making the safest possible play increases our (already high) percentage win rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Blainie said:

At least it wasn't the game to get to legend!

Yeah, that would hurt more. I have been one win away since, and got crushed hehe, though had I won the deckhand game I'd have been there already by then if the matchups went the same...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bozonik said:

Yeah, that would hurt more. I have been one win away since, and got crushed hehe, though had I won the deckhand game I'd have been there already by then if the matchups went the same...

Rest assured, something would have changed somewhere!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i was for some reason calculating that priest of the feast only healed two points per spell in my mind, so my play was going to be priest, double his life, play historian, bounce her and hero power, and finally traded. I had thought of bouncing operative, but i thought it would be better to search for another through historian. whether I replayed historian or not was up for debate, but that was my play. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2017 at 3:47 PM, Leonmorte said:

i was for some reason calculating that priest of the feast only healed two points per spell in my mind, so my play was going to be priest, double his life, play historian, bounce her and hero power, and finally traded. I had thought of bouncing operative, but i thought it would be better to search for another through historian. whether I replayed historian or not was up for debate, but that was my play. 

I always have to pause and double check cards if I don't normally play the class. We all get some effects wrong sometimes :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about the Aggro Tempo Mage guide.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Mind Blast Priest deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina
      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.