Jump to content
FORUMS
Stan

"Diablo Immortal Pretty Much Ready" Says NetEase CFO

Recommended Posts

40552-deadsets-impressions-and-interview

Blizzard is co-developing Diablo Immortal with NetEase Inc. and the company's Chief Financial Officer Yang Zhaoxuan told analysts during a conference call that the game is ready from their perspective, according to Bloomberg reports.

Blizzard announced Diablo Immortal at last year's BlizzCon. Reveal of Blizzard's first mobile game sparked a lot of controversy and hate among PC fans, because obviously, everyone among the hardcore PC gamer audience at BlizzCon was expecting Diablo IV, but that's a story for another day...

Wizard_1_tif_jpgcopy.jpg

Blizzard has been working with NetEase Inc to develop and launch Diablo Immortal primarily in China, where these types of games are particularly popular and NetEase's CFO said the following during a conference call to analysts:

Quote

“From a co-developer’s perspective the game development is pretty much ready,” he said of the title that is slated to be released this year. “As to the exact launch timetable, I would encourage the market to direct their questions directly to Activision Blizzard.”

Yang Zhaoxuan (NetEase Inc. CFO)

Diablo Immortal is pretty much ready for release and Blizzard is currently polishing the game for a global release that is slated for later this year.

Are you looking forward to playing the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stan said:

 

Are you looking forward to playing the game?

No.

But I have no problem that Blizzard launches it. How they introduced it was a bad joke, but if people are ready to pay hard currency for handy games (personally, I wouldn't even spent 1 cent) - hey, why shouldn't Blizzard grab it? Easy money.

And Blizzard is doing society a favor in general. If you have looots of money and your purse is very heavy - there is a high risk of getting a bad back and stuff like that. It's not good for your health to carry too heavy. Luckily Blizzard offers you a chance to get rid of all that money. 😉

 

Edited by WedgeAntilles
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Prophet001 said:

I actually don't have a phone that can play this.

Seriously.

I have never used my phone for anything else then to call somebody. My mobile phone is turned off for 99,9% of the time. (I turn it on if I have to call somebody. Which is approx. 2 times a month.)

If my 12 year old phone wouldn't have broken I would still use this. Luckily a friend of mine had a phone (several years old) that he no longer used...

But I guess I am one of the last persons in Germany who doesn't use a mobile phone.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, WedgeAntilles said:

But I guess I am one of the last persons in Germany who doesn't use a mobile phone.

Evident by the fact you call it a ‘handy’. ;D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, WedgeAntilles said:

But I have no problem that Blizzard launches it. How they introduced it was a bad joke, but if people are ready to pay hard currency for handy games (personally, I wouldn't even spent 1 cent) - hey, why shouldn't Blizzard grab it? Easy money.

I think many people underestimate the potential of mobile gaming. The power that some phones bring to the table is already far better that some of the pcs i used in the past. And the quality of the games for the future MIGHT improve. But if people stick to their mentality that mobile gaming isnt real gaming, and let the dumb society that throws their money into the mouths of shitty companies that make just mobile games with horrible monitization systems just continue doing what theyve always done, nothing will change.

The fact that games like fortnite and pupg released on phones as well is a big step up, for f2p games with somewhat fine monetization. If blizzard now can pull of a game with a fair system, it will improve the situation a bit further. So i am worrying, but at the same time hopeful.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently playing a mobile WoW clone on my iPad. I had to quit WoW when parenting and real life got in the way, and lots of my fellow mobile players have a similar story. I'm looking forward to Diablo Immortal.

Incidentally, remember the "come back free for a few days to WoW" promo they just had? That was done during the week of the mobile WoW-clone's launch. Blizzard is watching the mobile market and they are smart to do so; it's larger than you'd think and lots of people sink an incredible amount of time and money into their mobile games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Are you looking forward to playing the game?"

Yes please make all the future intallments of every title on mobile only in the future. After all most of us have phones therefore its completely logical to do so. Cant wait to play warcraft 3  and Overwatch on my mobile 🙂 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly - I hope this game is successful.

I say this in a great deal of my comments, but Acti-Blizz is a for profit company. Identifying new channels of revenue (in this case mobile gaming) is just basic business strategy, and China is a huge market who loves  mobile games. Any new revenue streams increase profits for the company which in turn let the company continue to develop great new games and content for us to play.

How they introduced this game was horrible and it shouldnt have taken center stage at blizzcon for the diablo panel. However, they have made it clear that the mobile channel is not replacing the pc channel and development is happening simultaneously. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Infinal said:

Evident by the fact you call it a ‘handy’. ;D

AFAIK no one outside of Germany calls a mobile phone "handy" or has the slightest idea what "handy" is^^

 

1 hour ago, Lawrenz said:

I think many people underestimate the potential of mobile gaming. The power that some phones bring to the table is already far better that some of the pcs i used in the past. And the quality of the games for the future MIGHT improve. But if people stick to their mentality that mobile gaming isnt real gaming, and let the dumb society that throws their money into the mouths of shitty companies that make just mobile games with horrible monitization systems just continue doing what theyve always done, nothing will change.

The fact that games like fortnite and pupg released on phones as well is a big step up, for f2p games with somewhat fine monetization. If blizzard now can pull of a game with a fair system, it will improve the situation a bit further. So i am worrying, but at the same time hopeful.

I agree with you - but as long as publishers (I do NOT refer to Blizzard, just a general statement) make tons of money with very simple and cheap to produce stuff nothing will change.

Same is true for the PC too of course. If you can make several hundred millions with some skins - why should you bother to make a "real" game? Which is a thousand times more expensive to make? 

The more player are ready to pay much money for "nothing", the less great games will be published. 

IMO it is very important that player stop buying tons of skins or unfinished games. 

Let's take Anthem as an example: The core of the game isn't bad. Flying works, optic is good. Flying around the landscape is even great. Firefights aren't bad either. However, the game has no content. Which is not surprising, if you take into account, that the game was developed in 12-16 month. (Yeah, Anthem is way longer in the making, but it was completly reworked. There is a interesting interview with Jacen Schreier on youtube about that.) The game is not done. Story is horrible. Fort Tarsonis (or whatever it is called) is an empty shell. All the cool stuff the trailers showed you - you can never play that. Endgame is horrible, next to no content. And what there is is recycled. 

If they would have had another year Anthem could have been a real good game.

But the way it is Anthem is not better then games like Warframe. But Warframe is free 2 play and Anthem is considered a AAA game for 60 bucks.

Still - selling numbers seem to be at least decent.

What is the lesson? Players don't give a *filtered* if you let them buy half finished games. No need to finish a game. Just publish it and take the money.
If players wouldn't have bought the game maybe the next game would not be half-finished.

Publisher realized that they can get away with bad games, buggy games, not finished games, games without content. They still sell those games.

Why should they spent lots of money to make great games? MAYBE they'd sell a few more copies. Maybe. Why take the risk?

For me - as a player - that is horrible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, WedgeAntilles said:

Still - selling numbers seem to be at least decent.

What is the lesson? Players don't give a *filtered* if you let them buy half finished games. No need to finish a game. Just publish it and take the money.If players wouldn't have bought the game maybe the next game would not be half-finished.

Publisher realized that they can get away with bad games, buggy games, not finished games, games without content. They still sell those games.

Why should they spent lots of money to make great games? MAYBE they'd sell a few more copies. Maybe. Why take the risk?

Yeah, that's true, but when ou take into account how long EA already abuses the FIFA players, since they implemented the "ultimate team" feature to sell the very first p2w lootboxes in a big title, and no one batched an eye about this, it is already very good that Publishers, developers and big AAA titles that do stuff like this get increased attention for that *filtered*. The bubble bursted and they get shitstorm after shitstorm. They numbers for those games will go down eventually, and people will praise the good developer behavior more and more. Now the players are more sensitive.

Contrary to the shitstorm of anthem, division 2 for example, came at the exact right time, to get praise for a good and polished game with lots of content. not perfect of course, but much needed fresh wind. I think we are on the brink of change.

Since all of the developers have had crashes in their stock prices recently, they will have to change something for the future. Just EA, i hope, should go bankrupt very hard. Seems like they dont intent to change anything, ever. Their greed should destry themselves. because EA is short for "Eternal A**holes"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't care less about this game, but if it is a success in China and gives Blizzard the cash to make better main-line games, I wish this nothing but luck. Maybe this will also make them inject more cash into HotS and even bring back HGC (which I doubt).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just not interested in playing PC oriented games on my phone it's not very appealing nor convenient.  I considered my phone for business and emergency incoming/outgoing calls only and keep it on silent for the majority of the time.  Hence why I play the majority of my gaming on PC or PS4.  But if the small minority of people are interested in trying their hand in on this mobile title then kudos to them.

But be forewarned there is always a chance for misuse of micro-transactions that has and continues to be part of the mobile gaming industry, along with gated restrictions put in place to get that individual to swipe that credit card some more.  You see it more in mobile gaming compared to PC/Console gaming.  (Unless you play EA titles.)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Prophet001 said:

I actually don't have a phone that can play this.

Seriously.

Me too 🙂

But when I will have one, I'll try it for sure. Who knows, it might be fun 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, WedgeAntilles said:

AFAIK no one outside of Germany calls a mobile phone "handy" or has the slightest idea what "handy" is^^

I hate to ruin that word for you but at least in north america it's slang for a *filtered* act you give to another person with your hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can always use Blue Stacks or Nox to play it.

I use those to play Lords Mobile. Which is a mobile pay to win game. Of course, if you have multiple devices in a game like that, or have a PC with Blue Stacks or Nox that can both now create multiple instances, you can play as a dozen+ people. Makes for a unique experience.

Not sure multiple accounts would work for Diablo though. Seems a little too fast paced. Maybe a healer account to support your main tank? I've used my laptop and PC in tandem before to use Abathur/insert hero here together and play Cho'Gall before. So it is possible. Manipulating a support character with my left hand on a phone and using my mouse with my right for the PC could work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/8/2019 at 10:33 AM, leapingshadow said:

If it's free and isn't riddled with microtransactions that are ridiculous I'll probably play it. It seems okay.

Of course it'll be full of microtransactions.  The company doing the port is reportedly just re-skinning one of their old games that is loaded with micros.  People that play mobile games and FB games have proven to be exceptionally stupid for the most part, shelling out the cost of a real game every month on content for a crappy mobile game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JestersTear said:

Of course it'll be full of microtransactions.  The company doing the port is reportedly just re-skinning one of their old games that is loaded with micros.  People that play mobile games and FB games have proven to be exceptionally stupid for the most part, shelling out the cost of a real game every month on content for a crappy mobile game.

That has been the unbased reason for outcry at the time of the announcement. But isn't it already confirmed that they just build up the game in one of the existing engines that they used for their previous games?. And isnt that a reasonable thing to do? People testing the game on blizzcon said it looks and feels way way more polished than other games of this style.

It just depends on the monetization and fairness towards the players now, because gameplayquality-wise you can be sure it won't be bad. (of course, if you dont like phone hack and slay, then this game doesnt have a chance from the get go)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JestersTear said:

Of course it'll be full of microtransactions.  The company doing the port is reportedly just re-skinning one of their old games that is loaded with micros.  People that play mobile games and FB games have proven to be exceptionally stupid for the most part, shelling out the cost of a real game every month on content for a crappy mobile game.

Not all mobile games are crappy. There is a convenience factor that can also more than make up for having a small screen. Graphics and speed does not = great game. Blizzard games for example, are not the highest grade but they are pretty darn good. The same can be said for some mobile games. And being able to play anywhere is always going to have an appeal.

That said, they can be money pits if you want to be the best and have no self control. You need a way to get around that. For me, it's having a P2P account like most of the more competitive players, but also having a bunch of F2P accounts that support it in a way it would normally take an entire guild of F2P players to do so. The P2P account also accelerates the F2P accounts so that they don't lose too much by being played by one person. But, you need to find the game where this works. Play the game, the mechanics and the monetary system as part of the game itself. I'm not sure which other games this can be done with, but it works with this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Morcalivan said:

That said, they can be money pits if you want to be the best and have no self control. You need a way to get around that. For me, it's having a P2P account like most of the more competitive players, but also having a bunch of F2P accounts that support it in a way it would normally take an entire guild of F2P players to do so. The P2P account also accelerates the F2P accounts so that they don't lose too much by being played by one person. But, you need to find the game where this works. Play the game, the mechanics and the monetary system as part of the game itself. I'm not sure which other games this can be done with, but it works with this one.

That sounds more like work to me than anything else.

IMO you just prove the statement of JestersTear. If I can either spent lot's of money, do not get any progress or handle several accounts - yeah, I do know why I'll never touch those "games".

But if it works for you, that is great 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The time spent on several accounts is nothing compared to a PC game, lol. Work. Diablo is an RPG of hack and slash. If a mobile game can be considered work, than a PC game like that can be considered a sweat shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      Le Monde, one of France's most respected publications, said in a piece published yesterday (full content for subscribers only) about the layoffs at Blizzard Europe and that Diablo 4 was shown to Blizzard employees.
      The article focuses mostly on the struggles at Blizzard Europe caused by the process of laying off 30% of the employees, which has apparently not been completed yet. Later in the article, the author starts explaining Blizzard's current situation, with most of its titles reaching the end of their lives or having not performed as expected. The following paragraph then follows about the future of the company.
      This translates as:
      What about the future? Teams at Blizzard Entertainment have already been presented with the long-awaited Diablo 4 and know that a new Overwatch game is in development. But neither of these two games will be released before 2020, at the very best, and employees at Versailles have no idea if they will still be around when they eventually release. « Activision Blizzard will be making less of a profit, but this will still amount to a lot of profit », says a veteran employee.
      In a piece about Blizzard's layoffs in France, Le Monde says that Diablo 4 has been shown to Blizzard employees.
    • By Starym
      It's Ghost all over again, it seems, as multiple sources have told Kotaku that Blizzard has cancelled project "Ares", apparently a first person shooter that's "like Battlefield in the StarCraft universe". The project was some 2 years along and, depending on which source you ask, was either looking good or that progress was coming along slowly.
      As we all remember, StarCraft Ghost had a similar fate, although it made it through 4 years of development before being cancelled. The reported reason this new project was cancelled was so that Blizzard could put more focus into developing Diablo 4 and Overwatch 2 (which are both expected to be announced at this year's BlizzCon), and the cancellation came as a "massive shock" to at least one of the developers when it was announced a few weeks ago.

      StarCraft: Ghost
      The lead designer on Ares was Dustin Browder  (he was also the lead for SC2: Wings of Liberty and Heroes of the Storm) and it began as "an experiment to see what the team could do with StarCraft on the Overwatch engine" There were already prototypes set up where Terran marines could shoot Zerg, and there was even talk of potential playable Zerg as well.
      This tweet is almost certainly related to the cancelled project, but the dev here wasn't necessarily one of the ones talking to Kotaku:
      Blizzard also had this to say to Kotaku in reference to the cancelled game, but they didn't acknowledge any specifics or even that anything has been cancelled:
      You should definitely head on over to the original Kotaku article and read it in full, as there's more detailed info about the whole matter.
    • By Stan
      Republican Senator Josh Howley has proposed a ban on loot boxes and pay-to-win microtransactions in titles for minors, claiming they are preying on user addiction and exploiting children.
      The Chinese government has restricted the number of loot boxes players can open each day and the government of Belgium said they were in violation of its gambling laws, according to BBC.
      Numerous countries including Australia, Denmark, Germany, and the UK had determined that loot boxes had nothing to do with gambling.
      On the other side of the spectrum, there's a chance loot boxes will be ruled illegal in the US in titles popular with minors.
      Republican Senator Howley said of his proposed Protecting Children from Abusive Games Bill:
      As a prime example, Howley singled out King's Candy Crush, where players can purchase a $149 bundle that comes with 1,000 units of its in-game currency.
      The problem, however, does not only affect Candy Crush. The issue of loot boxes first came into light with Battlefront 2. Currently, a large portion of popular games, including Overwatch, PUBG, and Rocket League, all encourage microtransactions.
      The bill first needs to pass the Senate and the House of Representatives, before potentially becoming a law, says Gamespot.
      (Source)
      Protecting Children from Abusive Games Bill

    • By Starym
      The amazing art of Blizzard games we all know and love is getting the fine art treatment, as Dutch online art dealership Cook and Becker has added three Blizzard franchises to their growing videogame collection. Said collection already consists of over 60 titles including Bloodborne, Cyberpunk 2077, Dark Souls, Dragon Age, Fallout, Uncharted and many more.
      World of Warcraft already has a collection available and Diablo and StarCraft will be following soon:

        


      About Cook and Becker:

      So, for those fine art collectors among you, you may want to look in to one of these, but they will set you back a bit, with all of the pieces going for $100+.

    • By Stan
      Results for the Q1 2019 Activison Blizzard Earnings Call are here and Blizzard is down to 32 million monthly active users (MAUs), since Q4 2018 when they announced layoffs and got rid of 8% of their non-development employees.
      Highlights
      Activision Blizzard Activision Blizzard delivered approximately $800 million of in-game net bookings in Q1 2019. For each of Activision, Blizzard and King, daily time spent per user playing their games increased Y/Y. For Activision Blizzard overall, average daily time spent per user was approximately 50 minutes. Blizzard Blizzard had 32 million MAUs in this quarter (down from 35 million MAUs in Q4 2018 and 37 million MAUs in Q3 2018). Segment revenues were in-line with expectations. ($344million) Segement operating margin of 16% ($55 million) was lower Y/Y due to decline in segment in-game revenues, partially offset by lower costs. Overwatch League The second season of the Overwatch League commenced in February to sell-out crownds at the Blizzard Arena. Viewership hours are over 30% higher than in the first season. Dallas Fuel hosted the league's first home games in front of a sell-out crown of thousands of fans. They have four key areas of focus include which include: Major Content Releases: "We are focused on delivering a strong cadence of major content releases, where we meet the growing demand of the industry's gaming communities and release our high-quality content more frequently." Live Operations: "We continue to grow our live operations capabilities, to deliver great content, services, features, and events that continuously engage our communities and drive in-game revenues." Franchise Expansion onto Mobile: "We are building on our existing mobile leadership as we extend our acclaimed console and PC franchises to the largest and fastest-growing gaming platform." New Engagement Models: "We are expanding the reach, engagement and our monetization of our francihses as we build on early success in esports, in-game advertising, and consumer initiatives." Presentation

      (Source)
×
×
  • Create New...