Jump to content
FORUMS
Stan

Activision Blizzard Q1 2019 Earnings Call

Recommended Posts

42165-fimggen.jpg

Results for the Q1 2019 Activison Blizzard Earnings Call are here and Blizzard is down to 32 million monthly active users (MAUs), since Q4 2018 when they announced layoffs and got rid of 8% of their non-development employees.

Highlights

  • Activision Blizzard
    • Activision Blizzard delivered approximately $800 million of in-game net bookings in Q1 2019.
    • For each of Activision, Blizzard and King, daily time spent per user playing their games increased Y/Y.
    • For Activision Blizzard overall, average daily time spent per user was approximately 50 minutes.
  • Blizzard
    • Blizzard had 32 million MAUs in this quarter (down from 35 million MAUs in Q4 2018 and 37 million MAUs in Q3 2018).
    • Segment revenues were in-line with expectations. ($344million)
    • Segement operating margin of 16% ($55 million) was lower Y/Y due to decline in segment in-game revenues, partially offset by lower costs.
  • Overwatch League
    • The second season of the Overwatch League commenced in February to sell-out crownds at the Blizzard Arena.
    • Viewership hours are over 30% higher than in the first season.
    • Dallas Fuel hosted the league's first home games in front of a sell-out crown of thousands of fans.
  • They have four key areas of focus include which include:
    • Major Content Releases: "We are focused on delivering a strong cadence of major content releases, where we meet the growing demand of the industry's gaming communities and release our high-quality content more frequently."
    • Live Operations: "We continue to grow our live operations capabilities, to deliver great content, services, features, and events that continuously engage our communities and drive in-game revenues."
    • Franchise Expansion onto Mobile: "We are building on our existing mobile leadership as we extend our acclaimed console and PC franchises to the largest and fastest-growing gaming platform."
    • New Engagement Models: "We are expanding the reach, engagement and our monetization of our francihses as we build on early success in esports, in-game advertising, and consumer initiatives."

Presentation

four key areas of focus.JPGprogress against our plan.JPGaudience reach.JPGdeep engagement.JPGplayer investment.JPGq1 2019 segment results.JPG

(Source)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love WoW but this is kinda sad to see. I know they're a business now and not who they were but when they first made the game they did it for the love of the game. Money for sure but the love of the game was the primary driver.

Reading something like this really does put a lot of perspective on the "hook em" techniques they're starting to implement.

They have the tail wagging the dog in my opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, the numbers for King / Candy Crush are insane, I had no idea.
Also, I thought that an average of 50 minutes daily per user was very high, but then roughly calculated my mean average a week. Now I don't think it's that much anymore 😛

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought exactly the same now that I've read through everything, King was worth comparable revenue as Blizzard + Activision combined and a lot more in actual profit, no wonder the company as a whole wants to push mobile as hard as possible 😮

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/4/2019 at 2:42 PM, Seksi said:

I thought exactly the same now that I've read through everything, King was worth comparable revenue as Blizzard + Activision combined and a lot more in actual profit, no wonder the company as a whole wants to push mobile as hard as possible 😮

King really specialises in games that have much lower costs than something like WoW, especially in terms of development. Compare Candy Crush to WoW, in terms of development costs, operating costs, all of it, and it's easy to see why it is so profitable. Also, don't forget how incredibly easy it is to pick up a mobile game vs. a PC-based one. Regardless of the perception of the current userbase towards mobile games, there is a massive untapped potential base of players that will flock to a decent mobile game of multiple genres.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Blainie said:

King really specialises in games that have much lower costs than something like WoW, especially in terms of development. Compare Candy Crush to WoW, in terms of development costs, operating costs, all of it, and it's easy to see why it is so profitable. Also, don't forget how incredibly easy it is to pick up a mobile game vs. a PC-based one. Regardless of the perception of the current userbase towards mobile games, there is a massive untapped potential base of players that will flock to a decent mobile game of multiple genres.

And that is the huge problem IMO.

Why on earth should Blizzard spent lots of money and time to make high quality PC games?
Why invest 50-100 Mio if you can make MORE cash by spending much LESS and instead of a great game you develop mobile games, sell skins and stuff like that?

If you love games (like Blizzard and Bioware did 10 years ago) you are conent that you make good money with good games. Because your heart is in what you do. You love your job. CD Project comes into mind.

But today? Decisions aren't done by the same people anymore. Now accountants get to decicde.

And they are correct: Why invest 100 Mio with a chance to maybe double your investment (but you riks loosing a significant amount too!) - if the alternative is to invest 5-10 mio and a chance to earn even more, like 150 Mio? And if all hell brakes loose you loose 5 Mio.

Obviously, the alternative is the MUCH better choice. More profit, less risk.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2019 at 11:23 AM, WedgeAntilles said:

And that is the huge problem IMO.

Why on earth should Blizzard spent lots of money and time to make high quality PC games?
Why invest 50-100 Mio if you can make MORE cash by spending much LESS and instead of a great game you develop mobile games, sell skins and stuff like that?

If you love games (like Blizzard and Bioware did 10 years ago) you are conent that you make good money with good games. Because your heart is in what you do. You love your job. CD Project comes into mind.

But today? Decisions aren't done by the same people anymore. Now accountants get to decicde.

And they are correct: Why invest 100 Mio with a chance to maybe double your investment (but you riks loosing a significant amount too!) - if the alternative is to invest 5-10 mio and a chance to earn even more, like 150 Mio? And if all hell brakes loose you loose 5 Mio.

Obviously, the alternative is the MUCH better choice. More profit, less risk.

That's why, even with D4 being worked on, Diablo Immortal was the clear choice for Blizzard. If they do it right, this game will be monetized well, be incredibly easy to pick up and get involved in, will bring in huge amounts of money and will have minuscule development costs compared to D4. 

CD Projekt could have focused on Gwent, mobile Witcher stuff etc., but are pouring money into Cyberpunk 2077 and whatever their other yet to be revealed big game is coming in the next few years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Blainie said:

That's why, even with D4 being worked on, Diablo Immortal was the clear choice for Blizzard. If they do it right, this game will be monetized well, be incredibly easy to pick up and get involved in, will bring in huge amounts of money and will have minuscule development costs compared to D4. 

CD Projekt could have focused on Gwent, mobile Witcher stuff etc., but are pouring money into Cyberpunk 2077 and whatever their other yet to be revealed big game is coming in the next few years. 

Yes, CD Project is the last of the big companies that is really interested in making a great game.

The last company, that seems to be led by people, who do not want to make the most money with the least input possible, but who want to make great games. Games that will be remembered in 30 years like we remember old games like Syndicate e.g.

Ubisoft, EA, Blizzard-Activision do not care if they make a great product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rare Patron

Mercedes Benz and Hyundai both make cars.

Mercedes Benz can't really make a good "on a budget" Benz because everyone will compare it to the "not on a budget" Benzes.

Hyundai can make a good "not on a budget" Hyundai because everyone will compare it to the "on a budget" Hyundai.

At least for a time.

Eventually, the "not on a budget" Hyundai is compared to the "on a budget" Benz and the Benz is found wanting.

Later, the "not on a budget" Hyundai is compared to the "not on a budget" Benz, and because Benz was busy "looking backwards" in their development, trying to capture a market that didn't fit their expertise, even the "not on a budget" Benz will be found wanting.

Meanwhile Toyota has been in NASCAR for almost 20 years, with an engine design they don't use in any production vehicle.

It's always easier to grow than to scale back. To conquer territory compared to holding it.

There are online games with orders of magnitude fewer people playing, without any monthly subscription, but they also started that way, they didn't really "fall" to that place, so the perception on them being a success or failure is entirely different.

WoW Classic is going to be an enlightening social experiment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      Republican Senator Josh Howley has proposed a ban on loot boxes and pay-to-win microtransactions in titles for minors, claiming they are preying on user addiction and exploiting children.
      The Chinese government has restricted the number of loot boxes players can open each day and the government of Belgium said they were in violation of its gambling laws, according to BBC.
      Numerous countries including Australia, Denmark, Germany, and the UK had determined that loot boxes had nothing to do with gambling.
      On the other side of the spectrum, there's a chance loot boxes will be ruled illegal in the US in titles popular with minors.
      Republican Senator Howley said of his proposed Protecting Children from Abusive Games Bill:
      As a prime example, Howley singled out King's Candy Crush, where players can purchase a $149 bundle that comes with 1,000 units of its in-game currency.
      The problem, however, does not only affect Candy Crush. The issue of loot boxes first came into light with Battlefront 2. Currently, a large portion of popular games, including Overwatch, PUBG, and Rocket League, all encourage microtransactions.
      The bill first needs to pass the Senate and the House of Representatives, before potentially becoming a law, says Gamespot.
      (Source)
      Protecting Children from Abusive Games Bill

    • By Starym
      The amazing art of Blizzard games we all know and love is getting the fine art treatment, as Dutch online art dealership Cook and Becker has added three Blizzard franchises to their growing videogame collection. Said collection already consists of over 60 titles including Bloodborne, Cyberpunk 2077, Dark Souls, Dragon Age, Fallout, Uncharted and many more.
      World of Warcraft already has a collection available and Diablo and StarCraft will be following soon:

        


      About Cook and Becker:

      So, for those fine art collectors among you, you may want to look in to one of these, but they will set you back a bit, with all of the pieces going for $100+.

    • By Stan
      Blizzard won't be attending Gamescom in Cologne this year to focus on game development. Attendees will still be able to buy Blizzard gear in the shop area and the company is looking forward to returning to the event in the future.
      Blizzard (Source)
      As part of a renewed effort this year to maintain our focus on development, for our current games and our future projects, we won’t have a booth at gamescom 2019. The show is an important one for the European and global gaming community, and we’re going to miss meeting players in Cologne this year. You’ll still be able to find Blizzard gear in the gamescom 2019 shop area, and we’re looking forward to returning to the gamescom show floor in the future. We’re also looking forward to sharing more details about the projects we’re currently working on when the time is right.
    • By Stan
      Kevin "Cloaken" Johnson announced on Twitter a few days ago that he is leaving the company. The voice of Heroes of the Storm was narrating Hero spotlights before the changes to the game and got later transferred to work on a different game within the company earlier this year.
      We wish him success in his future endeavors!
      Placeholder for tweet 1119273834513928192
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about Episode 40 of our Podcast.
×
×
  • Create New...