[Archived] S6 Hearthstone Low Budget Hunter Aggro Deck

Sign in to follow this  

14 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Low Budget Hunter Aggro Deck.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

this deck sucks against spell based mage, aka everyone i played today.

Could you provide a more detailed feedback? Like in which part of the game it fails, what rank, how would you improve it?

(By the way, I haven't met any mages today and I've been playing for 5 hours. I was the only mage around)

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck is simply great... and unlike my Murlock deck it's AoE-proof... when you happen to have a lot of creatures on the board, the opponent is already dead anyway. It often surprises me how early I have lethal biggrin.png

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm just not playing it right, but I'm pretty sure it's not anymore complicated than rush the opponent down.  Honestly, I think it's a pretty poor deck.  I don't see the point in having beast-oriented cards if you can barely synergize with them.  Just about anything will hard counter this deck because EVERY creature in this deck with the exception of Hyena and Arcane Golem have only 1 HP.  Mages, Rogues, and Druids are especially able to destroy your momentum.  Not to mention any taunt, even the pitiful Goldshire Footman, will always trade your creatures.  Goldshire is also played more on lower ranks so it's not even a good trade off.  Honestly, you're better off really pushing the beasts.  I made my own after losing several rounds and have been winning much more easily.


2x Arcane Shot

1x Timber Wolf

2x Explosive Trap

2x Misdirection

1x Snake Trap

2x Unleash the Hounds

2x Acidic Swamp Ooze (Again optional, just great to have on hand for weapon classes.)

2x Bloodfen Raptor

1x Dire Wolf Alpha

1x Knife Juggler (Helps deal with small creatures and maybe an extra ping to your opponents health with how many creatures drop)

2x Scavenging Hyena

2x Starving Buzzard

1x Eaglehorn Bow (2 would be a good idea, but I don't have enough to make it)

2x Animal Companion

1x Deadly Shot (Useful on big health creatures or just to slow down opponent)

2x Kill Command

1x Arcane Golem (Again, 2 fits better possibly, just can't make a 2nd)

1x Emperor Cobra (Again useful on particularly nasty minions, or as an extra beast)

2x Hound Master (Optional, but I like the security, and the 2/2 boost usually helps even if just for damage)


Same strategy applies more or less.  Just keep getting the most value for your cards, ramming into the opponent unless something real crazy needs to die.  And always Steady Shot if you can spare the mana, should be VERY easy later on to shoot one off every turn.  During the early game it's only really useful if you don't have any better plays, which is rare because there isn't a card above 4 mana in this deck.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to edge my way up to rank 15 with this deck, post UtH nerf. Already saving my dust to create the mid budget version, and eventually the Legendary version.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing fun deck. I've always thought I was more a Control player, but I seem to do better with this Aggro Hunter deck than the Control Hunter deck (and I'm not too bad on the Control version). Overall, both hunter decks are quite fun to play with in different ways.


This deck gets me moving between L12 and L14. My current game plan is built around the Eaglehorn Bow and secrets, so when those don't turn up when I need them, I'm still mastering how to win without them. 


Misdirection is one amazing card. Actually works like a finisher sometimes! Opponent has a big minion, you got nothing on board but the secret in play. He attacks, he wipes himself out. Great feeling! Surprise!


Anyways, hoping this is the deck that will take me higher in rankings, but in the meantime, really enjoying playing with it. 


Now if only Leeroy Jenkins will drop for me so I can take it up to mid-budget. I actually had a choice some time back to get any lengendary with the dust I had -- I went for Ragnaros. Although a great card, I now would rather have taken Leeroy to play with this deck.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reached rank 9 (single digits) for the first time thanks to this deck & still going strong.

Sweet, gz!


So how did the changes to eaglehorn bow affect this deck?

You might notice a small change when playing a mirror match or against mages / paladins, however you were perfectly capable of winning with only secrets of your own previously and you shouldn't feel any drastic changes post nerf.

Eaglehorn Bow is still op :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been playing my own hunter deck which has a legendary card (King Krush) but this low budget aggro deck is even better. As I already have some required cards, I only need to craft 3 new cards that cost 300 Gold dust.  Thank you for sharing this information with us.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting deck, with a number of benefits and drawbacks. The main benefit is that all the minions are expendable since they either charge or are sent out to die (as is the case with Leper Gnome). The drawback, however, is that your minions are limited and you can often depend very desperately on drawing the right card. 


When I first played with this deck, I went from rank 19/20 to rank 18, then back down to 20, then back up to 17,and now I'm down at 18 again. 


The biggest drawback for this deck is the lack of minions to reliably deal with strong enemy minions. Cards like Sen'jin ShieldmastaDark Iron DwarfLoatheb,Sludge Belcher,and Cairne Bloodhoof are especially troublesome to deal with unless you have a hunter's mark on hand (and even then, you only have two, and you'll have to finish them with either an explosive trap or you'll have to use unleash the hounds). 


Certain cards like Injured Blademaster are a major pain in the ass; especially when a Priest plays them. Speaking of Priests, Lightspawn requires an immediate hunter's mark or any Priest with a clue will combo it with Divine Spirit (only once.. if you're lucky). Lightwell can be problematic due to a lack of board control; you either need to waste a hunter's mark on it or hope that you have an eaglehorn bow and an explosive trap handy. Most priests seem to play Northshire Cleric on turn 1 or 2, and that card is just plain irritating since over time it will give the opponent a great card advantage over you, so I usually have to waste an attack with the eaglehorn bow or use kill command on her ASAP.


I'd say that - for me - Prists are possibly the biggest issue, followed by Mages (their late game spells are deadly) and sometimes Paladins as well. 


I feel like this deck is good for early to mid game, but the late-game minions are just too powerful to deal with. If you don't have a hunter's mark or already used it, then you have to possibly waste one of your minions just so you're not getting hit for 5 or 7 damage each turn. Taunt-heavy decks are a nightmare, and that's what makes Sludge Belcher so damned irritating. 


It's not often that I am able to combo unleash the hounds with timber wolf and/or starving buzzard. I'd say that at least 50%+ of the time I need to use unleash the hounds, it's either too early for me to combo (though lately I have been able to combo it at least with timber wolf in most cases), or the cards just aren't in my hand when I need them. Due to this, I've experimented with swapping them out completely or partially and adding in arcane shot and deadly shot just to help me clear through taunts and other tricky minions.


I'd say that the vast majority of matches leave my opponent rather beaten up. Usually if I lose, I'd say my opponent's health is at ~15, and I've had a number of matches where I brought them down to the single digits before they killed me with either a string of minions, spells, or a combo of both. On one hand, board control isn't needed because usually it's kept pretty clear thanks to the opponent trying to deal with the minions brought out. On the other hand, one good taunted creature is enough to really through a wrench in your plans and two taunts is just a nightmare.


This is a good deck, but I think that it's greatly improved upon with the mid-range and legendary versions of agrro/rush. Just pray that your opponent doesn't have a handful of taunted minions or how low-cost high-power cards; otherwise, you're toast.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Aggramar guide.
    • By Aleco

      It's rare, it's slimy, and it's latest card to be spoiled from Kobolds and Catacombs.
      It wouldn't be a proper dungeon crawl without an encounter against a giant ooze, and it wouldn't be a proper Hearthstone set without a Hunter card with Deathrattle synergy. Say hello to Seeping Oozeling:

      Despite the random nature of this card's Battlecry, it actually doesn't seem too difficult to construct a deck with nothing but hard-hitting Deathrattles. As a mere 5/4 for 6 mana I doubt that Seeping Oozeling will see play on the back of its stats alone, but there are plenty of powerful Deathrattle cards for this ooze to gobble up from your deck. Deathwing, Dragonlord, Cairne Bloodhoof, and Rat Pack come to mind as potential friends for the Oozeling.
      Do you think that Seeping Oozeling will find its way into standard decks this December? Let us know what you think about the card in the comment section, and remember to check our news forum and the Kobolds & Catacombs hub for more new cards from K&C!
      Card image courtesy of Hearthpwn.com
    • By Aleco

      After an unexpected delay, Spectral Pillager was announced as the latest Netural Epic from Kobolds and Catacombs.
      After an unexpected five-hour delay, Brazilian eSports site Esporte Interativo spoiled Hearthstone's latest Neutral Epic:

      In typical fashion for Neutral Epics in the Year of the Mammoth, Spiteful Summoner appears to be next in a long line of minions with fun and powerful, underwhelming stats, and conservative mana costs. With some creative deckbuilding one could attempt to maximize the effect of this cards Battlecry trigger, but it doesn't appear to be powerful enough on its own to build an entire deck around.
      What do you think about Spiteful Summoner? Let us know what you think about the card in the comment section, and remember to check our news forum and the Kobolds & Catacombs hub for more new cards from K&C!
      Card image courtesy of Hearthpwn.com
    • By Zadina

      The third Kobolds & Catacombs card reveal for today is Zola the Gorgon, a neutral Legendary minion.
      Popular Hearthstone personality Jeffrey "Trump" Shih revealed this card on his YouTube channel. Zola the Gorgon is a 3-mana 2/2 with the Battlecry: "Choose a friendly minion. Add a Golden copy of it to your hand."
      According to the schedule, there was supposed to be another card reveal before the one from Trump, but so far we've seen nothing. At this rate, it's not sure if four or five cards are going to be revealed today. Keep checking our news forum and our Kobolds & Catacombs hub for more new cards!
    • By Aleco

      Standing on the shoulders of the Star Wars: Battlefront II controversy, the Hearthstone community has been voicing their concerns over the game's rising costs louder than ever. What can be done to fix Hearthstone's payment model?
      The Hearthstone community isn't happy - what can Blizzard do to fix the rising costs of the game?
      Since the release of Star Wars: Battlefront II, EA Games has found itself in the midst of one of the most heated, unified, and prolonged attacks against a game studio in the history of the gaming industry. Infuratied by the game’s costly “pay to win” microtransactions, the online gaming community made a recent reddit comment by the EA Community Team the most downvoted comment in the history of reddit, an impressive accomplishment which EA can rest on their mantle next to their back to back "Worst Company in America" in awards.
      Hot on the heels of this controversy, Blizzard released an advertisement for Starcraft II to spread the word about its recent shift to free-to-play which appears to take some serious shots at EA. It's a funny and well-crafted advertisement which is certainly worth a watch:
      As we discussed on the Icy Veins podcast, it's a bit odd to see Blizzard to take an aggressive stance against other gaming studios. Not only does Blizzard have a tendency to play it safe with their marketing and advertising, but one could make the case that Blizzard is currently in the midst of a very similar (albeit far smaller) controversy over their payment model for Hearthstone.
      There has nearly always been a vocal part of the Hearthstone community speaking out against the game’s cost, but the complaints against Hearthstone’s payment model are currently as loud as they have ever been. Just as Blizzard decided to capitalize on the EA controversy to advertise StarCraft II, the Hearthstone community is using the Battlefront debacle as a pedestal to shout their grievances from.
      With such a significant portion of the Hearthstone community demanding changes to the current in-game reward systems and payment models, now seems as good a time as ever to have an honest dialogue about what kinds of changes will strike the fairest balance between our bank accounts and our Hearthstone collections.
      A Fair Price for Hearthstone
      Is there something fundamentally broken about Hearthstone’s reward systems and payment model, and what can be done to fix it? To answer that question, the Hearthstone community needs to be honest about what kind of game Hearthstone really is.
      It’s far too easy to draw unfair comparisons between the cost of Hearthstone and the cost of other games. Take Overwatch for example. It’s undeniable that you’ll get a vastly superior return of fun on your investment of 40 bucks for Overwatch when compared against the $49.99 it will cost you to pre-order 50 packs of the latest Hearthstone set, but it doesn’t make a lot of sense to compare the cost of these two games against each other. First and third person shooting games (Star Wars: Battlefront II notwithstanding) rarely cost more than $59.99 for an entire game’s worth of content, while card games are expected to charge their customers for packs of cards instead of charging for the game itself. So how does Hearthstone stack up against other card games? 
      If you compare Hearthstone against the grandaddy of them all, Magic: the Gathering, Hearthstone is incomparably cheaper. Speaking for myself, the primary reason I switched from MTG to Hearthstone was to save money. Take a look at the average cost of a Standard deck, then take a look at the average cost of a Legacy deck (the rough equivalent of Wild). Want to play a round of draft (the MTG equivalent of the Arena)? That’ll cost you between 10 and 15 USD to play three matches of Magic.
      Is Hearthstone starting to sound cheap yet? Well, it shouldn’t, because MTG and Hearthstone are also totally unfair comparisons. Magic is a trading card game, not a collectible card game, which means that its individual cards hold value and can be traded to other players. Though Magic is undeniably more expensive than Hearthstone no matter how you slice it, the fact that its cards can be sold at any time for real money means that the two games should be held to very different pricing standards.
      It’s about as useful to compare the price of MTG to Hearthstone as it is to compare the price of a BMW to a John Deere tractor, yet I see comparisons like this being made all the time. I’m personally guilty of drawing comparisons between the cost of MTG and Hearthstone in a guide I wrote on this very site.
      If we want to have a realistic conversation about what a fair payment model should look like in Hearthstone, then we need to be realistic about what kinds of games it’s fair to compare Hearthstone with. Not FPS games, not trading card games (TCGs), but only other collectible card games (CCGs). These are Hearthstone’s true competitors. Games which are free to download, charge money to unlock cards at an accelerated pace, and have no system in place to trade cards between players.
      Here’s a quick list of the most popular non-Hearthstone CCG’s on the market:
      Shadowverse Gwent Eternal Elder Scrolls: Legends Ready for a controversial opinion? Hearthstone should be more expensive than the other CCGs. It’s the oldest and most polished game of the lot, it has the largest player base by a mile, and it has vastly more cards, expansions, and free single player content than its competition. Before we can begin to discuss ways that we can improve the reward systems and payment models for Hearthstone we need to accept that Hearthstone has earned to right to call itself the premier CCG in the world. As such, a fair price point for Hearthstone is something higher than that of the other CCGs and something lower than Magic: the Gathering, which is where Hearthstone currently lies.
      The Hearthstone community would probably complain far less about the game's cost if its players felt as though they were being appropriately rewarded for their investments of time and money; superior products are allowed to cost more than inferior ones. However, there is a tangible gap between the time and money players are investing into Hearthstone and the feeling of “reward and accomplishment” they are getting in return. This is a problem which, quite frankly, the other CCGs just don’t have.
      Win or lose, playing the Draft mode in Eternal makes me feel as though I’m steadily marching closer and closer to building the decks I want to play on the ladder. Creating a Shadowverse account bestows players with so many packs that it made me feel as though I owed the developers a debt of gratitude in return. Having played each of the other CCGs I mentioned earlier in this article (some much more than others), there is a strong sense of generosity and progress present in these games which is largely absent in Hearthstone. 
      The unfortunate truth is that Hearthstone is so much bigger and more profitable than the competition that these games need to be generous with their players in order for them to stand a fighting chance. It's an extremely common business practice for smaller companies to undercut their bigger and better-funded competition. If the Draft mode in Eternal didn’t tangibly feel as though I was progressing towards a complete collection of cards then I probably wouldn’t play it at all. If Shadowverse didn’t immediately shower me with packs for creating a new account then it may not have held my attention past the tutorials. These vastly smaller CCGs are fighting an uphill battle by attempting to compete in the same design space as Hearthstone, making it a virtual necessity for their developers to be overtly generous to their player base.
      Blizzard has earned the right to charge more and reward less to Hearthstone players than other CCGs do. What Blizzard has failed to do thus far is make its players feel as though the rewards offered by playing and paying for Hearthstone are worth every penny.
      In-Game Rewards and Player Psychology
      Blizzard has made some serious strides in the past few expansions by providing its players with more free content than ever. They’ve started giving out one free Legendary card per set, have started producing rich single-player content for every new expansion, briefly experimented with daily login rewards leading up to the release of Journey to Un’Goro, and have periodically run festivals that handed out free packs and Arena runs. These are certainly significant strides in a positive direction, yet players still feel guilty when purchasing packs from the shop. Why is that?
      Let’s start by taking a look at the random Legendary reward which was introduced at the start of Knights of the Frozen Throne. It’s certainly a welcome prize, but how does it make players feel? I’d argue that in practice, the average Hearthstone player will end up receiving a shiny new Legendary card that they didn’t actually want. The majority of players will be crossing their fingers for a specific Legendary (such as the one belonging to their favorite class) and will feel disappointed when they receive one of the eight other Legendaries they weren’t hoping for. Newer players might only have enough cards in their collection to build a deck for one or two of the classes (I only crafted Druid cards for my first few months in Hearthstone) and will probably have no use at all for a random Legendary outside of those classes. What we have is a reward that is purely beneficial to players, yet somehow it often results in a negative player experience.
      Player psychology is an incredibly important issue in game design, and it’s an issue that Blizzard has demonstrated the ability to masterfully navigate in the past. A famous example comes from World of Warcraft, where Blizzard was able to successfully morph one of the most complained about systems in the game into a system which has since been copied by nearly every MMO after it:
      This notion of player psychology is undoubtedly playing an important role in the perceived gap between player investment and player reward in Hearthstone. The way that rewards and punishments are framed has a tremendous effect on player psychology, and it certainly seems as though Blizzard is losing the psychological battle with its player base. Without having to make any sweeping changes to the in-game reward systems, I’d argue that Blizzard could gain a lot of good will with its players by reframing the way that some of its current in-game rewards are presented. Let’s start by revisiting the random Legendary reward to see if it can reframed in a way which feels better its players.
      At worst, a random Legendary card can be turned into 400 dust; enough to construct four Rares or one Epic. Instead of setting up a large portion of the player base to be disappointed by receiving a random Legendary they may or may not have really wanted, how would players feel if they were simply given 400 dust instead? This reward would be strictly worse than receiving a random Legendary, but I would guess that it would have been received much better by the average Hearthstone player than the random Legendary reward currently is. It’s not so bad to receive a free reward you didn’t really want, but it feels downright awful to dust a Legendary into one quarter of its previous value. Taking this one step further, imagine how excited players would be if they received 1600 dust (or a Legendary of their choice) for trying out a new set. This would give players a feeling of agency and control which is wholly absent from the current in-game reward model. The single biggest problem with Hearthstone’s current in-game reward systems and payment models is a perceived lack of player control. 
      A Lack of Choice in Hearthstone’s Payment Model
      The slow trickle of gold players receive for playing games leads to a slow trickle of packs, and this slow trickle of packs leads to even slower trickle of dust, the only resource players get for constructing the cards they truly want. Outside of grinding away on the ladder, the only other tool at player’s disposal for getting the cards they need to build competitive decks is to pay for packs.
      The best rate that players can get on packs is $49.99 for a one time pre-order of 50 packs of the new set. The estimated average dust per pack is 102.71, assuming you dust every single card you open. 102.71 dust per pack times 50 packs equals 5135.5 dust, which is just enough to construct three Legendaries of your choosing but not nearly enough to build the vast majority of competitive decks in the current metagame.
      If you assume that most of the players who pre-order every new set have the majority of the most popular Legendaries and Epics from previous sets, then it’s fair to assume that 5k dust will be enough for these players to build one or two decks using cards from the newest set. For a newer player with a thinner collection, it’s much more likely that they will be at the mercy of the cards they open in those 50 packs and won’t be able to afford the luxury of dusting most of the cards they purchased. One could make the case that $49.99 is a fair price for a player with a deep collection to pay to be able to immediately build a couple of new decks, especially when you take into account the amount of free content that Blizzard has been rewarding players with of late. One could also make the case that it isn’t. Regardless, I have a very hard time believing that $49.99 is a fair price for a new player to pay to maybe be able to construct a single deck that they may or may not have wanted to build in the first place.
      Its debateable as to whether or not the issue with Hearthstone’s payment model is the actual value players are receiving from their purchased packs. One thing we can for certain is that there are no choices associated with opening packs that feel good for players to make. There’s really no two ways about it, dusting cards that you may or may not need in the future feels awful. A 25% rate of return for dusting cards feels like selling your grandmother’s jewelry to a pawn shop, yet choosing to dust or not dust cards is the only choice players are presented with after purchasing packs.
      Why is it that the only choice players are offered after paying money feels bad to make? There’s nothing intrinsic to the design of Hearthstone which has to prevent players from having more authority over the kinds of cards that are being added to their collection, and I seriously doubt that it is Blizzard’s goal to associate paying money with bad choices. Returning to the idea of player psychology, if we could reframe the current pack purchasing system to offer players more choices, to offer them better choices, perhaps Hearthstone fans wouldn’t feel as disenfranchised as they are feeling right now.
      An example of a way that Blizzard could offer players more choice in their pack purchases would be to give players the option to choose from one of nine “prerelease bundles”, one for each class. Each bundle could be guaranteed to contain one Legendary, two Epics, and four Rares belonging to the class of their choosing. Blizzard could easily adjust these bundles of 50 packs so that they have the same expected value as 50 normal packs. This would offer players with smaller collections a choice that maximizes the likelihood that they will actually be able to use the cards they open, while simultaneously offering the more hardcore players a better opportunity at opening the specific Legendaries and Epics they want most. All this upside can be offered to players without having to actually increase the total amount of cards and dust that players receive from their prerelease packs, and has virtually no downside for players when compared against the current prerelease bundle. I hope this example illustrates that Blizzard is highly capable of improving their existing payment model by providing players with more choices, and that sweeping changes to crafting and pack opening systems are likely unnecessary.
      To recap, here’s everything we’ve discussed so far:
      Hearthstone fans are currently as upset as they have ever been with the cost of the game. As the premier CCG on the market, Blizzard has earned the right to charge more for Hearthstone than other CCGs. The onus is on other companies to undercut Hearthstone to attract players to their less popular products. The way that players feel about the rewards they receive is just as important, if not more important, than the quality of the rewards themselves. Hearthstone has room to improve from a player psychology perspective and should seriously consider reframing some of their current rewards if they are unwilling to increase them. The only choice players receive when purchasing packs is which cards they would like to dust after opening them. The very low rate of return on dusting cards means that the only choice associated with spending money on the game is one that makes players feel bad, yet there’s no discernable reason that pack purchases can’t offer players meaningful choices that actually make them feel good. Its undeniable that Hearthstone has some room to improve on the systems which are currently under fire from its player base, but at the same, the player base needs to be a little more realistic about what they truly deserve from Blizzard. Hearthstone is an incredible game which provides its players with loads of free content, but at the same time, that doesn’t mean that its devoted fans don’t deserve more than they are currently receiving for their money. It seems as though Blizzard and Hearthstone fans need to meet each other halfway.
      Blizzard doesn’t need to make sweeping changes to its in-game reward systems and payment models to silence their unsatisfied customers. By offering players a greater degree of choice than they are being offered today, players will feel as though they are getting a much better return on their investments of time and money. There will always be a vocal minority of the Hearthstone community who feel as though they deserve more for their money, but when that minority turns into a majority as it has in today’s Hearthstone community, it’s time to make some changes.
      - Aleco