Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Shadowlands Season 2 Mythic+ DPS Log Rankings, Week 1: The Kings in Yellow

Recommended Posts

SheWDtn.jpg

 

It's finally time to look at the REAL Mythic+ Season 2 with the new affix! Lots of changes arrive as the king of Shadowlands has left the throne (but didn't go quite as far down as in raids) and the yellow team takes over! An important thing to note is that these are the logs for the past week and DO NOT include the hotfixes that went live yesterday/today, aka the Hunter, Fire and Affliction buffs and Shadow nerfs. There's also the new legendaries coming in for some specs this week, so there should be a lot of changes coming in next week's overview.

Note: The logs are based on POINTS, and not actual damage or healing, meaning they log the timed completion for the specs, with higher keys getting more points, obviously. The time in which the dungeon is completed is also a factor, but a much, much smaller one, as it grants very few points if you do it significantly faster than just any in-time completion. We're also using the Normalized Aggregate Scores numbers, for clarity, meaning the top spec is marked as 100 and then the rest are ranked in relation to that peak point.

This past week was Tyrannical Tyrannical, Raging RagingVolcanic Volcanic (and Tormented Tormented for the first time).
 

All Keys

While one king has indeed departed, the prince has taken over and brought his cousin with him! The top 2 are all yellow but unfortunately Assassination did not get the invitation, as it sits in the middle of the pack. Arcane rounds out the top 3 but the spec has been pretty volatile, going up and down a lot in the expansion, so we'll have to see if it holds. Fire is still hanging around the top 10, but both its fellow specs have outperformed it (for now before the buffs), while Windwalker fell a little from last week when it had Pride available. Fury is back and rising, and should see much higher placements as the gear starts to ramp up, while Balance dropped. On the bottom side of things Affliction is really having a bad time in all PvE activities, and that 5% buff doesn't look like it will help that much.

M+95.jpg
Mythic+ All Keys 95th Percentile Data by Warcraft Logs.

The all percentiles bracket is very similar to the top one, with Balance holding on a little higher and Fire dropping a LOT lower, actually quite surprisingly, as it's usually the general population that holds on to that top meta spec longer.

M+All.jpg
Mythic+ All Keys All Percentile Data by Warcraft Logs.

High Keys

The +15s used to be the real benchmark in Season 1 but that is a little different in the early days of Season 2, while the average gear is still mostly stuck in S1. In any case, in this bracket we see the prince take over the crown, as Subtlety has one of its many upswings - but will it hold on next week? Arms is the biggest outlier here, in 3rd place, as Havoc has actually been very regularly high-ranked in the higher keys, so it's not surprising to see it in 5th. The Rogues are generally doing really well in the high keys as we can see, while Druids are having a bad week (which should change for Balance, but as for Feral... well, we'll see).

M+15.jpg
Mythic+15 All Percentile Data by Warcraft Logs.

We'll actually be skipping the +20 keys again, as there have been VERY few clears there (as expected) and the rankings a re looking... well, jut take a look at this mess:

M+20.jpg
Mythic+20 All Percentile Data by Warcraft Logs.

It might take a while for enough players to re-gear up to get that high again, so we might focus on somewhat lower keys next week to compensate.

 

For even more in-depth data for each individual key head on over to Warcraft Logs. And if you're interested in more info on the specs themselves you can always check out our class guides or our extensive Mythic+ guides as well, which have tier lists, dungeon rankings and more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Starym said:

Is it wrong that I'm REALLY happy with that title?

Depends on whether it was intended as a cultural reference or as a nod to rogues.

Edited by Teufel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Teufel said:

Depends on whether it was intended as a cultural reference or as a nod to rogues.

Both! Although less cultural, more True Detective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Starym
      We've seen the crazy Torghast speed runs with players just sprinting to the finish line in a mad dash to the sub-3 minute mark, but today we have... well a different kind of mad dash!
      Gitoff has gone for speed AND performance in layer 12, not only going pretty fast in general (perhaps not as fast as the recent 2 minute 56 second run, but definitely faster than most of us can ever hope to go), but also getting the 5-star flawless score as well!   The immediate comment in the video description? "Wasted at least 30seconds on floor 1 :(" Granted, Gitoff did have a nice little 9-minute Momentum buff ready before entering the run, but that's preparation for you!
    • By Starym
      The final hotfixes of the week focus on Shards of Domination tuning.
      July 30 (Source)
      Items and Rewards
      Shards of Domination [With weekly maintenance in each region] Blood Link – The damage and healing amount has been increased at all ranks by 20%. [With weekly maintenance in each region] Winds of Winter – The amount of damage and healing stored by the Winds has been increased at all ranks by ~45%. Developers’ note: The difference between the three Rune Words for the Shards of Domination system is bigger than we want it to be. We have identified and fixed a bug in Winds of Winter which was preventing some damaging and healing abilities from counting towards its total, and we have retuned Winds of Winter and Blood Link so that the relative power between Rune Word bonuses is more balanced. Jotungeirr, Destiny's Call will now reset its cooldown at the end of boss encounters. Fixed an issue where Ticking Sack of Terror could trigger more than intended in the presence of multiple trinkets.
    • By Starym
      As the WoW team mentioned in their statement, they have been removing references "that are not appropriate for our world". While we've noticed the /spit emote change on the BCC PTR, most/all of the other content removal seems to be centered on references to Alex Afrasiabi, who was talked about in the Activision Blizzard lawsuit. Today we'll take a look at some of the things already removed from the game and some that remain, as the removal seems to be an ongoing process.
      First off we have many references already removed, with the Fras Siabi and Foror names being replaced by Ezra Grimm and Nostro. There's many more items, NPCs etc. related to the two names above and others, which you can check out over on Wowhead. The most notable NPC change, however, is the one that received immediate retribution from players when news of the lawsuit broke, as Field Marshall Afrasiabi is now Field Marshall Stonebridge. For a longer list of some of the items that have been removed, check out Wowhead's article here.

      Source: Wowhead.
      However, it seems the work is still ongoing, as there are some references that have not been addressed yet, or some that didn't quite go through completely, like the below. You can see the while the NPC's name remains problematic, it is actually changed in the chat window when he speaks:

      Source: MrGraffio.
      While many references to Fras Siabi have been removed from Stratholme, like the mini-boss, quest etc, at least one remains:

      Source: Thekingchem.
      And then there's this very specific one, which might have even gone completely missed if yuvalal hadn't spotted it, as Foror is mentioned in a conversation between two NPCs in the Escape from Durnholde Keep/Old Hillsbrad Foothills Caverns of Time dungeon:

      Source: yuvalal.

      Clearly the removal of references is still ongoing, and even the ones missed above may already be removed from the game when you read this, as Blizzard have a lot of them to go through.
    • By Staff
      Blizzard announced some nerfs for Shards of Domination set bonuses recently. They even made it live briefly, but have been reverted, as the devs didn't want to proceed with the change.
      Further Shard adjustments will be made in the coming days, but they don't want to nerf them now that many players have obtained and upgraded them. 
      (Source)
      Items and Rewards
      Shards of Domination Earlier this week, a change to the power of Shards of Domination set bonuses (e.g. Chaos Bane) was briefly applied to the live game. We are no longer planning to proceed with that change at all. We may make further adjustments in the coming days, but we will not reduce the power of Shards now that many players have earned and upgraded them.
    • By Stan
      Tired of looking up Soul Ash and Soul Cinder costs? Check out this simple macro that tells you how much of each you need to upgrade Legendary items in Patch 9.1!
      If you run the following macro in the chat, you will see how much Soul Ash / Soul Cinders you need for:
      A new Rank 1 and 4 Legendary; Rank 5 and 6 Soul Cinder costs; Soul Ash & Cinders cost from Rank 1 to 6. The macro was created by Shinela and improved by DoverBoys.
      /run local f,r,i,j,a,c=C_CurrencyInfo.GetCurrencyInfo,"\nRank","\124T3743738:0\124t","\124T4067362:0\124t" a=f(1828).quantity c=f(1906).quantity print(r,"1:",i,1250-a,r,"4:",i,5150-a,r,"5:",j,1100-c,r,"6:",j,1650-c,"/n",r,"1 to 6:",i,3900-a,j,1650-c) The following appears in the chat window when you run it.

      Source: Reddit
×
×
  • Create New...