Damien

[Archived] S20 Hearthstone Face Hunter BrM

Sign in to follow this  

41 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Face Hunter Deck for BrM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why exactly was Leeroy Jenkins included in this deck when it wasn't included in the Naxx/GvG Face Hunter Deck? It drives the dust cost up alot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why exactly was Leeroy Jenkins included in this deck when it wasn't included in the Naxx/GvG Face Hunter Deck? It drives the dust cost up alot.

From the guide:

 

"Leeroy Jenkins is included in the deck as a finisher, due to it's huge damage potential and fantastic synergy with Unleash the Hounds. This deck is so aggressive however, that you should not hesitate to simply play out Leeroy on curve if you don't have any better options."

 

"If you do not have access to Leeroy Jenkins you can use a second Arcane Golem as a replacement."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason for the change is that more people are teching Healbots etc to deal with Face Hunter than they used to, so the increased damage potential is needed sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

works well but is insanly boring to play hope meta chance someday

facehunter mechmage combo druid meh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People used to say Mech Mage is cancerous, then what is this? People who play face hunter should really feel bad for themselves. I don't really understand why to play the game if it doesn't bring any fun (and most of face hunter so called "players" easily admit the deck is boring and they don't enjoy it at all). It's definitely not the case of budget, because Mech Mage Mech Shaman or Zoo are at simillar or even lower cost, they all all good enough to hit legend, even arguably much better than this cancer, but face hunters is still much more than all of those decks. The only reason I can see is that it's easier to play this and some of wins are really cheap if opp can't handle early aggression. Doesn't change the fact that such reason to play boring, cnacerous deck that doesn't provide any fun and is hated by entire community means nothing to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People used to say Mech Mage is cancerous, then what is this? People who play face hunter should really feel bad for themselves. I don't really understand why to play the game if it doesn't bring any fun (and most of face hunter so called "players" easily admit the deck is boring and they don't enjoy it at all). It's definitely not the case of budget, because Mech Mage Mech Shaman or Zoo are at simillar or even lower cost, they all all good enough to hit legend, even arguably much better than this cancer, but face hunters is still much more than all of those decks. The only reason I can see is that it's easier to play this and some of wins are really cheap if opp can't handle early aggression. Doesn't change the fact that such reason to play boring, cnacerous deck that doesn't provide any fun and is hated by entire community means nothing to me.

actually the reason people play this deck is because games are extremely fast(you usually win or lose around round 6) and you can get gold more quickly with it,i agree that it's extremely boring to play and frustrating to play against,but people must accept that this sort of deck is necessary for game balancing.decks like face hunter are the reason you can't make overly greedy control decks filled with late game threats and dominate over anything.

 

and there are plenty of ways to counter face hunter,honestly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

actually the reason people play this deck is because games are extremely fast(you usually win or lose around round 6) and you can get gold more quickly with it,i agree that it's extremely boring to play and frustrating to play against,but people must accept that this sort of deck is necessary for game balancing.decks like face hunter are the reason you can't make overly greedy control decks filled with late game threats and dominate over anything.

 

and there are plenty of ways to counter face hunter,honestly.

Mech Mage and Zoo are very aggressive as well, maybe games don't last 7 turns or shorter usually (but still they sometimes last if you open good), however your win ratio is going to be higher as they are better decks. So you still farm gold very easily, but at least you don't get bored after single game and you don't feel bad for yourself. Also I played yesterday vs face hunter player on legend (I'm currently at 2), who had golden Leeroy and other cards, so I don't really believe he needs to farm gold, especially on ranked, especially on legend. He just wants to be a cheap winner, nothing else. Gold is the only reason I would maybe accept such cancer, but the fact is you meet Hunter on the every stage of ladder, so it's impossible they all do it just for gold.

 

And I agree aggressive decks are needed, but Face Hunter is just a ridiculous deviation. It breaks the rules of the game, because they don't trade and they generally don't care about any resources except LP, unless such behaviour would cost them the game. It's like playing vs someone on cheats or vs someone who has completely different rule applied. In card games you always assume your opponent is reasonable and thus you can analyze different scenarios. But vs face hunter you feel like playing vs monkey, so logic will not help you (unless you consider no logic as a logic).

 

No need to tell me about counters, because I'm not writting all of this because I'm having troubles v Hunters. Tbh it's one of my favourite amtch-ups, because I know the game is going to be quick and end with my win. I just wanted to express my disgust, that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Face Juggler is too slow. You never get to attack with it as it killed off imediately. Any knifes it throws the turn it's summoned typically hit enemy minions. Haunted Creeper is also pretty useless.

I play with 4x axes and 2x Southsea Deckhands and think it's much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mech Mage and Zoo are very aggressive as well, maybe games don't last 7 turns or shorter usually (but still they sometimes last if you open good), however your win ratio is going to be higher as they are better decks. So you still farm gold very easily, but at least you don't get bored after single game and you don't feel bad for yourself. Also I played yesterday vs face hunter player on legend (I'm currently at 2), who had golden Leeroy and other cards, so I don't really believe he needs to farm gold, especially on ranked, especially on legend. He just wants to be a cheap winner, nothing else. Gold is the only reason I would maybe accept such cancer, but the fact is you meet Hunter on the every stage of ladder, so it's impossible they all do it just for gold.

 

And I agree aggressive decks are needed, but Face Hunter is just a ridiculous deviation. It breaks the rules of the game, because they don't trade and they generally don't care about any resources except LP, unless such behaviour would cost them the game. It's like playing vs someone on cheats or vs someone who has completely different rule applied. In card games you always assume your opponent is reasonable and thus you can analyze different scenarios. But vs face hunter you feel like playing vs monkey, so logic will not help you (unless you consider no logic as a logic).

 

No need to tell me about counters, because I'm not writting all of this because I'm having troubles v Hunters. Tbh it's one of my favourite amtch-ups, because I know the game is going to be quick and end with my win. I just wanted to express my disgust, that's all.

This might sound a little off to someone so full of himself like u, but ur opinión about face hunter isn't the law. I actually enjoy playing this deck, I find it entertaintning and challenging because very calculated strategies are needed and one poor decision in early game will probably cost the whole thing. I'm sorry to bring this to u, but not everyone thinks the way u do, and I honestly believe that ur lack of empathy in transmitting ur opinions is something u should be ashamed of. I know internet gives u anonymity, but doesn't give u the right to be a bully nor to accuse, based on ur personal opinion, others of acting as ridiculously, being a cancer or an embarrassment. I find ur lack of touch disturbing and offensive. If u hate this deck, what's the point of make a comment here? just make others feel bad about themselves? Do u enjoy creating conflict and insulting? That's so sad, I might play a deck that's a "cancer" for hearthstone, but u represent the cancer of internet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the deck might take skill to play at a high level(if a professional player says so,i will believe so),but it's also the kind of deck that allows people who can't otherwise make it past rank 18 to reach rank 8 or some rank they should not be able to.

 

still,whether the deck is hard to play or not is debatable,but i don't think anyone can deny that it is one of the most frustrating decks to play against.and it's also not fun to play at all,at least for me.i can totally understand using the deck in ranked mode if you think it's a good choice for the current meta,but it annoys the crap out of me when i face face hunters while trying to chill with stupid decks like aggro priest in casual.like what's the point?casual mode is supposed to be where you mess around with the game not giving a crap about winning.i end up just straight up conceding on turn one when that happens.

 

but hey,it's a game.do whatever suits you.

Edited by batanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, the most common use of Casual is just people trying to clear their daily quests as quick as possible, hence the Face Hunters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King Crush fit in will for Leeroy Jenkins if anyone is wondering

Except, that King Krush is 9 mana, and it will just sit in your hand for a long long time and Leeroy ia 5 mana and can be used for several combos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King Crush fit in will for Leeroy Jenkins if anyone is wondering

I absolutely would not recommend this in any circumstance. Just put the 2nd Arcane Golem back in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man im having a tough time getting this deck going. bad mulligans can really make or break this deck and control decks are wiping the floor with me. every other face hunter i play is getting a much faster start than i am as well, which is annoying.

 

maybe im just having a bad run of luck, but i was doing better with a xrappy paladin deck i was using last month. im stuck hovering around 18-19 on the ladder. i dont have Leeroy, but i doubt its making that much of a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

man im having a tough time getting this deck going. bad mulligans can really make or break this deck and control decks are wiping the floor with me. every other face hunter i play is getting a much faster start than i am as well, which is annoying.

 

maybe im just having a bad run of luck, but i was doing better with a xrappy paladin deck i was using last month. im stuck hovering around 18-19 on the ladder. i dont have Leeroy, but i doubt its making that much of a difference.

 

(sottle can correct me on this)

 

you're probably doing something wrong.i don't really enjoy playing this deck,but i can usually rank up insanely fast with it(i use the exact same version on this site,except that i'm using a second golem instead of leeroy,as i don't have him).personally i find that you should go face 90% of the time,but there are instances where you should trade(like trading leper gnomes into 2 life creatures to save your more important cards like knife juggler) and when you are forced to go for board control(example:you get outstarted by a deck such as tempo/mech mage,you will more than likely lose if you don't try to clear the way for your creatures).against other face hunters it's also fine not go for an all out damage race if you feel like you won't win by doing so(especially because explosive trap or unleash can wreck you if you commit to the board too much).

 

apart from this, i also find that the general rule of "using hero power EVERY SINGLE TURN after turn 4" is also crucial,as you're outputting damage at no card expense.

 

hope this helps.

Edited by batanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Very good advice.

To put it in slightly more complex terms, here's how you win with Face Hunter in a nutshell.

- Play out your hand up until turn 3, making efficient trades to cement board advantage.
- Look at your hand, count how much damage you have, look at how much health the opponent has.
- Make an estimate of how much damage you can reasonably expect to draw, and how much health the opponent can reasonably be expected to gain.
- Use those numbers to calculate the amount of Hero Powers needed to win the game.
- Work out how to Hero Power that many times over the remaining turns in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait never mind, Face Hunter is easy mode, just hit face, blah, blah, blah braindead deck etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice. i dunno, maybe the deck just isnt for me. i get pounded playing this deck for some reason. frustrating as hell since everyone complains about how easy and brainless it is (and i have gotten my ass handed to me by other face hunters as well, so i know that pain.)

 

i seriously struggled for 2 days to play this deck and got sent back to rank 20 consistently. last month i was able to get to 14 with a very basic Paladin deck without this much heartache.

 

knife jugglers last all of one/two turns every single game. i can never protect them for long enough to make them worth it. i can do consistent damage and have  board control until like turn 6 and then its all buffed/huge/taunt creatures that i cant grind through to do damage anymore and i get overrun. traps come out in hand every single game, usually before Mad Scientists show up. its quite annoying.

 

ive been doing better with the mid-range  hunter deck on this site, but still not great. id be playing something else if i could afford it, but this was about all i could afford at the time. back to basic junk Paladin i guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Icy for the community support.

For people that are striglong or just kind hit a wall I have some frank advice for ya...not all decks are for all people. This means some make more sense and fit your style of play more than others. It's less a "broken deck" thing and more how we all think differently.

Sure we can force ourselves to learn a particular deck but if it doesn't "speak" so us then it may be a good idea to move on.

However, if you are enjoying this hyper aggressive deck then here's my second piece of advice: don't hesitate and attack, attack, attack. I've dueled many QSFH and many react too slowly. You must resit the urge to trade and gain board control. I've won several times when I had ZERO minions on the facing 15+ from opponents. It's because this deck is damn fast and lethal.

Lastly I use 1 Tracking and only 1 Abusive Sergeant. After this I'm going to try dropping 1 Creeper and add Leeroy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is amazing how useful this particular deck is.  I started at 10 and rode it down to 20!  That's good right?  The goal is to get bigger numbers, right?  I won against nothing.  Not. A. Damned. Thing.  I lost against every kind of deck, every hero type.  The best loss was against someone that was doing ranked play, for the first time, with a Shaman with only common cards.

Appreciate the recommendation, where/when did you play test the deck?

And spare me the, "you must suck," B.S.  I accept luck and random chance are part of the equation, but even if I was the worst player in the world (which I can't be starting at 10), random chance dictates I should have won something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Appreciate the recommendation, where/when did you play test the deck?


Uh, before I posted it? At whatever Rank I was at the time, probably Legend.

This deck has been one of the most consistent top decks in the meta for months, both at high legend ranks and in tournaments. You're playing it badly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any reason not to play Dire Wolf Alpha ? Instead of wolfrider or a 1drop? So far, I like the effect it has on the deck since board is often full you can trade and maximize its value

Not sure why my post isn't going through...

What about Dire Wolf Alpha in place of wolfrider or a 1drop?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.