Zadina

Hearthstone: Daxxarri on Deck Slots

Sign in to follow this  

10 posts in this topic

15397-hearthstone-daxxarri-on-deck-slots

Deck slots are a feature that Hearthstone players have been demanding for a long time. Most of them argue that it's quite a simple feature to implement in the game. Community manager Daxxarri had a response to these concerns.

 

Daxxarri's post on deck slots is part of the big thread in the official forums, where people criticised Ben Brode's stance in his latest video on content updates. You can find the whole thread here, where you can also read some other posts by Daxxarri. This is all part of the communication issue we covered yesterday.

 

On to our current topic, though, what did Daxxarri have to say about deck slots? The community manager said that deck slots aren't as simple to implement as people think and that the developer team is trying to find the most efficient way to add them in the game.

 

Blizzard Icon Daxxarri

Changing deck slots is one value. Just one. The scrolling is there, the interface is there and as has been discovered even the functionality is there. So there is no need to hold that back as no quality control is required - the client functions exactly the same as before and there are no new UI elements. So I will have to assume the reason this is being held back is because finance still tries to figure out if they can/should kick everybody in the teeth by making slight improvements to the client cost money, I see no other reason for the delay.

It's not a crazy difficult task, though not so simple as a one-value change as you’re suggesting. Regardless, I think you're underestimating the amount of discussion the team does over what the right approach is, and all of the other less-visible factors in play. I’ve seen some of the iteration on deck slots, and yeah, I think the final implementation is probably going to end up being surprisingly simple—but it took a lot of discussion to get there, and it’s not finished yet. The team works as a group, which means that there’s a ton of discussion about individual changes, and then a ton of iteration after a course of action is decided on. They don’t want to just find the fastest, simplest, or easiest way to implement something, but the best way to do it. Hopefully while accomplishing other goals at the same time, and keeping everything in a nice, elegant little bundle.

They want to try to make sure that each step they take is the right one. That means the team moves at a deliberate pace on nearly everything. They’re thinking in terms of months and years, not days and weeks. I don’t know if that’s the kind of fact that anyone is thrilled about, but it’s the truth.

If you're interested in what goes into our UI design, here's that video featuring Derek Sakamoto that Ben mentioned in his video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axkPXCNjOh8

(source)

 

The thing is that the team has kept teasing us for a while with deck slots; these last ones have already been long overdue. If we are to take  Ben Brode's mentions of deck slots in his latest video seriously, as well as the team's promise to be more communicative in the near future, deck slots might finally appear sooner than we think!

 

What's your opinion? Do you think deck slots will be the next big announcement? Do you think they will be implemented on their own or as part of a bigger patch?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just bullshit. I literally have no idea why they haven't just added them to the game yet. Maybe it wouldn't be as simple as changing one value, but surely it wouldn't take a major videogame editor like blizzard over an hour's worth of work and maybe 30 minutes of testing to do this. Maybe they would also need to change their database structure slightly to allow for more deck slots, but that also wouldn't take that much time to do.

Edited by batanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like more deck slots as well, but I don't appreciate why the community is so impatient for them.  Taking the above post as an example: there seems to be a lot of supposition involved.  The idea that a change to a permanently online game of such a high professional standard as Hearthstone, with it's considerable global user base, would take approximately 1.5 hours seems to be utterly fantastical.  As for altering the database structure: that's a hot developmental potato!  If one rushes these things, one might introduce a catastrophic bug, or otherwise damage usability (by overloading the network, say).  When the developers say they're taking their time to think these things through before acting, shouldn't we all be thankful?

 

This is all ignoring what seems to be a more fundamental issue: which is the design process.  Any software developer with much experience can tell you that without a design process, you're heading for disaster.  We have this incredibly clean design right now: 9 classes and 9 visible slots.  Sure, you could just double it to 18 slots, and have the user's scroll.  Will they make efficient use of the new space, or just leave most of their slots to rot on the vine (taking up space, somewhere)?  Will they be easily navigable?  Will new players find it difficult to process?  Should you then have it as an advanced feature?  Perhaps you should change the interface entirely to have one area for Mage slots, another for Hunter slots etc.  But now are you alienating happy veterans of the game?  Plus that's a complete re-design of that part of the interface.  UI requires design, iteration, usability testing, quality assurance etc.

 

Man, it's taken me about ten minutes to write this, and I'm not even involved.  That 1.5 hours seems pretty tight now, doesn't it?  If you stop to think.  I'll tell you what I think: it wouldn't take that much time to completely fuck up a good thing, but quality takes time.  I'm happy to wait for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just use a deck tracker and boom, you have your extra deck slots.

 

Not really, it takes to much time.

 

As a user of Hearthstone Deck Tracker, I can say it takes less than 15 seconds to import a deck and about the same time to export it back. That's quite quick, in my opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Just use a deck tracker and boom, you have your extra deck slots.

 

Not really, it takes to much time.

 

As a user of Hearthstone Deck Tracker, I can say it takes less than 15 seconds to import a deck and about the same time to export it back. That's quite quick, in my opinion.

 

 

Exactly. And there are no limits, so you never have to delete your decks from HDT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Blizzard/Activiosion will give you your deck slots, but with so much popular demand, they won't be free. They are thinking as we speak in a way to monetize it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I say anything, I would like to clarify that this post reflects solely my own opinion.

 

I get mimech's points to some extent and I can sympathise with the Hearthstone team. Last Wednesday, there was a new big patch on Diablo 3; five days later, the game is still ridden with all kinds of bugs and broken things. I take this as an example, because you never know what may or may not break if/when more deck slots are added to Hearthstone. I can also sympathise with the fact that they are trying to find the best way to add them: they need to find the most efficient, simple, clean - in short, the perfect - way to add these deck slots to both PCs and cell phones, where the app's design is super minimalistic. And yes, I can also understand that (and I will use D3 as an example again) that if you have more stash/more deck slots, you might end up having an unhealthy hoarding attitude.

 

That's it, though. I have talked with programmers (okay, they are just programmers, they don't work with games, but they know their stuff) and they have told me that while it's not a 2-hour procedure, it's definitely something very simple to do and that each slot requires only a few KBs of code. The team can even make it a work-in-progress, like they did with a lot of other things when the game was first released, by slowly improving on it. The fact that they have been contemplating adding deck slots since 2014 is simply ridiculous. They were quick to react with Spectator Mode, so why not deck slots when people have been crying about them for ages? Blizzard, in general, has a tendency (to put it nicely) with releasing content all together in big updates; while this may work for WoW (even here it is debatable with the rate of how MMO-RPGs are changing), it certainly doesn't work with a game with such a mass appeal like Hearthstone or with Heroes of the Storm (that's an entirely different story on its own).

 

To sum up, I don't think all these pro-deck slots people, who are ready to take their pitchforks and rage at Blizzard, are correct, but I do think that the rest of us sound people, who have been asking for them with solid arguments, are right in doing so. Deck slots have been long overdue and the game needs them, as desperately D3 needed these extra stash tabs added in the latest patch or as desperately WoW needs the new Wardrobe system that will be added in Legion.

 

@lexblow: I think they've said they want all extra additions to the client to be free.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.