Zadina

Hearthstone: Daxxarri on Deck Slots

Sign in to follow this  

10 posts in this topic

15397-hearthstone-daxxarri-on-deck-slots

Deck slots are a feature that Hearthstone players have been demanding for a long time. Most of them argue that it's quite a simple feature to implement in the game. Community manager Daxxarri had a response to these concerns.

 

Daxxarri's post on deck slots is part of the big thread in the official forums, where people criticised Ben Brode's stance in his latest video on content updates. You can find the whole thread here, where you can also read some other posts by Daxxarri. This is all part of the communication issue we covered yesterday.

 

On to our current topic, though, what did Daxxarri have to say about deck slots? The community manager said that deck slots aren't as simple to implement as people think and that the developer team is trying to find the most efficient way to add them in the game.

 

Blizzard Icon Daxxarri

Changing deck slots is one value. Just one. The scrolling is there, the interface is there and as has been discovered even the functionality is there. So there is no need to hold that back as no quality control is required - the client functions exactly the same as before and there are no new UI elements. So I will have to assume the reason this is being held back is because finance still tries to figure out if they can/should kick everybody in the teeth by making slight improvements to the client cost money, I see no other reason for the delay.

It's not a crazy difficult task, though not so simple as a one-value change as you’re suggesting. Regardless, I think you're underestimating the amount of discussion the team does over what the right approach is, and all of the other less-visible factors in play. I’ve seen some of the iteration on deck slots, and yeah, I think the final implementation is probably going to end up being surprisingly simple—but it took a lot of discussion to get there, and it’s not finished yet. The team works as a group, which means that there’s a ton of discussion about individual changes, and then a ton of iteration after a course of action is decided on. They don’t want to just find the fastest, simplest, or easiest way to implement something, but the best way to do it. Hopefully while accomplishing other goals at the same time, and keeping everything in a nice, elegant little bundle.

They want to try to make sure that each step they take is the right one. That means the team moves at a deliberate pace on nearly everything. They’re thinking in terms of months and years, not days and weeks. I don’t know if that’s the kind of fact that anyone is thrilled about, but it’s the truth.

If you're interested in what goes into our UI design, here's that video featuring Derek Sakamoto that Ben mentioned in his video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axkPXCNjOh8

(source)

 

The thing is that the team has kept teasing us for a while with deck slots; these last ones have already been long overdue. If we are to take  Ben Brode's mentions of deck slots in his latest video seriously, as well as the team's promise to be more communicative in the near future, deck slots might finally appear sooner than we think!

 

What's your opinion? Do you think deck slots will be the next big announcement? Do you think they will be implemented on their own or as part of a bigger patch?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just bullshit. I literally have no idea why they haven't just added them to the game yet. Maybe it wouldn't be as simple as changing one value, but surely it wouldn't take a major videogame editor like blizzard over an hour's worth of work and maybe 30 minutes of testing to do this. Maybe they would also need to change their database structure slightly to allow for more deck slots, but that also wouldn't take that much time to do.

Edited by batanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like more deck slots as well, but I don't appreciate why the community is so impatient for them.  Taking the above post as an example: there seems to be a lot of supposition involved.  The idea that a change to a permanently online game of such a high professional standard as Hearthstone, with it's considerable global user base, would take approximately 1.5 hours seems to be utterly fantastical.  As for altering the database structure: that's a hot developmental potato!  If one rushes these things, one might introduce a catastrophic bug, or otherwise damage usability (by overloading the network, say).  When the developers say they're taking their time to think these things through before acting, shouldn't we all be thankful?

 

This is all ignoring what seems to be a more fundamental issue: which is the design process.  Any software developer with much experience can tell you that without a design process, you're heading for disaster.  We have this incredibly clean design right now: 9 classes and 9 visible slots.  Sure, you could just double it to 18 slots, and have the user's scroll.  Will they make efficient use of the new space, or just leave most of their slots to rot on the vine (taking up space, somewhere)?  Will they be easily navigable?  Will new players find it difficult to process?  Should you then have it as an advanced feature?  Perhaps you should change the interface entirely to have one area for Mage slots, another for Hunter slots etc.  But now are you alienating happy veterans of the game?  Plus that's a complete re-design of that part of the interface.  UI requires design, iteration, usability testing, quality assurance etc.

 

Man, it's taken me about ten minutes to write this, and I'm not even involved.  That 1.5 hours seems pretty tight now, doesn't it?  If you stop to think.  I'll tell you what I think: it wouldn't take that much time to completely fuck up a good thing, but quality takes time.  I'm happy to wait for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just use a deck tracker and boom, you have your extra deck slots.

 

Not really, it takes to much time.

 

As a user of Hearthstone Deck Tracker, I can say it takes less than 15 seconds to import a deck and about the same time to export it back. That's quite quick, in my opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Just use a deck tracker and boom, you have your extra deck slots.

 

Not really, it takes to much time.

 

As a user of Hearthstone Deck Tracker, I can say it takes less than 15 seconds to import a deck and about the same time to export it back. That's quite quick, in my opinion.

 

 

Exactly. And there are no limits, so you never have to delete your decks from HDT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Blizzard/Activiosion will give you your deck slots, but with so much popular demand, they won't be free. They are thinking as we speak in a way to monetize it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I say anything, I would like to clarify that this post reflects solely my own opinion.

 

I get mimech's points to some extent and I can sympathise with the Hearthstone team. Last Wednesday, there was a new big patch on Diablo 3; five days later, the game is still ridden with all kinds of bugs and broken things. I take this as an example, because you never know what may or may not break if/when more deck slots are added to Hearthstone. I can also sympathise with the fact that they are trying to find the best way to add them: they need to find the most efficient, simple, clean - in short, the perfect - way to add these deck slots to both PCs and cell phones, where the app's design is super minimalistic. And yes, I can also understand that (and I will use D3 as an example again) that if you have more stash/more deck slots, you might end up having an unhealthy hoarding attitude.

 

That's it, though. I have talked with programmers (okay, they are just programmers, they don't work with games, but they know their stuff) and they have told me that while it's not a 2-hour procedure, it's definitely something very simple to do and that each slot requires only a few KBs of code. The team can even make it a work-in-progress, like they did with a lot of other things when the game was first released, by slowly improving on it. The fact that they have been contemplating adding deck slots since 2014 is simply ridiculous. They were quick to react with Spectator Mode, so why not deck slots when people have been crying about them for ages? Blizzard, in general, has a tendency (to put it nicely) with releasing content all together in big updates; while this may work for WoW (even here it is debatable with the rate of how MMO-RPGs are changing), it certainly doesn't work with a game with such a mass appeal like Hearthstone or with Heroes of the Storm (that's an entirely different story on its own).

 

To sum up, I don't think all these pro-deck slots people, who are ready to take their pitchforks and rage at Blizzard, are correct, but I do think that the rest of us sound people, who have been asking for them with solid arguments, are right in doing so. Deck slots have been long overdue and the game needs them, as desperately D3 needed these extra stash tabs added in the latest patch or as desperately WoW needs the new Wardrobe system that will be added in Legion.

 

@lexblow: I think they've said they want all extra additions to the client to be free.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about the Aggro Tempo Mage guide.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Mind Blast Priest deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina
      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.