L0rinda

Heroic Tavern Brawl Released

Sign in to follow this  

16 posts in this topic

McgjGkE.png

The much talked about Heroic Tavern Brawl is finally here, and as you can see above, it comes with a warning!

In this week's Brawl, you play a normal Standard constructed deck of your choice, from your collection and play until you either win twelve, or lose three, matches. At the end of the Brawl you are rewarded based on how well you performed, much in the same manner as Arena. The catch, it costs 1000 gold. I have calculated the payouts for each expected win rate in a previous post, and that table can be found here. The short version is that you need around 54% win rate for a break even payout, and that assumes you really value Golden Legendary cards. The rake is high in this Brawl.

Predictably this has been a big success with streamers, with WtyBill from Team Celestial being one of the first confirmed players to reach 12 Wins. He achieved this feat with Tempo Mage.

Perhaps an even more spectacular feat was that of Rdu and Ek0p. They managed to go 11 wins and then 10 wins playing Priest. It was a Dragon Priest deck, rather than control, but this is still a spectacular result. Congratulations to them!

Of course, as the novelty wears off, and as players start to run out of gold, this Brawl will get more and more difficult, so my recommendation is that if you fancy having a go at this, you do it while there are still some lower ranked players in the pool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was really sad this was the brawl. I do wonder why they did a huge gold sink right before the next expansion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Laragon said:

I was really sad this was the brawl. I do wonder why they did a huge gold sink right before the next expansion...

Are you trying to say that people spending more money on Hearthstone is somehow bad for the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too costly and the battles are just your regular ladder crap. If it was arena style deckmaking I would definitely go for it.

Also the rewards are not particularly attractive for someone who mostly plays arena. To get your gold back you need to win 11-12 matches. 

Disappointing brawl

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It costs way too much for me to do it myself, but I still think it's a great brawl as it's giving me hours upon hours of great viewing material from those participating streamers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PaasHaaS said:

It costs way too much for me to do it myself, but I still think it's a great brawl as it's giving me hours upon hours of great viewing material from those participating streamers. 

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, L0rinda said:

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

Definitely yeah. I was watching Firebat last night, who was really tryharding, and it gives incredible insight into the matchups etc.

Though of course I'm mainly looking forward to watching DisguisedToast fuck people over with stupid decks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

Are you trying to say that people spending more money on Hearthstone is somehow bad for the game?

It won't cause anyone to spend more money though. People that were going to spend still will, and those that never do won't. It's a clever brawl idea, and a long awaited reward for streamers. However, no one on this forum so far has said they are even playing it.

I'd consider it a failure of a brawl if it's literally just a streamers showcase, as it seems. That's what legendary already is. Spending money isn't bad for the game, but alienating a large population of your fan base is. If this is a one off (or rare pre-expansion occurrence), it's fine. If they consider it a success and it comes back as often as the crossroads brawls, it could be crippling over time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this would have been a much more user friendly brawl if they would have at least given everyone one shot for free and pay 1k coins for a second or each additional attempt to hit your 12 wins. I don't think most casual players want to drop 1k coins on such an unknown as far as how the meta is running in a pay to play tavern brawl, and even more so just before an expansion. Maybe next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a casual player, and I had the gold available, so I forked over the 1k. I'll try anything at least once! The competition is fierce indeed. It made me feel very mediocre, lol. :/ I threw together a midrange hunter featuring Barnes and was knocked out after 4 wins.

My 1st loss was to a Totem Shaman. Out of my 7 encounters, 3 of them were with Resurrect Priest. They were responsible for my 2nd and 3rd losses. I also fought a C'Thun Mage, a C'Thun Druid, and an Astral Communion Druid (was surprised to see one of those in there). With control priest being so prevalent, maybe build a deck to counter that deck type as best you can...

I did not break even with 4 wins, but I think I would still try this again in the future. Good luck to any of you here who has the guts to give it a go! I applaud you for your willingness to put yourself out there and experience something new. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

I look at it as a complete waste of time. Constructed is already anti-casual enough for all play modes one-hundred percent of the time, thank you very much!

If they want to implement a tournament mode for 'elite players', fantastic, but not at the cost  of the only thing that has so far been (almost always) accessible to everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of the format but it didn't work great for me. My best performing ladder deck is pirate warrior, with which I tend to finish around 2000 Legend rank each month on EU servers. I figured it was best to just play your best performing ladder deck for this, but as it turned out the meta seemed rather different to me. Still plenty of shamans, but a lot more control and reno decks than I normally see on the ladder. I went 4, 1, 2, 1, 2. Admittedly I made some bad plays and should've won a few more, and I also had some pretty horrible luck with opponents getting Malygos/Rag/Thaurisan from Barnes and spell totems seemingly at will. So I expect my long-run average would have been higher than that rubbish. But still, with a entry cost that could buy 50 packs and a return of the equivalent of 20.6 packs (in contrast, a run of 4, 1, 2, 1, 2 in arena would cost the equivalant of 7.5 packs and on average return the equivalent of 7.19 packs) if it were a permanent, or even recurring, feature I don't see how I could justify it. And if everyone bar the very top players gave up with it, even they would end up with a bad return.

I'd like to see it again, but with some changes. For £8 entry fee, you want to get a decent play-time out of it. Effectively losing £6.5 of it and playing for 20 minutes going 1-3 doesn't seem feel so good. One option could be to have a chance to play an AI in the early games (e.g. guaranteed matches 1-3, 75% 4-5, 50% 6-7, 25% 8-9 and expand the max wins to 18, and adjust the prizes appropriately). That way on average you get 6 free wins and so everyone gets at least 9 games per run.

Alternatively, keep it as it is but let people choose their entry fee. Maybe three options of (i) no fee - you win no prizes (except maybe one free chest for the first win to keep it consistent with normal tavern brawl) but get the normal 10 gold for every three wins, (ii) same fee as arena with similar prize distribution as arena, (iii) same fee as this week and same prizes. People in (iii) can still match people in (i) but like arena you only match people on the same score as you.

 

 

Edited by Bozonik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Keizoku said:

I look at it as a complete waste of time. Constructed is already anti-casual enough for all play modes one-hundred percent of the time, thank you very much!

If they want to implement a tournament mode for 'elite players', fantastic, but not at the cost  of the only thing that has so far been (almost always) accessible to everyone.

I don't think tournament mode will be for elite players, they're just getting those guys to test it out. I should think such a mode would have different entry costs, and many would be low enough to be not worth the time for those guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feels like an elite-only tavern brawl.  Sucks for the non-elite.  (And the elite already have ranked to show off in.)

It also feels like a cynical gold-sink pre-expansion.  I'm saving my gold for the expansion, so nyah boo, sucks to ya!

Edited by mimech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this kind of format has tons of potential. Imagine the very same thing with 100 gold entry fee and rewards starting from something like a single common card. 

Imagine this with special rules like 35(25) card decks or forced inclusion when your deck is locked to have two tinyfins or whatever. I understand why they did plain boring standard but should it be something more interesting that rewards deck building skills it will be great to watch

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.