L0rinda

Heroic Tavern Brawl Released

Sign in to follow this  

16 posts in this topic

McgjGkE.png

The much talked about Heroic Tavern Brawl is finally here, and as you can see above, it comes with a warning!

In this week's Brawl, you play a normal Standard constructed deck of your choice, from your collection and play until you either win twelve, or lose three, matches. At the end of the Brawl you are rewarded based on how well you performed, much in the same manner as Arena. The catch, it costs 1000 gold. I have calculated the payouts for each expected win rate in a previous post, and that table can be found here. The short version is that you need around 54% win rate for a break even payout, and that assumes you really value Golden Legendary cards. The rake is high in this Brawl.

Predictably this has been a big success with streamers, with WtyBill from Team Celestial being one of the first confirmed players to reach 12 Wins. He achieved this feat with Tempo Mage.

Perhaps an even more spectacular feat was that of Rdu and Ek0p. They managed to go 11 wins and then 10 wins playing Priest. It was a Dragon Priest deck, rather than control, but this is still a spectacular result. Congratulations to them!

Of course, as the novelty wears off, and as players start to run out of gold, this Brawl will get more and more difficult, so my recommendation is that if you fancy having a go at this, you do it while there are still some lower ranked players in the pool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was really sad this was the brawl. I do wonder why they did a huge gold sink right before the next expansion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Laragon said:

I was really sad this was the brawl. I do wonder why they did a huge gold sink right before the next expansion...

Are you trying to say that people spending more money on Hearthstone is somehow bad for the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too costly and the battles are just your regular ladder crap. If it was arena style deckmaking I would definitely go for it.

Also the rewards are not particularly attractive for someone who mostly plays arena. To get your gold back you need to win 11-12 matches. 

Disappointing brawl

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It costs way too much for me to do it myself, but I still think it's a great brawl as it's giving me hours upon hours of great viewing material from those participating streamers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PaasHaaS said:

It costs way too much for me to do it myself, but I still think it's a great brawl as it's giving me hours upon hours of great viewing material from those participating streamers. 

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, L0rinda said:

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

Definitely yeah. I was watching Firebat last night, who was really tryharding, and it gives incredible insight into the matchups etc.

Though of course I'm mainly looking forward to watching DisguisedToast fuck people over with stupid decks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

Are you trying to say that people spending more money on Hearthstone is somehow bad for the game?

It won't cause anyone to spend more money though. People that were going to spend still will, and those that never do won't. It's a clever brawl idea, and a long awaited reward for streamers. However, no one on this forum so far has said they are even playing it.

I'd consider it a failure of a brawl if it's literally just a streamers showcase, as it seems. That's what legendary already is. Spending money isn't bad for the game, but alienating a large population of your fan base is. If this is a one off (or rare pre-expansion occurrence), it's fine. If they consider it a success and it comes back as often as the crossroads brawls, it could be crippling over time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this would have been a much more user friendly brawl if they would have at least given everyone one shot for free and pay 1k coins for a second or each additional attempt to hit your 12 wins. I don't think most casual players want to drop 1k coins on such an unknown as far as how the meta is running in a pay to play tavern brawl, and even more so just before an expansion. Maybe next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a casual player, and I had the gold available, so I forked over the 1k. I'll try anything at least once! The competition is fierce indeed. It made me feel very mediocre, lol. :/ I threw together a midrange hunter featuring Barnes and was knocked out after 4 wins.

My 1st loss was to a Totem Shaman. Out of my 7 encounters, 3 of them were with Resurrect Priest. They were responsible for my 2nd and 3rd losses. I also fought a C'Thun Mage, a C'Thun Druid, and an Astral Communion Druid (was surprised to see one of those in there). With control priest being so prevalent, maybe build a deck to counter that deck type as best you can...

I did not break even with 4 wins, but I think I would still try this again in the future. Good luck to any of you here who has the guts to give it a go! I applaud you for your willingness to put yourself out there and experience something new. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Look at this one as a learning opportunity guys. Most of the streamers are try harding much more than usual on this, and so you can get an insight into the thought process of the very best.

While I understand it is frustrating, and definitely should be avoided by most people, there's a good chance it is a test for something like a tournament mode, and it is only one week out of over seventy where it has been really anti-casual.

I look at it as a complete waste of time. Constructed is already anti-casual enough for all play modes one-hundred percent of the time, thank you very much!

If they want to implement a tournament mode for 'elite players', fantastic, but not at the cost  of the only thing that has so far been (almost always) accessible to everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of the format but it didn't work great for me. My best performing ladder deck is pirate warrior, with which I tend to finish around 2000 Legend rank each month on EU servers. I figured it was best to just play your best performing ladder deck for this, but as it turned out the meta seemed rather different to me. Still plenty of shamans, but a lot more control and reno decks than I normally see on the ladder. I went 4, 1, 2, 1, 2. Admittedly I made some bad plays and should've won a few more, and I also had some pretty horrible luck with opponents getting Malygos/Rag/Thaurisan from Barnes and spell totems seemingly at will. So I expect my long-run average would have been higher than that rubbish. But still, with a entry cost that could buy 50 packs and a return of the equivalent of 20.6 packs (in contrast, a run of 4, 1, 2, 1, 2 in arena would cost the equivalant of 7.5 packs and on average return the equivalent of 7.19 packs) if it were a permanent, or even recurring, feature I don't see how I could justify it. And if everyone bar the very top players gave up with it, even they would end up with a bad return.

I'd like to see it again, but with some changes. For £8 entry fee, you want to get a decent play-time out of it. Effectively losing £6.5 of it and playing for 20 minutes going 1-3 doesn't seem feel so good. One option could be to have a chance to play an AI in the early games (e.g. guaranteed matches 1-3, 75% 4-5, 50% 6-7, 25% 8-9 and expand the max wins to 18, and adjust the prizes appropriately). That way on average you get 6 free wins and so everyone gets at least 9 games per run.

Alternatively, keep it as it is but let people choose their entry fee. Maybe three options of (i) no fee - you win no prizes (except maybe one free chest for the first win to keep it consistent with normal tavern brawl) but get the normal 10 gold for every three wins, (ii) same fee as arena with similar prize distribution as arena, (iii) same fee as this week and same prizes. People in (iii) can still match people in (i) but like arena you only match people on the same score as you.

 

 

Edited by Bozonik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Keizoku said:

I look at it as a complete waste of time. Constructed is already anti-casual enough for all play modes one-hundred percent of the time, thank you very much!

If they want to implement a tournament mode for 'elite players', fantastic, but not at the cost  of the only thing that has so far been (almost always) accessible to everyone.

I don't think tournament mode will be for elite players, they're just getting those guys to test it out. I should think such a mode would have different entry costs, and many would be low enough to be not worth the time for those guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feels like an elite-only tavern brawl.  Sucks for the non-elite.  (And the elite already have ranked to show off in.)

It also feels like a cynical gold-sink pre-expansion.  I'm saving my gold for the expansion, so nyah boo, sucks to ya!

Edited by mimech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this kind of format has tons of potential. Imagine the very same thing with 100 gold entry fee and rewards starting from something like a single common card. 

Imagine this with special rules like 35(25) card decks or forced inclusion when your deck is locked to have two tinyfins or whatever. I understand why they did plain boring standard but should it be something more interesting that rewards deck building skills it will be great to watch

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina

      Mage gets another useful Secret in Kobolds & Catacombs.
      ShtanUdachi revealed this spell card on his YouTube channel. It's a 3 mana rare Secret that reads: "After your opponent plays a minion, deal 6 damage to it. Deal all remaining damage to your opponent". The card's name hasn't been officially confirmed, but it should be Explosive (or Fire) Rune(s).
      The video is in Russian, with English subtitles available.
      This is a great card and fits perfectly into Secret Mage or any aggressive Mage deck. Essentially, it's a cheaper Fireball, that can potentially splits its damage to the enemy hero too! The only question that is raised is how this secret is going to work with minions with Divine Shield. Lastly, Explosive Rune(s) can benefit from Spell Power.
      Let us know what you think about the newest addition to Mage's arsenal of powerful spells. Final versions of all cards will be posted in our Kobolds & Catacombs hub.
    • By Zadina

      The Paladin Spellstone has been revealed and we finally know almost everything about it.
      After the Mage Spellstone, it was time for the Paladin Spellstone to be revealed by Korean streamer sung0, who was joined by RenieHouR. The translated name of the card should be Lesser Pearl Spellstone, but it hasn't been officially confirmed.

      Image by Hearthpwn.
      Another translation of this card reads "Spirit" instead of "minion". It might be the case that the summoned token is an Elemental. This would be interesting since Paladin will get Benevolent Djinn in Kobolds & Catacombs, which is an Elemental that also has healing synergy. The "Restore 3 health" part is not clear, as well: it probably means to both your hero and your minions, but it should still be clarified.
      The streamers weren't provided with the upgrades of the Spellstone, so again this is a mystery. There are two cases: a) it's either get one, two, three minions or b) the stats of said minion get upgraded. The former seems more likely.
      There's still not enough information to properly review this card. Keep checking this thread for updates and we'll be sure to have the final details in our Kobolds and Catacombs hub as well.

      UPDATE
      According to French site JudgeHype, it looks like the token will get +2/+2 stats when the Spellstone is upgraded. So, the second stage is "Summon a 4/4 Spirit with Taunt" and the last stage is "Summon a 6/6 Spirit with Taunt". The card does indeed state "Spirit", instead of minion, but it turns out the Spirit is NOT an Elemental. The name of the card is almost certainly Lesser Pearl Spellstone, with an official confirmation on it still pending.
      Now, the only unanswered question if the "Restore 3 health" part applies to both hero/face and minions. On its own, the Lesser Pearl Spellstone is a poor card since it basically summons a Frostwolf Grunt. The upgraded versions look much better, but that will depend on whether Healadin will become a viable deck or not.
    • By Zadina

      Dave Kosak is here with a new Hearthside Chat to talk about Dungeon Runs. He also showcased a legendary card from the new expansion!
      We've already talked about Dungeon Runs, one of the new features that Kobolds & Catacombs will bring. Lead Mission Designer Dave Kosak explains in this latest Hearthside Chat the design process behind Dungeon Runs.
      Dave presented some unique elements only present in Dungeon Runs. For example, there is a card you can pick called Cloak of Invisibility, which has a Passive effect of giving your minions permanent Stealth.
      He also gave some insight on the encounters. Some Dungeon Runs can have thematic encounters, like there's a band of Troggs or Trolls you will have to beat. As far as the Trolls are concerned, Battlecrier Jin'zo has a passive effect that is similar to Brann Bronzebeard, which you and him can both benefit from! Similarly, Spiritspeaker Azun's passive works like Baron Rivendare for both parties, while Voodoomaster Vex combines both of these passive effects!
      The narrator, that will be guiding you through your Dungeon Run, is King Togwaggle - the king of the Kobolds himself! He is also going to be an actual card available in the next expansion:

      Images from Hearthpwn
      Here's the official blog post with everything you need to know about Dungeon Runs:
      Blizzard Entertainment
      What’s a Dungeon Run?
      Dungeon Run is a new insanely fun, single-player “rogue-like” mode where you’ll face deadly encounters and collect incredible Treasures to build a deck worthy of a hero!
      When your Dungeon Run starts, you’ll choose a Hero and receive a starting deck consisting of 10 cards. You’ll use it to overcome eight encounters of increasing difficulty (chosen randomly from a huge pool of 48 possible encounters!) to clear the run.

      That initial deck might be enough to help you squeak by your first opponent, but you’ll need to get stronger if you hope to clear the whole run. Each time you defeat a Dungeon Run encounter, you’ll be given an opportunity to “level up” your Dungeon Run deck with themed sets of three cards appropriate to your class. Occasionally, you’ll also be able to pick from a selection of three incredibly powerful Treasure cards—non-collectible cards and abilities made just for this mode that are too blatantly overpowered to see normal play.
      You’ll need all that power—as well as your wits—because these encounters can be fiendishly difficult. Victory is not assured, and each encounter has its own unique perils. If one of them gets the better of you, defeat is permanent, so you’ll have to start a different run with a whole new deck!
      If you manage to complete a full Dungeon Run with each of the nine Classes—no mean feat!—you’ll add the Candle King card back to your collection.

      (source)
    • By Aleco

      Mage's Spellstone card for hints at a potential Elemental theme for the class in the upcoming set.
      Mage's Spellstone was revealed today by Chinese Hearthstone streamer LvGe, hinting at a potential Elemental theme for the Mage class in K&C:

      Card image courtesy of Hearthpwn.com
      The upgraded versions of Ruby Spellstone will provide an additional random Mage Spell for every two Elementals you can play while this card is in your hand, meaning that this card is capable of becoming a two mana Cabalist's Tome! The lesser version of this spell isn't very enticing, but both of the upgraded versions of Ruby Spellstone seem like quite the deal. Unfortunately, the requirement to upgrade Ruby Spellstone is quite prohibitive and will likely hold this card back from seeing widespread play on the ladder.
      Let us know what you think about Ruby Spellstone in the comment section, and be sure to check out our Kobolds and Catacombs hub for more information on the upcoming set.
    • By Zadina

      In this article, we are covering two new cards: Temporus, a Priest legendary minion, and Benevolent Djinn, a Paladin common minion.
      Benevolent Djinn was revealed earlier today by Thai player Anothersayoran1. The name of the card was officially confirmed by Puffin.

      Image by Hearthpwn.
      It is difficult to judge this card without seeing it in action. It’s comparable to Friendly Bartender: while the Djinn heals for more, its 2 attack value is a bit mediocre for a 3-mana minion. Shaman’s Hot Spring Guardian is slightly better, since it has Taunt and a targeted heal effect. Then again, Djinn also acts like a Taunt, in the sense that your opponent probably has to spend early resources to remove its powerful effect. Both cards, though, are beaten by Tar Creeper.
      This make the Djinn a great anti-aggro tool. Additionally, it synergises well with Blackguard and its Elemental tribe means that maybe we’ll get to see an Elemental Paladin. This is definitely a powerful Arena card. But can it secure a spot in constructed mode? It looks difficult, since Paladin already has some great 3-mana minions.

      This intriguing minion was revealed by Eurogamer. Its sister site, Metabomb, sat down with Peter Whalen and Ben Thompson to talk about this card. Both developers think that Temporus can be run in either the classic OTK Priest (Divine Spirit + Inner Fire) or in two new versions of Dragon Priest: a more midrange one and an OTK one with Malygos. 
      It would be interesting to see what it's interaction is going to be with Brann Bronzebeard. Temporus is a "high risk, high reward" card and, even if you don't like it or it turns out to be bad, you'd still have to commend its design.
      Don't forget to check out our Kobolds & Catacombs hub for everything you need to know about the upcoming expansion!