Damien

How to build a deck

Sign in to follow this  

16 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our How to build a deck article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when tweaking, how many games do you recommend?

 

I personally do the initial tweaking after c. 5 games, but when my deck grows more mature I increase this to 10 or maybe even 15 games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a pretty good guide, and it looks very helpful for people new to the genre.  My only nitpick is that I can actually see Sinister Strike being used in a super-aggressive rush deck; not that that's necessarily a good deck, but if you were to build it you would have a use for the card.  The Kidnapper is its own entire tier of worthlessness (even Pit Lords are more useful), and any card should be offended to be compared to it.

 

Re: tweaking, I generally modify things whenever I identify a problem.  Something like the week of the living murloc rush decks, where I threw Abominations and aoe into every deck I ran even if they hadn't lost yet, and was glad to have done so.  Most of the time it isn't that obvious, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when tweaking, how many games do you recommend?

 

I personally do the initial tweaking after c. 5 games, but when my deck grows more mature I increase this to 10 or maybe even 15 games.

 

That really depends on the quality of the games played. So, if I get crushed by some stupid deck that directly counters mine 4 times in a row, I'll probably play a few additional games. On the other hand, if I have 4 games against different decks, and in all games my deck exhibits the same issue, I'd make some changes right away.

 

 

This is a pretty good guide, and it looks very helpful for people new to the genre.  My only nitpick is that I can actually see Sinister Strike being used in a super-aggressive rush deck; not that that's necessarily a good deck, but if you were to build it you would have a use for the card.  The Kidnapper is its own entire tier of worthlessness (even Pit Lords are more useful), and any card should be offended to be compared to it.

 

Re: tweaking, I generally modify things whenever I identify a problem.  Something like the week of the living murloc rush decks, where I threw Abominations and aoe into every deck I ran even if they hadn't lost yet, and was glad to have done so.  Most of the time it isn't that obvious, though.

 

You're right, you could create some hyper-aggressive deck in which Sinister Strike would have a place. But that's really a fringe case (and if you're doing that, you're probably feeling frisky enough to overrule that sentence in the article), and in general Sinister Strike is just bad. That's actually part of what the article was trying to convey - that you need to keep refining your card choices until you place the *best* 30 in your deck. This means that you'll be removing a lot of cards, some of which aren't terrible (or which might even be good), just because there are other better ones.

 

Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey!

This is my first post on Icy-Veins. I've used the site a bunch before, but today I actually created an account :)
I love love love your guide and found it extremely helpful.

However, I was wondering if I could make a request for more depth?
You have how to build a pretty good deck, but what if I want more specific advice based on what type of deck I want?
For example, I would like to see a guide, or guides, that help to lay framework for deck styles.

I like to run control decks (I think) but sometimes I put minions that are more for aggro decks. But to be honest, I'm not even sure if I'm putting good aggro or control cards in!
I've read most of the hearthstone guides on here and tried using the constructed deck lists posted to create my own deck, but I would really appreciate a guide that goes over:

*What each deck style is

*What types of cards or card effects should be in those decks

*A short list of cards that are really good value for those deck styles. For example how Azure Drake and Gadgetzan Auctioneer are really good for control decks

*How the play styles may vary between classes because of class specific cards

*What styles counter what styles and maybe some short analyses of why or at least some viable options for dealing with counters.

I know this is asking a lot, and I don't expect anything like this to be done quickly, but I think it's something that would benefit both new players and advanced players :)

 

Again, Thank you so much for all that you've already done. You're amazing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey!

This is my first post on Icy-Veins. I've used the site a bunch before, but today I actually created an account smile.png

I love love love your guide and found it extremely helpful.

However, I was wondering if I could make a request for more depth?

You have how to build a pretty good deck, but what if I want more specific advice based on what type of deck I want?

For example, I would like to see a guide, or guides, that help to lay framework for deck styles.

I like to run control decks (I think) but sometimes I put minions that are more for aggro decks. But to be honest, I'm not even sure if I'm putting good aggro or control cards in!

I've read most of the hearthstone guides on here and tried using the constructed deck lists posted to create my own deck, but I would really appreciate a guide that goes over:

*What each deck style is

*What types of cards or card effects should be in those decks

*A short list of cards that are really good value for those deck styles. For example how Azure Drake and Gadgetzan Auctioneer are really good for control decks

*How the play styles may vary between classes because of class specific cards

*What styles counter what styles and maybe some short analyses of why or at least some viable options for dealing with counters.

I know this is asking a lot, and I don't expect anything like this to be done quickly, but I think it's something that would benefit both new players and advanced players smile.png

 

Again, Thank you so much for all that you've already done. You're amazing!

Hey!

 

Thank you for your very nice words. I'm very glad that you find the guide useful. The kind of suggestions you've made are certainly something I'd like to implement in one way or another on the site, but as you guessed, it's quite a lot of work and something that will require a bit of time.

 

For now, I am happy with this guide providing a solid starting point to people who are interested in creating their own decks. I don't want to clutter it with a lot of situational information, since that will just make it less appealing to a general audience. Hopefully we will be able to accommodate your suggestions in some specialised guides in the future.

 

Until then, feel free to use the forum to ask your questions!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How would you go about making a deck viable that relies on cards that just aren't so good? For example, I played Magic for a long time and just love the board-centric growth of creatures associated with green. So I would love to make a deck that gives permanent buffs to Shaman totems. In theory the win condition is "make very cheap totems into something they have to use cards to destroy, thus wrecking their mana efficiency and using the gains to win through board control." But then, the cards that really play into this vibe for me (swordsmith and priestess) aren't so hot. How do you go about taking an idea that is marginally viable, and make it into something more?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just read this guide and built a pretty good custom deck for the first time.  Thanks for the guide.. very well written, very helpful. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely love this guide. It helped me to understand a lot of about deck building when I first started, introducing me to core concepts like win conditions and how to distribute my 30 card limit. I had no idea about which cards are good for aggro and which for control and the guide gave me a starting point to do further research. I do feel that there should be an advanced or in depth version of the guide that gives a little list on which cards generally are good in what decks (control, tempo, aggro, anti aggro fun, joke) And list cards for card draw potential.

Perhaps the current guide can give a general guideline on spell to minion ratio. I know i used to include too many spells in my deck without realizing that I'm losing tempo because of it. 

 

One specific question I had about where you mentioned Nat Pagle as one of the viable minions for card draw. I was wondering if that still holds true after the nerf. Theoretically he should draw you at least as much as a loot hoarder, unless you are very unlucky, (more if you're lucky) but nat pagle doesn't trade with anything. It does act as a soft taunt though, so I don't know whether I should be using him in areas where i need the draw instead of a loot hoarder. I recently opened him in a pack but have heard people say pagle is dust fodder after nerf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely love this guide. It helped me to understand a lot of about deck building when I first started, introducing me to core concepts like win conditions and how to distribute my 30 card limit. I had no idea about which cards are good for aggro and which for control and the guide gave me a starting point to do further research. I do feel that there should be an advanced or in depth version of the guide that gives a little list on which cards generally are good in what decks (control, tempo, aggro, anti aggro fun, joke) And list cards for card draw potential.

Perhaps the current guide can give a general guideline on spell to minion ratio. I know i used to include too many spells in my deck without realizing that I'm losing tempo because of it. 

 

One specific question I had about where you mentioned Nat Pagle as one of the viable minions for card draw. I was wondering if that still holds true after the nerf. Theoretically he should draw you at least as much as a loot hoarder, unless you are very unlucky, (more if you're lucky) but nat pagle doesn't trade with anything. It does act as a soft taunt though, so I don't know whether I should be using him in areas where i need the draw instead of a loot hoarder. I recently opened him in a pack but have heard people say pagle is dust fodder after nerf.

Nat Pagle is completely useless. Disenchant him.

Don't really know where Nat Pagle would be used in place of Loot Hoarders. It is quite possible that Nat Pagle won't draw even one card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been thinking for a long time that my deck lacked power and I see now I may need to rebuild it. Your guide is very good, and helped me understand better how to build decks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, cooolconnor said:

how do i submit a deck onto icy veins?

You can't. Decks can be only uploaded by our writers, which are currently Pesty and Sottle with one more joining very soon. This way we maintain a very high quality of our guides and decks. You can, however, upload your decks onto our forums to share it with others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.