Damien

[Archived] S8 Hearthstone Legendary Mage Control Deck

Sign in to follow this  

37 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Legendary Mage Control Deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The legendary control deck that was posted here before March 25 seems to have disappeared... for good reason - it was awful. The change log says "revamped" but should say "shredded and started over." I lost a game with the old deck by running out of cards. How bad is that?

 

This new one, on the other hand, seems to be outstanding through the half dozen matches I've tried so far. The Taunts are key to surviving to the late rounds. If you live until turn seven, POW. I like this mage deck better than any one I've seen, including Trump's.

 

Nice job, Poyo. Huge improvement to the deck. And really appreciate the strategy discussion, too.

 

Some advice on getting this deck -- buy a 40 pack, mass disenchant the dupes, and use dust to create your missing cards. Rinse. Repeat. Don't buy packs hoping to get a drop, you'll go broke.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, Drift!

I have lost my fair share of games by decking myself out or fatigue burning my last health, however in most of those games I have done mistakes or plays that would lead to a different outcome if I had known how the rest of the game would play out. When you lose the game by running out of cards, I would suggest analyzing the lost game and considering the possibility of a different outcome if you made a different play at some point of the match. 

Generally when you run out of cards, it means that you were playing a rather evenly matched game where both you and your opponent found a solution to other player's threats, which shouldn't mean that the deck you play is bad.

Next time it happens to you, try to brainstorm a bit and see if a different play would have influence the outcome and pay most attention to how you used your finishers. (Generally running out of cards means that your opponent found a solution to all your finishers)

I'm really glad to hear that the new deck works for you.

Regards,
Poyo

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Poyo,

 

Point taken. I had a hand full of cards, why was I drawing? However, I had nothing to finish my opponent and three dead draws did me in. But that's old news.

 

I've played quite a few more games with this, and am liking it more all the time. Very balanced, and I often win early. If we get to the late game, lock it down - it's a win.

 

I see that you've recently joined IV, and I'm delighted you're overseeing all the decks. I put your latest legendary warrior control deck to the test today with great success. You're right - that one is tremendously fun to play. Keep up the great work!

 

Drift

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Poyo,

 

Point taken. I had a hand full of cards, why was I drawing? However, I had nothing to finish my opponent and three dead draws did me in. But that's old news.

 

I've played quite a few more games with this, and am liking it more all the time. Very balanced, and I often win early. If we get to the late game, lock it down - it's a win.

 

I see that you've recently joined IV, and I'm delighted you're overseeing all the decks. I put your latest legendary warrior control deck to the test today with great success. You're right - that one is tremendously fun to play. Keep up the great work!

 

Drift

We brought Poyo in specifically as "expert adviser" for Hearthstone content (though that's kind of an understatement, he practically writes most of it himself now!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly am struggling to get a win with this deck even in low ranks against aggro decks. Seems to have no early defense to not get destroyed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly am struggling to get a win with this deck even in low ranks against aggro decks. Seems to have no early defense to not get destroyed.

Use your spells, minions efficiently to keep the board clear. Also make a good use of your hero power.

 

I'm using a weaker version of this deck and I have had no problems up to rank 7 with it. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I put your latest legendary warrior control deck to the test today with great success. You're right - that one is tremendously fun to play. Keep up the great work!

 

Drift

I'm glad you like it :) and, thnx!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a weaker version of this deck and I have had no problems up to rank 7 with it. smile.png

How much weaker can it be? I don't have Nat Pagle, Cairne, Ragnaros, and missing a Sunfury Protector and an Azure Drake. Any ideas what I could use for replacements? At least temporarily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used Trump's F2P mage deck, that is here.

 

 

The only things you are missing from this deck are Sunfury protectors and Azure Drakes.

What are the possible replacements? Both these cards are quite unique and I cannot really think of any replacements, unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be a good sub for Ragnaros?

My options are:

1-Pyroblast

2-Alexstraza

3-Yzera

I'd say Ysera. It's a bit slower than Rag, but it's still powerful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used Trump's F2P mage deck, that is here.

 

 

The only things you are missing from this deck are Sunfury protectors and Azure Drakes.

What are the possible replacements? Both these cards are quite unique and I cannot really think of any replacements, unfortunately.

i've been using a slight variant on this deck and i'm loving it so far - brilliant results. The reason i varied was due to lack of dust. I currently need one more azure drake and faceless manipulator for now. But the way i have it my win/loss ratio out of 15 ranked games (starting at rank 18/17 - not too sure) i am now on rank 15 with a w/l of 11:4. It's brilliant!

 

Max

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason, this deck is useless whitout flamestrike vs any aggro deck. And if u get the bad luck like me, u lose 5 games in a row due to not getting any single flamestrike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason, this deck is useless whitout flamestrike vs any aggro deck. And if u get the bad luck like me, u lose 5 games in a row due to not getting any single flamestrike.

If you are facing many aggro decks recently, you are free to add 1-2 Arcane Explosions, which combined with Bloodmage/AzureDrake, can be quite devastating to aggro decks with 1-2 health minions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Rag but I have it replaced by a second Faceless.  Why would my replacement be not as much of a good choice?  I've been using the Faceless to copy heavy hitting taunt minions from the opponent.  I've also used it to put out 3 Bloodhoofs.  When I've used it to copy big hitters from the other side, it has caused a few to just concede out of pure frustration.  Rag seems to always get taken out so quickly when I use him so I'm thinking that maybe there is something to his utility that I'm not seeing.

As for being reliant on Flamestrike, I find that using your Hero Power to keep the lowbies down is key.  I'm usually able to frustrate murloc warlock decks pretty well by using hero power combined with other spells like frostbolt  to knock out their key murlocs.  Once they've blown their wad and go to no cards in their hand, they depend on using their hero power to try and gain control of the board but by then, it's too late for them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Rag but I have it replaced by a second Faceless.  Why would my replacement be not as much of a good choice?  I've been using the Faceless to copy heavy hitting taunt minions from the opponent.  I've also used it to put out 3 Bloodhoofs.  When I've used it to copy big hitters from the other side, it has caused a few to just concede out of pure frustration.  Rag seems to always get taken out so quickly when I use him so I'm thinking that maybe there is something to his utility that I'm not seeing.

As for being reliant on Flamestrike, I find that using your Hero Power to keep the lowbies down is key.  I'm usually able to frustrate murloc warlock decks pretty well by using hero power combined with other spells like frostbolt  to knock out their key murlocs.  Once they've blown their wad and go to no cards in their hand, they depend on using their hero power to try and gain control of the board but by then, it's too late for them.

Using 2 facelesses is completely fine in the current meta with this ...load of legendary decks.

However, putting out a Rag just at the right moment can be quite devastating for the opponent. Most of the classes don't run reliable cards to remove him from the game. The only cards I can think of are Hex, Poly, Assassinate. These cards can be forced out by other high value/hitting cards, like Ogres. Then, when you know that your opponents has nothing else that could make Ragg die, you play him and bamm. :)

 

Yet again, having 3 Bloodhoofs is also great and is better than a Ragg. But still, faceless requires something on the board to copy that is not as reliable as a guaranteed Ragg. (in my opinion at least)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using 2 facelesses is completely fine in the current meta with this ...load of legendary decks.

However, putting out a Rag just at the right moment can be quite devastating for the opponent. Most of the classes don't run reliable cards to remove him from the game. The only cards I can think of are Hex, Poly, Assassinate. These cards can be forced out by other high value/hitting cards, like Ogres. Then, when you know that your opponents has nothing else that could make Ragg die, you play him and bamm. smile.png

 

Yet again, having 3 Bloodhoofs is also great and is better than a Ragg. But still, faceless requires something on the board to copy that is not as reliable as a guaranteed Ragg. (in my opinion at least)

 

Definitely good points.  I'll see about adding him back into my deck and see how it affects things.  Thanks for the input...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sry this dec dosnt help at all, i've lost 6 matches in a row now. i dont have anything i can put on the table without minion getting destroyed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using 2 facelesses is completely fine in the current meta with this ...load of legendary decks.

However, putting out a Rag just at the right moment can be quite devastating for the opponent. Most of the classes don't run reliable cards to remove him from the game. The only cards I can think of are Hex, Poly, Assassinate. These cards can be forced out by other high value/hitting cards, like Ogres. Then, when you know that your opponents has nothing else that could make Ragg die, you play him and bamm. smile.png

 

Yet again, having 3 Bloodhoofs is also great and is better than a Ragg. But still, faceless requires something on the board to copy that is not as reliable as a guaranteed Ragg. (in my opinion at least)

If you only can think of Hex and poly you dont know so much about the game. things that can fuck up the "high cards" naturalize, Snipe, Deadly Shot, fireball, Humility, Repentance, Aldor Peacekeeper, sap, corruption, Siphon soul, Execute and probably some more. Playing a Legendary or any high card is never reliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you only can think of Hex and poly you dont know so much about the game. things that can fuck up the "high cards" naturalize, Snipe, Deadly Shot, fireball, Humility, Repentance, Aldor Peacekeeper, sap, corruption, Siphon soul, Execute and probably some more. Playing a Legendary or any high card is never reliable.

If we think of ie. Raggnaros:

Neutralize is never run usually, as it gives card advantage to your opponent.

Snipe is only 4 damage, Rag still lives.

Deadly Shot is random, and with a control deck you usually have more than one guys on the field. Ragg might still live.

Humility, Repentance, Aldor doesn't affect Ragg.

Sap, Siphon soul can mess with you instantly, yes.

For execute, the opponent will have to use at least 2 cards (something to damage your Ragg, and the execute). You've got card advantage by this.

 

I meant Hex and Poly as a 100% reliable remove and indeed I forgot about some of the cards as I only brought an example.

 

Considering this, playing a Ragg is still much more reliable, than waiting for your opponent to play something that MIGHT be valuable for a copy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sry this dec dosnt help at all, i've lost 6 matches in a row now. i dont have anything i can put on the table without minion getting destroyed. 

Unfortunately, for the current meta this deck is indeed too slow. You have to adapt to the meta and swap out some cards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys. Wondering if you guys had some tips for grinding arcsne dust to hopefully make this legendary deck one day. 11k seems like a lot any tips would be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of Nat Pagle. There were some games where it was doing nothing but simply sitting on the board. The card draw is awesome, but only when it works — the 50% probability is not exactly reliable. It would have been better if it was 1/x, not 0/4. What should I replace it with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of Nat Pagle. There were some games where it was doing nothing but simply sitting on the board. The card draw is awesome, but only when it works — the 50% probability is not exactly reliable. It would have been better if it was 1/x, not 0/4. What should I replace it with?

I dislike Nat Pagle for its 50% probability and you can easily take it out for The Black Knight (Taunters in metagame), Big Game Hunter (playing against a lot of fatties), Defender of Argus or maybe even a Faceless Manipulator.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.