Damien

[Archived] S19 Hearthstone Legendary Grim Patron OTK Warrior BrM

Sign in to follow this  

71 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Legendary Grim Patron OTK Warrior Deck for BrM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you feel about Axe Flingers? They're another great card with all the pain cards in the deck, but I can't seem to find a good space for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Axe Flinger is pretty poor in this deck, It's expensive to fit into a Warsong combo, and you will always get more damage from a Patron, Frothing or Worgen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...

This deck is... confusing to say the least. Knowing that I have all those great combos that I can only unlock in the later turns is pretty nice but in the current aggro meta I get wrecked usually before turn 8.

I played over 15 matches now, lost 14 of them and won 1 because a shaman surrendered in turn 2.

I don't know if the deck is consistent or bad at controling the early game or I am just a bad player for this deck, but anything I try doesn't work. I replaced the belchers for some additional tempo by playing dread corsairs instead and replaced inner rage for slam for additional help in early removal. I still get wrecked like it's nothing for the enemy.

Last round I played with a priest (which got super lucky by thoughtstealing though, stole me both dread corsairs and death bite and Battlerage) and lost with him still having 28 HP left.

I'm doing something wrong here. Can you please explain?

Also, I have quite the opposite succes with this deck: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/224656-senfglas-top-10-legend-grim-patron-warrior-700dust

Played 20+ matches on ladder and only lost two. Seems like that deck is more consistent because of the heavy card draw. This deck only brings you card draw with two cards - acolyte and battle rage. It's kind of stupid to use battle rage when you have no minions on the board and as this is the case for the most part in early game, I would probably be much more comfortable having slam instead. At least you do some damage along the way aswell.

The deck mentioned above does it much better - heavy card draw means you almost always have the turn 6 emperor and are practically almost able of comboing the patron in turn 7.

Another card I miss is commanding shout. Including this card in the combo (with emperors help it can be done on turn 7 instead of 10) it serves as the ultimate oponents board wipeout and by playing the Senfglas deck I get to use this an awful lot.

It is the main reason how I manage to wreck handlocks along the other benefits.

I really want to play my dr.boom and grommash, but it just doesn't work in this meta. sad.png

Ok went to the original idea of this deck and it works a bit better but most of the time it's really a 50-50 chance to win and really draw dependable. The only class I've had most luck with are druids, its actually pretty easy to win druids with this deck. Everything else mostly makes me suffer dearly.

Right that will be it for me. After playing this deck for the whole day, I won two games. I'm switching to something else until I get the cards to make myself control warrior.

Thanks for help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The strategy of the deck is explained pretty well in the guide I think, I can't really help you much more than that without more specific questions. 

As for the deck's effectiveness/consistency, it seems pretty solid to me :P

11157227_10205666836166608_934508127_o.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answer. 

 

Ok it seems that I am (it was the most likely explanation anyway) playing it pretty much wrong. 

 

I don't know usually I am saving at least one warsong commander to combo it with grim patrons etc. Do you think it's better to play it in a way that you can always answer the opponents threat? So if I need to warsong + frothing combo for example in turn 6 I use it for that? Play patron on turn 5 even though he might be removed? Or play patron + whirlwind on turn 6 for example? 

 

The guide explains the way of playing nicely though I always liked your guides. Thing is that have absolutely zero clue about optimal card play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea is that you shouldn't really NEED to play Warsong early to answer your opponent's threats. All of the cards like Whirlwind, Inner Rage, Taskmaster etc. are the expendable ones, you should be using those where possible to answer your opponent's options. Combine that with your Weapons and your own minions and you should be able to answer your opponent's options fairly effectively.

Don't be afraid to use Grim Patron either, it's only really Warlock with Hellfire, and Mage with Flamestrike that can deal with a Grim Patron board easily, so don't be afraid to get a couple of Patrons on the board without charging them to set up for a big Warsong turn later.

 

Basically Warsong Commander is your card to protect, all other cards can be used to keep control of the game if you need to, but protect your Warsongs and use them for the big burst combos and board clear, if you keep them in hand, almost every other card in the deck combos with them in some way or another, so you will always have options when it comes time to use them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clearing that up. And yeah I figured it out myself just before when I actually started playing with the same tactics you described - it works. Guess this deck just needs some serious practice. 

 

Forgot to ask one more question btw - when do you use battle rage? I mean sure, when you have no other choice you just play it but when do you consider this card as a "well spent card"? 

 

Does it already justify it's value when you draw one card? I guess not since slam would also do a similar thing. Two cards? 

Basically, how do you know when is the right time to play battle rage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Battle Rage draws 2, it's better than Arcane Intellect, so that's totally fine. The only time you should be really greedy with it is if you can see the ridiculous Grim Patron Whirlwind turn in your hand and you're going to draw like 6 cards.

Even cycling it for 1 card is fine if your hand is bad. Obviously the comparitive value to Slam is poor, but you're playing it for the potential blowout turns, you have to just suck it up and accept the bad ones sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yeah this cleared a lot of things for me. I was usually saving it up for the patron card draw combo. 

 

Yeah it makes perfect sense. 

 

I have tried all your suggestions and the deck now behaves much much better. I'm also getting way more consistency out of it. 

Thanks man you saved my warrior ^^ Yesterday I was so nervous because of me being unable to play this deck ok that I felt like exploding. 

 

Now it's a killer deck. I also feel much more comfortable in knowing that I can also use the patrons for some board clearing if necessary (handlocks or just some crazy turns sometimes) because I can compensate it with grom, boom or frothings. The warsong worgen combo is also nice if there is no sight of patron or other cards. Inner raging it under charge also give a 12 attack which is basically equal to grommash. Although by all means grom stays the all mighty :) 

 

Thanks for the awesome guide Sottle, my spirit now rests in peace :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're underestimating Axe Flinger. It's not there as an aggro piece, it's there as a serious counter to decks like Face Hunter, Paladin Rush, Mech Aggro etc. It tends to take out a card even in bad matchups, is an excellent target for a Taskmaster or Inner Rage if you don't have other tech, and puts pressure on heavy control decks. Sure, it's not optimal if you're going for face but in a slower Thaurissian-based build going for the OTK it can do heavy work alongside a Zombie Chow in the early game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is a 4 Mana 2/5 a counter to aggro decks? You'd just play Sen'jin in that slot, it's strictly better for that purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're probably right that Senjin's better as a defensive piece, but the flinger can also have late game combo potential. Not so much as the Patron, but if you've saved up a whirlwind effect or two then the direct damage can be useful. Especially if he's costing less off a Thaurissian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way how to succesfully counter face hunters and zoo decks? I usually end up at <10 hp on turn 8, a lot of times the fun ends way before. Depends on the opponents topdecking... 

 

Or mech mages? Everytime a mech mage opens with a annoy-o-tron I loose the game. My axe gets spent for removing his shield.

 

Should I whirlwind in this case? I guess inner raging him to remove the shield or taskmastering him is bad (then removing with the axe)?

Edited by Sparkl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey! I love the deck. I have one question, though... How does one deal with decks that have 2x hellfire or 2x flamestrike? Do you try to bait them both ( I can't imagine how that could be done, especially if the opponents see the type of deck that you are playing)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're probably right that Senjin's better as a defensive piece, but the flinger can also have late game combo potential. Not so much as the Patron, but if you've saved up a whirlwind effect or two then the direct damage can be useful. Especially if he's costing less off a Thaurissian.

 

The combo damage off an Axe Flinger is so insignificant compared to a Worgen or Frothing, it's just not worth having such a bad card in your deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a way how to succesfully counter face hunters and zoo decks? I usually end up at <10 hp on turn 8, a lot of times the fun ends way before. Depends on the opponents topdecking... 

 

Or mech mages? Everytime a mech mage opens with a annoy-o-tron I loose the game. My axe gets spent for removing his shield.

 

Should I whirlwind in this case? I guess inner raging him to remove the shield or taskmastering him is bad (then removing with the axe)?

 

I consider Mech Mage to be almost a free win with this deck. Face Hunter is a little tricker, but still quite favoured in my opinion. 

Mech Mage doesn't really push fast damage all that well, and plays so many 2 attack minions, that it really is just a matter of surviving until Grim Patron combo. Just survive by any means necessary.

 

Face Hunter you just need to use your 1 damage pings to good effect, Inner Rage, Whirlwind, Taskmaster etc. kill basically all of their minions. You can also force them to trade by just dropping a Frothing on the board and Inner Raging it, they can't leave that up, and it will technically heal you for a bunch while they kill it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey! I love the deck. I have one question, though... How does one deal with decks that have 2x hellfire or 2x flamestrike? Do you try to bait them both ( I can't imagine how that could be done, especially if the opponents see the type of deck that you are playing)?

 

Yeah, Double Hellfire decks are the worst. It's just a rough matchup. The gameplan here is just to save Warsong/Frothing and try and burst them down, since any Warlock deck with Hellfires is going to lower themselves to a scary life total at some point.

You're not going to win these matchups by board control from the Patron combo, so you really do just need to save up Burst pieces in your hand, along with Executes to clear Taunts, then just go for it when you see an opening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Mech Mage doesn't really push fast damage all that well, and plays so many 2 attack minions, that it really is just a matter of surviving until Grim Patron combo. Just survive by any means necessary.

 

Hmm well it seems that in my case they all just keep playing tinkertowns and spider tanks, practically material I cannot deal with my patrons. If they spawn low minions they spam them usually when I don't yet have the patron combo or in lower turns, forcing me to deal with them otherwise I would be toast until turn 6. Or they just keep flamecanoning everything I throw on the board. Or frostbolting or fireballing. Thats cool, but usually I can't do jack until higher turns but by then my health gets so low I usually have at most 2 turns in front of me while the opponent has like 3 4att+ minions on the board. Edit: And also, can you please tell me how do you usually deal with annoy-o-trons?

 

Maybe it's just my bad luck, maybe I still haven't figured out the optimal play but I feel a lot of times that I could answer the given situations easy have I drawn certain cards before. But when the opponent comes on the board with a few 4/4 minions even my patron combo sucks. 

 

Also shamans man... Silence, silence, lightning storm, lightning storm, they get even so lucky they get 4 taunt totems in a row (happened to me yesterday)... Then they crackle a bit, all while they maintain board presence.

 

How do you beat that stuff :/ 

 

I feel like the easiest match for me at the moment is vs. zoo. I kind of manage to survive long enough to trade all his low minions for my patrons. 

 

But I have absolute trouble vs. mech mage, handlock, face hunter, priest (mind controling belchers and gromm or boom at turn 10 is no fun at all), control warrior, shaman sometimes.

 

I can get by with druids and rogues. And even with druids, if I don't draw the removal cards it's usually a long wasted game. I play patrons with warsong (or turn 5 plus inner rage + deathbite aoe if I can) on turn 7-8, make a board he spawns AoW next turn, I don't draw a removal for the next few turns and it just all goes down from there. It would be just so nice if I could figure out how to achieve the perfect curve of card draw...

Edited by Sparkl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Kel'Thuzad viable in this deck? Since I don't have Grommash, I was wondering if I could replace him with KT. Either that, or a Shield Block, to get that armor and card draw you mentioned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.