Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Zadina

Dragon's Fury Reveal: Kobolds & Catacombs

Recommended Posts

34372-merciful-djinni-temporus-reveals-k

Mage gets yet another powerful board clear.

Dragon's Fury was revealed by PCGamesN. The article contains a small interview with Peter Whalen, who talks about the design process behind this card:

636477123472604510.png

Image by Hearthpwn

This card looks amazing. It definitely fits into Tempo Mage or in the new "Big Spells" archetype, since these decks don't run a lot of minions. If you reveal a spell that costs 4 or more, you already have an improved Flamestrike at 5 mana. With a revealed 3-mana spell, it's comparable to Excavated Evil, while with spells that cost 2 or less it loses power but it can be decent as an anti-aggro tool.

There's not much to add about this Mage card, it just seems really good! As always, you can check our Kobolds & Catacombs hub for everything you need to know about the new expansion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it really fit into a tempo secret deck though?  Clearing your own board is kind of bad.  Also they run a pretty high concentration of 3 drops since most are pretty secret oriented.  I could definitely see this as a 1 of in control mage, maybe even replacing flame strike or more probably one of the meteors.  Seems strong, and definitely a good role player card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another random card, oh god, STOP!!!!!

This expansion is turning into a f****** clown fiesta.

Almost every card in this set is either slow as a brick or totally unreliable.

And there are a bunch of broken cards, like new dragon and new priest board clear 'Autistic Screeching' (I know this is not the name, but it reminds me of this meme) and the Reckless Flurry(this card could bring control warrior back)

I thought that Gadgetzan was bad, obviously we can always be prepared for worse when it comes to card design I guess.

Edit: @VaraTreledees:  Those are high-cost spells, if you are hopeless to play this, you want your spells as big as possible. 

Edited by FanOfValeera
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, FanOfValeera said:

Another random card, oh god, STOP!!!!!

This expansion is turning into a f****** clown fiesta.

Almost every card in this set is either slow as a brick or totally unreliable.

And there are a bunch of broken cards, like new dragon and new priest board clear 'Autistic Screeching' (I know this is not the name, but it reminds me of this meme) and the Reckless Flurry(this card could bring control warrior back)

I thought that Gadgetzan was bad, obviously we can always be prepared for worse when it comes to card design I guess.

Edit: @VaraTreledees:  Those are high-cost spells, if you are hopeless to play this, you want your spells as big as possible. 

Yeh but control mage already runs like 7 - 8 6+ cost things.  Somethings gotta give for this.  If it isn't one of the 2 meteors, 2 firelands, the flamestrike, then its mediv, frost lich jaina or alex.

 

Edit: Also forgot skulking geist.

Edited by VaraTreledees

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are pushing a "Big Spell" archetype, it may work, surely they'll push it again in the next expansion, then maybe it will be a thing.

I think that the main problem with "casting spell from deck with a cheaper cost" is the random targeting. In Big Priest when I summon a minion, if it's a good minion (and I run only big expensive one, except Barnes, to be sure), it makes the board big. In Big Spell Mage, I can cast a fireball from my deck, and I can do it to my face, to the wrong minion.... And the more RNG, the more unreliable it is. With this card instead targeting is not a problem, the problem is destroying my board, or maybe doing nothing because I hit that only cheap spell I need to run.  And I need big spell in my deck, and big spell will not win the game all alone.

If this kind of cards will ever work, I see them in a secret-like archetype more then a Big one.

Edited by Synesthesy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, VaraTreledees said:

Yeh but control mage already runs like 7 - 8 6+ cost things.  Somethings gotta give for this.  If it isn't one of the 2 meteors, 2 firelands, the flamestrike, then its mediv, frost lich jaina or alex.

 

Edit: Also forgot skulking geist.

Except the fact that all these spells cost more than the new card, all those are better, because they have the guaranteed effect, and they don't kill your own minions. I don't think cutting a 6 mana meteor, for a possible 5 mana x (from 2 to 7) damage is good.

I might be wrong about playability of this, but it doesn't change the fact that so many cards in this expansion is just random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the reveal cards in this set make me really worried that mill decks are going to be WAY strong in the next meta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this expansion going to beat GvG as most RNG intensive?

Why? Is anyone asking for more RNG? What exactly is going trough their minds?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Kuster said:

Is this expansion going to beat GvG as most RNG intensive?

Why? Is anyone asking for more RNG? What exactly is going trough their minds?

RNG makes the game less repetitive. Rather than the RNG being just what you draw, you can know weigh the risks/rewards of using one of the new RNG cards and determine if it is worth it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SMOrcMan said:

RNG makes the game less repetitive. Rather than the RNG being just what you draw, you can know weigh the risks/rewards of using one of the new RNG cards and determine if it is worth it.

I agree. But I don't want games to be coin flips. I don't think so many cards should to be so RNG-centric, and I don't think anyone in the community is asking for that much of it. So why do they do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Kuster said:

I agree. But I don't want games to be coin flips. I don't think so many cards should to be so RNG-centric, and I don't think anyone in the community is asking for that much of it. So why do they do it?

Yeah, they did need some RNG because the lack of it lately has made game draw dependent lately. BUT, they didn't solve the issue and instead made it worse. Part of the reason the meta is like this is that they are releasing two class legendaries, thus making decks less consistent and more draw dependent. 

 

With the addition of legendary weapons they are only further killing the game. They want to make expansions cost more dust so people buy more packs and give them more money, but it is slowly ruining the game.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SMOrcMan said:

Yeah, they did need some RNG because the lack of it lately has made game draw dependent lately. BUT, they didn't solve the issue and instead made it worse. Part of the reason the meta is like this is that they are releasing two class legendaries, thus making decks less consistent and more draw dependent. 

 

With the addition of legendary weapons they are only further killing the game. They want to make expansions cost more dust so people buy more packs and give them more money, but it is slowly ruining the game.

I don't think we have a lack of RNG with the current cards being played. One of the most popular cards, The lich King has a lot of RNG attached to it. There are a bunch of discover effects running around between adapt and card generation. With big priest you rig the deck to have good chances of getting something big with shadow essence, but eventually a 5/5 barnes wrecks you. Games can be won and lost depending on which minion the +3 attack from cobalt scalebane lands. Atiesh can give you pretty crappy minions sometimes, as do evolve cards in shaman. 

On top of the "draw factor", Is that not enough?

I mostly agree with the class legendaries part. But at least quests are guaranteed on the opener and DK's don't always are build around cards, so you can just jam them into good decks and they'll only make them a bit better. But the weapons are just terrible. They had a whole new design space, giving weapons to classes that never had them, and managed to be predictable, boring and ineffective for the most part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting... ish. I feel that if they wanted to promote specific deck building and remove the RNG element, they could simply reword it to "Deal damage equal to the mana cost of the cheapest spell in your deck" or whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

Except the fact that all these spells cost more than the new card, all those are better, because they have the guaranteed effect, and they don't kill your own minions. I don't think cutting a 6 mana meteor, for a possible 5 mana x (from 2 to 7) damage is good.

I might be wrong about playability of this, but it doesn't change the fact that so many cards in this expansion is just random.

Oh I misunderstood you.  Yeah I generally agree that this expansion is a clown fiesta of randomness.  I don't really care for it tbh.  As for the play-ability, I don't think it will be a control mage staple, but I think it is definitely an option if you want more AoE vs aggro.  Gives you an AoE that bridges the gap between volcanic potion and flamestrike, all the while also threatening some more mid rangey minions since you can high roll.  Plus volcanic is rotating soon.  In a meta where you want to tech vs aggro, meteor becomes a lot less useful since you generally need to deal with wide boards.  The randomness and inherent unreliability of this card could just be too much, but, barring glyphs and frost bolts, the lowest mana cost spell will be 3, and excavated evil wasn't a bad card in control priest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think this card is bad rng really. From the perspective of the person running it in their deck, the rng is pretty limited since you’re only going to be running it in decks where the possible outcomes are largely favourable.

It’s more random when it ends up in the hands of someone not running it. But I’m ok with a Tempo Rogue getting a coin flip between 5-mana deal 1dmg to all minions, and 5-mana deal 0dmg to all minions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you guys said all what is to say about the card but I want to add why I am again disappointed by a card of this exp.

They started to put in cards that may (a big "may"?) make elemental mage viable. Then (if it turns out to be playable) they throw in this card pointing the players back to the already know all time played old archetypes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      In the Year of the Pheonix post, we learned more about the Ranked mode overhaul in Hearthstone and Blizzard has now put together a general matchmaking FAQ which hopefully helps answer the most common questions.

      Rank Mode Changes
      The existing ladder in Ranked Mode has been replaced with a new league system. The system has five leagues each made up of 10 ranks. You will start each season at Bronze 10 and slowly make your way to Bronze 1 before graduating to the Silver League and above. Each league also has rank floors at rank 10 and rank 5 where you won't go down in ranks when losing matches. New players will have their own league that runs from ranks 40-1. 
      Stars & Bonuses
      You need to gain 3 starts to be promoted from Gold 10 to Gold 9 for example. You will gain one star for each match you win and lose one for a loss.  Based on your performance in the previous season, you will be rewarded with a star bonus which acts as a multiplier on the starts you get from each win.
      Ranked Rewards
      They've also reworked rewards that you earn at the end of each season or Ranked Play. Reward chest can now contain card packs from the latest expansions, Rare, and even Epic cards based on the rank you achieve. There are also brand new first-time rewards to help new players.

      You can find more details here and check out the FAQ below for more information.
      Blizzard (Source)
      Hey everyone! We put together a general matchmaking FAQ here for our new ranked system to help answer questions you may have.
      For general description of this new system, please refer to our Year of the Phoenix blog.
      If you want to learn some basic concepts of matchmaking, here is our previous blog about matchmaking in Battlegrounds.
      Q: How does matchmaking work for each season?
      A: There are two matchmaking pools: matchmaking by rating (aka. MMR) and by rank.
      When your star bonus multiplier is bigger than 1, or you are in Legend rank, you are (generally) in the first matchmaking pool; when your star bonus drops to 1, you are in the second pool.
      Q: Why are there two matchmaking pools?
      A: Since each player starts at the bottom of the ladder at start, we want fair matches for everyone (aka. win-rate close to 50%). At that time, your progression on ladder is protected by your star bonus, thus your net expected gain will be positive through the ladder. Once other players run out of star bonuses, matching by rank will allow for good players, or players who want to push themselves a bit, to be able to progress to a higher rank.
      In short, having two matchmaking pools helps players progress in the ladder without having to grind as much, while still making most matches fair.
      Q: If I “tank” my MMR at certain rank floor, will I be matched with easier opponents next season because you are matchmaking by MMR at the start?
      A: No, in general you won’t. At the start of the season we will recover your MMR to certain threshold if it is dropped below that value, which is based on what your rank is in the previous season. Therefore, there would be no benefits to intentionally tank your MMR.
      Q: How many stars bonuses do I get at the start of the season?
      A: It depends on your current MMR and the rank you reached from your previous season, whichever gives a higher value. Generally, the minimal initial star bonuses you get for each rank floor you reached are:
      Best Rank Minimal Initial Star Bonuses Bronze 10 2 Bronze 5 2 Silver 10 2 Silver 5 3 Gold 10 4 Gold 5 5 Platinum 10 6 Platinum 5 7 Diamond 10 8 Diamond 5 9 Legend 10 As you can see, every player starts with at least two stars bonuses.
      Q: Do you reset MMR each season?
      A: No, we do not.
      Q: Will the value of my previous season’s MMR be exactly same as the new season?
      A: Technically no, although the change will be very small and the “value order” will be kept (Player A whose MMR is larger than player B in the last season will still be ordered as such). Mathematically, a re-normalization process takes place at the start of each season to keep the distribution in a nice bell-shaped curve.
      Q: If I missed one season, will I lose my star bonuses when I return?
      A: No, you won’t.
      Q: If I missed multiple seasons, will I lose star bonuses when I return?
      A: Based on how long you are absent, there will be some small decay applied to your MMR. Therefore, you may (or may not) lose some star bonuses.
      Q: Where do the win steak bonuses end?
      A: Diamond 5.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Jambre's Rank 4 Legend Highlander Galakrond Rogue Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our PapaJason's Top 50 Legend Reno Mage Deck.
    • By Stan
      Update 17.0 came with a few bugs that need fixing, so Blizzard outlined a hotfix schedule for the next two weeks.
      Blizzard (Source)
      We are currently in the process of putting out a few hotfixes for issues introduced after the 17.0 update. Please note that these fixes take place on the server side, so you should not need to download anything if you’ve updated to 17.0.
      We’ve identified and fixed an issue that could cause the game to fail to offer some eligible players the Returning Player Experience. Affected players should now receive the appropriate quest line when logging into Hearthstone. Whizbang the Wonderful will no longer offer decks with cards that have moved to the Hall of Fame. Kingsbane will now correctly be destroyed and shuffled into your deck when it reaches 0 durability. Living Roots, when disenchanted, now properly gives the amount of dust of a common instead of an epic. However, its gem rarity will not be updated until Monday (3/30). Invoke cards will now no longer appear from cards that generate other cards. Clever Disguise will now correctly function as intended when played. This coming Monday (3/30), we’re planning to deploy a data-only patch that addresses a couple more issues:
      Darkness Awaits will no longer be incorrectly marked as collectible in the Collection. Basic cards will no longer be incorrectly earned from Arena rewards. Living Root’s gem rarity will be corrected from Epic to Common. There are several known issues that will self-resolve on 4/7 when the Demon Hunter and Ashes of Outland unlock:
      Felfin Navigator will correctly appear in the Battlegrounds minion pool. The Battlegrounds Perks button will correctly function as intended when clicked. The new Priest cards will correctly appear in the Arena card pool. Demon Hunter Initiate cards will no longer be granted by completing Galakrond’s Awakening Chapters. Hallucination and Blink Fox will work correctly when played against Demon Hunter in Practice Mode. Curious Glimmerroot will no longer cause client crashes when played against Demon Hunter in Practice Mode. The Search Bar in the Collection will correctly function as intended, and will no longer jump to the top of the screen. Additionally, there are a few Boomsday Project Puzzles that can no longer be completed now because of card changes introduced in 17.0. We’re planning to deploy a fix for Boomsday Project Puzzles on April 9.
      We are investigating several other reports and will keep you posted as we know more. We’d like to thank everyone for their patience while we get some of these bugs squashed!
    • By Stan
      Update 17.0 came with free decks for returning players. Blizzard defines a returning player as one who had not logged into the game for four months as of March 17, meaning if you logged into Hearthstone between November 18, 2019 and now, you don't qualify as a returning player and won't receive the Class Deck.
      Blizzard (Source)
      As our new Returning Player Experience went live along with the 17.0 update, we’ve found a few places where we think we can clarify the process and what you can expect.
      To expand upon the eligible time period, we’ve defined a returning player as one who had not logged into Hearthstone for four months as of March 17th, so your last login to Hearthstone needed to be before 11/18/2019 to qualify. If you logged in on or between 11/18/2019 to 3/17/2020, you would not qualify as a returning player and receive the Class Deck.
      If you’re a returning player who has not logged in since before 11/18/2019, to earn your free deck
      Log into Hearthstone and be presented with a new Legendary Quest line, which is made up of three total quests. In the first quest, you will face three bosses made specifically for the quest line. In the final two quests, you will play 30 cards then deal 100 damage to an enemy hero. Upon completing the third and final quest, you will be able to select your free Class Deck once you return to the main menu. If you’re a new player and have not completed the new player ranks,
      Log into Hearthstone and complete the tutorial and the Starter Quest line You will need to graduate from the New Player Ranks (Ranks 50-26) Upon completing these quests, you will be able to select your free Class Deck once you return to the main menu. If you have played Hearthstone before, but either did not complete the tutorial or the New Player Ranks, you will need to do both before receiving the free Class Deck. Note that there’s also a chance you’ll see the Returning Player quests and need to complete those as well.
      As a final note, it is possible that you may not see the deck in your deck list if you did not have an open deck slot when you chose your free Class Deck. If this happens, don’t worry! You will still receive all of the cards from that deck. If you would like to delete one of your existing decks, you can then navigate to this page and use our deck list. From here, copy the deck code, and you can then add the deck to your deck list from within Hearthstone.
      We hope this helps to clarify the experience for everyone! In addition, we are going to keep investigating any potential issues with the returning player decks, and we will provide updates as we learn anything new.
      EDIT 1: Quick update: the team has indeed identified an issue that we know is affecting some players. We're currently investigating the steps needed to fix it. I may not have an update again until tomorrow, but I'll let everyone know what to expect as soon as I know more.
×
×
  • Create New...