Zadina

Dragon's Fury Reveal: Kobolds & Catacombs

Sign in to follow this  

17 posts in this topic

34372-merciful-djinni-temporus-reveals-k

Mage gets yet another powerful board clear.

Dragon's Fury was revealed by PCGamesN. The article contains a small interview with Peter Whalen, who talks about the design process behind this card:

636477123472604510.png

Image by Hearthpwn

This card looks amazing. It definitely fits into Tempo Mage or in the new "Big Spells" archetype, since these decks don't run a lot of minions. If you reveal a spell that costs 4 or more, you already have an improved Flamestrike at 5 mana. With a revealed 3-mana spell, it's comparable to Excavated Evil, while with spells that cost 2 or less it loses power but it can be decent as an anti-aggro tool.

There's not much to add about this Mage card, it just seems really good! As always, you can check our Kobolds & Catacombs hub for everything you need to know about the new expansion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it really fit into a tempo secret deck though?  Clearing your own board is kind of bad.  Also they run a pretty high concentration of 3 drops since most are pretty secret oriented.  I could definitely see this as a 1 of in control mage, maybe even replacing flame strike or more probably one of the meteors.  Seems strong, and definitely a good role player card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another random card, oh god, STOP!!!!!

This expansion is turning into a f****** clown fiesta.

Almost every card in this set is either slow as a brick or totally unreliable.

And there are a bunch of broken cards, like new dragon and new priest board clear 'Autistic Screeching' (I know this is not the name, but it reminds me of this meme) and the Reckless Flurry(this card could bring control warrior back)

I thought that Gadgetzan was bad, obviously we can always be prepared for worse when it comes to card design I guess.

Edit: @VaraTreledees:  Those are high-cost spells, if you are hopeless to play this, you want your spells as big as possible. 

Edited by FanOfValeera
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, FanOfValeera said:

Another random card, oh god, STOP!!!!!

This expansion is turning into a f****** clown fiesta.

Almost every card in this set is either slow as a brick or totally unreliable.

And there are a bunch of broken cards, like new dragon and new priest board clear 'Autistic Screeching' (I know this is not the name, but it reminds me of this meme) and the Reckless Flurry(this card could bring control warrior back)

I thought that Gadgetzan was bad, obviously we can always be prepared for worse when it comes to card design I guess.

Edit: @VaraTreledees:  Those are high-cost spells, if you are hopeless to play this, you want your spells as big as possible. 

Yeh but control mage already runs like 7 - 8 6+ cost things.  Somethings gotta give for this.  If it isn't one of the 2 meteors, 2 firelands, the flamestrike, then its mediv, frost lich jaina or alex.

 

Edit: Also forgot skulking geist.

Edited by VaraTreledees

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are pushing a "Big Spell" archetype, it may work, surely they'll push it again in the next expansion, then maybe it will be a thing.

I think that the main problem with "casting spell from deck with a cheaper cost" is the random targeting. In Big Priest when I summon a minion, if it's a good minion (and I run only big expensive one, except Barnes, to be sure), it makes the board big. In Big Spell Mage, I can cast a fireball from my deck, and I can do it to my face, to the wrong minion.... And the more RNG, the more unreliable it is. With this card instead targeting is not a problem, the problem is destroying my board, or maybe doing nothing because I hit that only cheap spell I need to run.  And I need big spell in my deck, and big spell will not win the game all alone.

If this kind of cards will ever work, I see them in a secret-like archetype more then a Big one.

Edited by Synesthesy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, VaraTreledees said:

Yeh but control mage already runs like 7 - 8 6+ cost things.  Somethings gotta give for this.  If it isn't one of the 2 meteors, 2 firelands, the flamestrike, then its mediv, frost lich jaina or alex.

 

Edit: Also forgot skulking geist.

Except the fact that all these spells cost more than the new card, all those are better, because they have the guaranteed effect, and they don't kill your own minions. I don't think cutting a 6 mana meteor, for a possible 5 mana x (from 2 to 7) damage is good.

I might be wrong about playability of this, but it doesn't change the fact that so many cards in this expansion is just random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the reveal cards in this set make me really worried that mill decks are going to be WAY strong in the next meta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this expansion going to beat GvG as most RNG intensive?

Why? Is anyone asking for more RNG? What exactly is going trough their minds?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Kuster said:

Is this expansion going to beat GvG as most RNG intensive?

Why? Is anyone asking for more RNG? What exactly is going trough their minds?

RNG makes the game less repetitive. Rather than the RNG being just what you draw, you can know weigh the risks/rewards of using one of the new RNG cards and determine if it is worth it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SMOrcMan said:

RNG makes the game less repetitive. Rather than the RNG being just what you draw, you can know weigh the risks/rewards of using one of the new RNG cards and determine if it is worth it.

I agree. But I don't want games to be coin flips. I don't think so many cards should to be so RNG-centric, and I don't think anyone in the community is asking for that much of it. So why do they do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Kuster said:

I agree. But I don't want games to be coin flips. I don't think so many cards should to be so RNG-centric, and I don't think anyone in the community is asking for that much of it. So why do they do it?

Yeah, they did need some RNG because the lack of it lately has made game draw dependent lately. BUT, they didn't solve the issue and instead made it worse. Part of the reason the meta is like this is that they are releasing two class legendaries, thus making decks less consistent and more draw dependent. 

 

With the addition of legendary weapons they are only further killing the game. They want to make expansions cost more dust so people buy more packs and give them more money, but it is slowly ruining the game.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SMOrcMan said:

Yeah, they did need some RNG because the lack of it lately has made game draw dependent lately. BUT, they didn't solve the issue and instead made it worse. Part of the reason the meta is like this is that they are releasing two class legendaries, thus making decks less consistent and more draw dependent. 

 

With the addition of legendary weapons they are only further killing the game. They want to make expansions cost more dust so people buy more packs and give them more money, but it is slowly ruining the game.

I don't think we have a lack of RNG with the current cards being played. One of the most popular cards, The lich King has a lot of RNG attached to it. There are a bunch of discover effects running around between adapt and card generation. With big priest you rig the deck to have good chances of getting something big with shadow essence, but eventually a 5/5 barnes wrecks you. Games can be won and lost depending on which minion the +3 attack from cobalt scalebane lands. Atiesh can give you pretty crappy minions sometimes, as do evolve cards in shaman. 

On top of the "draw factor", Is that not enough?

I mostly agree with the class legendaries part. But at least quests are guaranteed on the opener and DK's don't always are build around cards, so you can just jam them into good decks and they'll only make them a bit better. But the weapons are just terrible. They had a whole new design space, giving weapons to classes that never had them, and managed to be predictable, boring and ineffective for the most part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting... ish. I feel that if they wanted to promote specific deck building and remove the RNG element, they could simply reword it to "Deal damage equal to the mana cost of the cheapest spell in your deck" or whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

Except the fact that all these spells cost more than the new card, all those are better, because they have the guaranteed effect, and they don't kill your own minions. I don't think cutting a 6 mana meteor, for a possible 5 mana x (from 2 to 7) damage is good.

I might be wrong about playability of this, but it doesn't change the fact that so many cards in this expansion is just random.

Oh I misunderstood you.  Yeah I generally agree that this expansion is a clown fiesta of randomness.  I don't really care for it tbh.  As for the play-ability, I don't think it will be a control mage staple, but I think it is definitely an option if you want more AoE vs aggro.  Gives you an AoE that bridges the gap between volcanic potion and flamestrike, all the while also threatening some more mid rangey minions since you can high roll.  Plus volcanic is rotating soon.  In a meta where you want to tech vs aggro, meteor becomes a lot less useful since you generally need to deal with wide boards.  The randomness and inherent unreliability of this card could just be too much, but, barring glyphs and frost bolts, the lowest mana cost spell will be 3, and excavated evil wasn't a bad card in control priest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think this card is bad rng really. From the perspective of the person running it in their deck, the rng is pretty limited since you’re only going to be running it in decks where the possible outcomes are largely favourable.

It’s more random when it ends up in the hands of someone not running it. But I’m ok with a Tempo Rogue getting a coin flip between 5-mana deal 1dmg to all minions, and 5-mana deal 0dmg to all minions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you guys said all what is to say about the card but I want to add why I am again disappointed by a card of this exp.

They started to put in cards that may (a big "may"?) make elemental mage viable. Then (if it turns out to be playable) they throw in this card pointing the players back to the already know all time played old archetypes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco

      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina

      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.
    • By Aleco

      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s  
    • By Aleco

      This week's episode features a fresh take on a popular deck, courtesy of Casie.
      Can you guess the next move?
      Situation #22: Let's Even the Odds
      Picking up where we left off last week, we find ourselves in the middle of an odd/even matchup between Warlock and Shaman. I picked this situation partially because it was an interesting spot with many options available to us, and also because its a ladder situation I highly doubt any of my readers have encountered before:

      Commenters quickly identified several key factors about this matchup, namely that Defile and Hellfire are off the table for our opponent and that the only "board clear" available for our opponent is Despicable Dreadlord. Our opponent is more likely to have single target removal (such as Voodoo Doll) or is looking to play a demon-related 5 drop next turn in Skull of the Man'ari, Possessed Lackey, or Doomguard.
      Bozonik summed up this situation excellently in his comment from last week's thread:
      There seemed to be a consensus among commenters that "Option 1", Hero Power + Sea Giant was the line here. It puts a big nasty minion on the board, applying pressure and forcing our opponent to have Voodoo Doll. In the heat of the moment I went with "Option 2", the full clear, but after looking back on things and reading over the comments I believe Hero Power + Giant was the correct line. Despicable Dreadlord is really the only card which gives us serious trouble next turn (since our opponent won't be able to play Possessed Lackey and kill it) and this line plays around Dreadlord while applying just as much pressure as the other options.
      I was secretly hoping that the tap + Giant wasn't the correct line here (because its the most obvious one), but the obvious solution is often the correct one. If you're ever in a situation such as this where you have no idea what your opponent is up to, it's probably best to go for the "obvious" line and not get cute.
      Situation #23: Broken Mirrors
      Today's deck comes courtesy of Kevin "Casie" Eberlein, who cut the dragon package from Mind Blast Priest to turn the deck into something with much more of a combo/aggro feel to it. Many pros are pegging Mind Blast Priest to be the next "best deck in the meta" after the nerfs drop, and Casie's list has a serious advantage in the mirror match:
      Though I didn't find nearly as much success with the deck as Casie did, it did provide me with plenty of interesting situations for What's the Move! Here's the one I ended up choosing for this week's episode:

      It's turn 2, we're on The Coin, and our ladder opponent just played a Wild Pyromancer. For the purposes of this exercise, we can say that we're 100% confident our opponent is on Mind Blast Priest. However, this isn't a mirror match at all. We have Prophet Velen, Holy Smite, two copies of Holy Fire (most Mind Blast Priests run just one), and Lifedrinker in our deck, which gives us a huge advantage in late-game Anduin vs Anduin races. Knowing that we have an advantage in the late game should color our decision heavily on turn two, where have a surprising number of options available to us.
      So, what's the move?