Zadina

Blizzard Survey Asks: "Would You Continue Playing Hearthstone if There Were No Tournaments"

24 posts in this topic

6A8DB6CREWSL1534450318368.jpg

Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.

The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.

Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

KQHLhLp.png

The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.

It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.

Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.

On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ylothrian said:

Say yes so that the funds are moved to WoW 😄

Jokes on you - WoW has no funds what so ever and wont get any more. All of these funds will be plowed into the only remaining powerhouse game Activision cares for Blizzard to keep alive; Overwatch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly? I haven't watched a single tournament, streamer, or taken part in any tournament in several years yet play Hearthstone several times a week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received an email to participate in that survey. Upon clicking the link, I was redirected to a page saying "thank you for participating in this survey", and that was it. I did not get to answer any question. If I click the link again, it says I have already taken part in the survey and I can't do it again.

That's pretty poor from Blizzard, and not how they are actually going to get proper feedback from their players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Lithari said:

I find the game rubbish, so i don't play the damn thing, but each to their own.

Very constructive comment , seeing as the link says "would you CONTINUE" 

I would however keep playing HS , i dont play more or less just cuz i watch tournaments and streamers.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me a curmudgeon - maybe I am! - but I long for the days when "esports" were barely a thing outside of QuakeCon, when no one cared about streaming, when developers didn't seek ways to endlessly monetize their products. But we're never going back, and to me it sucks - I'm just here to play the damn games.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Rexx said:

Jokes on you - WoW has no funds what so ever and wont get any more. All of these funds will be plowed into the only remaining powerhouse game Activision cares for Blizzard to keep alive; Overwatch.

Even Overwatch doesn't get much of new content, so likely more will be invested into new titles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, tkioz said:

Honestly? I haven't watched a single tournament, streamer, or taken part in any tournament in several years yet play Hearthstone several times a week.

I barely played any HS, but I do play HOTS quite often and I do think that people REALLY overstimate the role of professional e-sports. I mean, HOTS doesn't have it anymore and probably things won't change that much. For instance, Icy Veins gave HGC almost no coverage, but people don't remember it now, do they? 😛

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, VegaPl said:

I barely played any HS, but I do play HOTS quite often and I do think that people REALLY overstimate the role of professional e-sports. I mean, HOTS doesn't have it anymore and probably things won't change that much. For instance, Icy Veins gave HGC almost no coverage, but people don't remember it now, do they? 😛

I think it varies. Culturally, I think card games tend to be more top-down -- even though Hearthstone is very accessible by design and has a huge "casual" base, so much of the game and culture around it is informed by the top-level players and tournaments. Especially since players can break into the competitive scene just by playing at a high level and pushing into Legend ranks every season, getting Hearthstone Masters points. It's hard to imagine a card game remaining as successful and relevant as Hearthstone is without the top players streaming and making content, but it's possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearthstone is too expensive to make sense. Same with Magic, but at least those could be resold.

Here's another question. Do funded E-Sports raise the price of games?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, darkinchworm said:

Call me a curmudgeon - maybe I am! - but I long for the days when "esports" were barely a thing outside of QuakeCon, when no one cared about streaming, when developers didn't seek ways to endlessly monetize their products. But we're never going back, and to me it sucks - I'm just here to play the damn games.

I remember the days when it took days to level in Diablo 2.  I don't miss the days when Blizzard released a new update to their titles hardly ever, compared to nowdays. More money = more content; I like nowadays. 

10 hours ago, VegaPl said:

I barely played any HS, but I do play HOTS quite often and I do think that people REALLY overstimate the role of professional e-sports. I mean, HOTS doesn't have it anymore and probably things won't change that much. For instance, Icy Veins gave HGC almost no coverage, but people don't remember it now, do they? 😛

how do you go from that premise to that other one? Believe what you want to think. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, greatCraft said:

I remember the days when it took days to level in Diablo 2.  I don't miss the days when Blizzard released a new update to their titles hardly ever, compared to nowdays. More money = more content; I like nowadays.

Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy "more money = more content." The free content updates these days are cooler than getting extra throwaway (to me) multiplayer maps for Starcraft or War3. But Blizzard was, and I'd say still is, more consistent about supporting games with updates than most developers. I don't think "hardly ever" accurately reflects the updates of the time.

Also, leveling in D2 wasn't hard at all until they completely fucked leveling past 70 with - what else? - an update.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2019 at 7:33 PM, Zadina said:

this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general 

Have you never seen Mad Men? This is exactly what they do when want information on an issue without making it too obvious that that's what they're asking for. They create a survey with a bunch of irrelevant questions, and throw that one question that actually means something in there somewhere. HS e-sports is on the chopping block. Nobody cares about it. Their entire Twitch audience watches an arena player. Ranked is an afterthought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, t3ramos said:

they should have asked this the heroes of the storm players.. fucking activision.. 

Again, how actively did you watch HGC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Rooach said:

Funds in OW and WoW. Best laugh of 2019 so far. Funds are going to mobile

This is probably true, they already announced it for all the brands they own.

Truth be told, I am actually counting on WoW to finally fall, at least to a point where a new expansion might not be as profitable as they were. This is the only chance I see for Warcraft IV (RTS I mean) to see light ever again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, VegaPl said:

Again, how actively did you watch HGC?

i did actively watched it by the way.. not just for the loot twitch provided. it was the first esport i regulary watched cause it was fun to see some tactics and some insane pro plays.. 😞 now im following kaldor and a few other hots casters on switch and intend to see every match they cast on their stream. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care much about watching regular streamers but I think the tournaments are actually pretty important for a card game like this to be taken seriously by the community. Look at Magic: the Gathering. I don't think it would have stayed around this long if they didn't have such a huge tournament atmosphere around their game. Granted, the digital nature of HS means it will remain accessible to all players. However, the top players are likely to become much less interested and there WILL be a trickle down effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2019 at 7:22 PM, Regdorito said:

However, the top players are likely to become much less interested

That's indeed quite possible.

Quote

and there WILL be a trickle down effect. 

That, on the other hand, isn't so obvious (which must be why Blizzard asked the question in a poll). Care to explain how you think casual players care about top players and tournaments? They have collections I'll never be able to afford, therefore playing decks I will never own and never play. They certainly have skills way beyond mine as well, playing the game 8h/day all year long. This makes it almost a different game altogether. I have never watched any tournament and do not plan to.

To make a parallel between online game tournaments and sports on TV, you don't have to play a given sport by yourself to enjoy watching professionals. On the other hand, you may also play a sport and not watch it on TV. Doing it and watching others do it are quite different things. In the end, What really matters on TV (and for online tournaments) is how entertaining it is to watch. Is there variety, suspense, emotion, turnarounds?

The only difference I see between online game tournaments and sports on TV is that many sports don't need any prior knowledge to be interesting to watch. I believe you can enjoy watching a basketball game or soccer game on TV without knowing much of the rules beyond where the ball must go to score. That doesn't hold for Hearthstone for example, for which it seems clear that the tournament audience must be a subset of the player base. If you don't know the game rules and mechanics, you won't understand what you're watching. That, however, doesn't imply that the player base would shrink if there was no tournaments. People have been playing video games long before professional gaming became a thing.

I believe the actual way to make players stay is by keeping the game itself interesting to play by the intended audience. That means keeping all the balances right (cards balance, classes balance, ladder mechanism, arena matching mechanism) and the contents interesting (solo adventures existence and balance, tavern brawl diversity, quests, events). The rewards are also key in keeping players motivated. These are areas on which Blizzard has been working a lot already, with many changes over the years, but I dare say there is still room for improvement.

For example, I believe that tavern brawls are under-exploited, because of how they are rewarded. Most players are trying it only until they win it once, to get the reward, and then no more until the following week. They could build a lot on top of the tavern brawl concept to make it more interesting and/or more rewarding, like mini-tournaments, or a temporary one-week-ladder ranking system, or rewards for winning streaks. But I guess I'm getting off-topic now 😉

Edited by Smorod
Initial post was by accident, sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Smorod said:

For example, I believe that tavern brawls are under-exploited, because of how they are rewarded. Most players are trying it only until they win it once, to get the reward, and then no more until the following week. 

This is pretty much the same people do in HOTS. They would mostly play only to get the loot chest and rarely any more. I myself enjoy one lane brawls so I would play them very often when they come, but other brawls usually work for me the same - get chest, donlt play anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      IksarHS
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.
    • By Stan
      It's been a while since we last heard of Ben Brode who left Blizzard in April 2018 to form the Second Dinner game development studio. In the latest update, we learn that Brode along with former Hearthstone developers are currently working on a Marvel game and the studio received $30 million in funding from Netease in China.
      Netease is currently co-developing Diablo: Immortal with Activision Blizzard. Here's the latest press release posted on the Second Dinner website. The company now has enough funds to expand and grow beyond its five co-founders.
      They also released a video talking about exciting news in the new office.