Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damien

Hearthstone Legendary Warrior Fatigue TGT

11 posts in this topic

Hello, the part about Justicar Truehart being important against Patron might need revisiting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any substitute for second Brawl and Gorehowl. Maybe a 5/2 weapon can be some kind of help instead of Gorehowl???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there an alternate card for garrash? i dont really want to spend 1600 dust on a card i will only use for one deck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grom? He's also used in Patron and Control Warrior. I can't see why you would build any Warrior deck without him. There's no single card to properly replace him. If you must try the deck without Grom....WIndfury Harpy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Windfury Harpy? Absolutely not.

Healbot or Ragnaros could work. Healbot will make it easier to stabilise earlier against Aggro decks and to survive fatigue easier. Rag can be used as a finisher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragnaros is a great minion but it's far too unreliable to use as a finisher. Sometimes it can be a finisher, other times it will just keep zapping SHRecruits, Boombots and Imps for you. Also, tragic things can happen in combination with an opponents Sylvanas. Think 'drunk, blindfolded Ogre Brute with a bazooka'.

 

A fatigue Warrior shouldn't be wanting for armour and I can't see that a non-threat like Healbot can be any kind of replacement for Grom against aggro or anything else.

 

I'm not saying the Harpy is great. Clearly it's not. Like I said; I think any Warrior deck needs Grom in it and he should be a top crafting priority for Warriors.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck runs Geddon, Revenge and DBs to get rid of small minions, which makes Ragnaros a solid-ish choice as a finisher.

Not many players run Sylvanas. The meta is too aggro for her to be run in many decks and therefore Rag has higher value. 

Fatigue decks don't really need threats, they want to stabilize and outlast aggro, which is now very common in current meta. Healbot gives you this option and can be somewhat useful even against control when you get to Fatigue. Instead of killing opponent with Grommash, you will have to play a few extra turns and kill him by fatigue. 

Although Grommash is the top priority for warrior players, people who don't want to spend dust on warrior will simply have to replace him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sottie hi from Greece! 

Im a great fan of your decks! Always play something yours!

I like this deck. Do you think we could fit Nzoth here?

       

orcwarrior.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎13‎.‎7‎.‎2016 at 6:34 PM, Guest redmeatkills said:

Sottie hi from Greece! 

Im a great fan of your decks! Always play something yours!

I like this deck. Do you think we could fit Nzoth here?

Not with 5 detahrattle cards, with only one having huge quality even in the late-game. You can try to include it in place of Big Game Hunter if you face a lot of aggro, or in place of Deathlord if you face a lot of control. If you want to try a warrior deck with N'zoth, you can try Legendary N'Zoth Warrior Control Wild.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!
    • By L0rinda

      Blizzard have announced that the next update will contain big changes to the way Arena works.
      The newly announced changes will come into force at the same time as the nerfs to Small-Time Buccaneer and Spirit Claws, which we discussed previously.
      The most important change will be that Arena will change from Wild format to Standard. This will help to keep Arena feeling fresh, as well as make sure that card synergies can be drafted more easily.
      Changes have also been made to the distribution of cards. Common and Basic cards will show up less often, and the frequency of spells and class cards being offered has been raised. The full discussion can be found in the announcement link above, but the main reasoning is to allow players to have more opportunities to outdraft and outplay their opponents, rather than just playing the game on curve.
      This philosophy will have some implications in Standard too. If Blizzard are actively trying to reduce the impact of playing on curve in Arena, this could mean that they will carry over the same thoughts into constructed play. I feel that moving away from the style, unaffectionately known as Curvestone, would be good for the game. The changes will almost certainly be welcomed in the Arena community, and it is good to see Blizzard making them now, rather than waiting for the next set to launch.
    • By FreezedIce
      Im making a telegram bot that can send you new decks and news from https://www.icy-veins.com/hearthstone.
      It already can send some decks and filter them by class and deck format.
      Im going to open bot for all users in next few weeks. 
      Any suggestions?
      Pic1 Pic2 Pic3 Pic4


    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kazakus Zoo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard deck.