hearthstone War Master Voone Reveal: Rastakhan's Rumble

[Zadina 848]

It turns out that Dragon Warrior is definitely going to return in Rastakhan's Rumble and the Warrior Legendary Champion is proof of that!

The card was revealed in the third episode of the Wronchi Animations series of videos for Rastakhan's Rumble (here is Part 1 and Part 2). Krag'wa the Frog is literally swallowing the opponent Annoy-o-trons, when War Master Voone shows up, astounding Garrosh in the audience.

The video has an older version of the card, since it looks like the team decided that the final version of Voone is actually a 4-mana 4/3:

The wording is slightly vague, but the copies are added to your hand. As shown in the video, this could work great with The Boomship. However, if you are playing expensive Dragons, I don't see how useful it would be to have more copies of them unless you are absolutely sure that the game is going to last long enough so you can play them all. There's also the problem that currently in Standard there aren't that many powerful Dragons and we've yet to see any new ones in Rastakhan's Rumble. Other than that, War Master Voone and the newly revealed Firetree Witchdoctor can work great in a Dragon Warrior deck and let it be noted that they are both Even cards.

[Synesthesy 80]

Until we know what new dragon there will be, we can't rate this card. However, it's surely good if a dragon warrior will exist (and in wild, it can easily exist), because of dragon synergy "if you hold a dragon". So, playing this card means that you can freely play whatever dragon you hold without losing the synergy, plus the value. It is good.

[tkioz 131]

At least the Hearthstone team knows how utterly tedious it is to play against warriors in the current meta...

[WedgeAntilles 172]

IMO it could be a great card.

Sure, it depends on the Dragons - but even a copy of an expensive dragon you may never play is good: It makes sure your "if you hold a dragon" requirement is always fullfilled.

And 4 mana for a 4/3 that creates more cards you can play - how can that be NOT good?

Again, that is only true if dragons itself will be usefull. If you only have 2 dragons in your deck this card will obviously be bad.