Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BrightwingMain

Why Warrior Archtype list lacks "Patron Warrior"

4 posts in this topic

The Archetype list of Hearthstone "decks" section seems to not have Patron Warrior. Although not relevant deck for the metagame anymore, especially after year of the Mammoth is coming up, its still a unique deck that influenced the game and the community like no other. The section should be there, if not for competitive purposes (I actually have zero idea if Patron is still good in Wild format), it should be added to show new players some of the unique legacy of previous expansions as well as for some nostalgic players to have the decklist in case they would want to experience the Patron madness again.

Although not super important task, it shouldn't be super hard either and would be nice to have it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the reason is simple - there simply aren't enough patron warrior decks (and the existing are simply too unpopular) to justify adding them as a standalone archetype. Patron decks used to be a significant force indeed, but are weak and too complicated nowadays.
At this moment, we are trying to reduce the clutter, and adding more items that the majority of users consider unuseful or uninteresting is not an option. I'll make sure to come back to your suggestion later and we'll definitely reconsider it.
Thanks for the suggestion!

2 hours ago, BrightwingMain said:

I actually have zero idea if Patron is still good in Wild format

Not really, sadly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/03/2017 at 10:21 PM, positiv2 said:

Well, the reason is simple - there simply aren't enough patron warrior decks (and the existing are simply too unpopular) to justify adding them as a standalone archetype. Patron decks used to be a significant force indeed, but are weak and too complicated nowadays.
At this moment, we are trying to reduce the clutter, and adding more items that the majority of users consider unuseful or uninteresting is not an option. I'll make sure to come back to your suggestion later and we'll definitely reconsider it.
Thanks for the suggestion!

Not really, sadly.

Not true. I'm currently at legend 35 in wild, and I've seen people in the top 100 run Patron Warrior. It's still a very good counter to aggro decks, and things like druid or secret paladin which have no way of dealing with a big patron board. The reason it's not as good as it once was is because it just loses badly to any deck that runs AoE and enough life gain to stay out of grom range(reno decks mainly).

A deck being unpopular doesn't mean it's bad, it could just mean it's not a deck the average HS'er will pick up and get good results with, or that it just doesn't fit the current meta that well. In the case of PW I would say it's a bit of both.

Plus if you have lists for beast druid and Echo Giants mage on the website, I don't see any reason not to include patron as well.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

Not true. I'm currently at legend 35 in wild, and I've seen people in the top 100 run Patron Warrior.

Using legend tanks is usually a bad idea, especially in wild, which is the more casual ranked ladder. A friend of mine had a top 30 finish with beast druid, and beast druid is definitely not a deck I would call powerful. 

2 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

The reason it's not as good as it once was is because it just loses badly to any deck that runs AoE and enough life gain to stay out of grom range(reno decks mainly).

Shamans are still quite popular, and they tend to run Lightning Storm. Reno decks are very common as well. Control Warrior runs Brawl, all kinds of mages run Flamestrike, dragon priests run Dragonfire Potions or even Excavated Evils, though that seems to be quite rare.
Most of current meta counters patron warrior, which is basically what you said with AoE and life gain.

2 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

A deck being unpopular doesn't mean it's bad, it could just mean it's not a deck the average HS'er will pick up and get good results with, or that it just doesn't fit the current meta that well. In the case of PW I would say it's a bit of both.

The deck gets countered by most of meta, and even if it was strong enough, but still unpopular, we would be adding an item that almost no people would click, which is the exact opposite of what we want to do right now. I am not saying we will never add it, but rather that now that we are trying to reduce clutter, adding more items is not the way to go.

3 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

Plus if you have lists for beast druid and Echo Giants mage on the website, I don't see any reason not to include patron as well.

We do have lists for patron, actually. It's just that we do not have Patron Warrior archetype assigned to them. Creating new archetypes is, sadly, not as easy as one might think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cope
      Hey guys, im about to play Wow again after a half year break and i want to start as Warrior or as Death Knight and i cant decide between both.
      I pretty much know how they work but my question is : which works better/more simple in Mythic+ and eventually heroic raiding (im not interested in mythic ToS).
       
    • By Zadina

      Some exciting card pack changes are coming with the next Hearthstone expansion.
      With the release of the next Hearthstone expansion, but still applying to ALL packs, you won't be able to get the same legendary card from a card pack. This applies to crafted legendaries, as well: if you have crafted a legendary card, for example Tirion Fordring, he won't drop for you if you open a Classic pack.
      Moreover, beginning with the release of the next expansion, you’re also guaranteed to get a Legendary within your first 10 packs of a new set.
      Watch Ben Brode announce this amazing piece of news in his usual excited tone. I mean, what is there not to be excited about?
      Lastly, a special promotion is coming soon in the Store. The bundle prices will stay the same, but the number of the packs you will be able to get will be increased. The dates for the promotion haven't been announced yet,

    • By Zadina

      The second phase of Hearthstone Global Games begins with a new round robin group stage.
      The 24 countries, that successfully made it into this stage, were reassigned in six different groups. Each group contains four teams that will battle against each other in a round robin.
      The groups are:

      The format remains the same as stage 1:
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Each team is comprised of four members. Teams will need to bring one deck for each of the nine Hearthstone classes, with two assigned to each member and one reserved as an "Ace Deck".
      Matches will be played in a best-of-five format, with the first team to win three games taking victory. Competitors can only play one game per match, and the order in which they battle must be decided before the match begins. However, players will be allowed to choose between either of the two decks assigned to them when it’s time for their game.
      Should a match reach game five, the designated "Ace Players" from each team will face off using either their unused deck or the unassigned "Ace Deck". (source)
      The top two teams from each group, and the four highest 3rd place teams based on tie-breakers points will advance to Phase 3.
      Tuesday games have concluded. You can find the results in the spoiler tag:
      Tomorrow's schedule is:
      16:00 CEST / 10:00 EDT
      Netherlands v Philippines Czech Republic v Israel Greece v Peru USA v Belgium Canada v Mexico You can find more info on the event, the casters and a recap of phase 1 here. Don't forget that you can watch all the games on the official Hearthstone Twitch channel.
    • By Zadina

      A thread called 'Why was Old Murk-Eye removed as a collection reward?' rose to the front page of r/hearthstone yesterday and Ben Brode dropped by to share some insight on promo cards that have rotated out of Standard.
      More than a year ago, when Standard and Wild were introduced to Hearthstone, Team 5 decided it was time to bid farewell to the following promo cards: Captain's Parrot, Old Murk-Eye, Elite Tauren Chieftain and Gelbin Mekkatorque. Yesterday, a Reddit user was wondering why these cards (and specifically the legendary Murloc one) weren't available anymore, while other users wanted to know why the team decided to keep these cards in Wild only.
      Enter Hearthstone's Game Director Ben Brode, who answered to the original poster first. Ben repeated the team's statement from a year ago that Old Murk-Eye was removed because Charge minions have proved historically (and especially in 2016) problematic. He also explained that they removed the card as as a reward, because they wanted players to focus on acquiring Basic, Classic and Standard sets first and leave Wild last. Additionally, Ben characterised the whole concept of "promo" cards complex - which is quite a peculiar statement. Ultimately, if the team wanted to give away a free Legendary, they wouldn't give this one.
      Ben Brode
      Hey there!
      We had to make a call on "promo" cards: Should they be Standard forever? Or Wild?
      I think it could have gone either way, but the opportunity to remove another Charge minion in Standard (Charge has been the cause of a lot of balance issues, historically), was hard to pass up. We also stopped Captain's Parrot from showing up in "random Beast" drops in Standard.
      At the end of the day, we felt like Standard would be more fun without those cards. Maybe we should have just nerfed Murk Eye to remove Charge instead, but I actually like that it exists in Wild.
      We removed it as a reward because we didn't want players to randomly unlock Wild before our yearly rotation, or before they initiated the unlock themselves by crafting a Wild card. Ideally new players move through the cards in this order: Basic > Classic > Standard-Legal > Wild.
      In game design, you can eventually get players to very high levels of complexity, but starting with the most complex thing can turn new players off. We call it the "complexity curve", start with the basics, then layer in complexity. It's why you take Algebra before Calculus, and not the other way around. It's also one of the reasons why new players don't start with everything unlocked.
      In some of the comments here I think players see it as a lost opportunity for a free Legendary. If we want to give out some other free Legendary (and that might be a good idea), I don't think doing it for this specific card (Charge, unlock Wild) is the right solution. (source)
      Several people pressured Brode on that last issue: for example, one user stated that Old Murk-Eye could be given as a reward when a player crafts his/her first Wild card. However, Ben responded to all of them multiple times that he didn't think this was the ideal legendary to give to players for free (1, 2 and 3).
      Ben explained his comment that "promo" cards can seem complex to new players, by saying that: "The more concepts we introduce, the more you have to learn, the more work it is" (source). When asked if the Hearthstone team planned to make more "promo" cards, Brode expressed his uncertainty on the issue.
      Lastly, Patches the Pirate managed to sneak in (or more properly, charge into) this discussion. When somebody commented that Patches was printed even after the team acknowledged that Charge minions are problematic, Ben Brode answered:
      Ben Brode
      At least Patches will someday rotate. We can get an ebb and flow to Standard this way. Classic cards are the baseline, and some of them are great to have around forever. We'll add more Charge minions, I'm sure. But doing it in rotating sets gives us a lot more control. (source)
    • By Stan

      Return of the Lich King was trademarked by Blizzard a while ago and redditor PenguinJ2 posted some solid pointers as to why it could be the next Hearthstone expansion.
      Return of the Lich King won't be a World of Warcraft expansion. We all know where WoW's heading after Legion's defeated and N'zoth breaks free from his prison ReturnoftheLichKing.com was registered as soon as the title got trademarked four months ago Last two card backs were places Arthas visited in order (Source) The promotional Year of the Mammoth (image above) has Death Knight runes Hearthpwn datamined an Icecrown image Some redditors claim it's possible Blizzard's working on a Warcraft IV title now that the Starcraft II trilogy is finished and next year it's 15 years since W3's Frozen Throne came out (Source)