L0rinda

hearthstone Card Reveals: Babbling Book and Malchezaar's Imp

14 posts in this topic

nmT7jUv.jpg

Spoiler season for One Night in Karazhan is underway, with the first two cards since the launch stream being revealed by PCGames China, and Hearthstone Japan Twitter.

The first two to be revealed were Babbling Book and Malchezaar's Imp.

hyV9ylB.png

Babbling Book doesn't seem to have the stats to work well as a turn one minion. Rather than a random spell, you could simply play the spell you wanted in the first place in your deck in place of the Book. 

Malchezaar's Imp has imp-lications for Zoo decks. A 1/3 is a good shape to be buffed by cards like Abusive Sergeant, and ties in with the idea of Zoo playing sticky minions. It also has obvious synergy with Soulfire and Doomguard. It is definitely a card to try out. There is also the potential for a discard deck to become a new archetype, but that will require a lot of testing and building before we can judge.

What do you think of the new cards? Feel free to comment below.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Discarding a card for drawing a card... hm, where have I seen this before?

*COUGH COUGH* Darkshire Librarian *COUGH COUGH*

And as for discard decks-although the concept is cool-the cost of discarding cards means that you could potentially discard valuable discard-synergy cards. I think discard decks are too risky to fit in the meta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Discard zoo finally viable in standard? Either way, looks like this adventure will be full of cards for niche decks, and I am looking forward to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I strongly despise that discard mechanic. The second I see it on a new card my mind just goes 'nope, poop!'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PaasHaaS said:

I strongly despise that discard mechanic. The second I see it on a new card my mind just goes 'nope, poop!'.

I can strongly agree on this one, discarding cards seems plain wrong to do.

Even when playing with all the upsides of discarding (getting buffs, the random 4 dmg card, charging, overpowered minion on turn 2) it's not worth it.

Same as the felguard's 'remove 1 mana gem' it brings chills to my spine...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Book looks interesting. It could certainly be put to good use in a mage Freeze deck to get more fuel to control and stall while you wait for Alex/circumvent her entirely and nuke your opponent down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't usually have to care about discarding a card, since in discard zoo, it will usually be a small, needless minion, such as Argent SquirePossessed Villager or even Fist of Jaraxxus. The main disadvantage of discarding in discard zoo decks was that you ran out of steam pretty quickly, which won't be that problematic anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Keizoku said:

Book looks interesting. It could certainly be put to good use in a mage Freeze deck to get more fuel to control and stall while you wait for Alex/circumvent her entirely and nuke your opponent down.

In that case, why not just play a useful spell instead? With Babbling Book there is a good chance to get some ... crap. If at least it were 'Discover a mage spell'.

Edited by Kobal
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Keizoku said:

Book looks interesting. It could certainly be put to good use in a mage Freeze deck to get more fuel to control and stall while you wait for Alex/circumvent her entirely and nuke your opponent down.

There was a tweet from RDU that sums up my feelings about the book:

Placeholder for tweet 759400426781499392
3 hours ago, positiv2 said:

You don't usually have to care about discarding a card, since in discard zoo, it will usually be a small, needless minion, such as Argent SquirePossessed Villager or even Fist of Jaraxxus. The main disadvantage of discarding in discard zoo decks was that you ran out of steam pretty quickly, which won't be that problematic anymore.

Definitely excited to see if we get discard zoo back in. Anything that brings new decks to light or old ones back in makes me happy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, positiv2 said:

You don't usually have to care about discarding a card, since in discard zoo, it will usually be a small, needless minion, such as Argent SquirePossessed Villager or even Fist of Jaraxxus. The main disadvantage of discarding in discard zoo decks was that you ran out of steam pretty quickly, which won't be that problematic anymore.

Talking about Fist of Jaraxxus, Doomguard discarding 2 fists amounts to 13 face damage on an empty board.

And before you say that it's unreliable, go tell it to the guy that pulled that off on me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Kokuendan said:

Talking about Fist of Jaraxxus, Doomguard discarding 2 fists amounts to 13 face damage on an empty board.

And before you say that it's unreliable, go tell it to the guy that pulled that off on me.

That sounds painful. Luckily I play C'thun Monkey Warrior and managed to get Reno 3 times to save me so I don't have these problems.

 

 

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Blainie said:

That sounds painful. Luckily I play C'thun Monkey Warrior and managed to get Reno 3 times to save me so I don't have these problems.

 

 

:D

Fun thing is that I managed to win the game, I was on Ramp C'Thun so I managed to stop him from dealing the last 6 damages (don't know if he had Soulfire but he sure got one with Peddler), but the really amazing part was that he had like 5 cards in hand after playing Doomguard!

It made me realize though that if we want Discard Zoo to be a thing we need more cards that get off by discarding, draws are not that useful, you tend to either lose cards or empty your hand to not discard.

I think something like "If you play or discard this card summon a X/X Demon" would be a step in the right direction.

Edited by Kokuendan
forgot to mention something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kobal said:

In that case, why not just play a useful spell instead?

Said Spells are in the deck already. The idea is to be a greedy fucker and try for even more.

Quote

With Babbling Book there is a good chance to get some ... crap. If at least it were 'Discover a mage spell'.

Yeah it's definitely a gamble, no disagreement there. One Mana just to curve off a turn nicely... Worth a shot.

And yes, Discover would be much better, but then it'd be crazy overpowered at one Mana. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the big problems with spell Mage is there isn't enough room for all the spells you could need.  Ice block/barrier or board clears against agrocompete to heavily against resources cards to win against control.  It's one of the reasons cabilist tomb is so strong a card because it can give you those spells to turn your game around.  With that many Mage cards require combing to be effective so having another spell activator can't hurt including a non situational card to play at any point makes me belive it will see play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our OTK Djinni Priest Standard deck.
    • By Zadina

      The announcement of the Year of the Mammoth was the big news of the week and obviously it stirred everyone's curiosity. An upcoming live stream will hopefully answer all of our questions.
      Tune in this Tuesday February 21st at 11 a.m PST (20:00 CET) to learn more about the changes that the Year of the Mammoth will bring. Among the topics that will be discussed are the set rotation, expansions and missions, and the Wild format.
      It is not specified who will be hosting the Q&A, but we assume it's going to be Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala again.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Want to learn what’s on the horizon for Hearthstone in 2017? Join us on February 21 at 11 a.m. PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. This week our developers will be reviewing the upcoming changes for Year of the Mammoth, so tune in to hear their thoughts on topics like: set rotation, expansions with missions, and the Wild format.  
       
      Have something you'd like to ask? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)
    • By L0rinda

      Blizzard have announced that the next Hearthstone year will be called The Year of the Mammoth. Six cards from the Classic set will be moved to a new Hall of Fame set, which can only be played in Wild.
      The announcement explains that the new Hall of Fame set will include cards that are currently in the Reward set, but the big news here is the six cards that will be leaving Standard. You can see Blizzard's reasons on the link above, but I've given a few notes in this article. Those cards are shown below.
      As well as the removed cards, there will be no adventures in 2017. Instead we will be given three full expansions that will be accompanied by a single-player mission, which will be used to enhance flavour, and offer challenges. This sounds like it will be along the lines of an adventure, but optional. I feel this is a great change, as it hurts nobody.

      Azure Drake is simply in too many decks. It is a hard card to nerf without making it weak, but it is pretty much as powerful as a 5-drop can be. Removing this to free up other 5-drops makes sense.

      The reasoning for Sylvanas is similar. Blizzard's words make a lot of sense on this one, and also give an insight into the future:
      Blizzard
      Similar to Azure Drake, it’s hard to see a card at the six mana cost out-value Sylvanas. In addition, Sylvanas has the most powerful Deathrattle effect in the game—as a comparison, the Priest card Mind Control costs 10 mana. We have exciting Deathrattle build-arounds coming soon, and in combination with Sylvanas, they would be too powerful for Standard. This seems to imply that N'Zoth, the Corruptor will be making a big comeback soon!

      I suspect a lot of people will be glad to see the back of Ragnaros. The Random element was often a contentious issue.

      The removal of Power Overwhelming is a bit of a surprise, but it seems that it has mainly been nerfed because of its strength in combinaton with cards like Leeroy Jenkins and Faceless Manipulator. I would also assume that Warlock is going to be getting some fun new toys to replace it.

      Ice Lance has been removed to remove Freeze Mage and allow new strategies to develop. It is also interesting that Blizzard mention it will allow them to make cards that copy cards. That could also apply to Power Overwhelming, so I would expect something along those lines to be in the next set.

      Conceal leaving will make sense to everyone. It allows Gadgetzan Auctioneer to survive as an interesting card, and removes the annoyance of not being able to interact with your opponent.
       
    • By L0rinda

      This week's Tavern Brawl is called Blood Magic. It is the 88th Tavern Brawl.
      Blood Magic has a simple enough concept, which is that all spells cost Health instead of Mana. This could lead to an interesting metagame where healing is premium, and expensive burn spells are used to finish your opponent. Violet Illusionist is a key card in this Brawl, it allows the burn finish to only kill your opponent and not yourself. I expect to see it a lot over the coming days. 
      This is the third constructed Brawl in a row. It is an interesting Brawl to me, as I have felt that Blizzard have been trying to push this mechanic slowly on us over the last few expansions, but are terrified of it. In other card games, paying Health for cards has often been a broken mechanic, and I feel this might be a test to see how far they can push it.
      As always, feel free to leave your own lists in the comments.
    • By L0rinda

      Blizzard have ended speculation as to the fate of Small-Time Buccaneer by announcing nerfs that will be active with Update 7.1. The ladder system will also see a small change.
      The changes were outlined by Blizzard in a Reddit post, and they should shift the metagame significantly.
      The big, although expected, news is that Small-Time Buccaneer will be nerfed to become a 1/1 rather than a 1/2. This puts it into turn 2 ping range and should stop the card getting out of control. It remains to be seen if it will still be playable considering it will still fetch patches, and still trade one Mana for two Mana in a lot of early game situations.
      Spirit Claws also sees a change, and although expected by many, was a minor surprise to me as Blizzard generally dislike messing with cards from adventures. The cost of the card has been raised from 1 Mana to 2 Mana. This might seem like a minor change, but the implications are huge. It will be very awkward in the early game with Bloodmage Thalnos and Wrath of Air Totem, and it will almost certainly see far less play after the update. 
      The ladder changes feel like Blizzard dipping their toe in the water, rather than a full on change. There will now be a series of Ranked Play floors, which are ranks that you can't de-rank below within a season. Those ranks are 5,10, and 15. This should help a little with ladder anxiety for many people.
      No date has been confirmed for the patch yet, but it seems likely that it will not be before the APAC Playoffs which end on February 25.
      Overall I feel that the changes are good. There will be chance for more sweeping changes when the new expansion hits later in the year, but these should tide us over in the meantime. Reno Jackson decks will be the obvious beneficiaries of the changes, but this means that Jade decks will be stronger. It will be fun to see where the meta settles down.