Damien

Hearthstone Druid Minions and Spells

24 posts in this topic

There's at least one word missing in Claw's Contructed Play section. The first sentence is "Claw can be great if the meta game is extremely aggressive, especially if are using Wild Pyromancer as well." Considering the card, I think it's supposed to be "you", but less experienced players could maybe think you were talking about the meta using Wild Pyromancer a lot.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

Edited by EDL666

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

 

The main problem is that the synergy is not strong enough. You only have Wildwalker and Druid of the Fang. For example, Mech Mage has Mechwarper, Blastmage, Cogmaster, Technician and sometimes even Clockwork Knight. That is what I call synergy. Having two cards that synergise is not enough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

 

The main problem is that the synergy is not strong enough. You only have Stablemaster and Druid of the Fang. For example, Mech Mage has Mechwarper, Blastmage, Cogmaster, Technician and sometimes even Clockwork Knight. That is what I call synergy. Having two cards that synergise is not enough. 

 

Well Stablemaster is a Hunter card(but there's also Wildwalker and Knight of the Wild) and I don't think you can compare Mech Mage to this, there's just Blastmage that's a Mage exclusive and you could totally make a Mech Druid with the same cards!

What I'm trying to say is that you don't have to put shitty Beasts to be able to make those cards work! You now have good beasts! Savage Combatant is good, Mounted Raptor is good, Druid of the Flame is good, Druid of the Claw is good, Druid of the Saber is good! Malorne is crazy good! Aside from that, you could experiment a little, nobody said that YOU have to ramp you could just curve out with more excellent Beasts like Haunted Creeper(Ironbeak Owl possibly if you REALLY want to not have Keeper of the Grove but I wouldn't recommend it), Tomb Spider, Stranglethorn Tiger, Stampeding Kodo, Mukla's Champion, Captured Jormungar, The Beast. King Mukla can be good if you can apply enough pressure. You could use Fossilized Devilsaur if you want more huge taunts besides Ironbark Protector... There's enough material there! Okay, BGH whatever you want to say that people are using because of the meta. I mean, If they use BGH on a big thingy and you play another, and another, or you just have so many beasts... That's a valid concept to me! I know Force of Nature + Savage Roar is incredibly stupid. That doesn't mean Beast Druid isn't good. It's just not that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, yeah, I meant Wildwalker, not Stablemaster, sorry! The Knight of The WIld could be good, but if you get a bad draw, he won't be played before turn 6 anyway.

Yes, the beast cards are great, but as long as the synergy cards aren't that strong, you shouldn't focus on the synergy itself and rather build a midrange deck with good cards (and some of them will definitely be beasts). The problem with playing a big thing after another is that if you get BGHed once, you lose tempo (except for Boom, yay) and druids can't play from behind the board. This is one of the reasons why Ramp Druid plays without BGH targets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Just because Beast Druid exists doesn't mean you should play it. It is not a competitive deck, at least not as competitive as Ramp druid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Just because Beast Druid exists doesn't mean you should play it. It is not a competitive deck, at least not as competitive as Ramp druid.

 

My original complaint was about not discouraging people that wanted to try it. Because it is quite good now. It is not the best, but you don't expect people playing on a budget to actually use the best deck either. I mean I get it that it's weird to want to use really shitty cards like Dalaran Mage. But Druid of the Flame isn't a bad card and a Druid Beast deck is not a bad deck either. Sure you won't explode ladder and crush everyone on legend, but is this a requirement to give tips about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.

 

We're not exactly dealing with statements like "You freaking noob! Why would you even think Beast Druid would be a thing! Learn to play before you dare read our site!"

The statements are like "but these decks have so far not proven to be successful." and "Druid Beast decks are also currently a long way from being viable." which are just accurate statements. Then on top of that, I have a guide published for people that want to experiment with it anyway.

So...yeah?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I actually do think that players on budget who visit sites such as this want a good deck, instead of spending dust on decks that do not work as well as the "meta decks". Also, the price difference between Sottle's fast druid and Beast druid is 400 dust. The difference is low enough for newer players to play the meta decks instead. 
As I said previously, the beasts are good, it's the synergy that is not good enough. Druid of the Flame is played in midrange and so are Savage Combatant and Druid of the Claw. You can find Druids of the Saber and Mounted Raptors in aggro. The beast tag just doesn't matter, same as Azure Drake's dragon tag. Dragon decks weren't played either. Although there was some synergy, it just wasn't strong enough (but that got changed with TGT), same as Beast Druid.
 

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.


I am not criticising your deck, all I am saying that beast tag is not strong enough to be considered meta. That it is and will stay for some time with the Unique decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.

 

We're not exactly dealing with statements like "You freaking noob! Why would you even think Beast Druid would be a thing! Learn to play before you dare read our site!"

The statements are like "but these decks have so far not proven to be successful." and "Druid Beast decks are also currently a long way from being viable." which are just accurate statements. Then on top of that, I have a guide published for people that want to experiment with it anyway.

So...yeah?

I'm sorry, I just wanted to give some input, but if you all think it's fine, we're having a discussion. It just feels like it's pushing away from the card rather than actual tips on how to use it like the description says it does, but it is my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, why does the "druid" pictured in the artwork seem to be wearing shaman 25 man T9 Heroic? Seems like a pretty massive mistake for the QC team, or am I just missing something obvious lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, why does the "druid" pictured in the artwork seem to be wearing shaman 25 man T9 Heroic? Seems like a pretty massive mistake for the QC team, or am I just missing something obvious lol.

It would be nice to know which card exactly you're reffering to. Also, a lot of different clothing look alike and maybe the guy making the artwork just felt like it was better like this... I don't think anyone here can really answer that... Unless the guy that made the artwork is here, which I doubt a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be interesting to tell people which ramp cards will give them excess mana when played at 10 crystals and which ones won't. I didn't check all the cards, but Astral Communion doesn't(not that it really affects the card's playability in that specific case).

Also, in the Arena section of Savagery, Mark of Nature, Astral Communion, Poison Seeds, Soul of the Forest and Tree of Life, you might wanna take into account that they can't be drafted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

I think it might be interesting to tell people which ramp cards will give them excess mana when played at 10 crystals and which ones won't. I didn't check all the cards, but Astral Communion doesn't(not that it really affects the card's playability in that specific case).

AC does give you the draw card, as does Wild Growth. If it is a spell effect that grants a permanent crystal, it will give you Excess Mana.

I'll note down your other points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not all cards that give permanent crystals give Excess Mana at 10 crystals. If I'm not mistaken, only Wild Growth and Astral Communion do. It was a suggestion as I've seen my opponents sometimes picking the crystal option with Mire Keeper at 10 crystals even though it doesn't give Excess Mana and I thought it wasn't that much a useless information in a guide aiming at teaching how to best use the card...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

No, not all cards that give permanent crystals give Excess Mana at 10 crystals. If I'm not mistaken, only Wild Growth and Astral Communion do. It was a suggestion as I've seen my opponents sometimes picking the crystal option with Mire Keeper at 10 crystals even though it doesn't give Excess Mana and I thought it wasn't that much a useless information in a guide aiming at teaching how to best use the card...

I've made a note of it for Sottle, but let me correct myself slightly:

If there is no other effect on the card that can be generated and it is a spell, it will generate excess mana. Darnassus Aspirant, Mire Keeper can still do things when played on Turn 10 that are not related to the mana increase. AC, Wild Growth do absolutely nothing but generate crystals, so they grant EM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about this, but it says in the Arena section of Mark of the Lotus that, since you usually only play one minion per turn, you are "likely" to find value out of the card. Isn't it the opposite? I could be wrong on that one.

 

The second sentence in the Arena section of Jade Blossom should be improved because it is quite difficult to read. It is possible to understand but I'm fairly sure it is worded incorrectly and could be faster to understand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

The second sentence in the Arena section of Jade Blossom should be improved because it is quite difficult to read. It is possible to understand but I'm fairly sure it is worded incorrectly and could be faster to understand

I find it very easy to understand. Do not draft ramp in general, but draft this ramp if you have jade golem cards. Is there a specific different wording you'd suggest?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, positiv2 said:

I find it very easy to understand. Do not draft ramp in general, but draft this ramp if you have jade golem cards. Is there a specific different wording you'd suggest?

It's not particularly difficult to understand, just difficult to read. Does removing "the card" between "Jade Golem" and "justifies it" preserves the intended meaning? English not being my main language I sometimes have difficulties that might not actually apply to the average English-reader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite minor, but there's an apostrophe missing in the General Comments section of Lunar Vision. "Being able to draw 2 minions effectively reduces the cards Mana cost to 1"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      Iksar has confirmed that the Matchmaking in Legend Ranks has been changed.
      As stated in our previous article, Legendary players have been noticing that in the last few days that they have been matched with players much closer to their own rank than usual. There was some confusion regarding this, as Iksar had not been made aware of the changes, but he has now confirmed that there are definitely changes in place.
      It is hard to precisely evaluate community feeling on the the new system, especially as I personally think they're a step in the right direction, but there are some players who are not keen on the changes. RayC and Xzirez have been the two highest profile players so far to disagree with the change. The issues that people against it have can be summarised as follows: Counter-Queuing: Many top Legends do not like counter-queuing, which is where you change your deck to try to counter your opponent. With the new system meaning you can often play the same person several times in a row, counter-queuing will become an important part of the game.
      Early Legend Advantage: People opposed to the changes claim that it overly favours the players who reach Legend early on. The older system made it easier to catch up at the end of the season.
      Win Trading: Due to the increased chance of playing against the same opponent, it is now easier to cover your tracks if you lose to a friend many times in a row to boost their ranking.
      There does seem to be a majority of players who support the new system however. The ladder system has been a cause of much debate for a long time now, and these changes, alongside the recent addition of ladder floors, seem to show that at the very least, ladder is currently a high priority for Blizzard to get right.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Menagerie Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Murloc Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By L0rinda

      The Hearthstone Championship Tour continues this weekend, with the focus shifting to the Asia-Pacific region. In this article I have introduced some of the players, and listed their deck archetypes.
      The APAC region is often regarded as the weakest region, and with some justification. However, although the region lacks a little in depth, the best players are definitely world class. Not only that, but the rest of the pack is rapidly improving, and it would be very negligent to ignore the region in 2017. Staz, from The Philippines recently won the $150,000 first prize at a stacked WESG, which marked the first major tournament won by the region. The top players will be looking to keep the rest of the world on notice, with some high quality play this weekend.
      Below I have listed a few of the key players, along with notes and deck archetypes.
        CaraCute: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      CaraCute has been touted by both NeilYo and Staz as having a good chance, and since those comments were made, she has come through the Tavern Hero Qualifier to take her place in the main Swiss. She learned her trade at Guildhouse Fireside gatherings, the same Fireside gatherings where caster Jia Dee also rose through the ranks.
        Che0nsu: Jade Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      Che0nsu made his name by first winning the Last Call qualifier, and then building on that to finish top four in the World Championship at BlizzCon. 
        ChongGEr: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Reno Warrior
      ChongGer is one of the most consistent performers in the South-East Asia scene. He came fourth in the Singapore Major, third in the Thai Major, and second in the Malaysia Major, where he lost two matches in the final to a player he had already beaten in the upper bracket! He also placed consistently high in the preliminaries last year. 
         GundamFlame: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      GundanFlame impressed observers in the Japan Summer Championship with his understanding of aggressive play. His understanding of when to ease off the pedal, and when to go all-in, won him the national title. It is no surprise that his lineup for the Playoffs is an aggressive one.

        HandomeGuy (pictured above): Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      HandsomeGuy is regarded as the man to beat whenever he steps foot in an APAC tournament. He finished in second place in the APAC Winter Championship, and that proved to be his worst result, as he went on to win both the Spring and Summer Championships.
        Kranich: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman (shown below), Reno Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      Kranich played in both the 2014, and 2015 World Championships, finishing top four and top eight respectively. Due to this, and the fact that he was a member of Team Dignitas before they withdrew from Hearthstone, he is one of the best known APAC players in the West. He is not scared to put his own stamp on decks, his RenoLock contains Doomguard and Krul the Unshackled, while his Shaman deck is slower than most Aggro Shamans, and leans towards midrange.

        NaviOOT: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      NaviOOT has built a strong reputation on the back of relentless top 100 finishes, and a consistently popular stream. In recent months he has turned his attention more and more to the tournament scene, making the trip to the Malaysia Open, in which he placed top 8. He has also stated that he will be travelling to DreamHack Austin, which is coming up soon. He managed top four at last Winter's APAC Championship, and is a genuine contender in 2017.
       Pinpingho: Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Reno Warlock, Water Warrior
      Pinpingho finished top eight in the 2015 World Championship. He was known for being one of the strongest Shaman players, back before Shaman was regarded as a playable class, so it will be interesting to see how a does now! He qualified for two APAC Championship events in 2016, and so is no stranger to these events.
        Surrender: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      Although he is yet to have a big win, Surrender is highly regarded in the community and has numerous good results. He already had Xixo as a playtest partner, and has recently joined Counter Logic Gaming, along with Xixo and Hoej. He will be as well prepared as anyone for this event.
        Tom60229: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      One of the most accomplished players in the field, Tom60229 has shown consistent results since the dawn of Hearthstone. His most recent tournament win was the Malaysia Major, but also had good success on the 2015 ONOG Tour. His worldwide tournament experience will stand him in good stead in this event.
       
      The event begins at 3am CET on Saturday 25 February, and coverage will be on the official PlayHearthstone Twitch channel.
    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!