Aleco

Receive Two Free KFT Packs and an Arena Ticket for Logging in to Hearthstone on Halloween

Sign in to follow this  

21 posts in this topic

5EpW9mt.jpg

Don't forget to log in to Hearthstone today! You'll receive two free KFT packs and a free Arena run for your troubles.

Blizzard is giving away two free Knights of the Frozen Throne packs and one free Arena run as a reward for logging in to Hearthstone on Halloween. Don't miss out on this golden opportunity to play the Hallow's End dual-class Arena for free, as this special Arena is already regarded as one of the best holiday events in the history of Hearthstone.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is no reason to complain. When I look at a lot of tavern brawls they made I could cry how bad they are made but this is a funny thing and not forever just for halloween. I think a lot of players who had nice cross class combos in normal games (through discovery) will enjoy this.

And no one's forcing you to play it. Just make a deck, retire and get a free pack and some dust or gold :)

Edited by Caldyrvan
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Caldyrvan said:

I think there is no reason to complain.

Yes there is.

Quote

When I look at a lot of tavern brawls they made I could cry how bad they are made

So could I, but that's entirely beside the point. Tavern Brawl has always been the "let's try dumb stuff out" portion of HS.

Quote

this is a funny thing

No, it really, really, really is not. This is "Randomonium" levels of pathetic.

Quote

and not forever just for halloween.

And (censored) thanks (censored) God! What Arena needs is balance, not this absolute crapfest.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, got Arfus and Valeera the Hollow, thanks Blizzard.

But yeah, double class Arena was fun at first, but I felt it got old real quick, I like the idea of changing the rules of Arena once in a while, but not like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new arena is just awful. Can't wait to see the regular arena return. There are so many ways to make arena interesting, but they went for Encounter-at-the-Crossroads-for-the-eighth-time level of fun. Disappointing at best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one have been really enjoying the dual-class Arena! Though it does make things a bit more random and harder to predict, an alternative way to look at it is that the skill cap in the dual-class Arena is even higher than normal. The top Arena pros have been stringing together more 12 win runs than ever during this event, and I believe that is due to the fact that there are more difficult decisions to them to make, which creates even more opportunities for their higher skill to shine through the randomness than normal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Aleco said:

The top Arena pros have been stringing together more 12 win runs than ever during this event, and I believe that is due to the fact that there are more difficult decisions to them to make, which creates even more opportunities for their higher skill to shine through the randomness than normal. 

More because they're playing more, or higher percentage of 12-wins than normal? In theory, the top players should be averaging higher than usual, given that the overall standard should be lower than usual (everyone getting free entries).

Personally quite enjoyed it as a novelty, and like that they did it. At the same time, not really enjoying arena in general these days. KFT really messed up arena balance imo. Agree with Kripp, Death Knights should never have been in arena. They're fun when you get them, but no fun to play against and just make many games one-sided or completely determined on how deep down one card is in its deck. Feels like fewer and fewer games come down to the skill of either player to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bozonik said:

Agree with Kripp, Death Knights should never have been in arena. 

Totally agree with you there! Whereas legendary minions can typically be answered by a well constructed Arena deck, Death Knights offer so much value over a long game that they're just too difficult to overcome without ridiculous card quality.

2 hours ago, Bozonik said:

More because they're playing more, or higher percentage of 12-wins than normal? In theory, the top players should be averaging higher than usual, given that the overall standard should be lower than usual (everyone getting free entries).

It appears to me that they're getting many more 12 win runs than they would outside of the event. Though the free entry players are certainly a factor in the first few matches I'd guess that they'd be mostly gone by the time you reach the 9 to 11 win mark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that Arena's main issues are common\rare\epic\legendary system and huge luck factor in drafting

I would prefer 3 crads being offered on some different criteria and in a way that gives decks of roughly equal power.

Something like giving sets of 3 cards with similar global winrate in arena would be much more preferable for me.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, free 2 packs and an arena-run :)

My packs gave me 2 x rare, 8 x common (I don't have any luck with the last 40 packs or something like that).

Unfortunatly my arena-run totally sucked (1:3...)

My deck didn't seem that bad (not great, I got one legendary card. And the best avaiable legendary was Nat Pagle, no shit!) but well, I just sucked *g*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Aleco said:It appears to me that they're getting many more 12 win runs than they would outside of the event. Though the free entry players are certainly a factor in the first few matches I'd guess that they'd be mostly gone by the time you reach the 9 to 11 win mark.

Sure, but it filters through since the typical 9-win opponent during the event will be more like the typical 7/8-win opponent outside of the event as they've also faced easier opponents along the way.

And a new meta, even if temporary, should provide opportunities for those quickest to figure it out.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/1/2017 at 5:56 AM, Strongpoint said:

I believe that Arena's main issues are common\rare\epic\legendary system and huge luck factor in drafting

I would prefer 3 crads being offered on some different criteria and in a way that gives decks of roughly equal power.

Something like giving sets of 3 cards with similar global winrate in arena would be much more preferable for me.

Thing is, how do you judge that level of power? Would giving Flamestrike to a Mage be the same as giving a Rogue Fan of Knives? Explosive Trap and Blizzard? Fireball and Eviscerate? I think it's incredibly difficult to do it by any criteria other than rarity, simply because of how different the actual classes are. 

Blade Flurry can be better than Flamestrike with a good weapon, so is it rated higher or lower? The same? How do the weapons rank? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Blainie said:

Thing is, how do you judge that level of power? Would giving Flamestrike to a Mage be the same as giving a Rogue Fan of Knives? Explosive Trap and Blizzard? Fireball and Eviscerate? I think it's incredibly difficult to do it by any criteria other than rarity, simply because of how different the actual classes are.

I would use Blizzard's internal statistics aka winrate of the card in arena for the past few weeks dynamically changing. First few weeks of new expansion will have all new cards at 50%, creating a special meta happening three times per year.

It is objective data. It creates decisions in draft. It gives good players an edge by letting them to draft hard to play cards that have lower than they deserve global winrate. It balances classes, if class has a ton of high quality class cards it will get fewer of them. If class has shitty class cards it will get more bonemares to compensate. It makes all decks closer to each other in power. It is far from ideal, but it is far better than what we have today.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is as well that there are pretty strong and pretty bad legends/epics. I understand blizz creates the shitty high rarity cards so ppl have lower chance to get the good ones and hopefully throw more money at them.

But for arena it makes no sense. They should just remove those obviously bad cards ;)

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2017 at 4:11 PM, Strongpoint said:

I would use Blizzard's internal statistics aka winrate of the card in arena for the past few weeks dynamically changing. First few weeks of new expansion will have all new cards at 50%, creating a special meta happening three times per year.

Interesting way of doing it - I don't think this would work for legendaries at all though. You can draft a 3 legendary deck and never draw them while going 0-3. You can win with Patches and no pirates and go 10-3. I think they should be independent of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 07.11.2017 at 4:31 AM, Caldyrvan said:

The problem is as well that there are pretty strong and pretty bad legends/epics. I understand blizz creates the shitty high rarity cards so ppl have lower chance to get the good ones and hopefully throw more money at them.

But for arena it makes no sense. They should just remove those obviously bad cards ;)

I hate the whole idea of removing cards from arena. Arena is the place I want to play cards that I'd never put in a constructed deck. And I want it doing because I made such choice not because I got unlucky.

It can be fun to choose between Backstreet Leper Shieldbearer and Grimscale Oracle

But only if you know that you get fair decks and your opponents have similar choices. It is far more interesting choice than "choosing" between UI and two shitty epics.

 

3 hours ago, Blainie said:

Interesting way of doing it - I don't think this would work for legendaries at all though. You can draft a 3 legendary deck and never draw them while going 0-3. You can win with Patches and no pirates and go 10-3. I think they should be independent of it.

Never draw them going 0-3 will even out in global statistics. Maybe winrate of when drawn can be better than winrate when in the deck (but cards that still in your deck do influence your play, so it doesn't seem right)

Also, why legendaries should be special? Why not good spells or something like Bonemare

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

Also, why legendaries should be special? Why not good spells or something like Bonemare

Because legendaries are normally not as straight forward as something like Bonemare. Bonemare is a straight 4/4 buff with a 5/5 body on board. You know exactly what it does and it normally has a straight forward impact on the game.

Think about how many legendaries have completely unpredictable outcomes. Whether it's RNG targeting, random effects that you can't control, effects that rely on time of triggering etc. They have so much more potential to be either amazing or awful because of it, so are so much harder to quantify.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Blainie said:

Think about how many legendaries have completely unpredictable outcomes. Whether it's RNG targeting, random effects that you can't control, effects that rely on time of triggering etc. They have so much more potential to be either amazing or awful because of it, so are so much harder to quantify.

Servant of Yogg-Saron is a rare and it has huge variance attached. Should it be treated differently, too?

We are discussing thing that will never happen, but if, in this hypothetical system, late in draft,  you choose between three cards with low winrate it is obvious that some cards will be strong for you because of synergies (N'Zoth, the Corruptor with zero deathrattles and ten deathrattles is very different in power. or just type of deck (Sinister Strike in some crazy aggresive rogue deck may be a fine card). Decks won't have same power level

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

Servant of Yogg-Saron is a rare and it has huge variance attached. Should it be treated differently, too?

We are discussing thing that will never happen, but if, in this hypothetical system, late in draft,  you choose between three cards with low winrate it is obvious that some cards will be strong for you because of synergies (N'Zoth, the Corruptor with zero deathrattles and ten deathrattles is very different in power. or just type of deck (Sinister Strike in some crazy aggresive rogue deck may be a fine card). Decks won't have same power level

But then compare Servant to the real Yogg, there's definitely a huge difference in the amount of RNG. N'Zoth is a far better example of varying usefulness though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina

      The two Hearthstone developers talked to IGN about the design process behind some of the most impactful cards from Kobolds & Catacombs.
      First of all, Peter Whalen and Mike Donais confirmed that there will be an update on February, a month after the World Championship. This patch will contain new events and possibly balance changes. They will take a look at the meta as it's been and as it is in the World Championship and they will decide accordingly.
      Moving on, they talked about some of the classes and how K&C cards have affected them. Starting with Warlock, Cubelock was a deck that was tested internally and it was an archetype the team was "certainly concerned about and [they] played a bunch of games with it". Carnivorous Cube was also tested internally in Recruit Hunter and in Quest Druid. As far as Possessed Lackey is concerned, there was a second version of it that read "Battlecry: If you control a Demon, Recruit a Demon", while Dark Pact was 0 mana at some point. Lastly, Rin, the First Disciple's seals used to have different effects and Azari, the Devourer was a 15/15 untargetable minion.
      The two devs talked next about the other dominating class of the current meta: Priest. Mike Donais pointed out that Highlander Priest was already doing well, so it was only given one new card: Psychic Scream. On the other hand. Big Priest has a pretty medium win rate, even though it can feel frustrating to play against. It's also a deck that will lose several cards in the upcoming rotation. At this point, the devs repeated that they are looking forward to develop and see in action new playstyles in the post-Barnes era. Finally, during the design process Twilight's Call could summon any minion, not just Deathrattles, but this was deemed too powerful.
      The next class to be discussed was Rogue. The team is happy with how balanced the Kingsbane Rogue deck turned out to be. Some internal iterations of the Rogue legendary weapon were dual-wielded daggers or a weapon that had the Battlecry: Discover a card, everything you draw is a copy of that. Mike also talked about Valeera the Hollow: he expected her to be more powerful than she already is, but maybe players will find a way to use her more in the future.
      There were a few words about Hearthstone's currently weakest class: Shaman. The devs think that the Shaman Spellstone is a powerful "sleeper" card, although maybe there's presently not a proper deck for it. They were also slightly worried about Unstable Evolution. Another "sleeper" card for them is Warrior's Drywhisker Armorer.
      An important point is that when asked about Corridor Creeper, Peter said that it's "one of the cards that raised a red flag". Lastly, they talked about King Togwaggle and the numerous iterations he had - all around swapping decks with your opponent. The penalty on the spell card isn't high enough on purpose, because they didn't want Togwaggle to be a super competitive card.
      I've tried to summarise the most important points, but you should definitely check out the entire interview on IGN. There's much more detail behind the design process of Kobolds & Catacombs, while there is also temp artwortk of cards as well as two cards that never made it into the game!
    • By Aleco

      Players can earn up to three free packs for logging in to Hearthstone during the Hearthstone World Championships.
      The folks over at Hearthpwn.com have learned from data mining of patch 10.0 that the Hearthstone World Championships will offer players three free packs as daily login rewards. The first day of the championships will give players a Journey to Un'Goro pack, the second day a Knights of the Frozen Throne pack, and the third a Kobolds & Catacombs pack. The Hearthstone home screen will also change to sparkling white theme honor the World Championships.

      Along with this week's awesome Tavern Brawl featuring World Championship winning decks, this marks the first time that Blizzard has brought Hearthstone eSports all the way to the Hearthstone client. Given the recent start of the Overwatch League and the choose your champion feature for the World Championships, it seems that Blizzard is supporting competitive gaming now more than ever.
    • By Zadina

      This week's Brawl honours the 3 previous Hearthstone World Champions!
      The 2018 World Championship is about to begin and Team 5 is celebrating by giving us a very special Tavern Brawl. In this Brawl, you get to play with decks that the previous world champions from 2014, 2015 and 2016 used on their way to the top. Your player name will even change to the respective Champion: Firebat, Ostkaka or Pavel!
      Here are the deck archetypes you can get:
      Firebat's Undertaker Hunter Firebat's Ramp Druid Firebat's Miracle Rogue Firebat's Zoolock Ostkaka's Patron Warrior Ostkaka's Oil Rogue Ostkaka's Freeze Mage Pavel's Tempo Mage Pavel's Malygos Miracle Rogue Pavel's Midrange Shaman Pavel's C'Thun Warrior Pavel's Malygos OTK Druid You might think: "why would I want to play a deck from 2014 with cards that have been nerfed"? Well, all cards are on their pre-nerfed versions, therefore they are basically in the same state as when originally used by each World Champion. So, say hello to pre-nerf Undertaker, Leper Gnome, Hex and many others.
      Amnesiac can never catch a break.
      A slight inconsistency is that cards that generate other cards or tokens, like Piloted Shredder or Babbling Book, can generate cards/tokens from later expansions. For example, my opponent's dead Shredder created Friendly Bartender, a card that neither Champion had encountered at their time.
      Enjoy the Brawl and tune in to the World Championship this weekend!
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our HCT World Championships coverage.
    • By Aleco

      Aleco walks through a series of simple early-game decisions while playing an Unstable Evolution deck.
      "Simple early game decisions" and "multi-turn decisions" are the two most common requests I've been receiving since the start of this series, so I decided to do an episode that tackles both! In today's episode I navigate a series of relatively simple early-game decisions against an aggressive Hunter start with my Unstable Evolution Shaman deck.
      If you have any requests for future episodes of "What's the Move?", please feel free to reach out to me here on Icy Veins or via Twitter @Aleco_P. I prefer to always fulfill requests for new episodes if possible, and always love hearing feedback from the community which can help me improve on this series in the future. Don't be shy!
      If you're looking for the guide I referenced in this video, please follow this link to "Legend in the Making: Part 2".