L0rinda

New Cards Revealed on Live Stream: Part Two

Sign in to follow this  

8 posts in this topic

6jHTqnL.jpg

Today's HCT Championship broadcast began with the reveal of 10 new cards. The second half of this article takes a look at the five cards not covered in the first half, and assesses how they might be used in the Year of the Mammoth.

o5sdGee.png

Mirage Caller is another interesting Priest card, and seems to fit best with the Deathrattle Quest. Given that it will not trigger the Battlecry of minions that it copies, the best use will likely be with Deathrattles, and is therefore a natural fit. A Potential downside of the card is that it is awful if you do not have a minion in play, and so Priest will be hungry, as ever, for a good 2-drop to go alongside Mirage Caller. 

WmFgoS8.png

The obvious comparison for Corrupting Mist is Doomsayer, but there are important differences. The first thing to note is that it can't be stopped very easily. Silence will prevent the minion from dying, but other than that, you can't just kill it like you can kill a Doomsayer. However, there is also a downside. If you play this with only two Mana available, you will not be able to put a minion on the board, and so your opponent will gain the initiative. If you play it late in the game and then play a Minion alongside it, your opponent will be able to use their existing Minions to kill yours. This lack of initiative might prove to be back breaking, although the card will still have uses as an AoE spell that can remove cards like Finja, the Flying Star.

v48iKOO.png

Even given the murky waters of predicting most cards, Lost in the Jungle seems to be more difficult than usual to project. Given that Sunkeeper Tarim will be looking for targets to turn into 5/5 Minions, this card should find a home somewhere. We also have yet to see what the Paladin Quest is going to be. I would not be surprised if it ties into this card. Finally, the card is also reasonable on defense. It is not as good at that as Living Roots is in Druid of course, but two 1/1s are often very good at slowing down an early beating from very aggressive opposing decks.

fFRh0fG.png

Molten Blade seems very unlikely to see serious constructed play. It is, however, a card that will allow more casual players to have fun, and those cards are always required in every set.

35Gjnx9.png

The Marsh Queen should provide a big talking point. It is clearly a strong card, but how strong remains to be seen. The upsides are reasonably obvious, so let's have a look at the downsides of the card. Firstly, you will run out of cards very fast while trying to activate the Quest. Not only do 1-drops tend to get dealt with pretty easily, but you also lose a card by starting with the Quest in your hand. You also do not get to play one of your 1-drops on turn one, unless you don't play the Quest on the first turn. The Brood are also often not going to draw into other Brood. Your deck will likely contain a high percentage of 1-drops, and so the power level of the deck, once the Queen has been dealt with, might be quite low.

With those downsides in mind, it might be that the deck doesn't aim to simply trigger the Quest as quickly as possible. Balancing the deck so it can still play damaging cards will be a challenge, and I'm sure many of you will want to weigh in with your opinions on it below!

Previous Un'Goro Reveals:

Live Reveal Part One: here.

21 March here.

Elementals: here.

19-20 March: here.

Live reveal stream, 11 cards: here.

Un'Goro announcement video: here.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting less and less impressed by these quests. They all seem REQUIRED to draw early. Otherwise it is a totally dead card in your deck. That's hard to build around. It's the complete opposite of what makes Patches so good. This might be damning, unlike Cthun, Nzoth, or many other finisher cards that you don't need in your opening hand they don't become dead as the game goes. If you don't have and activate your quest within the first 5-8 turns you might already be doomed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Laragon said:

I'm getting less and less impressed by these quests. They all seem REQUIRED to draw early. Otherwise it is a totally dead card in your deck. That's hard to build around. It's the complete opposite of what makes Patches so good. This might be damning, unlike Cthun, Nzoth, or many other finisher cards that you don't need in your opening hand they don't become dead as the game goes. If you don't have and activate your quest within the first 5-8 turns you might already be doomed.

Just to be clear, you start with them in your opening hand, and have the option to keep it or to Mulligan it.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Just to be clear, you start with them in your opening hand, and have the option to keep it or to Mulligan it.

OH! I never understood it was guaranteed. That's totally different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Just to be clear, you start with them in your opening hand, and have the option to keep it or to Mulligan it.

I didn't know you could mulligan it, but even if you can, is it a good choice?

Priest has only one good 1-drop so far, it is Northshire Cleric, you may want to play crystalline oracle after you play the quest, so quest is a guaranteed turn 1 play. I believe it is fine to keep.

You can send back hunter quest, but as you start playing your 1-drops, and you will most likely have like 8 to 10 if quest is not played, it is not activated, so accomplishing the quest will be harder.

Same for shaman quest.

Rogue quest needs the multiplying spells, minions and Shadowstep, since the deck will be some kind of a tempo deck, options are limited, you probably don't want to play Shadowcaster or Thistle Tea, and  if you send back quest, there is a good chance, you will either find the quest and not be able to play 4 minions with the same name, or the other way around.

Warlock quest looks like the only one which could be sent back more often than not, thanks to life tap and the potential it creates to get back the quest a quickly as possible.

What do you think?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

I didn't know you could mulligan it, but even if you can, is it a good choice?

In aggro matchups mostly. Aggro matchup can be won without the quest reward simply by outlasting the opponent. So, you often want an extra card that affects the board rather than a "winmore" card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, positiv2 said:

In aggro matchups mostly. Aggro matchup can be won without the quest reward simply by outlasting the opponent. So, you often want an extra card that affects the board rather than a "winmore" card.

Fair enough.

So, can we say that quest is a win condition against slower decks? At least the ones so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

Fair enough.

So, can we say that quest is a win condition against slower decks? At least the ones so far.

Yeah, though Priest's quest can be used to stabilize against aggro decks or to get out of combo range of freeze mage or malygos decks, though these aren't popular at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      The HCT Summer Championship took place from 13-15 October 2017. The top four players advanced to the World Championship in January.
      After three days of competition the winner was   Surrender, who joins Planet Odd teammate Hoej at the World Championship. Surrender won a tense final 3-2 against   Orange, with the final game being a Highlander Priest mirror. In that game, Orange chose to mill Surrender for five cards to attempt to burn the combo, but the attempt failed. The VoD of the final can be found here.
      Listed below are the other finishing positions, and the number of packs you will receive for picking each player as your champion in the "Choose your Champion" promotion.
      Finalists, 4 Packs: Surrender, Orange. 
      Semi-Finalists, 3 Packs: JasonZhou, Purple
      Quarter-Finalists, 2 Packs: Empanizado, OldBoy, Pavel, Tom60229
      All other players were worth 1 Pack.
      All of the decks from the event can be found on our new esports section here.
    • By Zadina

      For the first time, the Hearthstone World Champion won't be determined at BlizzCon.
      It was noticed that European venues weren't getting much love in this year's Hearthstone Championship Tour, but it turns out that the World Championship finals will take place in Amsterdam!
      HCT will finish its journey in the Beurs van Berlage Conference centre, lasting from Thursday 18th January 2018 until Sunday 21st January 2018.
      Anyone who physically attends the World Championship will get the following card back, while they will also be able to participate in on-site tournaments:

      The tournament's format will be the same as all other seasonal Hearthstone Championships. 16 players will fight for a total prize pool of $1,000,000 USD! Eight players have qualified so far from the Winter and Spring Championships: Ant, DocPwn, Fr0zen, Hoej, Kolento, Neirea, SamuelTsao and ShtanUdachi. Four more players will qualify from the Summer Championship, that is currently going on this weekend. And the last four players will be seeded from the highest HCT point earners from each region (Last Call slots).
      A question remains: without the World Championship this year, will there be any e-sports events at BlizzCon? According to its schedule, the answer is yes! There will be a Hearthstone Inn-vitational, where four teams of three Hearthstone personalities each will compete against each other in various formats; there is also the NA Tavern versus Tavern tournament.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our HCT Summer Finals coverage.
    • By Zadina

      Gameplay Engineer Josh Durica discusses a couple of upcoming changes to game mechanics.
      These mechanics changes address some rare interactions (Disguised Toast has presented a lot of them in his videos), but they are still substantial changes in Hearthstone's core systems.
      The first one is that "After" effects will only activate if they were present for the original action. The example presented in the video is that if you pull a Wild Pyromancer from your opponent with Shadow Visions, the Pyromancer won't trigger from the Shadow Visions.
      The second change involves the sequence of triggers. Currently, the game checks for triggers first on the board, then on your hand and then in your deck (and with the same order for the second player). Now the game will simultaneously check for triggers in all three zones. This will prevent cards like Bolvar Fordragon to trigger off themselves.
      A more in-depth explanation with various other examples and a glossary of terms can be found below:
      Daxxarri
      Hearthstone has a lot going on under the hood. The cause-and-effect relationships when cards are played are relatively straightforward and easy to predict, but because of the way certain events are timed, some very surprising things can happen in rare circumstances. We want cards to work the way that you guess they might—in other words, we want the game to work intuitively. 

      In the upcoming patch, we’re making some changes in pursuit of that goal. We want Hearthstone to continue to be strategically deep: a game of careful choices, calculated risks, and exciting events. So we want to be extra clear that this update isn’t a change in depth; instead it’s one step in an ongoing effort improve Hearthstone’s mechanics.

      Hearthstone’s core gameplay won't change, but what will change are some rare edge-cases. 

      Please be aware: what follows is a detailed look at Hearthstone’s mechanics by Hearthstone Gameplay Engineer Josh Durica. If you want to delve into the nitty-gritty details regarding how this change will work, read on.

      First, A Glossary
      Event
      Events are interactions that occur throughout gameplay that can cause triggers to activate when they happen. 

      Example Events: Whenever a Card is Played After a Card is Played Deathrattle (When this minion dies) Whenever a Minion Takes Damage At the End of Your Turn

      Trigger
      A trigger has two parts: an event (usually starts with “Whenever”, “After”, or “At”), and an effect. Sometimes triggers can also have a condition (usually noted with “if” or “while”, but sometimes noted by qualifiers like “your”).

      Example triggers: Whenever you cast a spell, gain +1 Attack. After you cast a spell, deal 1 damage to ALL minions. At the end of your turn, give another random friendly minion +1 Health. If you control a Secret at the end of your turn, gain +2/+2.

      Zone
      In Hearthstone, there are three zones where triggers can happen, and they happen in order: First, any triggers in the Battlefield, then those that occur in a player’s Hand, and finally those that belong to cards in a player’s Deck. 

      Sequence
      Whenever an action is taken, Hearthstone executes a sequence of steps to resolve what happens. 

      Here’s a simplified example sequence:
        ACTION: A card is played (this begins the sequence) EVENT: Whenever A Card is Played o Whenever A Card is Played triggers resolve
      Card ability activates EVENT: After a Card is Played event occurs o After a Card is Played triggers resolve

      Here’s what that sequence would look like using actual cards, if you had a Questing Adventurer and a Flamewaker on the board, and then played Frostbolt:
        ACTION: Frostbolt is played (this begins the sequence) EVENT: Whenever a Card is Played triggers resolve o Questing Adventurer gains +1/+1 
      Frostbolt’s text resolves: Deal 3 damage and freeze EVENT: After a Card is Played triggers resolve o Flamewaker shoots two missiles

      This is a simple example, but a sequence can incorporate many events and triggers.

      Keep in mind that dealing damage, destroying a minion, and other things can interrupt sequences with new sequences, like in this more detailed example:
        ACTION: Frostbolt is played (this begins the sequence) EVENT: Whenever a Card is Played triggers resolve o Questing Adventurer gains +1/+1 
      Frostbolt’s text resolves: Deal 3 damage and freeze o NEW SEQUENCE: Damage dealt
      o EVENT: Whenever a Minion Takes Damage triggers resolve
      EVENT: After a Card is Played triggers resolve o Flamewaker shoots 1 missile
      NEW SEQUENCE: Damage dealt EVENT: Whenever a Card Takes Damage triggers resolve o Flamewaker shoots another missile
      NEW SEQUENCE: Damage dealt EVENT: Whenever a Card Takes Damage triggers resolve

      In Pursuit of the Goal
      If you watched the video in our recent blog post, then you saw two different examples of cards triggering in counter-intuitive ways because they weren’t present when the sequence that activated them took place. That sets the stage for the primary goal we wanted to accomplish with these changes:

      If you want to trigger off something, you need to be present and valid when that something first happens.

      A more technical way to say this is: In order for a trigger to activate from a sequence, it needs to be present and valid at the time the sequence began.

      This means any card featuring a trigger that appears in the middle of a sequence can’t activate during that sequence. So, when you play a card (or when a card is destroyed, or an attack occurs, etc.) you only need to consider what is currently on the board instead of guessing what the board state might be in the middle of the sequence. The Mindgames + Wild Pyromancer interaction showcased in the video is an example of an interaction improved by this change.

      The valid qualifier is more subtle, but equally important. Before any trigger can activate, it needs to be validated. Each trigger has its own specific validation step, which allows the trigger to filter when it should and shouldn’t activate. For example, the Whenever a Card is Played event occurs when any card of any type (Minion, Spell, Weapon, etc.) is played. However, we want a card like Flamewaker to only trigger when a friendly spell is cast, so the Flamewaker’s validation step checks the card type and controller of the card played. In other words, Flamewaker’s trigger is only valid if the card played was a spell cast by Flamewaker’s controller.

      Before our changes, we would validate triggers whenever their related event occurred, even if that was in the middle of the sequence. After the mechanics update, all triggers are validated when the sequence begins, and then they are only allowed to activate if they were valid from the start. 

      For further insight, let’s look at a bug that will be addressed by the update:

      Currently, if you have a Djinni of Zephyrs on the board and cast Entomb on an enemy minion, your Djinni of Zephyrs will trigger, sending itself back to your deck. Not great for you or the Djinni! Djinni of Zephyrs triggers off the After a Card is Played event, and his validation step should only pass if the card played was a spell cast on a different friendly minion. Entomb is a spell, but it was cast on an enemy minion, so why does Djinni trigger? 

      Remember: the After a Card is Played event occurs after the ability on the played card resolves. In this case, that card is Entomb, and its ability moves the enemy minion into your deck. When the enemy minion enters your deck, it becomes a friendly minion. So, by the time the After a Card is Played event occurs, Djinni’s trigger is valid, because the minion is now friendly. 

      After the mechanics update, Djinni’s trigger is validated at the beginning of the sequence when the enemy minion is still on the battlefield, and because the trigger isn’t valid at that point (since Entomb counts as being cast on an enemy minion), it’s prevented from triggering when the After a Card is Played event occurs.

      There is one final change we should mention, which is a tweak to when we validate triggers across different zones. Currently, the order in which triggers are validated and activated looks like this:

      1) Validate Player 1 Battlefield triggers and then activate those that are valid.
      2) Validate Player 1 Hand triggers and then activate those that are valid.
      3) Validate Player 1 Deck triggers and then activate those that are valid.
      4) Validate Player 2 Battlefield triggers and then activate those that are valid.
      5) Validate Player 2 Hand triggers and then activate those that are valid.
      6) Validate Player 2 Deck triggers and then activate those that are valid.

      That approach meant new triggers could appear in the middle of a sequence and still be activated, and a trigger’s validation could even be affected by previous triggers’ activations. The Bolvar Fordragon/Spirit Echo interaction detailed in the video was an example of a weird interaction caused by this.

      After the update, the order now looks like this:

      1) Validate all Battlefield triggers
      2) Validate all Hand triggers
      3) Validate all Deck triggers
      4) Activate Player 1 valid Battlefield triggers
      5) Activate Player 1 valid Hand triggers
      6) Activate Player 1 valid Deck triggers
      7) Activate Player 2 valid Battlefield triggers
      8) Activate Player 2 valid Hand triggers
      9) Activate Player 2 valid Deck triggers

      This means all triggers are validated before any trigger is allowed to activate. Since all triggers are validated using the same game state, then triggers that appear in the middle aren’t allowed to fire. It’s important to note that the order in which triggers are activated is unchanged. 

      Here are some more examples of sequences and their results before and after the mechanics update:

      Card Played
      Example Interaction:
      Player 1 has a Mad Scientist on the board, and a Mirror Entity in their deck.
      Player 2 plays Stampeding Kodo.
      Before Update
      1) Stampeding Kodo kills Mad Scientist.
      2) Mad Scientist pulls Mirror Entity into play.
      3) Mirror Entity triggers, copying Stampeding Kodo.
      After Update
      1) Stampeding Kodo kills Mad Scientist.
      2) Mad Scientist pulls Mirror Entity into play.
      3) Mirror Entity does NOT trigger, because it did not exist when Stampeding Kodo was played.

      Minion Destroyed
      Example Interaction:
      Player 1 has a Piloted Sky Golem and a Wisp on the board (played in that order).
      Player 1 plays Deathwing.
      The Piloted Sky Golem spawn a Cult Master from its Deathrattle.
      Before Update:
      The Cult Master's power triggers off of the Wisp's death, and Player 1 draws a card.
      After Update:
      The Cult Master does not trigger off the Wisp's death, because it wasn’t present to see the Wisp destroyed.

      Summon Minion
      Example Interaction:
      Player 1 has Starving Buzzard and Rotface on the board.
      Player 1 also has a Flame Leviathan on top of their deck.
      Player 1 plays Savannah Highmane.
      Starving Buzzard triggers off of Savannah Highmane, causing Player 1 to draw Flame Leviathan.
      Flame Leviathan triggers, dealing 2 damage to all characters.
      Rotface triggers off the damage and summons Spiritsinger Umbra.
      Before Update:
      Spirit Singer Umbra triggers off the Savannah Highmane and summons two hyenas.
      After Update:
      Spiritsinger Umbra does not trigger off the Savannah Highmane, because she was not present when Savannah Highmane was played.

      Thanks for Reading!
      Of course, our work to make Hearthstone better won’t stop here!
      Like the majority of odd interactions, each of these situations represents an edge case. While this update will address every situation we illustrated (among many others), there are still bound to be more. Keep in mind these are substantial changes to the core systems that underlie Hearthstone! We need to make them incrementally, and with the utmost care, but you can rest assured that we’ll continue to make improvements over time. (source) Part of these changes are the fixed interaction between Evolve and/or Thrall, Deathseer and Unlicensed Apothecary. In a future patch, the team is also planning to make sure evolve effects won't activate any summon triggers.
      jdurica
      This mechanic change actually does not affect the Apothecary/Thrall interaction because that’s due to a different issue involving evolve effects activating certain summon triggers. However, we ARE specifically changing Apothecary in the next patch, so that it will no longer trigger off evolve effects.
      Additionally, while it won’t make the next patch, we’re planning to make sure evolve effects won’t activate any summon triggers in the future. (source)
       
       
      Another issue with UA that was mentioned on reddit at some point, is that he apparently triggers twice on minions that transform. I can see that it's much less relevant, but it would be nice to see it fixed anyhow.
      This is something we plan to address! (source)
      This mechanics update, along with the removal of Arena synergies, are expected to hit live servers within October.
    • By Zadina

      The cycle of repeat Tavern Brawls continues this week with Spellbook Duel.
      This is the 122nd Tavern Brawl overall and it's the second time it appears. Pick a class and then make a deck of 10 different cards. Instead of drawing cards each turn, you will Discover a copy of a card from your deck. Card draw mechanics won't get you the cards in your deck; instead you will get a 1-mana spell called Peruse, which in turn allows you to Discover a copy of a card from your deck.
      Remember that cards like Fel Reaverand Tracking or Mysterious Challenger and Mad Scientist will remove cards from your Discover pool.
      Decks that were popular the previous time were: the usual suspect in Tavern Brawls, Mage with Flamewaker and spells; Jade Druid; decks with Reno Jackson and/or Kazakus; and various Aggro decks (Murlocs, Pirates) that try to kill the opponent as fast as possible.
      The community has started noticing that the Tavern Brawl game mode is slowly losing its novelty. We've had 122 Brawls so far and more than 50% of them are repeats. This week is another example: it's the fourth week in a row (almost a month) that we've had a repeat. The team seems to have been more busy with the Fireside Brawls, but regular Tavern Brawls also require some love!
      Feel free to share old or new decks for this Tavern Brawl and tell us our thoughts about the state of this fun and casual game mode!