Zadina

Mike Donais and Dean Ayala Talk About the Upcoming Nerfs

Sign in to follow this  

15 posts in this topic

MZPJQLZDUYMK1487020766402.jpg

In the first part of an IGN interview, the two devs discussed the heated topic of the reasoning behind the nerfs to Fiery War Axe, Innervate and Spreading Plague.

After Ben Brode's initial clarifications and his lengthy posts on Fiery War Axe specifically, now it's time for more talk about the upcoming card nerfs! Mike Donais and Dean Ayala sat down with IGN in a two-part interview and explained the changes on the three aforementioned cards.

I have summarised the most important points, but you should definitely check out the whole interview here.

As far as Druid in general is concerned, the two developers revealed some statistics from Blizzard's own data. it turns out that Spreading Plague was the top card in Druid, followed by Innervate which has been in the top three cards of the class historically. On the other hand, Ultimate Infestation was hoovering around the tenth position. The card changes will hit the current top four decks (assumedly Aggro Druid, Jade Druid, Pirate Warrior and Murloc Paladin), so this opens up space for new decks to shine.

Moving on to Innervate, it was so powerful it was auto-included in all Druid decks no matter the synergies. This made all Druid decks feel the same and it limited design space, since Innervate synergises, well, with... everything! The nerf was intentionally hard, otherwise the card would still be included in most Druid decks.

The same rationale was used for Fiery War Axe. These two cards were included in all decks of their respective classes. However, the team wants players to focus more on cards that promote synergies, instead of cards that are just too powerful so they HAVE to be included in a deck. Donais and Ayala also talked about wanting to limit the number of Basic and Classic card in decks to around 25-30%.

The team admits that they underestimated the power of Spreading Plague. They didn't want to change the stats of the scarabs, as many people suggested, due to consistency; these are the exact same scarabs that Druid of the Swarm and Malfurion the Pestilent can create. Six mana feels good for a late-game board tempo swing.

Lastly, the team is still looking into Ice Block and discussing whether it will be moved to the Hall of Fame, but it's too early to tell.

A final detail worth noting is a phrase Dean Ayala used when talking about Innervate: "I think at some point there will be some meta where Innervate will be super useful for Druids when they need cheap spells for whatever the new Auctioneer is three years from now, or next year". This could be interpreted in many ways: 1) he was just talking generally, 2) they are thinking of rotating Gadgetzan Auctioneer, who has already survived a nerf, to the Hall of Fame, 3) they might design a similar card in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First Ben Brode now these two guys with a lot of words for "we want to make players buy expansion packs instead of using basic/classic cards".(yea yea, I know ofc there are other (good) reasons for nerfs but that's no excuse for how bad they did that) 

Maybe I should mention I'm not the greatest fan of playing warrior and when facing them (once the nerfs go live) I will have it easier against them, at least until players adapt to the changes. Still I think the change/nerf to Fiery War Axe was badly executed.

Edited by Caldyrvan
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spreading plague is still ridiculously overpowered. Who cares if druid of the swarm and malfurious spawn 1/5's? alot of boards go wide and having an equal amount of 1/5 taunts for six mana is still too much. They should be 1/3's at the most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a lot of games against Druids who either didn't play or didn't draw Spreading Plague and they are still powerful. Ofc it makes them even stronger and it needed a nerf but making them 1/3 would be a joke (no offense ^^).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Zadina said:

The card changes will hit the current top four decks (assumedly Aggro Druid, Jade Druid, Pirate Warrior and Murloc Paladin), so this opens up space for new decks to shine.

Priest not top 4 kek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Donais and Ayala also talked about wanting to limit the number of Basic and Classic card in decks to around 25-30%.  

*Looks at all rogue decks and shudders*

 

Really, what they need to do to rogues to force them to use 25%-30% of basic\classic cards?

Edited by Strongpoint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Strongpoint said:

*Looks at all rogue decks and shudders*

 

Really, what they need to do to rogues to force them to use 25%-30% of basic\classic cards?

The entire problem with rogues is largely like the innervate problem with druids, a sort of super synergy.  It is really hard to design good cards for rogues without breaking them.  If they give them any type of cards that promote aggressive styles, ie more burst, then you get super tempo decks like oil rogue that are extremely strong, any sort of strong lower cost spells, and miracle has a field day.  Give them anything else, and it is pretty worthless because "taunts, heals, and good AoE isn't in rogues class identity".  Rogue is currently a broken class that needs to be rethought, and I shudder to think what will happen to the class if auctioneer is HoFed (seriously, miracle is actually in a healthy spot now, it is far more interactive then it ever has been, and is just in general, no where near as broken as it used to be).  Rogue is pigeon holed into using most of its classic and basic cards because they are the only good ones rogue has, because if they print anything else, it will either be worthless (since rogue lacks the ability to play a value based strategy), or have to be intentionally weak or gimmicky, or else rogue gets. . . broken.  You see a similar problem with priest.  Priest is the lone class in hearthstone that basically wants to play a reactive game plan.  Hearthstone is a game about aggression and tempo, which means that if priest is ever strong, it ends up stiffing that sort of game play, which makes it really unfair feeling to play against.  Simply put, priests don't play "fair".  If you look at the current strong priest decks, big priest and kazamakus priest, I don't really think the actual power level of the deck is higher then any of the other tier one decks we have seen in history, at least relative to the meta.  It just feels that way, because losing to priest feels really bad.  That is why blizzard just doesn't print many good control priest cards, because control priest is, in a way, unhealthy for the game.  Also, in case anyone wants to accuse me of bias against the aforementioned classes, I play mainly miracle rogue and control priest, and yes i am a particular kind of ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Caldyrvan said:

First Ben Brode now these two guys with a lot of words for "we want to make players buy expansion packs instead of using basic/classic cards".(yea yea, I know ofc there are other (good) reasons for nerfs but that's no excuse for how bad they did that) 

Maybe I should mention I'm not the greatest fan of playing warrior and when facing them (once the nerfs go live) I will have it easier against them, at least until players adapt to the changes. Still I think the change/nerf to Fiery War Axe was badly executed.

Yeah, it feels like they may put the last weeks to the motto: "We are disgusted by your poverty"

Seriously, a limit of 30% classics? You are a new player, you start the game (Free 2 Play, remember?) - and the first thing you see when you want to create a deck: "Oh, sorry, you poor pathetic being, you can only use 10 cards out of those you have for free. Buy 10 more packs that you can at least make a deck." And you definitly would have to buy packs - because without being able to make a single deck you cant finish a single quest. Because every quests requires you to have one playable deck.

They can't be serious about that.

What did they say in this advertisement? You are Hearthstone, everybody is welcome - or something like it?

Yeah, like in a strip club, you are welcome if you have a few hundred bucks.

 

If they continue the path they seem to be taken at the moment Hearthstone has had it's best times. And will die in a few years, because more and more players will leave it. Because it becomes too expensive.

2013: Start of Beta

2014: official release of Hearthstone + 1 adventure + 1 expansion

2015:  2 adventures + 1 expansion

2016: 1 adventure + 2 expansion

2017: 3 expansions

 

From 2015 - 2017 it has become more and more expensive / difficult each year to keep up.

And now they discuss to limit standard-cards alltogether.

 

It is ok that they want to earn money with Hearthstone (in 2016 they earned several hundred million bucks). That is out of the question.

But what they seem to be pulling now is over the top IMO. I have the feeling they get too greedy. You can increase the price of your product - but not infinitely. There comes a point when your customers will just say: "Screw you" and stop buying your product.

Blizzard shouldn't forget that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, WedgeAntilles said:

Seriously, a limit of 30% classics? You are a new player, you start the game (Free 2 Play, remember?) - and the first thing you see when you want to create a deck: "Oh, sorry, you poor pathetic being, you can only use 10 cards out of those you have for free. Buy 10 more packs that you can at least make a deck." And you definitly would have to buy packs - because without being able to make a single deck you cant finish a single quest. Because every quests requires you to have one playable deck.

 

I think you misunderstood their words. No one is planning to make some kind of hard limit. They want meta decks to have ~30% basic\classic cards by nerfing\HOFing cards to the point when it will be logical choice by players to not include more. No one is going to stop new players from making 30 basic card decks, it would be insane.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, SMOrcMan said:

Priest not top 4 kek

Yeah, I found this statement perplexing. They mentioned "the top four decks were hit" but they didn't say which were the top four decks. From various reports, Priest is definitely in the top 4 decks at the moment but the upcoming nerfs don't affect it. That's why I assumed they meant Jade & Aggro Druid, Murloc Pala and Pirate Warrior.

They did talk about Kazamakus Priest in that interview, saying that it's really strong and that they expect it to perhaps become the best deck of the new meta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strongpoint said:

I think you misunderstood their words. No one is planning to make some kind of hard limit. They want meta decks to have ~30% basic\classic cards by nerfing\HOFing cards to the point when it will be logical choice by players to not include more. No one is going to stop new players from making 30 basic card decks, it would be insane.

 

Ah, ok, probably a problem because I am not a native.

I took the word limit is an maximum number you musn't get over. Like a speed limit.

If it is just an aim, like: We'd like that decks don't contain more then 30% of standard cards that sounds way better.

Thx for the clarification!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Caldyrvan said:

I had a lot of games against Druids who either didn't play or didn't draw Spreading Plague and they are still powerful. Ofc it makes them even stronger and it needed a nerf but making them 1/3 would be a joke (no offense ^^).

Spreading plague should only give them one turn of safety, not a wall of 1/5 taunts that take two to three hits each (two to three turns) to clear them all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, Spreading Plague is definitely strong and the weeks after the nerfs go live will tell us how strong.

My problem is still their stance on and nerfs of basic/classic cards along with the faster release of new expansions as well as creating a meta in standard where decks need more and more expensive cards.

It's totally ok to make people pay. After all they provide a game we enjoy and that requires work but there is a point where they get too greedy.

 

Edited by Caldyrvan
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/9/2017 at 4:09 PM, Dustintime said:

Spreading plague should only give them one turn of safety, not a wall of 1/5 taunts that take two to three hits each (two to three turns) to clear them all.

1/4 would have been nice since they are then actually killable by more AoE. They hit Flamestrike range then, as well as double Holy Nova. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina

      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.
    • By Aleco

      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s  
    • By Aleco

      This week's episode features a fresh take on a popular deck, courtesy of Casie.
      Can you guess the next move?
      Situation #22: Let's Even the Odds
      Picking up where we left off last week, we find ourselves in the middle of an odd/even matchup between Warlock and Shaman. I picked this situation partially because it was an interesting spot with many options available to us, and also because its a ladder situation I highly doubt any of my readers have encountered before:

      Commenters quickly identified several key factors about this matchup, namely that Defile and Hellfire are off the table for our opponent and that the only "board clear" available for our opponent is Despicable Dreadlord. Our opponent is more likely to have single target removal (such as Voodoo Doll) or is looking to play a demon-related 5 drop next turn in Skull of the Man'ari, Possessed Lackey, or Doomguard.
      Bozonik summed up this situation excellently in his comment from last week's thread:
      There seemed to be a consensus among commenters that "Option 1", Hero Power + Sea Giant was the line here. It puts a big nasty minion on the board, applying pressure and forcing our opponent to have Voodoo Doll. In the heat of the moment I went with "Option 2", the full clear, but after looking back on things and reading over the comments I believe Hero Power + Giant was the correct line. Despicable Dreadlord is really the only card which gives us serious trouble next turn (since our opponent won't be able to play Possessed Lackey and kill it) and this line plays around Dreadlord while applying just as much pressure as the other options.
      I was secretly hoping that the tap + Giant wasn't the correct line here (because its the most obvious one), but the obvious solution is often the correct one. If you're ever in a situation such as this where you have no idea what your opponent is up to, it's probably best to go for the "obvious" line and not get cute.
      Situation #23: Broken Mirrors
      Today's deck comes courtesy of Kevin "Casie" Eberlein, who cut the dragon package from Mind Blast Priest to turn the deck into something with much more of a combo/aggro feel to it. Many pros are pegging Mind Blast Priest to be the next "best deck in the meta" after the nerfs drop, and Casie's list has a serious advantage in the mirror match:
      Though I didn't find nearly as much success with the deck as Casie did, it did provide me with plenty of interesting situations for What's the Move! Here's the one I ended up choosing for this week's episode:

      It's turn 2, we're on The Coin, and our ladder opponent just played a Wild Pyromancer. For the purposes of this exercise, we can say that we're 100% confident our opponent is on Mind Blast Priest. However, this isn't a mirror match at all. We have Prophet Velen, Holy Smite, two copies of Holy Fire (most Mind Blast Priests run just one), and Lifedrinker in our deck, which gives us a huge advantage in late-game Anduin vs Anduin races. Knowing that we have an advantage in the late game should color our decision heavily on turn two, where have a surprising number of options available to us.
      So, what's the move?