Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Year of the Mammoth: Six Cards Leaving Classic

32 posts in this topic

619nB8R.jpg

Blizzard have announced that the next Hearthstone year will be called The Year of the Mammoth. Six cards from the Classic set will be moved to a new Hall of Fame set, which can only be played in Wild.

The announcement explains that the new Hall of Fame set will include cards that are currently in the Reward set, but the big news here is the six cards that will be leaving Standard. You can see Blizzard's reasons on the link above, but I've given a few notes in this article. Those cards are shown below.

As well as the removed cards, there will be no adventures in 2017. Instead we will be given three full expansions that will be accompanied by a single-player mission, which will be used to enhance flavour, and offer challenges. This sounds like it will be along the lines of an adventure, but optional. I feel this is a great change, as it hurts nobody.

ZBCQKzH.png

Azure Drake is simply in too many decks. It is a hard card to nerf without making it weak, but it is pretty much as powerful as a 5-drop can be. Removing this to free up other 5-drops makes sense.

6NGP6Q5.png

The reasoning for Sylvanas is similar. Blizzard's words make a lot of sense on this one, and also give an insight into the future:

Blizzard LogoBlizzard

Similar to Azure Drake, it’s hard to see a card at the six mana cost out-value Sylvanas. In addition, Sylvanas has the most powerful Deathrattle effect in the game—as a comparison, the Priest card Mind Control costs 10 mana. We have exciting Deathrattle build-arounds coming soon, and in combination with Sylvanas, they would be too powerful for Standard.

This seems to imply that N'Zoth, the Corruptor will be making a big comeback soon!

mZYTnDj.png

I suspect a lot of people will be glad to see the back of Ragnaros. The Random element was often a contentious issue.

RCo1QyZ.png

The removal of Power Overwhelming is a bit of a surprise, but it seems that it has mainly been nerfed because of its strength in combinaton with cards like Leeroy Jenkins and Faceless Manipulator. I would also assume that Warlock is going to be getting some fun new toys to replace it.

gqz1mFk.png

Ice Lance has been removed to remove Freeze Mage and allow new strategies to develop. It is also interesting that Blizzard mention it will allow them to make cards that copy cards. That could also apply to Power Overwhelming, so I would expect something along those lines to be in the next set.

VvY10TL.png

Conceal leaving will make sense to everyone. It allows Gadgetzan Auctioneer to survive as an interesting card, and removes the annoyance of not being able to interact with your opponent.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Those removals are insanely important... I'm a little annoyed at removing classics since they previously claimed they would always be a part of standard (which is why I crafted Rag). Actually nervous of what tools they will give control. Since these are mostly (not power overwhelming) finishers or critical value for control decks, and combine that with losing reno and a few other tools, we will see what they have learned and might give us.

Also a really brave choice to scrap adventures but slightly merge them with the expansions.

Addition after reading their article:

"We wanted to allow players to disenchant Classic cards that are being added to the Hall of Fame set for full dust refunds, but then felt that incentivizing players to dust their cool Wild cards was counter to our goal of making Wild awesome.

So instead, we're just going to give you the dust, and you can keep the cards!"

Blizzard... how do you always know how to make me optimistic about huge changes. Since I have max copies (non-golden) of all of these, that's a lot of free dust.

Edited by Laragon
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RIP Zoo Lock

RIP Freeze Mage

RIP Miracle Rogue

Oh, well...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully these changes mean that meta will shift to control.

But it's Blizzard, so it's entirely possible these changes are not really justified (I think everyone remembers how they nerfed a bunch of classic cards last year and now nobody plays them).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Esmer said:

Hopefully these changes mean that meta will shift to control.

Not with these switches, it won't! The only of these six cards that can be found in an aggro deck is Power Overwhelming. This hurts midrange and control far more than aggro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a wild player, this barely affects me. It gives me free dust, I get to keep the cards, what's not to like.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Keizoku said:

Not with these switches, it won't! The only of these six cards that can be found in an aggro deck is Power Overwhelming. This hurts midrange and control far more than aggro.

Pretty much, but since standard was so fast, a lot of decks had to adapt. Freeze mage is played as the freeze face variant, miracle is played as face deck with pirates and Questing Adventurer. Still, Azure Drake is a big loss for a ton of control and slower midrange decks, and it will affect them heavily I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im fucking sad... Blizzard just wants to kill the most decision heavy decks in the game..... Why do you have to kill all the combo decks?

Why do you want to turn hearthstone constructed into a midrange arena?

I dont understand.....

PS : i really hope the new expansion introduces new deck archetypes that are actually interesting to play.

Edited by CodeRazor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, see ya hearthstone, was fun while it lasted.

 

I'm off to play paladins, a game run by a company which actually listens to their players and doesn't take a little under one year to "fix"(I use the term losely) any balance issue the game runs into. Oh, and where the skill involved in playing a hero is actually taken into account when addressing said balance issues.

Edited by JooBatanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 expansions?

A year???

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

That's a lot of money if you want a decently full collection, every year?

I dunno, my son and I already use the same account because we cannot afford 2 decent collections, this could be the nail in the coffin for me/us.

I was pissed enough at starting the game late, getting a fullish collection within a few months and then, oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

Man. Lesson really learnt this time, actilizard is too much cash cow.

Edited by SuperFly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SuperFly said:

3 expansions?

A year???

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

That's a lot of money if you want a decently full collection, every year?

I dunno, my son and I already use the same account because we cannot afford 2 decent collections, this could be the nail in the coffin for me/us.

I was pissed enough at starting the game late, getting a fullish collection within a few months and then, oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

Man. Lesson really learnt this time, actilizard is too much cash cow.

I'm going to play the devil's advocate here(because believe me when I tell you I do NOT like blizzard's design focus for hearthstone at all, just not in this regard) and tell you that if you genuinely believe blizzard are using hearthstone as a cash cow, you should try playing more games with the f2p model. That might actually be one of the few things they got right in the whole game so far.

There is more than one million ways to make cards easily without spending money(in fact myself, and many others have gone to legend more than once without ever spending money on Hearthstone), but sadly people want the game to not only be accessible, but also easy to achieve stuff, and I would argue that is what ended up killing it's entice for me.

And ironically enough, blizzard isn't even doing a good job of catering into the casuals(which is obviously their focus since the game released). I very much doubt rank 15-20's enjoy playing against face hunters/pirate warriors/secret paladins on every other game. And I would wager that for every person that has ever quit the game because of "uninteractive decks" like miracle rogue or freeze mage there are at least 20 that have for the aforementioned decks.

Yet for some strange reason, deleting decks like these from the game has been their top priority for a bunch of nerf/wild ban waves now. Mysterious isn't it?

Edited by JooBatanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh.  This is a bad move on Blizzard's part.  I feel this is going to do more bad then good.  I don't like this approach of "We feel its too powerful so we are just going to remove it."  I can see if these were physical cards then yes by all means like Magic: The Gathering has to do but they are not.  Blizzard has the oppertunity to fine tune any of these cards, to change them as they are digital.  You could fix them but thats time and money right?  So instead we just remove them and wait to see what the long term consquences is.  Thats bad.  That is a bad trend to get into. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I applaud blizzard on this decision.  Nerfing cards, especially iconic ones like Sylvanas, just feels bad for people who play wild.  Removing them from the rotation is a much more sensible thing (besides if they nerfed them it would basically do the same thing, how many cards has blizzard nerfed and they still see play?  Not many), in my opinion.  Azure Drake is the most ubiquitous 5 drop in the game, probably the most ubiquitous card in the game in terms of just the sheer number of decks it is played in.  The card is both incredibly strong and multi-purposed, to the point that any five drop printed has to be broken strong or incredibly niche to compete.  Sylvanas and Rag are much the same, there power level is so strong and the deck slots for 6+ cost cards are so limited that anything printed has to be stronger then sylvanas and rag, which means they have to be doctor boom levels of broken, which was a card that defined the meta game for quite some time.  As for conceal, this nerf won't kill off miracle rogue, the loss of tomb pillager and azure drake will hurt far more, and blizzard has shown expansion after expansion that they will support the archtype.  Miracle rogue has been nerfed time and time again and each time it was "the end of miracle rogue", deck is still around and still strong and will most likely remain as such.  Ice lance will pretty much ruin freeze mage, which I don't like much but it does go against blizzards design philosophy (as well as being one of the most consistently complained about decks that has ever existed by the community), so I won't defend it but I will say that I understand it.  As for power overwhelming, it has created multiple degenerate combo's over the years on top of being one of the cards that makes zoo incredibly oppressive when it is strong (which is honestly fairly often).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think these changes and removals have to be good for the game.  I have been thinking for a while now that the new sets are having less and less impact on the game (with a few exceptions) because for the pro/top players it is too easy to take a current core deck, and tweak it here and there with a couple of new cards, job done.

Azure drake is everywhere, and so is Rag, taking these cards out will mean people with have to have a good think about the core build of decks, think how many have 2 x drake and rag in ....

That and the changes to the ladder make me a happy bunny!

Exciting times and I guess Mammoth = Un Goro :-)

On a synical note, 3 xpacs a year = a shed load more money for Blizz!  An adventure gets you the cards guaranteed, packs = more dosh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 copies of Ice Lance and 2 golden copies of Ice Lance. Do I have to dust the non-goldens to get 100 dust at rotation or will Blizzard automatically allocate to the highest value cards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, SuperFly said:

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

I believe ~140 cards were confirmed.

14 hours ago, SuperFly said:

oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

But that's where you were wrong when you dismissed wild too fast. Wild is a fantastic place, and it will take quite some time to be completely out of hand. I would even say that Wild is more balanced than standard at this moment.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, positiv2 said:

I believe ~140 cards were confirmed.

But that's where you were wrong when you dismissed wild too fast. Wild is a fantastic place, and it will take quite some time to be completely out of hand. I would even say that Wild is more balanced than standard at this moment.

 

Yes, I hope 45 to 60 cards are free from the adventure aspect of the expansions.

Its suddenly gone from 1.5 expansions a year to 3. Yes that is also 1.5 adventures less, but that is 1.5 adventures worth of cards for only the cost of 1.5 of an adventure a year.

It's going to cost a bomb to keep a mainly full collection now and it was not cheap to start with!


I've not dismissed wild and I enjoy playing wild, what I said was, when wild came loads of cards because 'half worthless'.

I'ld rather have seen old cards balanced, or new cards of the same power level and there be only standard, with no wild, where all cards are in play, but with some great thought into making ranking up exciting for all.

...

Idk, if we want to carry on, it is going to cost us more unless they change the pricing... it's really annoying, if the game was half price my son and I would have two decent collections and spent the same money. Now they want more money... I'm not sure we can afford that any more, like, roof over head and food in belly is more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeze mage and miracle rogue after centuries got dealt with, wondering why they took so long to remove them.

PO wasn't that strong paladin has +3 atk for 1 mana that not make the card even die, and was used for combo with many warlock cards like shadowflame as board clear, trade or finisher in control, they coulda keep it honestly since warlock isn't played aggro against all the pirate trash running around. And Warlock has no removals under 3 mana shadow bolt (Soulfire is useless outside aggro decks if you discard a Reno is auto concede).

Drake is the most popular card in the game and alongside Thalnos is pratically everywhere no aggro.

I don't know why they kept Thalnos that is pratically identical to drake tho.

Sylvanas was good when N'zoth come out but nowadays in pirate meta nobody plays her outside of Renos maybe in future coulda be stronger who knows. In a deathrattle deck you replace her with Cairne and there is close to no difference because you rarely steal better than a 4/5 , Warlock can't shadowflame her anymore to board clear seems the biggest deal with her.The blizzard guy compared to MC but seems he doesn't play the game much because to steal anything with sylvanas she has to die and for example in priest making her die cost 3 mana so is 6+3 to mimic a MC you save only 1 mana and lose a shadow word death, if you suicide her on a 5/5 she isn't better than a magma rager and she steals nothing, if enemy has no board she steals nothing and so on.To get value from sylvanas she has to die during your turn because your opponent will give you usually nothing when she die on his turn.

Rag is clearly the strongest 8 drop and played in all Reno decks of sort that are the only control you see around.

The removals from stardard seems good hope in more variety of decks in 2017 and stop of the pirate meta trash that last expansion generated with shitloads of face cancers.

In conclusion for me:

Good Removals: Ice Lance, Conceal, Azure Drake, Ragnaros

Bad Removals: Sylvanas, Power Overwelming

 

PS: When they will nerf the damn Fiery War Axe that is disgustingly broken in every way you look at it?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

I don't know why they kept Thalnos that is pratically identical to drake tho.

Bloodmage Thalnos is quite easy to replace. Removing Bloodmage Thalnos would not be as impactful as Azure Drake.

19 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

In a deathrattle deck you replace her with Cairne and there is close to no difference because you rarely steal better than a 4/5

That's true, you will not get Chillwind Yeti value from Sylvanas Windrunner that often, but the power of Sylvanas Windrunner isn't only in generating board presence for you, but also reducing your opponent's board value - you gain much more tempo than with Cairne Bloodhoof.

21 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

The blizzard guy compared to MC but seems he doesn't play the game much because to steal anything with sylvanas she has to die and for example in priest making her die cost 3 mana so is 6+3 to mimic a MC you save only 1 mana and lose a shadow word death

As I said previously, if you steal a minion, your opponent loses that minion. Say, if Sylvanas Windrunner died to a 5-drop (killing it in the process) and stole a 2-cost minion, you gain 5 mana value from the minion killed, 2 mana value from the minion you gain, but also 2 mana value you get from removing the minion.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Blizzard goes through with these changes, Standard is going to be even less appealing to me now than it's ever been.

It's bad enough that Hearthstone has become a P2W landscape with the introduction and restrictions of Standard format, but now the issue of Standard only having 3 or 4 commonly played decks is only going to get worse now that so many core cards are getting removed and from a set that was previously established as being safe from changes.

The reason that only 3 deck archetypes are being played right now is because you keep banning and nerfing cards that were commonplace until only a couple of the newest cards have any appeal left, Blizzard. It won't mean anything by next year or even next expansion because players will find some new broken cards and combos to replace those lost, and you just can't keep performing historical revisionism on cards that you don't like because soon enough we'll have nothing but a single deck type used by only one or two classes that people will want to play anymore.

That defeats your vision of having Standard out as a format where things are always fresh. It's creating more stagnation than it is encouraging change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of want to summarise the changes as "money money money".

Removing standard cards could be considered balancing but have they really been watching the meta?  Okay I accept Azure drake is prominent (so nerf make it 3/3 or remove spell damage) but otherwise none of the other hall of fame cards are used in more than one deck in the top 20 decks according to Tempo Storm and believe me since crafting Sylvanas I have used her much at all.  I think removing power cards from classic is just to reduce classic to a swamp of mediocrity, I suspect the ideal situation for Blizzard is to make it impossible to play any worthwhile decks with spending $$$ of money buying cards but still retaining the illusion of FTP 

If that the above being money related is arguable then adventures being removed is more obvious, consider the Adventure income model, 1) release adventure 2) people pay fix amount 3) players have all the cards, compare that against expansions 1) Release expansion 2) players buy packs 3) player don't get all the cards they want 4) buy more packs 5) play for a while meta shifts, dont have the right card for new deck 5) buy more cards... steadier stream of income.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Occultus3 said:

I kind of want to summarise the changes as "money money money".

Removing standard cards could be considered balancing but have they really been watching the meta?  Okay I accept Azure drake is prominent (so nerf make it 3/3 or remove spell damage) but otherwise none of the other hall of fame cards are used in more than one deck in the top 20 decks according to Tempo Storm and believe me since crafting Sylvanas I have used her much at all.  I think removing power cards from classic is just to reduce classic to a swamp of mediocrity, I suspect the ideal situation for Blizzard is to make it impossible to play any worthwhile decks with spending $$$ of money buying cards but still retaining the illusion of FTP 

If that the above being money related is arguable then adventures being removed is more obvious, consider the Adventure income model, 1) release adventure 2) people pay fix amount 3) players have all the cards, compare that against expansions 1) Release expansion 2) players buy packs 3) player don't get all the cards they want 4) buy more packs 5) play for a while meta shifts, dont have the right card for new deck 5) buy more cards... steadier stream of income.

 

Well, on the other hand making adventures requires lots of money to be invested by Blizzard. Creating new cards alone requires investments. There is no such thing as free lunch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/02/2017 at 10:50 PM, LandKelvin said:

Well, on the other hand making adventures requires lots of money to be invested by Blizzard. Creating new cards alone requires investments. There is no such thing as free lunch...

Oh poor blizzard having to spend some of the almost $400 million dollars they got from hearthstone last year on content, poor things.
  
We should go to 4 expansions a year and double pack costs, maybe we could get an extra voice actor in this year...

Edited by SuperFly
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a slightly different note ...

If I want to continue playing Wild, and don't have all of the above cards yet, now would be the time to craft them, in gold even, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Kobal said:

On a slightly different note ...

If I want to continue playing Wild, and don't have all of the above cards yet, now would be the time to craft them, in gold even, correct?

Absolutely. Now, what I don't know is whether you get dust for both golden and normal card(s) if you have both, or only from the golden one. If it's the former, I just closed the best trade deal with Mexico got a ton of free dust and golden animations. If it's the latter, I just lost about 4k dust. So, until it is clear which is true (though I might have missed the information), I would refrain from crafting golden cards that you have without gold as well. Crafting golden cards that you do not have normal is a good deal though, unless you are going to need the dust until march/april.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      As expected, the card reveals are now coming thick and fast. March 21st brought four more, which brings the total so far to twenty-eight. The Shaman Quest card was amongst those revealed in E.Malone's Journal Week 3.
      For those interested in the flavour of the Journal, it can be found on the official site. Professor George H. Doyle's second video is shown at the bottom of this post. The rest of this article concentrates on the cards revealed.
      As with all of the Quest cards so far, the Shaman Quest relies on doing something a certain number of times. It remains to be seen if there will be ways to counter this, or if you have to rely on being able counter the reward once it has happened.

      Unite the Murlocs seems really powerful, although 10 Murlocs is a lot of Murlocs, especially if you have to keep the Quest and play it on turn 1 or 2, which seems likely. Megafin is the perfect reward because decks that have to play a huge number of cheap minions run out of cards fast, refilling your hand for five mana while developing a huge threat seems like it will probably be game winning in many situations. All that remains to be seen is if there are any new Murloc cards, and how the synergy plays out in practice.

      So, there is a new Murloc card, which follows the pattern so far of printing a new card that is clearly designed to work alongside the Quest. Although it is not clear which way you would build a Murloc deck for maximum efficiency, the ability to Discover a Murloc is a powerful one, especially with Finja, the Flying Star in the rotation. It seems very likely that this card will see a lot of play. Just a note of caution to budding deckbuilders out there, Everyfin is Awesome does rotate out of Standard when Un'Goro is released, so that won't be able to go into this deck.

      Tol'vir Stoneshaper builds on the Elemental synergy plan that is being pushed hard in this set. Obviously the card is pretty powerful if it comes down after an Elemental often enough. A 3/5 for 4 Mana is reasonable enough on the occasions that it doesn't trigger that the card will definitely be considered in Elemental heavy decks that have things to do on turn 3.
      Previous Reveals:
      Elementals: here.
      19-20 March: here.
      Live reveal stream, 11 cards: here.
      Un'Goro announcement video: here.
    • By L0rinda

      7.1 is live, brings Arena changes, balance tweaks and more
      The latest update, Patch 7.1, is live. This update includes changes to Arena, the long awaited balance changes, and the introduction of Un'Goro pre-purchase.
      The entire list for the notes can be seen at the bottom of this post, but here are the highlights.
      Balance and Ladder Changes
      As announced previously, Small-Time Buccaneer is now a 1/1 minion. Spirit Claws now costs 2 Mana. You will no longer be able to fall below certain Ranks on ladder. Those ranks are 15,10, and 5.
      Arena Changes
      Also now live are the announced Arena changes.
      Arena has seen a major overhaul, with the format being Standard only. Commons, and neutral Basic and Classic cards will be less frequent. Spells will be offered more often. If you have Golden cards in your collection, they will appear in your draft.
      Other Changes
      The keyword Poisonous has been added to replace "Destroy any minion damaged by this minion". This will apply to Pit Snake, Emperor Cobra, Maexxna, and Patient Assassin. From the pieces we have seen regarding Un'Goro, it will probably also apply to Plants in the new set, and possibly some other cards as well.
      There have been changes to the matchmaking system. Presumably in line with the discussion with Iksar last week. If so, these changes will mainly impact Legendary players.
      Blizzard
      Ranked Play Upon achieving certain milestones in Ranked Play, it will no longer be possible to lose ranks beyond those milestones for that season. The milestones are Rank 20, 15, 10, 5, and Legend. Arena Creating decks for the Arena will now feature Standard cards only. Arena runs that were started prior to the patch will still include Wild cards. Rares, Epics, and Legendaries will be offered more frequently during Arena deckbuilding. Spells will now show up with a higher frequency. Neutral Basic / Classic cards will appear less often. If you own a Golden version of a card, the first copy you draft will be Golden. If you own multiple Golden copies of a card, all copies you draft will be Golden. Balance Updates Small-time Buccaneer’s health reduced from 2 to 1. The mana cost of Spirit Claws increased from 1 to 2. GeneralNew keyword: Poisonous - Minions with Poisonous will destroy any minion they inflict damage to.  Pit Snake, Patient Assassin, Emperor Cobra, and Maexxna have been updated with the new keyword. Added some memory optimizations. Improved matchmaking for new players. We are testing an update to the account creation process for mobile players. This will minimize the overhead associated with creating a new Battle.net account, and will be available in limited release. Maximum in-game music volume has been capped in order to retain the best audio quality. [Android] We made some optimizations to Android distribution, allowing for a smaller install size and smoother patching in the future. Bug Fixes Resolved inconsistencies in the way that Small Time Buccaneer’s Attack interacts with effects such as those generated by Humility, Keeper of Uldaman, and Crazed Alchemist. Resolved an issue where a Kazakus potion spell cards could appear blank when copied by a minion or spell effect. Knuckles will now correctly use its effect when under the effects of Misdirection. Addressed an issue with the interaction of Wrath’s card draw timing in conjunction with Daring Reporter. Snipe will now correctly trigger after Potion of Polymorph. Djinni of Zephyrs will now correctly copy spells buffed by spell damage. Bouncing Blade will now correctly continue bouncing after clearing a Divine Shield. Resolved an issue where seasonal reward cards could take a while to show up in the Collection Manager. Searching the Collection Manager with a class name will now correctly display Tri-Class cards. Resolved issues that could slow or stop payment authentication when using the in-game Shop. Fixed many minor visual issues and some card text inconsistencies. (source)  
    • By L0rinda

      The official site has published a discussion with Mike Donais about the design process of Elementals for Journey to Un'Goro. The article contains a lot of interesting information, as well as four new cards.
      As usual when the designers discuss their work, the article is well worth a read. Anyone interested in the design process should take a look. For the purposes of this article and comments though, we will concentrate on the new cards revealed.

      Stone Sentinel introduces us to how Elementals are going to function, where the full power of the card is unleashed if you also played an Elemental on the previous turn. A comparable card is Jade Chieftain, which in a straight stats battle will probably come out on top. However, if the metagame goes the right way, Stone Sentinel could still be a playable card in a control deck as aggressive decks often struggle to get through two Taunt minions in one turn. Shaman can also usually find ways to use wide boards, and generating three minions from one card will have added value because of this. This is a good example of why just adding up stats isn't always the best way to decide how good a card is, and the card will require testing within a synergetic deck to see how powerful it is going to be.

      While Ozruk has some "wow" factor, (It is stated in the article that the design team have seen it with 30 Health), it is probably aimed more at casual players than serious ones. Unless it can combine with another card to become untargetable, then a huge Health total might not be as good as it seems most of the time. Ancient of War comes down just in time to be a huge nuisance to aggro decks, while Soggoth the Slitherer almost always eats a relevant amount of damage. Ozruk has neither of those benefits, and although it will definitely win some games as a 5/20 Taunt minion, it seems likely that there are will be too many ways for decks to circumvent a single expensive card like this.

      After seeing the first two cards, it was clear we were going to need some enablers. Fire Fly and Flame Geyser are two of those. A little like predicting Jade cards, these are going to be difficult to have a feel for until they are played in the new meta. They do seem like good cards on face value alone though, and when Elemental synergy is added in, it seems likely that we'll be playing these cards next month!
      The other notable point regarding Elementals in the article, was the list of cards that will now be classed as Elementals. Those cards are listed below. We know, from when Mechs were added, that even if there are cards that impact Elementals in a negative way, there will be no dust refund for the changed cards. (Other than Ragnaros of course, as it is entering the Hall of Fame.)
      Blizzard
      Water Elemental Anomalus Ragnaros Lightlord Lightspawn Dust Devil Unbound Elemental Fireguard Destroyer Rumbling Elemental Earth Elemental Fire Elemental Neptulon Al’Akir the Windlord Arcane Anomaly Ice Rager Magma Rager Frost Elemental Baron Geddon Ragnaros the Firelord  
    • By Zadina

      There’s a current theory, based on two major clues, placing the release of the next Hearthstone expansion in the beginning of April.
      Namely, the date is Thursday the 6th of April. This conclusion was reached when u/17inchcorckscrew used a well-known trick: he/she set his/her computer’s clock ahead until the Un’Goro pack he/she had became openable. If you want the exact hour, the pack was made available after 10 a.m. PST in the Americas and after 7 p.m. EST in Europe.




      Screenshot provided by the Redditor mentioned above. The client crashed when the user tried to open the pack.
      Hearthpwn has also pointed out that there is currently an Amazon coin promotion for pre-purchasing Journey to Un’Goro. The offer is due to end exactly at 11:59 p.m. PST on April 5th.

      Now, this is pretty strong evidence, but the Un’Goro packs ingame mention that they are “available in mid April*!” and the 6th of April isn’t exactly in the middle of April. Perhaps the asterisk signifies that this isn't something set in stone.
      On the other hand, if this turns out to be true, it will be the second time that something about the new expansion is accidentally leaked – the first time being when its name and its dinosaur-themed content were revealed a few days before its actual announcement.

    • By L0rinda
       

      Four more cards have been revealed since our previous update. This brings the total revealed so far to twenty.
      With under a month to reveal 135 cards, spoiler season is well underway, so let's take a look at the most recently spoiled cards.

      The first thing that springs to mind when seeing this card is that it is designed to be played with Awaken the Makers, the new Priest Quest card that requires you to summon seven Deathrattle minions. Cards from your opponent's deck will not have good synergy with your deck, but they will tend to be good cards (other than situational cards like weapon buffs, or Quests that have been mulliganed away). Babbling Book was not expected to be a very playable card, but found a home in many decks by being just good enough. I think Crystalline Oracle is also destined to be played, but I am not sure how much.

      Sunkeeper Tarim seems to have many potential uses, and as such will likely find a home somewhere. As its ability can turn your army of 1/1s into a huge army at a moment's notice, just the threat of it being in your deck will put pressure on the opponent to keep that army under control. At first, Tarim also seems to be an okay solution to opposing Jade cards, as it would take three enemy 3/3s to get through the 3/7 taunt. The main problem with that, is that if your deck is far enough behind that it needs to turn Jades into 3/3, the Jade player will probably make even bigger minions on the following turn. The best use seems to be the combination of the two,which is to force through final damage in an aggressive deck.

      This is a very interesting card. If the meta is fast, then Shadow Visions will be unplayable, but if it is slow, then the card can be used as a way to generate slots in your deck. Having only one of some cards will help to reduce the clutter that sometimes occurs in control decks, and so this card will have to be tested quite heavily. There is also the more amusing combo with the new Elise card, which would enable you to find your pack faster.

      As with Crystalline Oracle, Clutchmother Zavas seems like it was created to fit in with the Warlock Quest. One of the big problems with Lakkari Sacrifice is that even in a control shell, discarding six cards over the course of a game is a very expensive ask. Your hand empties, and then you have to not only refill it, but be prepared to discard some of it. Zavas appears to solve those problems, and has a big upside as well. I would expect this card to not only fit into a Control Warlock Quest deck with ease, but to enable the archetype to exist.
      Previous News:
      Live reveal stream, 11 cards: here.
      Un'Goro announcement video: here.