Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Year of the Mammoth: Six Cards Leaving Classic

32 posts in this topic

619nB8R.jpg

Blizzard have announced that the next Hearthstone year will be called The Year of the Mammoth. Six cards from the Classic set will be moved to a new Hall of Fame set, which can only be played in Wild.

The announcement explains that the new Hall of Fame set will include cards that are currently in the Reward set, but the big news here is the six cards that will be leaving Standard. You can see Blizzard's reasons on the link above, but I've given a few notes in this article. Those cards are shown below.

As well as the removed cards, there will be no adventures in 2017. Instead we will be given three full expansions that will be accompanied by a single-player mission, which will be used to enhance flavour, and offer challenges. This sounds like it will be along the lines of an adventure, but optional. I feel this is a great change, as it hurts nobody.

ZBCQKzH.png

Azure Drake is simply in too many decks. It is a hard card to nerf without making it weak, but it is pretty much as powerful as a 5-drop can be. Removing this to free up other 5-drops makes sense.

6NGP6Q5.png

The reasoning for Sylvanas is similar. Blizzard's words make a lot of sense on this one, and also give an insight into the future:

Blizzard LogoBlizzard

Similar to Azure Drake, it’s hard to see a card at the six mana cost out-value Sylvanas. In addition, Sylvanas has the most powerful Deathrattle effect in the game—as a comparison, the Priest card Mind Control costs 10 mana. We have exciting Deathrattle build-arounds coming soon, and in combination with Sylvanas, they would be too powerful for Standard.

This seems to imply that N'Zoth, the Corruptor will be making a big comeback soon!

mZYTnDj.png

I suspect a lot of people will be glad to see the back of Ragnaros. The Random element was often a contentious issue.

RCo1QyZ.png

The removal of Power Overwhelming is a bit of a surprise, but it seems that it has mainly been nerfed because of its strength in combinaton with cards like Leeroy Jenkins and Faceless Manipulator. I would also assume that Warlock is going to be getting some fun new toys to replace it.

gqz1mFk.png

Ice Lance has been removed to remove Freeze Mage and allow new strategies to develop. It is also interesting that Blizzard mention it will allow them to make cards that copy cards. That could also apply to Power Overwhelming, so I would expect something along those lines to be in the next set.

VvY10TL.png

Conceal leaving will make sense to everyone. It allows Gadgetzan Auctioneer to survive as an interesting card, and removes the annoyance of not being able to interact with your opponent.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Those removals are insanely important... I'm a little annoyed at removing classics since they previously claimed they would always be a part of standard (which is why I crafted Rag). Actually nervous of what tools they will give control. Since these are mostly (not power overwhelming) finishers or critical value for control decks, and combine that with losing reno and a few other tools, we will see what they have learned and might give us.

Also a really brave choice to scrap adventures but slightly merge them with the expansions.

Addition after reading their article:

"We wanted to allow players to disenchant Classic cards that are being added to the Hall of Fame set for full dust refunds, but then felt that incentivizing players to dust their cool Wild cards was counter to our goal of making Wild awesome.

So instead, we're just going to give you the dust, and you can keep the cards!"

Blizzard... how do you always know how to make me optimistic about huge changes. Since I have max copies (non-golden) of all of these, that's a lot of free dust.

Edited by Laragon
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RIP Zoo Lock

RIP Freeze Mage

RIP Miracle Rogue

Oh, well...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully these changes mean that meta will shift to control.

But it's Blizzard, so it's entirely possible these changes are not really justified (I think everyone remembers how they nerfed a bunch of classic cards last year and now nobody plays them).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Esmer said:

Hopefully these changes mean that meta will shift to control.

Not with these switches, it won't! The only of these six cards that can be found in an aggro deck is Power Overwhelming. This hurts midrange and control far more than aggro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a wild player, this barely affects me. It gives me free dust, I get to keep the cards, what's not to like.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Keizoku said:

Not with these switches, it won't! The only of these six cards that can be found in an aggro deck is Power Overwhelming. This hurts midrange and control far more than aggro.

Pretty much, but since standard was so fast, a lot of decks had to adapt. Freeze mage is played as the freeze face variant, miracle is played as face deck with pirates and Questing Adventurer. Still, Azure Drake is a big loss for a ton of control and slower midrange decks, and it will affect them heavily I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im fucking sad... Blizzard just wants to kill the most decision heavy decks in the game..... Why do you have to kill all the combo decks?

Why do you want to turn hearthstone constructed into a midrange arena?

I dont understand.....

PS : i really hope the new expansion introduces new deck archetypes that are actually interesting to play.

Edited by CodeRazor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, see ya hearthstone, was fun while it lasted.

 

I'm off to play paladins, a game run by a company which actually listens to their players and doesn't take a little under one year to "fix"(I use the term losely) any balance issue the game runs into. Oh, and where the skill involved in playing a hero is actually taken into account when addressing said balance issues.

Edited by JooBatanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 expansions?

A year???

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

That's a lot of money if you want a decently full collection, every year?

I dunno, my son and I already use the same account because we cannot afford 2 decent collections, this could be the nail in the coffin for me/us.

I was pissed enough at starting the game late, getting a fullish collection within a few months and then, oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

Man. Lesson really learnt this time, actilizard is too much cash cow.

Edited by SuperFly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SuperFly said:

3 expansions?

A year???

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

That's a lot of money if you want a decently full collection, every year?

I dunno, my son and I already use the same account because we cannot afford 2 decent collections, this could be the nail in the coffin for me/us.

I was pissed enough at starting the game late, getting a fullish collection within a few months and then, oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

Man. Lesson really learnt this time, actilizard is too much cash cow.

I'm going to play the devil's advocate here(because believe me when I tell you I do NOT like blizzard's design focus for hearthstone at all, just not in this regard) and tell you that if you genuinely believe blizzard are using hearthstone as a cash cow, you should try playing more games with the f2p model. That might actually be one of the few things they got right in the whole game so far.

There is more than one million ways to make cards easily without spending money(in fact myself, and many others have gone to legend more than once without ever spending money on Hearthstone), but sadly people want the game to not only be accessible, but also easy to achieve stuff, and I would argue that is what ended up killing it's entice for me.

And ironically enough, blizzard isn't even doing a good job of catering into the casuals(which is obviously their focus since the game released). I very much doubt rank 15-20's enjoy playing against face hunters/pirate warriors/secret paladins on every other game. And I would wager that for every person that has ever quit the game because of "uninteractive decks" like miracle rogue or freeze mage there are at least 20 that have for the aforementioned decks.

Yet for some strange reason, deleting decks like these from the game has been their top priority for a bunch of nerf/wild ban waves now. Mysterious isn't it?

Edited by JooBatanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sigh.  This is a bad move on Blizzard's part.  I feel this is going to do more bad then good.  I don't like this approach of "We feel its too powerful so we are just going to remove it."  I can see if these were physical cards then yes by all means like Magic: The Gathering has to do but they are not.  Blizzard has the oppertunity to fine tune any of these cards, to change them as they are digital.  You could fix them but thats time and money right?  So instead we just remove them and wait to see what the long term consquences is.  Thats bad.  That is a bad trend to get into. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I applaud blizzard on this decision.  Nerfing cards, especially iconic ones like Sylvanas, just feels bad for people who play wild.  Removing them from the rotation is a much more sensible thing (besides if they nerfed them it would basically do the same thing, how many cards has blizzard nerfed and they still see play?  Not many), in my opinion.  Azure Drake is the most ubiquitous 5 drop in the game, probably the most ubiquitous card in the game in terms of just the sheer number of decks it is played in.  The card is both incredibly strong and multi-purposed, to the point that any five drop printed has to be broken strong or incredibly niche to compete.  Sylvanas and Rag are much the same, there power level is so strong and the deck slots for 6+ cost cards are so limited that anything printed has to be stronger then sylvanas and rag, which means they have to be doctor boom levels of broken, which was a card that defined the meta game for quite some time.  As for conceal, this nerf won't kill off miracle rogue, the loss of tomb pillager and azure drake will hurt far more, and blizzard has shown expansion after expansion that they will support the archtype.  Miracle rogue has been nerfed time and time again and each time it was "the end of miracle rogue", deck is still around and still strong and will most likely remain as such.  Ice lance will pretty much ruin freeze mage, which I don't like much but it does go against blizzards design philosophy (as well as being one of the most consistently complained about decks that has ever existed by the community), so I won't defend it but I will say that I understand it.  As for power overwhelming, it has created multiple degenerate combo's over the years on top of being one of the cards that makes zoo incredibly oppressive when it is strong (which is honestly fairly often).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think these changes and removals have to be good for the game.  I have been thinking for a while now that the new sets are having less and less impact on the game (with a few exceptions) because for the pro/top players it is too easy to take a current core deck, and tweak it here and there with a couple of new cards, job done.

Azure drake is everywhere, and so is Rag, taking these cards out will mean people with have to have a good think about the core build of decks, think how many have 2 x drake and rag in ....

That and the changes to the ladder make me a happy bunny!

Exciting times and I guess Mammoth = Un Goro :-)

On a synical note, 3 xpacs a year = a shed load more money for Blizz!  An adventure gets you the cards guaranteed, packs = more dosh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 copies of Ice Lance and 2 golden copies of Ice Lance. Do I have to dust the non-goldens to get 100 dust at rotation or will Blizzard automatically allocate to the highest value cards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, SuperFly said:

Wow, erm, I hope that 45-60 cards come with each adventure.

I believe ~140 cards were confirmed.

14 hours ago, SuperFly said:

oh wild, so all those cards/money are more than half worthless now. Great.

But that's where you were wrong when you dismissed wild too fast. Wild is a fantastic place, and it will take quite some time to be completely out of hand. I would even say that Wild is more balanced than standard at this moment.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, positiv2 said:

I believe ~140 cards were confirmed.

But that's where you were wrong when you dismissed wild too fast. Wild is a fantastic place, and it will take quite some time to be completely out of hand. I would even say that Wild is more balanced than standard at this moment.

 

Yes, I hope 45 to 60 cards are free from the adventure aspect of the expansions.

Its suddenly gone from 1.5 expansions a year to 3. Yes that is also 1.5 adventures less, but that is 1.5 adventures worth of cards for only the cost of 1.5 of an adventure a year.

It's going to cost a bomb to keep a mainly full collection now and it was not cheap to start with!


I've not dismissed wild and I enjoy playing wild, what I said was, when wild came loads of cards because 'half worthless'.

I'ld rather have seen old cards balanced, or new cards of the same power level and there be only standard, with no wild, where all cards are in play, but with some great thought into making ranking up exciting for all.

...

Idk, if we want to carry on, it is going to cost us more unless they change the pricing... it's really annoying, if the game was half price my son and I would have two decent collections and spent the same money. Now they want more money... I'm not sure we can afford that any more, like, roof over head and food in belly is more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeze mage and miracle rogue after centuries got dealt with, wondering why they took so long to remove them.

PO wasn't that strong paladin has +3 atk for 1 mana that not make the card even die, and was used for combo with many warlock cards like shadowflame as board clear, trade or finisher in control, they coulda keep it honestly since warlock isn't played aggro against all the pirate trash running around. And Warlock has no removals under 3 mana shadow bolt (Soulfire is useless outside aggro decks if you discard a Reno is auto concede).

Drake is the most popular card in the game and alongside Thalnos is pratically everywhere no aggro.

I don't know why they kept Thalnos that is pratically identical to drake tho.

Sylvanas was good when N'zoth come out but nowadays in pirate meta nobody plays her outside of Renos maybe in future coulda be stronger who knows. In a deathrattle deck you replace her with Cairne and there is close to no difference because you rarely steal better than a 4/5 , Warlock can't shadowflame her anymore to board clear seems the biggest deal with her.The blizzard guy compared to MC but seems he doesn't play the game much because to steal anything with sylvanas she has to die and for example in priest making her die cost 3 mana so is 6+3 to mimic a MC you save only 1 mana and lose a shadow word death, if you suicide her on a 5/5 she isn't better than a magma rager and she steals nothing, if enemy has no board she steals nothing and so on.To get value from sylvanas she has to die during your turn because your opponent will give you usually nothing when she die on his turn.

Rag is clearly the strongest 8 drop and played in all Reno decks of sort that are the only control you see around.

The removals from stardard seems good hope in more variety of decks in 2017 and stop of the pirate meta trash that last expansion generated with shitloads of face cancers.

In conclusion for me:

Good Removals: Ice Lance, Conceal, Azure Drake, Ragnaros

Bad Removals: Sylvanas, Power Overwelming

 

PS: When they will nerf the damn Fiery War Axe that is disgustingly broken in every way you look at it?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

I don't know why they kept Thalnos that is pratically identical to drake tho.

Bloodmage Thalnos is quite easy to replace. Removing Bloodmage Thalnos would not be as impactful as Azure Drake.

19 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

In a deathrattle deck you replace her with Cairne and there is close to no difference because you rarely steal better than a 4/5

That's true, you will not get Chillwind Yeti value from Sylvanas Windrunner that often, but the power of Sylvanas Windrunner isn't only in generating board presence for you, but also reducing your opponent's board value - you gain much more tempo than with Cairne Bloodhoof.

21 minutes ago, Hanz39 said:

The blizzard guy compared to MC but seems he doesn't play the game much because to steal anything with sylvanas she has to die and for example in priest making her die cost 3 mana so is 6+3 to mimic a MC you save only 1 mana and lose a shadow word death

As I said previously, if you steal a minion, your opponent loses that minion. Say, if Sylvanas Windrunner died to a 5-drop (killing it in the process) and stole a 2-cost minion, you gain 5 mana value from the minion killed, 2 mana value from the minion you gain, but also 2 mana value you get from removing the minion.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Blizzard goes through with these changes, Standard is going to be even less appealing to me now than it's ever been.

It's bad enough that Hearthstone has become a P2W landscape with the introduction and restrictions of Standard format, but now the issue of Standard only having 3 or 4 commonly played decks is only going to get worse now that so many core cards are getting removed and from a set that was previously established as being safe from changes.

The reason that only 3 deck archetypes are being played right now is because you keep banning and nerfing cards that were commonplace until only a couple of the newest cards have any appeal left, Blizzard. It won't mean anything by next year or even next expansion because players will find some new broken cards and combos to replace those lost, and you just can't keep performing historical revisionism on cards that you don't like because soon enough we'll have nothing but a single deck type used by only one or two classes that people will want to play anymore.

That defeats your vision of having Standard out as a format where things are always fresh. It's creating more stagnation than it is encouraging change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of want to summarise the changes as "money money money".

Removing standard cards could be considered balancing but have they really been watching the meta?  Okay I accept Azure drake is prominent (so nerf make it 3/3 or remove spell damage) but otherwise none of the other hall of fame cards are used in more than one deck in the top 20 decks according to Tempo Storm and believe me since crafting Sylvanas I have used her much at all.  I think removing power cards from classic is just to reduce classic to a swamp of mediocrity, I suspect the ideal situation for Blizzard is to make it impossible to play any worthwhile decks with spending $$$ of money buying cards but still retaining the illusion of FTP 

If that the above being money related is arguable then adventures being removed is more obvious, consider the Adventure income model, 1) release adventure 2) people pay fix amount 3) players have all the cards, compare that against expansions 1) Release expansion 2) players buy packs 3) player don't get all the cards they want 4) buy more packs 5) play for a while meta shifts, dont have the right card for new deck 5) buy more cards... steadier stream of income.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Occultus3 said:

I kind of want to summarise the changes as "money money money".

Removing standard cards could be considered balancing but have they really been watching the meta?  Okay I accept Azure drake is prominent (so nerf make it 3/3 or remove spell damage) but otherwise none of the other hall of fame cards are used in more than one deck in the top 20 decks according to Tempo Storm and believe me since crafting Sylvanas I have used her much at all.  I think removing power cards from classic is just to reduce classic to a swamp of mediocrity, I suspect the ideal situation for Blizzard is to make it impossible to play any worthwhile decks with spending $$$ of money buying cards but still retaining the illusion of FTP 

If that the above being money related is arguable then adventures being removed is more obvious, consider the Adventure income model, 1) release adventure 2) people pay fix amount 3) players have all the cards, compare that against expansions 1) Release expansion 2) players buy packs 3) player don't get all the cards they want 4) buy more packs 5) play for a while meta shifts, dont have the right card for new deck 5) buy more cards... steadier stream of income.

 

Well, on the other hand making adventures requires lots of money to be invested by Blizzard. Creating new cards alone requires investments. There is no such thing as free lunch...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 18/02/2017 at 10:50 PM, LandKelvin said:

Well, on the other hand making adventures requires lots of money to be invested by Blizzard. Creating new cards alone requires investments. There is no such thing as free lunch...

Oh poor blizzard having to spend some of the almost $400 million dollars they got from hearthstone last year on content, poor things.
  
We should go to 4 expansions a year and double pack costs, maybe we could get an extra voice actor in this year...

Edited by SuperFly
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a slightly different note ...

If I want to continue playing Wild, and don't have all of the above cards yet, now would be the time to craft them, in gold even, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Kobal said:

On a slightly different note ...

If I want to continue playing Wild, and don't have all of the above cards yet, now would be the time to craft them, in gold even, correct?

Absolutely. Now, what I don't know is whether you get dust for both golden and normal card(s) if you have both, or only from the golden one. If it's the former, I just closed the best trade deal with Mexico got a ton of free dust and golden animations. If it's the latter, I just lost about 4k dust. So, until it is clear which is true (though I might have missed the information), I would refrain from crafting golden cards that you have without gold as well. Crafting golden cards that you do not have normal is a good deal though, unless you are going to need the dust until march/april.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      Iksar has confirmed that the Matchmaking in Legend Ranks has been changed.
      As stated in our previous article, Legendary players have been noticing that in the last few days that they have been matched with players much closer to their own rank than usual. There was some confusion regarding this, as Iksar had not been made aware of the changes, but he has now confirmed that there are definitely changes in place.
      It is hard to precisely evaluate community feeling on the the new system, especially as I personally think they're a step in the right direction, but there are some players who are not keen on the changes. RayC and Xzirez have been the two highest profile players so far to disagree with the change. The issues that people against it have can be summarised as follows: Counter-Queuing: Many top Legends do not like counter-queuing, which is where you change your deck to try to counter your opponent. With the new system meaning you can often play the same person several times in a row, counter-queuing will become an important part of the game.
      Early Legend Advantage: People opposed to the changes claim that it overly favours the players who reach Legend early on. The older system made it easier to catch up at the end of the season.
      Win Trading: Due to the increased chance of playing against the same opponent, it is now easier to cover your tracks if you lose to a friend many times in a row to boost their ranking.
      There does seem to be a majority of players who support the new system however. The ladder system has been a cause of much debate for a long time now, and these changes, alongside the recent addition of ladder floors, seem to show that at the very least, ladder is currently a high priority for Blizzard to get right.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Menagerie Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Murloc Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By L0rinda

      The Hearthstone Championship Tour continues this weekend, with the focus shifting to the Asia-Pacific region. In this article I have introduced some of the players, and listed their deck archetypes.
      The APAC region is often regarded as the weakest region, and with some justification. However, although the region lacks a little in depth, the best players are definitely world class. Not only that, but the rest of the pack is rapidly improving, and it would be very negligent to ignore the region in 2017. Staz, from The Philippines recently won the $150,000 first prize at a stacked WESG, which marked the first major tournament won by the region. The top players will be looking to keep the rest of the world on notice, with some high quality play this weekend.
      Below I have listed a few of the key players, along with notes and deck archetypes.
        CaraCute: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      CaraCute has been touted by both NeilYo and Staz as having a good chance, and since those comments were made, she has come through the Tavern Hero Qualifier to take her place in the main Swiss. She learned her trade at Guildhouse Fireside gatherings, the same Fireside gatherings where caster Jia Dee also rose through the ranks.
        Che0nsu: Jade Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      Che0nsu made his name by first winning the Last Call qualifier, and then building on that to finish top four in the World Championship at BlizzCon. 
        ChongGEr: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Reno Warrior
      ChongGer is one of the most consistent performers in the South-East Asia scene. He came fourth in the Singapore Major, third in the Thai Major, and second in the Malaysia Major, where he lost two matches in the final to a player he had already beaten in the upper bracket! He also placed consistently high in the preliminaries last year. 
         GundamFlame: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      GundanFlame impressed observers in the Japan Summer Championship with his understanding of aggressive play. His understanding of when to ease off the pedal, and when to go all-in, won him the national title. It is no surprise that his lineup for the Playoffs is an aggressive one.

        HandomeGuy (pictured above): Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      HandsomeGuy is regarded as the man to beat whenever he steps foot in an APAC tournament. He finished in second place in the APAC Winter Championship, and that proved to be his worst result, as he went on to win both the Spring and Summer Championships.
        Kranich: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman (shown below), Reno Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      Kranich played in both the 2014, and 2015 World Championships, finishing top four and top eight respectively. Due to this, and the fact that he was a member of Team Dignitas before they withdrew from Hearthstone, he is one of the best known APAC players in the West. He is not scared to put his own stamp on decks, his RenoLock contains Doomguard and Krul the Unshackled, while his Shaman deck is slower than most Aggro Shamans, and leans towards midrange.

        NaviOOT: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      NaviOOT has built a strong reputation on the back of relentless top 100 finishes, and a consistently popular stream. In recent months he has turned his attention more and more to the tournament scene, making the trip to the Malaysia Open, in which he placed top 8. He has also stated that he will be travelling to DreamHack Austin, which is coming up soon. He managed top four at last Winter's APAC Championship, and is a genuine contender in 2017.
       Pinpingho: Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Reno Warlock, Water Warrior
      Pinpingho finished top eight in the 2015 World Championship. He was known for being one of the strongest Shaman players, back before Shaman was regarded as a playable class, so it will be interesting to see how a does now! He qualified for two APAC Championship events in 2016, and so is no stranger to these events.
        Surrender: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      Although he is yet to have a big win, Surrender is highly regarded in the community and has numerous good results. He already had Xixo as a playtest partner, and has recently joined Counter Logic Gaming, along with Xixo and Hoej. He will be as well prepared as anyone for this event.
        Tom60229: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      One of the most accomplished players in the field, Tom60229 has shown consistent results since the dawn of Hearthstone. His most recent tournament win was the Malaysia Major, but also had good success on the 2015 ONOG Tour. His worldwide tournament experience will stand him in good stead in this event.
       
      The event begins at 3am CET on Saturday 25 February, and coverage will be on the official PlayHearthstone Twitch channel.
    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!