L0rinda

Blizzard on the State of Hearthstone

8 posts in this topic

3Ven9ki.jpg

IGN have conducted an interview with Mike Donais and Peter Whalen on "The State of Hearthstone". The interview discusses their opinions on what they feel is good and bad about Hearthstone at the moment.

The ongoing theme throughout the article is that Blizzard are very pleased with how Standard has turned out. It is clear that they wanted people to have fun with cards like C'Thun and Yogg-Saron, Hope's End, and Donais believes that this goal has been achieved. Due to the fact that the win rates of deck archetypes are close together, he is also happy that the nerfs at the start of The year of the Kraken have worked out well.

There are several references to the diversity of ladder in the interview. Donais seems to be surprised just how many archetypes of some classes, particularly Warrior, are available. He warns that having more than two playable archetypes within a class is probably unrealistic in the long run, due to the nature of how the metagame picks out the best decks. He believes that although Miracle Rogue and Freeze Mage are uninteractive, they add a necessary richness to the game. He mentions that Blizzard do keep a close eye on such decks to make sure they don't become overly powerful. 

Going forward, it seems like the next changes will be related to social aspects of the game. Donais mentions that the ladder system is imperfect, but is not a high priority. Fireside Gatherings get mentioned a lot, and the fact people want the game to be more social is brought up. It also seems that there is a sense from this article, and also from Ben Brode's older interview with Hafu, that Arena needs to change. I get the impression that they are not entirely sure how, but that they will be playing around with it to see where it leads. Blizzard have shown that they are not scared to experiment when it comes to exploring ideas in Hearthstone. They are also keeping an eye on China's Arena rewards scheme, where players can get rewards for getting multiple 12 win finishes but have no plans to follow suit at this time.

There is plenty more in the interview, and reading what Mike Donais has to say is always interesting. He spends quite a lot of time in streams and forums, and usually has his finger on the pulse as to what is going on from the players' perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, L0rinda said:

The ongoing theme throughout the article is that Blizzard are very pleased with how Standard has turned out. It is clear that they wanted people to have fun with cards like C'Thun and Yogg-Saron, Hope's End

and of course Flamewreathed FacelessEternal SentinelDarkshire Councilman or Possessed Villager. Why didn't they picked the most played cards, that is what I don't understand. 

7 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Donais seems to be surprised just how many archetypes of some classes, particularly Warrior 

or Shaman. Wait, not that. Or Warlock. Oh, it isn't Warlock either. Was it Druid? Nope, one archetype as well. So, Paladin? Nope, N'Zoth is the only viable archetype now. Nice diversity for sure. Only Warr and Priest have more than 2 viable archetypes (imo).

7 hours ago, L0rinda said:

Freeze Mage are uninteractive, they add a necessary richness to the game

What the H is necessary richness? Like, Each CCG has to have an annoying uninteractive and boring-to-play-against deck to be really good? Is that what he's saying?

This seriously disappointed me. I hoped that they would see that their tries to slow meta down has done the exact opposite. I was also hoping for some changes in arena to make it a little bit more "fresh", but eh, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Anyway, nice article from you, even though it was disappointing for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, positiv2 said:

What the H is necessary richness? Like, Each CCG has to have an annoying uninteractive and boring-to-play-against deck to be really good? Is that what he's saying?

There are people, like me, who love playing Freeze Mage, Miracle Rogue, and other combo/control decks.  I've been a fan of that macro-archetype since 2002 when I got my first taste of Psychatog decks in M:tG, and the possibility of playing decks like that is one of the biggest things that drew me to Hearthstone and keeps me playing.  I'll grant you that they aren't the most fun to play against, but they are complex, challenging, and highly rewarding to pilot. 

 

I also thing it's dishonest and misleading to call them uninteractive simply because they do not focus on combat and trading minions.  These decks all have a high number of cards that affect, or interact with, their opponent's board, and learning the appropriate use for them is a large part of learning to play the decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Dawnblade said:

I also thing it's dishonest and misleading to call them uninteractive simply because they do not focus on combat and trading minions.  These decks all have a high number of cards that affect, or interact with, their opponent's board, and learning the appropriate use for them is a large part of learning to play the decks.

Both decks just keep stalling until they find their combo pieces. So, all the opponent can do is just bash the face of freeze mage or miracoli, while the deck (let's use freeze mage as the example) keeps freezing minions, plays Doomsayer+Freeze, AoEs, health gain (Ice Block and Ice Barrier) and so on. Then, if the uninteractive deck survives, it launches the combo, which cannot be avoided for most classes and it's game over. That is why I play control warrior. Last match against freeze mage, I got about 80 health in armor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, positiv2 said:

or Shaman. Wait, not that. Or Warlock. Oh, it isn't Warlock either. Was it Druid? Nope, one archetype as well. So, Paladin? Nope, N'Zoth is the only viable archetype now. Nice diversity for sure. Only Warr and Priest have more than 2 viable archetypes (imo).

 

Face shaman, midrange shaman, fatigue shaman, zoolock, combolock, renouncelock, c'thun druid, token druid, beast druid, aggro pala, n'zoth pala, reno pala. All perfectly viable decks that I run into regularly. I can't say I've ever seen ladder as diverse as it is atm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, PaasHaaS said:

fatigue shaman

Never met one. We don't even have a fatigue shaman deck on the website. Also, 

7 hours ago, PaasHaaS said:

zoolock, combolock, renouncelock

Haven't met a single combolock since WotoG, and only one renouncelock, and Peter Whalen said himself that he can't win with the deck, which, I would say, signifies that it isn't exactly competitive. 

7 hours ago, PaasHaaS said:

token druid, beast druid, aggro pala, reno pala

One token druid, not a single beast druid, about 4 aggro paladins (counting the secret version as well), one reno pally (but he ran N'Zoth as well). Hearthstone deck tracker says that druids are 4% of my matchups. Now, isn't that a dead class - who cares if there are more decks for that class, when nobody plays those decks? (Rogue has 3%, by the way)

7 hours ago, PaasHaaS said:

All perfectly viable decks

So, you would be able to hit the same rank with beast druid as with zoo or face shaman?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alas, I'm late to the party. 

If you ask me, Hearthstone is in its best shape right now. Tons of decks, less punishment and generally longer games = more room for mistake = more skill = balanced gameplay. Design issues like Druid comboing you off, Freeze Mage being wildly unbeatable and Secret Paladin sealing the game t6 regardless of what you do are (thankfully) gone. You actually have to work to win your games now.

I was expecting combo decks to be a problem in slow metagame, and ever since Patron Warrior nerfs Blizzard's hypocrisy in that matter was leaving me wondering if they have an idea about what they are doing. Game is tied to very basic mechanics and there is a very small room for actual combo-interaction cards, like Loatheb, that's not even Standard anymore.  However, consistency is a major factor and that's exactly why Freeze Mage and Miracle Rogue are relegated to tournaments mostly. This is not a long-term solution, however.

Such combo decks are very important to the whole design balance thing, essentially filling the Paper thing where Rock is Control and Scissors is aggro. In Hearthstone they are interactive because they are bad and they have to include some "not gonna die for some time" pieces and that is distilled, pure interaction. Without Combo, game would be reduced to midrange fiesta of different sorts where you try to draw more gas than your opponent. Combo decks have a solid timer and force you to pressure them or lose, instead of durdling with your Old Gods and removal for 15 turns. Not to mention playing them is a complex puzzle task that's generally enjoyable and rewarding (do it = win, fail it = lose, sometimes even if you are against them: plus Combo player and his opponent both are signed up for free wins if solitaire goes south.

The whole diversity thing vs you play against 5 different decks but they are all Warrior - it is a natural state of things. Metagame shares are based on what is the most consistent and more optimal against those most consistent. There are flaws but such thing cannot be done perfectly. With 2 different decks for pretty much all classes I think Blizzard are doing OK.

Regarding Old Gods - I thing Yogg-Saron, Hope's End is the biggest design mistake made ever, period. It is a card that always leaves one player frustrated - either the caster when it does some nothing (most cases), or his opponent when it OTKs you from 30 health. This card exemplifies the bad RNG that Hearthstone is getting so much slack for, but turned into overdrive. 

Not to mention you can go to the tournament with Yogg.deck and have stars aligned so you win the whole thing riding Blessing of KingsBlessing of KingsChargeBlessed Champion.

Memorable? Certainly.

Fair? Skill-intenisve?

P.S. @positiv2, you're a consenting adult with moderator blue thing under your profile pic. At least back up your salt with some reasonable claims.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Mind Blast Priest deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina
      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s