Nerfs for Six Cards Are Now Live

Sign in to follow this  

17 posts in this topic


The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.

UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.

Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!

Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?

Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.

These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.

Blizzard LogoDaxxarri

In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:

Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)

In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.


We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.


Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)

After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.


Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)

There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.


Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)

Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.


Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)

Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.

We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).


Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.

The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)

The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.



Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not really a fan of Spiteful Summoner nerf. Making it 7-mana doesn't solve much of its problems. I wished it actually consumed the spell she used. It would make her still okay if you don't draw the spells, and you can't play two Spiteful Summoners and follow it up with double Ultimate Infestation.

Crystal Core nerf is awkward. I mean, it is okay I think. But, how about nerfing Shadowstep by actually preventing 0-cost minions (just like Summoning Portal)? Or making quest reward a minion, so it takes a space on board.

Others seem okay. Dark Pact nerf seems a bit harsh to be fair. 

Again, Blizzard knows what's wrong with the metagame, but they don't have any idea about how to fix it.


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much as expected.

CTA is still too good even at 5 mana and ppl will just switch to odd pala.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly I don't see this being a major blow to the use of Spitefuls.   The card will continue to generate a 4/4 body and a random 10 cost body for 7 mana.     That's still insane value considering the 10-cost cards in the pool.    Is there even a potentially bad 10-cost minion out there anymore?    Even used in Priest where there's usually an 8 cost spell involved, the value is still redonkulus.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

those 4/4 minions actually make it better against priest. i think that dark pact nerf was uncalled for

Edited by blackstar128
forgot something

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahahaaaa, die Naga, die.

Oh... the other changes are decent too.

1 hour ago, Migol said:

Frankly I don't see this being a major blow to the use of Spitefuls.   The card will continue to generate a 4/4 body and a random 10 cost body for 7 mana.     That's still insane value considering the 10-cost cards in the pool.

Yes, but you do also have to run a clunky deck with next to no spells to get that effect. It’s still good value and tempo at ten mana but it’d never get played.

Increasing it to 7 gives opponents more time to draw their answers, delays it long enough for things like nether to be relevant, and also increases the likelihood of drawing your spells before you play the summoners.

They can always increase it to 8 if 7 isn’t enough. My guess is it’ll hit the performance of the deck quite hard as it is.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, is overreaction. However:


1) Naga sea witch: this is the right nerf to the Giant package, but it won't (almost) change anything. The main problem with giants are that they polarize the match: either you have an out to the combo, or you lose. Assuming the giant player will live enough to assemble the combo, of course. Now we'll have more time to draw the out. BUT the needing to own that out will stay, and classes like warlock have all the tools to wait for turn 8. So, it won't change a lot, as you'll still have to put that poison seed or equality pyromancer in your midrange deck.

2) Spitefull summoner: it won't change a lot, but it will make druid less strong. I never felt this card to be OP, so I don't like this nerf much. But I think it's still playable.

3) Dark pact: this card was, IMHO, the strongest in the cubelock/controllock arsenal. Why? Because it is a heal, (almost) unconditional heal, something that a slow deck needs like air. A class that take damage to draw is a card in desperate needs from some heal. This nerf will make every warlock more weak agains  aggro/burns deck.

4) Possessed Lackey: this is a big nerf. The card already was a huge tempo loss against aggro deck. Now that you need 7 mana to summon a voidlord and heal 4, it's really weak. I'm afraid this will lead to some form of aggro/tempo rogue or burn mage to rise....

5) Call to Arms: this card will stay in every control/combo paladin for the deck thinning ability. Maybe it will be ok for some midrange deck (dude?), but it won't for aggro, IMHO. This could even be the death of even paladin (pun intended).
Again, I never felt in standard this card to be OP, it was stronger in wild but in wild, you need to be extraordinary to be normal.

6) Crystal Core: a huge number of Italian ingiuries I loved this quest, I hated when they made it unplayable, I liked the fact that K&C made it usable again, only spending SO MUCH dust to make Zola and Sonya.... They nerfed patches, killing my Quest OTK in wild. Now they killed it again. I don't understand, only druid can be an anti control? :'(


IN THE END: I read in tempostorm site that the first tier 1 deck untouched is control priest, that is weak only to quest rogue... and that aggro mage is the strongest of tier 2. Well, I call it... Aluneth will be the next most hated card, with something from slow priest (the DK?).

And I hope it will be this way, because 40-minutes control fatigue warriors are waiting........

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Synesthesy said:

1) Naga sea witch: this is the right nerf to the Giant package, but it won't (almost) change anything. The main problem with giants are that they polarize the match: either you have an out to the combo, or you lose. Assuming the giant player will live enough to assemble the combo, of course. Now we'll have more time to draw the out. BUT the needing to own that out will stay, and classes like warlock have all the tools to wait for turn 8. So, it won't change a lot, as you'll still have to put that poison seed or equality pyromancer in your midrange deck.

Well, we’ll have to wait and see, but my guess is that Giantslock will be completely gone. If it stays, then yes, we just get a lot more time to draw our answers. But I think this cripples the win rate so badly it’ll disappear and people will stop teching specifically for it.

On (4), you may be right on both counts. But Warlock is one of Burn Mage’s good matchups already. Nerfing one of a deck’s best matchups may well hurt the deck. Burn Mage wants to queue into warlock, so reducing the number of warlocks isn’t something it wants, especially if control decks that can heal/armour up a lot are on the rise.

On (5), really don’t see how anyone can think CTA isn’t OP. Draw three cards and summon them for 4 mana is just ridiculous. I think at 5 mana it’s still strong enough to see play. I doubt it’ll end up in odd paladin, but I’d be surprised if standard or wild Murloc Paladin drops it or becomes too weak to be viable. Likewise the no-parity no-Murloc wild aggrodins. But they’ll be a bit weaker, which is surely a good thing, Paladin has been dominating the meta since December.


Edited by Bozonik

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

I am not really a fan of Spiteful Summoner nerf. Making it 7-mana doesn't solve much of its problems. I wished it actually consumed the spell she used. It would make her still okay if you don't draw the spells, and you can't play two Spiteful Summoners and follow it up with double Ultimate Infestation.

While I've heard a lot of people express the same view, and it is an interesting idea, I think the problem with Spiteful is/was the front end, not the back end. Sure, it feels super bad to fight through two spitefuls and then still lose to Ultimate, but most of the time what happens is you lose to the untargetable 12/12 before casting Ultimate even becomes a thing. 

7 hours ago, Caldyrvan said:

Pretty much as expected.

CTA is still too good even at 5 mana and ppl will just switch to odd pala.

I think the fact that it can only grab 1-drops in Odd paladin, in addition to the increased mana cost, might make the card a miss for that deck. But Odd Paladin is a deck full of garbage that seems to just win anyway, so who knows. 

I wouldn't be surprised if it still saw play in Murlocs. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hanz39 said:

After they nerfed The Caverns Below I found that card again in a pack, 1600 dust for me again with this copy since I never use it anyway.

I don't think this most recent nerf to it will give a full refund, because the card itself didn't get touched.




They completely murdered Naga Sea Witch. She'll never see play again.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think the nerfs are pretry boring, I guess they will get the job done. Blizzard nerfed the most powerful decks without making them completely unplayable (maybe the exception being odd paladin) and that is definitly a good thing.

The Dark Pact nerf feels like a HUGE swing at Warlock. Lifegain will always be powerful in Warlock losing half of it will give the class much more trouble against aggro.

13 hours ago, Caldyrvan said:

CTA is still too good even at 5 mana and ppl will just switch to odd pala.

I played some odd paladin and I don't think that I want to play Call to Arms in it...5 Mana for 3 1-cost-cards is not super powerful (since your heropower gets you two 1/1 already) and playing two copies of it is probably terrible, since your deck will often be out of 1-cost-minions when you play the second one. So maybe one copy to thin out your deck...but 5 Mana is a pretty steep price tag.

Spiteful Summoner...hmm...on the one hand I hate to play against this deck on the other hand I hate to play it myself, because you are so limited when building your deck and I often draw the spells before I get the Summoner...feels terrible :( . Increasing the cost by one seems okay, to give the opponent more options against it.

13 hours ago, FanOfValeera said:

I wished it actually consumed the spell she used. It would make her still okay if you don't draw the spells, and you can't play two Spiteful Summoners and follow it up with double Ultimate Infestation.

While this one would be way more interesting, it would probably be a "nuked from orbit"-kind of-nerf. Meaning: Spiteful Summoner would become unplayable...or at least super luck-dependent. Drawing even a single Ultimate Infestation before turn 6 would render one of your Summoners a mere 6-mana 4/4.

Bottomline: I am very happy that I get my dust back for Spiteful Summoner. Maybe its still good, but I hate to play Spiteful-Decks,

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good nerfs all around, lets see how the meta will shake up. Think most of the recent and dev comments are spot on, call to arms at 5 fetching three 1 cost minions is playable but not nearly as overpowered as fetching three 2 cost minions for 4 mana.

Giants is still a polarizing matchup but now with even worse odds of actually assembling giants in time.

Warlocks might finally not be banned left and right at tournaments, best change of them all!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, what a fucking great job Blizzard.

Cubelock is more or less dead against any aggro deck. And against quite a lot of other decks too, because it just is too slow now. You have ridden quite a close edge already against many decks.

And the best part: You don't get your fucking dust back.

You sit on a bunch of more or less useless legendaries/epics that remain untouched.

"Hey, this card hasn't been changed, why give the dust back" - yeah sure...

And the absolute most epic: Cube-Warlock hasn't changed with the last expansion. Blizzard had tons of time if they wanted to change this deck.

But no, let players think: OK, Cubelock is around since nearly ages, no change. Save to craft.

Let them waste their dust. At this time my estimation is that every player who wanted to play this deck has crafted it. Or in other words: Everybody who would ever do it has already wasted his dust. Perfect timing for the nerf, right?
If the nerf would have come with the expansion many wouldn't have crafted it.

They can always put 100 bucks into the game to get new dust, right?


What a bunch of...

  • Sad 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't want to say players will switch to odd Paladin because CTA is odd now but because even paladin might be weaker now.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is true that nerfing a deck by nerfing the lower rarity cards instead of the big legendaries is a huge dust waster.

But cubelock having been around for so long as Wedge mentioned also means people who crafted it had plenty of time to reach legend / cruise through ranks as they pleased.

Treat it like a new raid / expansion in WoW, all that amazing mythic bis titanforged gear you got is now useless. Otherwise how could we get new shiny gear / decks? Powercreep needs to be avoided or the game itself won't last for long..

It always sucks to be nerfed tho :(

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Dean "Iksar" Ayala was active on Reddit yesterday commenting on the purpose and the design philosophy behind the Basic and Classic sets as well as the reasoning behind nerfs on cards from these sets.
      The Lead Balance Designer explained that the Basic and Classic sets' purpose is to introduce players to the game's mechanics and the fantasies behind each class. Since these sets are always around, powerful cards in them can be frustrating and cause negativity. For example, Wild Growth and Nourish were under the scope for a nerf for a long time. That doesn't mean all Basic and Classic cards have to be weak; some of them, like Fireball, Al'Akir the Windlord, Frothing Berserker and Tirion Fordring, are powerful, they show off class fantasy well enough and are safe from any changes (for now!).
      Card nerfs aren't meant to just solve short-term problems. For example, the Fiery War Axe nerf made it possible for other Warrior weapons to see play. It's true that nerfing cards from the Classic and Basic cards makes players feel obligated to invest their gold or real money on newly released sets. The team has tried to offset this with more seasonal events, as well as the reworked new player experience, which all give packs to players.
      Ideally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
      We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in. (source)

      I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.  (source)

      The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal. (source)
    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.