Zadina

Peter Whalen and Mike Donais on K&C Card Design

Sign in to follow this  

9 posts in this topic

A4ERM880Y6R41512443343639.jpg

The two Hearthstone developers talked to IGN about the design process behind some of the most impactful cards from Kobolds & Catacombs.

First of all, Peter Whalen and Mike Donais confirmed that there will be an update on February, a month after the World Championship. This patch will contain new events and possibly balance changes. They will take a look at the meta as it's been and as it is in the World Championship and they will decide accordingly.

Moving on, they talked about some of the classes and how K&C cards have affected them. Starting with Warlock, Cubelock was a deck that was tested internally and it was an archetype the team was "certainly concerned about and [they] played a bunch of games with it". Carnivorous Cube was also tested internally in Recruit Hunter and in Quest Druid. As far as Possessed Lackey is concerned, there was a second version of it that read "Battlecry: If you control a Demon, Recruit a Demon", while Dark Pact was 0 mana at some point. Lastly, Rin, the First Disciple's seals used to have different effects and Azari, the Devourer was a 15/15 untargetable minion.

The two devs talked next about the other dominating class of the current meta: Priest. Mike Donais pointed out that Highlander Priest was already doing well, so it was only given one new card: Psychic Scream. On the other hand. Big Priest has a pretty medium win rate, even though it can feel frustrating to play against. It's also a deck that will lose several cards in the upcoming rotation. At this point, the devs repeated that they are looking forward to develop and see in action new playstyles in the post-Barnes era. Finally, during the design process Twilight's Call could summon any minion, not just Deathrattles, but this was deemed too powerful.

The next class to be discussed was Rogue. The team is happy with how balanced the Kingsbane Rogue deck turned out to be. Some internal iterations of the Rogue legendary weapon were dual-wielded daggers or a weapon that had the Battlecry: Discover a card, everything you draw is a copy of that. Mike also talked about Valeera the Hollow: he expected her to be more powerful than she already is, but maybe players will find a way to use her more in the future.

There were a few words about Hearthstone's currently weakest class: Shaman. The devs think that the Shaman Spellstone is a powerful "sleeper" card, although maybe there's presently not a proper deck for it. They were also slightly worried about Unstable Evolution. Another "sleeper" card for them is Warrior's Drywhisker Armorer.

An important point is that when asked about Corridor Creeper, Peter said that it's "one of the cards that raised a red flag". Lastly, they talked about King Togwaggle and the numerous iterations he had - all around swapping decks with your opponent. The penalty on the spell card isn't high enough on purpose, because they didn't want Togwaggle to be a super competitive card.

I've tried to summarise the most important points, but you should definitely check out the entire interview on IGN. There's much more detail behind the design process of Kobolds & Catacombs, while there is also temp artwortk of cards as well as two cards that never made it into the game!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Zadina said:

There were a few words about Hearthstone's currently weakest class: Shaman. The devs think that the Shaman Spellstone is a powerful "sleeper" card

Blizzard and their "We think that...". "Haha, Shaman!" is the new "Haha, Priest!". Except this is 2 seasons now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what they are thinking.

First they cheer on themselves about the creation of cards/sets, then they release bad/shitty/op cards, followed by being ppl pissed off then they discuss it and try to look competent then they nerf cards and ppl are pissed off again :D

Voidlord is one of the K&C cards I hate the most, I was hoping for a cool demon for Warlock but this card is so bad.

Ofc it's a strong card and it's not over powered but makes the game so boring.

Psychic Scream is a pain in the ass, too. Priests ability to remove and deny everything was already annoying enough, why make it even worse?

I'm pretty sure Corridor Creeper will see a nerf and it definitely deserves that. It's a neutral powerful auto include in nearly every deck. Maybe they learned something from their past mistake with patches, but who knows :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree on the rogue part. i got kingsbane and valeera and i have so much fun with mill rogue and miracle rogue. it's challenging (mill more than miracle imo) and you really have to think and play well to win and then the payoff is great. truly this should be how every archetype should be like. in a competitive game like hearthstone there shouldn't be an easy tier 1 deck, not even tier 2, because it promotes boring, unengaging encounters.

I don't understand, why they gave highlander priest a new card at all, it wasn't necessary, rather the opposite would've been. Darkness is a viable counter, but a 4-mana minion that is dead on board for a long time punishes you more than the opponent.

Also I think they need to think about how to push warrior and shaman back into the meta with some new and diverse archetypes. Since Pirate Warrior won't be a thing after patches rotates out, I wonder whats left... big warrior certainly didn't stick.

Overall I was expecting something like this. games like hearthstone are hard to balance perfectly (rather, impossible), so I don't think it's reasonable to complain, rather critisize. Especially because finally the strongest decks are not pirates, but control, which is usually way more exciting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Solanaar said:

... because it promotes boring, unengaging encounters.

That's what I think about Mill Rogue and I always concede for these reasons.

Otherwise I mostly agree with you but there is definitely room for complains because since it's already hard to balance the game they should have used their brains and think ahead but they didn't so we got jade, patches as well as Raza and Anduin being within the same rotation.

Either they are not testing their cards or they are just damn stupid. Not sure which one is worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/01/2018 at 6:47 PM, Caldyrvan said:

That's what I think about Mill Rogue and I always concede for these reasons.

Not a fan of insta-concede but gotta admit I’ve done it against Mill Rogue a few times in wild. I tend to play control decks in wild (after I’ve got to rank 5 with pirate warrior to speed past the ridiculously greedy decks you tend to run into lower down the ranks) and often you’re in for a 30min game that is a near certain loss. Concede and play next match aggro is probably the best option sometimes, since you meet repeat opponents more often in wild.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with conceding early, I am playing HS to have fun and when I encounter something that I will not enjoy why would I stay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/19/2018 at 12:51 AM, Caldyrvan said:

I'm not sure what they are thinking.

First they cheer on themselves about the creation of cards/sets, then they release bad/shitty/op cards, followed by being ppl pissed off then they discuss it and try to look competent then they nerf cards and ppl are pissed off again :D

Voidlord is one of the K&C cards I hate the most, I was hoping for a cool demon for Warlock but this card is so bad.

Ofc it's a strong card and it's not over powered but makes the game so boring.

Psychic Scream is a pain in the ass, too. Priests ability to remove and deny everything was already annoying enough, why make it even worse?

I'm pretty sure Corridor Creeper will see a nerf and it definitely deserves that. It's a neutral powerful auto include in nearly every deck. Maybe they learned something from their past mistake with patches, but who knows :D

Void Lord isn't that bad, it's. . . Turn 6 void Lord's, cubes full of void Lord's, nzoths full of them, and president bloodreaver guldan, and his policy of keeping the aggro decks out by building a wall and making them pay for it, even if they have been in the meta long enough to be naturalized citizens.

 

Psychic scream is problematic, in the same way the entire priest class is problematic.  Fundamentally, hearthstone is a proactive tempo driven game, and 8 out of the 9 classes, to some extent or the other, play a proactive strategy at their core, while priest plays reactively.  This means priests tend to feel very unfun to play against when they are strong, because they fundamentally want to play a different game from you.  This is also why they have such a weak core set, there strong cards tend to mesh poorly with neutrals, so their card pool is inherently smaller.

 

As for corridor creeper, I think it's power level is largely carried by patches and the ubiquitous pirate package.  Without that, I don't know if many decks would play it.  I mean some still would, aggro paladin jumps to mind, since call to arms is one hell of a drug.

On 1/18/2018 at 4:58 PM, Yridaa said:

Blizzard and their "We think that...". "Haha, Shaman!" is the new "Haha, Priest!". Except this is 2 seasons now.

Eh, I remember when the bottom tier was called shaman tier.  Shamans were really bad for a long time.  There time will come again.

Edited by VaraTreledees
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco
      A new Hearthside Chat video gave us a sneak peek of Puzzle Labs in action.
       
      Today's Hearthside Chat shed some light on Puzzle Labs, the new single player content for The Boomsday Project releasing on August 21st. We already knew that Lethal, Mirror, Board Clear, and Survival were going to be the 4 puzzle types, but developers Giovanni Scarpati and Max Ma helped reveal the Puzzle Lab menus and UI, as well as some of the backstory on how Puzlle Labs came to be. Watch the video below to get a sneak peek of Puzzle Labs in action:
       
       
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Warrior Guide.
    • By Stan
      After 9 years, Production Director Yong Woo left Blizzard entertainment to join Ben Brode's new game company called Second Dinner.
      Production Director Yong Woo joined Brode's indie company according to his latest tweet.
      Placeholder for tweet 1029786314365796352 There's also a video of Brode welcoming both on board. According to Hearthpwn, there are now 5 ex-Hearthstone developers working at Second Dinner.
      (Source)
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Spell Damage Mage deck.
    • By Zadina
      The latest Hearthstone community contribution allows you to train the skills needed to master Combo Priest: quick thinking, fast mouse movements, strategic decisions and on-the-spot calculations. What's more to ask?!
      Combo or OTK or APM Priest is a reiteration of Combo and Vivid Nightmare Priest that was born with The Boomsday Project thanks to two cards: Topsy Turvy and Test Subject. Dog is credited as the creator and true master of the deck:
      Many have subsequently tried and failed to pilot the deck, which can require almost 100 moves during the 75 seconds of a single turn. Pro players like Trump and Thijs have hilariously failed, while others like Disguised Toast and Kolento kept trying until they got the hang of it.
      Right now, you might be dreading that you don't have the IQ to play this deck. Fear no more: everything can be practiced and Patashu has made the tool for it! Combo Priest Simulator allows you to practice the OTK combo on your browser, while also timing you. You can change the parameters of the starting gamestate, too.
      In all seriousness, the deck's winrate is below average and it's honestly too much trouble for too little gain. Then again, slamming your opponent's face for 100+ damage is quite satisfactory. It would be awesome if someone was brave enough to bring this deck at a tournament: it would be the casters' nightmare!
      Apart from Combo Priest Simulator, we have a guide for Topsy Turvy OTK Priest here on Icy Veins; the guide breaks down the necessary steps of the combo in a useful priority list. Alternatively, you can listen to Aleco trying to explain how the deck works to Patrick (and actually succeeding) in the latest Icy Veins Podcast!