Damien

Y'Shaarj Hunter Standard

27 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Legendary Y'Shaarj Hunter Standard deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a lot of fun playing this deck.  When it goes wrong, it goes very wrong indeed - but when the planets are in alignment (even if you don't get the Barnes combo off on turn 3/4) it's more fun than I've had in a long time playing HS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This fine piece of technology showcases why Barnes is a disgusting slice of cheddar cheese a major design mistake that should not be tolerated. 

For a lot of people (including me) he looked fine when he got spoiled - an interesting and variative card that rewards deckbuilding decisions and oozes with flavor - what can be better than a 1\1 actor playing the part of your favorite card?

That's where the good stuff ends. It is really easy to break the 1-mana value off the copy, taking into the account our Glorious Overlord Spider Tank is The Golden Standard Of Vanilla 3-drop. What's even more easy is to make Barnes's Battlecry a complete blowout. Tirion FordringRagnaros the FirelordCairne BloodhoofSylvanas WindrunnerMalygos. Even just a Savannah Highmane or Infested Wolf is already over-the-top enough to cause a ton of problems. Even Resurrect and Purify suddenly look good!

Low opportunity cost, high payoff, RNG frustrating for both sides. It is like Yogg-Saron, Hope's End turn 4, except it doesn't fizzle at all.

Adding Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound to the mix makes things even worse, because people who are playing a "fair" Barnes are at least operating in value territory. I get death threats from people whom I kill in less cheesy and slower combo fashion. With free turn 4 win, everyone can feel the fairness of the game.

While a concept of a "free win" is no alien to TCG, I do not think it should belong to the universal "oops nuts draw" territory, but rather be an example of how does one makes a deck with unique angle of attack, having certain matchups very lopsided. Zoo Warlock is a free win for Freeze Mage but Control Warrior is literally unbeatable - that's a normal "free win" set-up.

 


26 other cards in the deck are fine. A nice meme deck overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's not really a free win in this deck: it's just fun to play.  Even if you play Barnes on turn 3/4 and end up with a 3/4, 1/1 and 10/10, you are not necessarily in an auto-win situation.  And, on most plays, the combo doesn't come out.  Y'Shaarj comes out first, well, at least half the time, which isn't all that can go wrong.

It's not as bad as you're making out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My biggest concern is not the consistency of such interaction, but rather the sole possibility of it, which I do not believe to be a balanced and healthy gameplay. If a game is presented and sold as a competitive and e-sports product, its outcome should be decided by skill, not the order of your draws. The concept of TCG presents enough variance as it is.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Paracel said:

its outcome should be decided by skill

If this is your complaint, then Barnes is not your only problem.  Chess is pure skill: Hearthstone is heavily loaded with variance in so many ways it would be strange to have to list them.  We're drawing cards from a deck, is the first thing, and a core mechanic.  The decks are different: massive variance.  So many cards rely on random effects.

There's a deck that celebrates the random madness of the game here: http://www.icy-veins.com/hearthstone/randuin-wrynn-priest-deck

Removing all the variance I don't know what would be left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, mimech said:

 We're drawing cards from a deck, is the first thing, and a core mechanic.  The decks are different: massive variance.  

That's precisely what I said. I double-check my posts when I'm complaining about balance.

14 hours ago, Paracel said:

The concept of TCG presents enough variance as it is.

 

5 hours ago, mimech said:

Chess is pure skill: Hearthstone is heavily loaded with variance in so many ways it would be strange to have to list them.  

Removing all the variance I don't know what would be left.

What would be left is an actually good, World of Warcraft -flavored Chess with normal TCG variance. RNG is as much fun as actually winning because you did the right thing.

What I meant to point out is that cards with the word "random" in them are really hard to balance out and really easy to break. It feels fine yet stil NaCl generating when it's a relatively low impact or low variance, like Knife Juggler. Barnes is exactly the other side of spectrum.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, mimech said:

If this is your complaint, then Barnes is not your only problem.  Chess is pure skill: Hearthstone is heavily loaded with variance in so many ways it would be strange to have to list them.  We're drawing cards from a deck, is the first thing, and a core mechanic.  The decks are different: massive variance.  So many cards rely on random effects.

There's a deck that celebrates the random madness of the game here: http://www.icy-veins.com/hearthstone/randuin-wrynn-priest-deck

Removing all the variance I don't know what would be left.

Just because there's variance involved in every card game, doesn't mean it should be taken to extremes like barnes or yogg. If some variance is present, the better players are still likely to win games against the inferior ones, with the odd loss here and there to nutty draws by their opponent. But it seems that with every expansion so far they are pushing the game towards being more coin flippy, not the other way around.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JooBatanete said:

Just because there's variance involved in every card game, doesn't mean it should be taken to extremes like barnes or yogg

As it's being explained to me, I'm understanding the subtleties better.  I've been ignoring Yogg as a sort of way out there chaos engine, but as time's gone on, I've been watching streamers get fairly solid positive results with the card.

I think time will tell with Barnes.  This particular Hunter build doesn't seem too OP to me, but then maybe I'm just playing it poorly.  I'm not sure if I've lost any match where the combo comes up - the opponent has to spend too many resources removing it to allow them to survive for long.  My win rate when I don't get the combo is a lot worse (and definitely under 50%).  

So: does the crutch of having no other minions but Barnes and Y'Shaarj outweigh the ridiculous combo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem with Barnes is not randomness. I like randomness. Evolve is my favourite card. My problem with Barnes is his power. Make him 4 mana 3\3 and let it generate 0\1 copy of some random minion in your deck and I have zero problem with it. You still like your minions with active\inspire\end of the turn abilities. You still have your powerful deathrattles but it is a bit harder to pop them. And you are not happy if you get 3\3 and vanilla 0\1 on turn 4.  One\few minions decks like this one require players to do sacrifices, Yeti that can win you a game on spot, requires few sacrifices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

My problem with Barnes is not randomness. I like randomness. Evolve is my favourite card. My problem with Barnes is his power. Make him 4 mana 3\3 and let it generate 0\1 copy of some random minion in your deck and I have zero problem with it. You still like your minions with active\inspire\end of the turn abilities. You still have your powerful deathrattles but it is a bit harder to pop them. And you are not happy if you get 3\3 and vanilla 0\1 on turn 4.  One\few minions decks like this one require players to do sacrifices, Yeti that can win you a game on spot, requires few sacrifices.

A step in the right direction, but a 0/1 Malygos/Tharassian can still end a game.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 06.09.2016 at 3:37 AM, JooBatanete said:

Just because there's variance involved in every card game, doesn't mean it should be taken to extremes like barnes or yogg. If some variance is present, the better players are still likely to win games against the inferior ones, with the odd loss here and there to nutty draws by their opponent. But it seems that with every expansion so far they are pushing the game towards being more coin flippy, not the other way around.

Barnes would be a coinflip if he either lost or win the game. he doesn't work like that. Barnes either give the player a decent, good, very good, or game winning result.  This is awful even for guys like me who like gambling. I want to make decision and take calculated risks, not have "I got Barnes, time for a free win chance" to win

Barnes is a Tuskar totemic squared. I would love Tuskar totemic if we had one or two awful totems to roll.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/24/2016 at 2:17 PM, Strongpoint said:

 

Barnes would be a coinflip if he either lost or win the game. he doesn't work like that. Barnes either give the player a decent, good, very good, or game winning result.  This is awful even for guys like me who like gambling. I want to make decision and take calculated risks, not have "I got Barnes, time for a free win chance" to win

Barnes is a Tuskar totemic squared. I would love Tuskar totemic if we had one or two awful totems to roll.  

So you want it nerfed because it works too well for you? I can't remember the last time I saw a Mana Tide/Flametongue from TT :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 26.09.2016 at 2:47 AM, Blainie said:

So you want it nerfed because it works too well for you? I can't remember the last time I saw a Mana Tide/Flametongue from TT :(

I want it nerfed because even with my 3 month experience of hearthstone it is obvious that it is too strong. Blizzard does nerf it to summoning only basic totems and it seems fine but this makes card far less fun for me. 

Question is - when Barnes will get nerfed? :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Strongpoint said:

 

I want it nerfed because even with my 3 month experience of hearthstone it is obvious that it is too strong. Blizzard does nerf it to summoning only basic totems and it seems fine but this makes card far less fun for me. 

Question is - when Barnes will get nerfed? :D

 

How exactly does one propose they Nerf Barnes? I keep hearing people say this but I haven't seen any suggestions as to what he would read after the Nerf. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/28/2016 at 9:08 PM, KingMe said:

How exactly does one propose they Nerf Barnes? I keep hearing people say this but I haven't seen any suggestions as to what he would read after the Nerf. 

Lower stats is often a big hope, since right now he is at worst a Yeti, at best he could be anything.

Maybe going down to a 3/3 that spawns a 0/1. I think that's one of the main propositions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blainie said:

Lower stats is often a big hope, since right now he is at worst a Yeti, at best he could be anything.

Maybe going down to a 3/3 that spawns a 0/1. I think that's one of the main propositions.

That's actually not too bad of a proposition. Even a 3/3 - 1/1 would be an improvement. Either way he would still be a broken card with those stats. As crazy as Blizzard is with their nerfs, I see them dropping him down to a 2/2 maybe a 2/3 while keep the spawn at 1/1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2016 at 7:08 AM, KingMe said:

That's actually not too bad of a proposition. Even a 3/3 - 1/1 would be an improvement. Either way he would still be a broken card with those stats. As crazy as Blizzard is with their nerfs, I see them dropping him down to a 2/2 maybe a 2/3 while keep the spawn at 1/1. 

Probably yeah. I think the effect won't be touched, stats are almost guaranteed to be hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1/1 loses all abilities (such as deathrattles, spell power or abilities that trigger at the end of turn) until the start of your turn, This way your opponent has time to kill the 1/1 before it becomes a powerful tool (Ragnaros the FirelordEmperor Thaurissan...) and disables the possibility of OTK Malygos combo in midgame. It would kill this deck, but would improve the game as whole imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually a very good suggestion. Gives the opposing player a chance to deal with the board state before being buried by a broken mechanic, not unlike the Patron/Worgen/Force of Nature nerfs.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

glad to see im not the only one seeing how far i can push Barnes. 

I've been mucking about with him in a Priest/resurrect deck. If he pulls up a token of something big, you can silence it to pop it right back to the original stats. If your opponent kills it, you can resurrect it back to normal size. Can you imagine starting turn 5 with TWO 10/10 YShaarj?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/6/2016 at 8:33 PM, Allegro said:

glad to see im not the only one seeing how far i can push Barnes. 

I've been mucking about with him in a Priest/resurrect deck. If he pulls up a token of something big, you can silence it to pop it right back to the original stats. If your opponent kills it, you can resurrect it back to normal size. Can you imagine starting turn 5 with TWO 10/10 YShaarj?

It would probably produce some pretty wild results!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been tracking my games (rank 13-14 right now). 50% win rate with 32 games played. I can successfully trigger the Barnes-Y'Shaarj combo just under 60% of the time, and win those combos about 84%.

when i don't trigger the combo... i haven't been able to win yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      The Europe Spring Playoffs and Championship took place over the weekend of May 20-21, which decided not only the new Europe Champion, but also the four players who would represent Europe at the Global Spring Championship in Shanghai next month.
      After seven rounds of Swiss, the top eight players cut to a knockout phase. The results of which were as follows:
        Hoej beat   FibEli3
        Neirea beat   INER
        Rdu beat   Casie
        Kolento beat   StanCifka
      This means that Hoej, Neirea, Rdu, and Kolento will represent Europe in the Global Championship. The top eight being so strong is a sign that the metagame is in a healthy place. All of the players were already known to be among the best in Europe, and despite their lineups differing substantially, they were still able to make it through.
      Hoej went on to take the title, beating Kolento 3-0 in the final. Hoej has been touted as one of the best players in Europe for some time, but traditionally has brought Control decks to major events. This time around, he brought a very aggressive lineup, and was rewarded for his willingness to adapt his style to the meta.
      The deck archetypes that each player brought to the event are listed below:
      Hoej: Aggro Druid, Secret Mage, Murloc Paladin, Pirate Warrior
      Kolento: Jade Druid, Midrange Paladin, Quest Rogue, Quest Warrior
      Neirea: Jade Druid, Discover Mage, Quest Rogue, Quest Warrior
      Rdu: Aggro Druid, Face Hunter, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      The next four players to qualify for the Global Championship will be decided next week, with the Americas Spring Championships.
    • By L0rinda

      The Hearthstone Championship Tour (HCT) European Spring Playoffs will take place this weekend, 20-21 May 2017.
      This will be the first playoff event since Journey to Un'Goro was released, and so if anyone has saved any surprise deck tech, this is the event where it will be revealed.
      The top 64 point earners, and ties, from the EU server will be joined by 8 Tavern Hero tournament qualifiers for the event, which will be played in esports bars across Europe. If you want to attend one of the events to cheer on your local favourite, the list of locations can be found here. There will be side events for anyone wishing to attend, with Blizzard prizes available for winners, and the Power Core cardback for all attendees.
      The point standings, showing the top 64, can be found here. As usual the event is stacked with many of the big names from the region. The top four will advance to the HCT Spring Global finals next month.
    • By Starym

       
      Fight Promoter is promoting Hearthstone by giving itself away! Ok, that didn't make sense, but the point is everyone gets a fee card for just logging in this Saturday!
      Blizzard (source)
      Yeah, we can get you a card. Really! Log in to Hearthstone on Saturday, May 20, to get a Fight Promoter card for free!

      No catch, just a free card--so don’t miss out.
      We’ll see you in the tavern!
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Holy Paladin PvP guide for Legion.
    • By Starym

       
      There's a new update arriving in the coming weeks and it's going to bring a much requested feature to HS: completing quests while playing with your friends! The other big feature coming with this update is importing decklists, allowing you to easily copy and share your favorite decks without resorting to screenshots or outside sites! No specific ETA has been given and if you want to know all the details check out the announcement post below.
      Blizzard (source)
      Hearthstone’s upcoming update has a lot of cool stuff in it, but we wanted to call special attention to a couple of features that we’re particularly excited about. We think you’ll like them too!

      Friends Forever
      When the new Hearthstone update arrives, you’ll be able to complete quests in Friendly Challenges! Just issue a Friendly Challenge to someone on your Friends list and rack up credit for nearly any quest you can receive.
      Last year, the Friendly Feud allowed players to complete quests when they played with a friend. You gave us a ton of positive feedback about that event, and a lot of you asked us to have Friendly Feuds more often. We thought that was a good idea, so we took it a step further!
      There are some minor caveats. For example, any quests that can’t be completed as part of a Friendly Challenge aren’t eligible, such as those that require you to play vs The Innkeeper or watch a match. Most everything else is fair game though, so now you’ll have a reason to make friends with a recent opponent that isn’t just to send them a compliment.
      Sharing is Caring
      You’ll soon be able to easily copy and share decklists with Deck Importing! No more screen shotting decklists, or staring at a web page as you carefully build a deck, card by card. Trying—and sharing—a new decklist will be as simple as copy and paste!

      Here’s how it works:
      If your deck is already full, when you select the Hero portrait at the top of a deck in your collection, you’ll see a Copy button*. Press that button and your decklist will be copied to your clipboard. If you paste your decklist into a text document, it will look like this:
      Click to view sample decklist. See that conveniently highlighted ‘code’ near the bottom? That code also works on its own, making it easier to share a decklist with friends in chat or social media.
      Importing a decklist is easy. When you go to create the new deck, Hearthstone will “know” when you’ve got a valid decklist on your clipboard, so you’ll be asked if you’d like to create a new deck with the one you’ve got copied. Then you can watch your new deck be built before your eyes. You can also import decklists to Tavern Brawls!
      Don’t have all the cards a deck requires? No worries! In that case, it works just like a deck recipe. Any cards you don’t already own will appear insubstantial and you can select them for suggested replacements. You might also notice that your golden and non-golden cards now stack in decklists too!

      Deck Importing is great for finding and sharing new decks, but it’s also helpful for managing your library of decks. Save the code for decklists you rarely use, and when you’re ready to play one again, just copy and import it.
      The new update including these features will arrive in the coming weeks. We’re super excited about them, and we can’t wait to hear what you think! 
      * Desktop users can use ctrl+c to copy a decklist (you’ll get a confirmation when your copy is successful), then ctrl+v when viewing My Decks to import a decklist.