Damien

Budget Jade Druid Standard

47 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, douchebanner said:

ancient is not a battlecry minion, youve got 6 battlecry minions on the deck 1 less than the deck with aya...

brann fits with aya but it doesnt fit without her?

Sorry, mad bad, was distracted. I tried running Brann in place of one of the Raven Idols, but I did not like the loss of versatility as I encountered a lot of aggro. If you have slower meta, then sure, you can play Brann, but you will have lower winrate against aggro as you won't be able to discover third Swipe or more healing/armor effects to counter the aggressive deck.
You could also try playing it in place of one Arcane Giant, though I personally prefer to run 2 if I don't have Aya in the deck.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sottle give us other upgrade options to improve this deck. can we add brann without aya and fandral ? can we use starfire ? i lost 1 rank with this deck...dont know "unlucky draw" or this deck is for  max 20-18 rank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Guest guest said:

sottle give us other upgrade options to improve this deck. can we add brann without aya and fandral ? can we use starfire ? i lost 1 rank with this deck...dont know "unlucky draw" or this deck is for  max 20-18 rank

Starfire is too slow. Brann Bronzebeard can be included in place of one Arcane Giant, though I prefer to run 2 of them.

13 hours ago, Guest guest said:

can we add kun here ? 

Kun is too expensive mana-wise. Currently, playing anti-aggro or tech cards is a better choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, AptypR said:

There's something wrogn with card swaps session, there's already two gadgetzan auctioneers in the deck.

We are aware of this issue (and also that the section suggests including Raven Idol, though there are 2 in the deck) and there should be a fix soon, but thanks anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't move past rank 18 in standard with this deck. It's fun to play it but until i get to 7-8 mana i am on brink to lose game if i play vs aggro decks and most of the time i am against aggro decks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Guest Zagrash said:

I can't move past rank 18 in standard with this deck. It's fun to play it but until i get to 7-8 mana i am on brink to lose game if i play vs aggro decks and most of the time i am against aggro decks...

Could you please upload a replay? I don't have issues getting into the late-game with this deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Guest Zagrash said:

I can't move past rank 18 in standard with this deck. It's fun to play it but until i get to 7-8 mana i am on brink to lose game if i play vs aggro decks and most of the time i am against aggro decks...

If aggro is giving you problems, especially Pirate warriors, try to tech in an Acidic Swamp Ooze or two. Pirate decks live or die by delivering a lot of damage in the early turns, and blowing up their weapon helps a lot with calming them down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This game i was a bit unluckly with the RNG gods:

https://hsreplay.net/replay/YcdXBpSX4FSntdZ9yroCQZ

First move  no minion to be summoned from my hand later on heroic brawl from 4 my minions it chose his one :/

https://hsreplay.net/replay/4sQLhgcg3AwbEE8NisootF

This one is example how i strugle on rank 20, since i installed hsreplay i had 2:3 score but before that i went from rank 18 to 21.. I get to better rank with zoo lock even tho i miss some of the main cards for that build.. I wanted to switch from mid range paladin and level up other heroes but i think it;s time to go back on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Guest Zagrash said:

This game i was a bit unluckly with the RNG gods:

https://hsreplay.net/replay/YcdXBpSX4FSntdZ9yroCQZ

First move  no minion to be summoned from my hand later on heroic brawl from 4 my minions it chose his one :/

https://hsreplay.net/replay/4sQLhgcg3AwbEE8NisootF

This one is example how i strugle on rank 20, since i installed hsreplay i had 2:3 score but before that i went from rank 18 to 21.. I get to better rank with zoo lock even tho i miss some of the main cards for that build.. I wanted to switch from mid range paladin and level up other heroes but i think it;s time to go back on him.

Sorry it took me so long to give you a replay.

First game:
Innervating the Wild Growth wasn't very good, as it caused you to run out of cards quickly, and you had no card in hand that benefitted from the extra mana, or that prevented you from playing it the following turn. 
Choosing the armor was unwise, as you could see that the deck was not playing aggressively, and you could have used the card to clear a minion instead, such as the rat in combination with Living Roots.
Using Wrath on Elise Starseeker was unnecessary, as you did not kill her, and you could have used it to draw a card either with Gadgetzan Auctioneer, or choosing the 1-dmg effect.
On 9 mana, playing Azure Drake into Wrath for 2 cycles was better. Alternative option would be Azure Drake into Jade Spirit for better board position.
On 10 mana, you should have used your hero power to get rid of the divine shield on the C'Thun's Chosen, and then innervate the swipe for full board clear.

Second game:
The root of all your problems was the reporter - you should have tried more aggressively to remove her. You could also tech in one copy of Mulch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i am making noobish mistakes but since than i got much better but still not good enough, i realised that i am saving 2 much spell for gad. auctioner. I stil have problem with aggro decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Zagrash90 said:

Yeah i am making noobish mistakes but since than i got much better but still not good enough, i realised that i am saving 2 much spell for gad. auctioner. I stil have problem with aggro decks.

If you have any more replays, feel free to link them. From what I've seen the misplays were mostly wasting resources and not planning turns ahead - in the first replay that is. In the second replay there wasn't much that you could do, sadly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, positiv2 said:

If you have any more replays, feel free to link them. From what I've seen the misplays were mostly wasting resources and not planning turns ahead - in the first replay that is. In the second replay there wasn't much that you could do, sadly.

https://hsreplay.net/replay/ecG7jdZXX8Ge9pNe6Hid5N

https://hsreplay.net/replay/8kKST5jbCZ4pvtqyRpckGi

https://hsreplay.net/replay/w2NWPmSnH79jHa7Vw73zEh

https://hsreplay.net/replay/zBbAhTLk6ePVFcxSRmFRPn

 

In few of them after watching replay i notices few errors but in some of them i rly did not have any luck with the draws.

 

Edited by Zagrash90

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Zagrash90 said:

Replay #1:
On 3 turn, choosing Feral Rage was better than Innervate, as you already had 5 mana and nothing to innervate. Possibly even Power of the Wild was better as you could have played second Jade Spirit and play Power of the Wild to get a huge board advantage.
On turn 4, Wrathing for one to cycle was possibly better, as you had Arcane Giant that would allow you to stabilize.

Replay #2:
On turn 5, keeping the Raven Idol for Gadgetzan Auctioneer might have been better.
On turn 6, you should have drawn first. Luckily this time it had no effect, but next time might not be as good.
On turn 7, choosing the attack instead of the armor in order to clear the Gadgetzan Auctioneer was better as he could draw more cards for you opponent. Against control you should aim to clear the board instead of healing up, which was also the case with the second Raven Idol.
I'm also thinking about using Mulch on Brann Bronzebeard rather than on Jade Behemoth, since Brann was able to generate a lot of value afterwards - more than the body value of the Behemoth.

Replay #3
On turn 6, Swiping the Bloodhoof Brave caused you to take more damage without achieving anything that you couldn't have next turn.
On turn 9, you should have played Azure Drake first so you didn't have to trade with the Jade Golem.
On turn 10, picking Swipe was worse than picking board presence in the form of Jade Blossom - the warrior wouldn't be able to build a big board that would require Swipe.

Replay #4
On turn 2, you should have used Living Roots instead of Wrath. The extra damage can change everything.
On turn 3, using Feral Rage to get rid of Mana Wyrm was an overkill. Living Roots+hero power would have been better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reviews it helps a lot to see where i make mistakes but i think my main problem is that i am not used to play with so many spells, i am more of a board control player and this style is very new to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Zagrash90 said:

Thanks for the reviews it helps a lot to see where i make mistakes but i think my main problem is that i am not used to play with so many spells, i am more of a board control player and this style is very new to me.

Since you are playing a budget deck, I assume you don't have the option to play C'Thun Kun deck, so I recommend you to start saving dust for it. It plays more minions and I personally like to play the deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, positiv2 said:

Since you are playing a budget deck, I assume you don't have the option to play C'Thun Kun deck, so I recommend you to start saving dust for it. It plays more minions and I personally like to play the deck.

I used a last bit of dust to make even the budget version..saving 700 coins for last chapter in one night in karazhan for malchezaars imp and after that i will start saving dust for better decks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Imperius guide.
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.