L0rinda

Every Un'Goro Card Revealed on Facebook

Sign in to follow this  

15 posts in this topic

jWQW2wc.jpg

The final cards from Journey to Un'Goro have been revealed by Frodan and Game Director, Ben Brode. Many of them were shown on a live stream, and the rest are available on Facebook.

As with previous reveals, a series of games were played with the new cards. If you missed the show, you can check it out on the video on this page. Overall, there seemed to be many defensive tools in the set. The design also seems to be heading in the right direction with lots of interactions, many of which are courtesy of Adapt, the new keyword that allows you to change your Minions slightly.

There were a couple of bonuses too. There will be a Reward of a new Hero Portrait for winning 10 Standard games in the new format. The Hero will be Maiev Shadowsong, for Rogue, and can be seen in action on the video. There has also been a small but very useful change to the interface. Hovering over the deck now tells you not only how many cards are in your deck, but how many are in your hand. Finally, it was finalised that the release will indeed be on April 6.

If you want to see every new card, they are all now available on Facebook.

Watch live video from PlayHearthstone on www.twitch.tv

We are working to have as much content for you as possible on release day. We will have guides for opening day, and those will be rapidly updated to adjust to the meta, and to testing. We have pages discussing Quests (Will be updated very soon), and Adapt, already available on the site!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uhh, hunter got some pretty interesting stuff. Especially "Dinomancy" seems fun to build around (and pretty strong in a deck full of 1-Mana-Minions ;)). "Terrorscale Stalker" seems awesome too (and would probably be overpowered with Sylvanas still around).

Then the new mage-quest...might not be as strong in a "Reno"-Deck, but maybe awesome in any other control-deck. If an extraturn is that usefull in Hearthstone, iam not sure (but maybe it is better than it is in Magic). The new "Shimmering Tempest" and "Primordial Glyph" could be nice additions in a quest-themed-deck too, though.

So bottomline: I think we will see hunter more often now. But Paladin...I don't know. I'am not a big fan of the paladin-quest and its reward and the other paladin-cards are not thaaaat outstanding.
Also now that I've seen all elementals, I'am not that interested to play a deck based on them. For shamans it seems kind of powerful, but any other class will probably be better of with Jade or just general good-stuff.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The druid quest is yet another buff to Magma Rager. We'll see a bit more of it for sure, especially thanks to Tortollan Forager. Sadly, I will have to find a different meme deck as Magma Rager will be too meta :(
Evolving Spores have a Magma Rager synergy as well - it's on curve, and you might even get stealth. Just imagine how powerful Magma Rager with stealth would be!
I'm sad that Elder Longneck is not a rager.

Gotta get that Archmage Antonidas into infinite loop of Primordial Glyphs value.
I am really nervous about the mage quest, as the reward is super annoying to play against. I loathe OTK decks, and this is another step towards them. 

What the H is Curious Glimmerroot? I hope the card's a joke. It mocks what players complain the most about - RNG. Now Blizzard's not even trying to hide it - they are supporting it. 

As I said previously, Vilespine Slayer looks like an amazing card in arena. Rogue is getting more good cards for arena, so I'm afraid the meta will be dominated by rogue, and the players will have to hope that they get to pick the class.

Warlock is getting nice cards, but they seem quite bad in comparison to other classes' cards (like powercreeped Flash Heal, a card that actually saw quite a lot of play).

As a player that prefers playing against pirate warrior rather than control warrior, I don't like seeing so many control cards for warrior, especially since control warrior is strong already.

Overall, I am quite unhappy with the set. I like midrange meta, but this seems it will slow the meta way too much. If the meta is too slow, the strongest end-game card will be dominant - Jade Idol. Also, powercreep, bad card design (mage quest) and arena meta. I hope it turns out better than I expect it to.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, positiv2 said:

What the H is Curious Glimmerroot? I hope the card's a joke. It mocks what players complain the most about - RNG. Now Blizzard's not even trying to hide it - they are supporting it. 

I heard some people calling "Curious Glimmerroot" an anti-netdecking-card. To me, it doesn't look so much RNG-based (your decision is actually based on what you have seen so far from the enemy deck). And besides: after over 12 years of playing Magic: The Gathering, it is the RNG I enjoy most in Hearthstone :D (and I will cry bitter tears, when Yogg-Saron, Hope's End leaves standard next year :( ).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hoped that jade druids will get no cards to make them stronger but earthen scales looks like a huge survival tool for them and new card to cycle with Gadgetzan Auctioneer .   

I am very disappointed that we got no new paladin secret. With Mysterious Challenger going wild there were no reason to not to add one (other than sanity of players playing wild)

On other hand !!MURLOCS!!. I love murlocs, 4 new murlocs and the quest make me happy even if this taunt heavy expansion doesn't promise murloc friendly meta. I am considering spending my rag\sylv dust on the quest and Old Murk-Eye for some wild action. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, positiv2 said:

Just imagine how powerful Magma Rager with stealth would be!

You mean Shadow Rager. Even with buffs like Shadow Sensei, it doesn't see play.

Also, ragers are elementals, you can try them in the elemental shaman or mage (I'm sure you will anyways!)

I don't know what is the problem with slower meta. At some point towards the end of the month, I've played 10 games in a row, with either pirate warrior or aggro shaman. At least 1/3 of the games I played this month is against one of these decks. For a rogue main, this meta is like hell. 

Maybe the games take longer, however, I definitely prefer playing against control decks. Not only when I play rogue, but whatever that I play. Even when I have the disadvantage.

Let me explain it this way; I would prefer playing against 10 control warriors in a row with Freeze Mage, than this torture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, FanOfValeera said:

You mean Shadow Rager. Even with buffs like Shadow Sensei, it doesn't see play.

That's the joke.

11 hours ago, Taan said:

To me, it doesn't look so much RNG-based (your decision is actually based on what you have seen so far from the enemy deck).

You might be offered Ancient of WarWisp and a Demolisher against druid, and then it's pretty much clear. You might also be offered Counterfeit CoinSmall-Time Buccaneer and a Southsea Deckhand against rogue. Then it's usually your luck what decides. Now, imagine arena, where you have no idea what your opponent has drafted, and you wouldn't be able to tell even in the druid example. As an arena player, this annoys me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, positiv2 said:

You might be offered Ancient of WarWisp and a Demolisher against druid, and then it's pretty much clear. You might also be offered Counterfeit CoinSmall-Time Buccaneer and a Southsea Deckhand against rogue. Then it's usually your luck what decides. Now, imagine arena, where you have no idea what your opponent has drafted, and you wouldn't be able to tell even in the druid example. As an arena player, this annoys me.

Okay, I didn't thought about it that way.

But when it comes to Arena, there might be more involed than just luck. You also have to think about what card you would actually benefit from. Based on the Druid-Example: Ancient of War is epic but would be super useful, Wisp is drafted rarely and is pretty useless and Demolisher is mediocre. So if you got a cheap hand and/or the enemy is pretty agressive, betting on Ancient of War might be the best choice, because you get the highest reward, compared to the risk.

But still...Curious Glimmerroot seems not super powerful to me. 3/3 for 3 is bad and even if you draw a card from the opposing deck, it might be mediocre at best AND you got the risk of getting nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought about creating my own thread concerning this but its easier this way. The (lack of) balancing between classes seems really concerning for this upcoming expansion. Hunter, which has been on the receiving end of the meta since the introduction of standard seems to have gotten the short straw with the new cards. Yes, hunter was actually half popular in the meta with cloaked huntress just before spirit claws and maelstrom portal made shaman the worst meta culprit since Undertaker but took a very deep dive back into the pit of uselessness very quickly afterwards.

The quest based metagame will make most classes dependent on playing quest on 1 and rushing to the reward fast as possible. Some rewards are really strong like the Warrior one (which i think is arguably the worst card design ever made), some rewards are really interesting although the convenience of them is unclear (Mage and Rogue as best examples). Hunter's reward would be really strong in standard midrange hunter if you could complete it before turn 10. But the very niche completion clause forces you to play humongous amounts of 1 drops which means you will be dry on cards around turns 6-8. After that you should have the quest done and you can get Carnassa. However getting CONSISTENT value out of the chain draw of the broodlings you need to have some lategame in your deck in case you whiff on the draw chain, as drawing only a mere 1 drop on turn 9 for example is game over on the spot. The clause can be worked around by playing ONLY 1 drops in your deck, and completing the quest on turn 4 and cashing the rewards and playing Carnassa on turn 5. But after that you are completely out of gas and if you don't draw broodlings on the very next turn its again, game over on the spot. As you only get 15 raptors, and by turn 6 you still have 22 regular cards left in your deck, its UNDER 50% you get even the first chain draw off the broodlings. Stampede could solve some of the issues; running 1 drops, 2 drops, some OP cards that would be higher cost than that but considering how little "mana cheat" cards hunter has it would sacrifice too much tempo in the mid turns, especially with the RIDICULOUS powercreep of for example Warrior.

You might think, its 5 mana 8/8, easy turn 6 lethal right? No. There are like half dozen of cards that completely destroy the 1 drops, for example volcanic potion, ravaging ghoul, maelstrom portal and fan of knives.

TL;DR: Too many too good clear cards on small minions makes Carnassa on turn 5 plan whiff every time. Carnassa on later turns plan would make the deck become way too inconsistent with Hunters very poor hand refill.

I guess we all should just embrace the bad balancing and enjoy playing taunt Warrior. The quest single-handedly wins you lategame so the deck can focus other 29 cards on earlygame and beating midrange with oversized taunt minions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the warrior-quest an april fools joke?

 

The reward is laughable overpowered - and you don't have to sacrifice much to get it.

Take lot's of taunts -> youl'll have no problem vs aggro / midrange. And since warrior has some nice taunt-cards chances are high you would play quite a lot of them anyway (that is if you don't play aggro-warrior of course).

And if you encounter a late-game build - well, with the reward that shouldn't be that much of a problem, should it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, BrightwingMain said:

Hunter, which has been on the receiving end of the meta since the introduction of standard seems to have gotten the short straw with the new cards.

Really? I think Hunter got some of the best cards in the whole set. Even without taking the quest into account. "Dinomancy" is just great and basically what Hunters need: a heropower that effects the board.

 

7 hours ago, WedgeAntilles said:

Is the warrior-quest an april fools joke?

The reward is laughable overpowered - and you don't have to sacrifice much to get it.

I don't think so. I like the idea of making Warrior a Taunt-based-class. It fits the Tank-theme way more than Aggro- or Control-Warrior. On the other hand 7 (!) Taunt is A LOT and Sulfuras doesn't win you the game on the spot. It is a 3 mana Truesilver Champion that changes your heropower in a kind of situational way. Against an empty board its bonkers. But if you opposing a lot of enemy minions it's pretty mediocre. And when half of your deck is just taunt-minions, it might be hard to clear the enemy board...

Btw. Warrior got only TWO playable taunt-minions in the current sets (minus the ones, leaving standard in a few days).

But don't get me wrong: the Warrior-Quest IS very powerful. But it is also the only way to make Taunt-Warrior finaly viable. Because when you got a deck full of taunts, it might be the only option to finish the game. And this deck (playing with or against it) might be way more interesting then playing against Aggro-face-warrior or control-warrior, that doesn't care about using the board at all. For me...I still like playing warrior the least (not enough RNG!).

Edited by Taan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Taan said:

Btw. Warrior got only TWO playable taunt-minions in the current sets

Sen'jin ShieldmastaAlley ArmorsmithSecond-Rate Bruiser and Bloodhoof Brave are playable even without the quest. More taunts become viable with the quest, which means that warrior certainly has more playable taunts than 2.

1 hour ago, Taan said:

But if you opposing a lot of enemy minions it's pretty mediocre. And when half of your deck is just taunt-minions, it might be hard to clear the enemy board...

You get to clear a random minion for 2 mana (not counting the weapon's clearing abilities). That's great value, even if you end up hitting a small-ish minion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time warp is broken because we can't interact during the opponent's turn. They can roll over us while we can't respond. And the quest is so easy... just requires people to get value. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Taan said:

But don't get me wrong: the Warrior-Quest IS very powerful. But it is also the only way to make Taunt-Warrior finaly viable. Because when you got a deck full of taunts, it might be the only option to finish the game. And this deck (playing with or against it) might be way more interesting then playing against Aggro-face-warrior or control-warrior, that doesn't care about using the board at all. For me...I still like playing warrior the least (not enough RNG!).

My prediction is that the deck will be super oppressive midrange focused warrior with decent amount of warrior's innately high quality removal cards from the classic set. The hero power will also be full RNG meaning that if the deck will become viable it will also become one of the infamous "highroll" decks like Finja rogue. Decks where you on avegrade have good winrate but in smaller sample sizes you have very little control over which games you actually win and lose as the deck will rely on getting good rolls on avegrade. Still somewhat glad we get this to purge pirates and jades out of the ladder, but feel like this is not THE way to do it as the deck's innate skill cap will probably be rather low. Still hoping for the best that the deck will not be another forced meta culprit like Kazakus Reno decks or dragon priest with Drakonid Operative but hard to do it over fearing of the worst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think warriors can do their quest in many ways. From playing regular control warrior with sufficient amount of taunts to get the quest in late game to going very taunt heavy deck  with intention to finish quest early and playing mediocre cards like Pompous Thespian

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco

      We take a look back on the first week of the KFT metagame to share everything you can do to dominate the next one.
      With the first week of Knights of the Frozen Throne behind us we are just now starting to glimpse what the upcoming meta has in store for us. It’s still far too early to claim that all the new decks and archetypes have been finely tuned, but we have learned a lot from our first week with the new cards in KFT.
      The first change we encountered in the new meta was the dominance of the dedicated control deck. Towards the end of the Un’Goro metagame the most dominant decks were almost entirely aggressive or midrange in nature, yet nearly all of the most played decks from the first week of KFT have been controlling. Everybody was very excited to try the new Death Knight cards, and since these cards have high mana costs they tended to end up in naturally controlling or midrange decks.
      Once it became obvious that nearly every deck on the ladder was big and greedy, the next few days became a battle to become even bigger and greedier. At one point while watching Dog’s stream I saw him put N'Zoth into his Control Mage deck with only two Deathrattle cards in the entire deck (Pyros and the Frozen Champions from Sindragosa) to get back from N’Zoth’s battlecry! Talk about greedy.
      As fun as it was to have a Control-dominated meta for the first few days of KFT, this kind of greed wouldn’t go unpunished for very long. Thanks to a lack of Aggro decks, the overwhelming popularity of Jade Druid, and the new cards Simulacrum and Ghastly Conjurer, a more consistent Quest Mage deck emerged as a way to punish the slow meta. As players started to gear more and more towards beating slow decks, the pendulum began to swing back towards the aggro side of things. In the past few days the number of Pirate Warriors on ladder has greatly risen, and I haven’t spotted a single Frost Lich Jaina or Uther of the Ebon Blade in over 100 games.
      Towards the end of the Un’Goro metagame no one class was vastly more dominant than the others, but the same is certainly not true for the early days of KFT. Druid has become the most popular by a wide margin. According to the current Reaper Live report a staggering 36% of the Legend meta is made up of Druid decks. Thanks in no small part to the new cards Ultimate Infestation and Spreading Plague, Druid now boasts highly competitive Midrange and Control decks to compliment the Aggro deck which was already top tier in Un’Goro.
      A major reason why all three decks are so difficult to play against is how difficult it is to mulligan against a Druid. You can never know for sure if you should be keeping cards which are strong against Jade Druid or Aggro Druid, which surely plays a part in the success of both decks. Druid might be quite strong at the moment but it is certainly not unbeatable, and according to the Reaper Live report there are multiple decks which have a positive winrate against two of three Druid builds.
      Meta Beaters
      The perfect deck for this early meta will have the defensive tools to outclass Aggro decks such as Pirate Warrior and Aggro Druid in the early game while still being fast enough to kill Jade Druid and Kazakus Priest decks before they get the chance to dominate the late game. Aggro decks make up only 25% of the current meta, which means it’s still much more important to slant your deck towards the speedy end of things so that you can beat up on the slower decks which are still popular. All of these signs point towards an aggressively slanted Midrange deck as the best choice for the current meta, and the data from Reaper Live agrees. The deck with the best winrates across the board is not a Druid deck at all, but an aggressive Midrange Murloc Paladin deck.
      Midrange Murloc Paladin
      2x Murloc Tidecaller 2x Righteous Protector 2x Vilefin Inquisitor 2x Hydrologist 2x Rockpool Hunter 2x Murloc Warleader 2x Rallying Blade 1x Stonehill Defender 1x Wickerflame Burnbristle 2x Blessing of Kings 2x Corpsetaker 2x Gentle Megasaur 1x Bolvar, Fireblood 1x Finja, the Flying Star 2x Spikeridged Steed 1x Sunkeeper Tarim 2x Bonemare 1x Tirion Fordring Shockingly, Midrange Paladin has positive matchups against every deck in the meta except for Token Shaman and Aggro Druid, but even these matchups sit at a very manageable 48%. The deck was already a strong choice in the Un’Goro meta but it picked up some exciting new toys in KFT to build upon its previous success. Defensive minions like Righteous Protector and Corpsetaker allow the deck stall aggressive decks into the midgame, where Midrange Paladin shines. A Bonemare or a Spikeridged Steed on a Skelemancer is commonly a game ending play, and all of the powerful legendary minions the deck had access to in the Un’Goro meta have gone nowhere.
      Midrange Paladin also packs an impressive number of early Murlocs which are capable of applying tons of pressure. The dream 1-2-3-4 of Murloc Tidecaller into Rockpool Hunter into Murloc Warleader into Gentle Megasaur has to potential to kill as early as turn 4 against any opponent who doesn't pack interaction for the early game . With Murloc Paladin boasting such high win rates across the board, don’t be surprised if you see Hungry Crab start popping up as the tech card of choice in the near future.
      Big Priest
      2x Forbidden Shaping 1x Silence 2x Pint-Size Potion 2x Potion of Madness 2x Shadow Visions 2x Shadow Word: Pain 2x Shadow Word: Death 1x Barnes 2x Eternal Servitude 2x Priest of the Feast 2x Shadow Word: Horror 2x Dragonfire Potion 2x Shadow Essence 1x Free From Amber 1x The Lich King 2x Obsidian Statue 1x Ysera 1x Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound In what I consider to be another big surprise, Big Priest is the only other deck with positive winrates against two of the three popular Druid decks . A brand new deck in KFT thanks to Eternal Servitude, Shadow Essence, and Obsidian Statue, the deck boasts a dominant 71% winrate against Midrange Druid and a very respectable 53% against Token Druid. Its 45% win rate against Jade Druid isn’t embarrassing either, which means this deck still has some game against the most popular deck in the format.
      Big Priest seems like a very luck-oriented deck on its surface as it features high-roll cards like Barnes and Shadow Essence to pull powerful minions from its deck at a discounted cost, yet in practice the deck is shockingly consistent. It doesn’t have any true misses off a Barnes, who himself is the only awkward card to hit off Shadow Essence. Even if it doesn’t hit one of these cards early, double Dragonfire Potion and double Pint-Size Potion plus Shadow Word: Horror allows the deck to draw out the game until they can play their huge minions naturally.
      With all that said, the deck still has a tendency to defeat itself by drawing the wrong combination of cards. It gets absolutely run over by Pirate Warrior and Quest Mage and isn’t able to run tech cards like Golakka Crawler or Dirty Rat due to the nature of Barnes and Shadow Essence. Fortunately for fans of Big Priest, these two bad matchups make up just 10% of the meta while the positive matchups for Big Priest account for roughly 40% of the meta, making Big Priest an excellent choice for the early KFT metagame.
      Tech of the Week
      The one piece of technology which has remained consistently powerful throughout the first week of KFT is The Black Knight. Thanks to the extremely widespread play of Bonemare there are almost no decks in the metagame which lack a juicy target for The Black Knight to gobble up. This Aggro Druid list which hit #1 Legend not only runs Bonemare, but also runs The Black Knight to pave the way for its cheaper minions to sneak in those last few points of damage. It doesn’t really seem to matter if your Aggro, Midrange, or Control, The Black Knight is a game winning tech card in the current meta. 
      Deck to Watch
      The success of Midrange Paladin can be attributed to the fact that it is both fast enough to go underneath the current Control decks and defensive enough to go over the top of the current Aggro decks. Any other deck which is capable of accomplishing this same feat would also be very well positioned, which makes me believe that Nostam's Midrange Hunter is poised to take off.
      2x Alleycat 2x Hungry Crab 2x Tracking 2x Crackling Razormaw 2x Golakka Crawler 2x Kindly Grandmother 2x Animal Companion 2x Bearshark 2x Eaglehorn Bow 2x Kill Command 2x Houndmaster 1x Nesting Roc 2x Tundra Rhino 1x Deathstalker Rexxar 2x Savannah Highmane 2x Bonemare This deck has all the tools it needs to blast its way through Jade Druid with the proper draw. Bearshark curves amazingly into Houndmaster, and Bonemare is like a Houndmaster on steroids. It runs a healthy curve of one and two drops to contest the board early, and pack all four crabs so it can steal some free wins off of Aggro decks. Deathstalker Rexxar seems at his absolute best in this style of deck, as he provides the deck with the card draw engine it needs to not run out of steam against controlling decks.
      I still think the list has a bit of room to improve. Hunter is currently the least played class in the entire meta which also means it is the least tested. I’m not sure that double Tundra Rhino shines in this list without Deathstalker Rexxar already in play. The deck also might be in need one more tool to outvalue opposing Midrange decks in the mid to late game, as it doesn’t pack many tools to catch up once it’s fallen behind.
      Conclusion
      Our goal with this report was to get you up to speed on the current trends in the meta and to provide you with the analysis you’ll need to stay ahead of the competition. As this was our first meta report for Hearthstone we would love to hear your feedback on what you felt worked or what you thought might have been missing. Please feel free to tell us in the comments what you found to be helpful and if there if there is anything you’d like to see in the next meta report!
      Until next time,
      Aleco
    • By Zadina

      Choose your Champion returns for the Hearthstone Global Games finals.
      Once again, as with every major Hearthstone competition hosted by Blizzard, we can choose our favourite representative and potentially win card packs! This time it's the Hearthstone Global Games finals with four teams of four people from four different countries.
      The finalists are: the United States, Ukraine, South Korea and the Czech Republic.
      Head over to this site and pick the country that you think is most likely to win. The voting will last until August 23 at 23:59 PDT. You will get a free Knights of the Frozen Throne pack just for participating in the voting. Since the Global Games are already on the semi-finals stage, you can win up to a maximum of two packs only (given that the two semi-finalists will progress to the finals and there's no progressing after that).
      The finals will take place at Gamescom on August 25. Choose wisely!
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Sindragosa guide for Knights of the Frozen Throne.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Blood Queen Lana'thel guide for Knights of the Frozen Throne.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Professor Putricide guide for Knights of the Frozen Throne.