Damien

Retro Zoo Standard

8 posts in this topic

This thread is for comments about our Retro Zoo Standard deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a joke LOL,  Wrathguards getting shield slammed, fireballed not to mention you getting 2 wrathguards on board just so your opponent can use auch+circle or flamestrike etc. Nothing like taking a 10-20 dmg shield slam to the face or up to 8 dmg to the face from board clear...  AND not including the op PO so big taunts need 2-3 cards to be taken care of since no alchemist is included... Haven't played this deck much, I gave up after 2 wins and 6 losses. In current meta there is no place for taking face dmg from removals. I mean really, opponents are like do I go face or do I fight for board? Oh, he runs wrathgurads, i guess i can do both at he same time LOL 

I'm not saying the deck is UTTER SHIT,  just... good luck using it  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your opponent uses Fireball on your Wrathguard, you won. I wouldn't be really worried about priest combos when nobody is actually playing priest (tempostorm even called the lowest tier "priest tier"). Any zoo will have problems with big taunts, but only decks playing big taunts are C'thun decks (with only Twin Emperor Vek'lor and possibly Twin Emperor Vek'nilash, which means 2 big taunts total) and ramp druid, who stands no chance if you are able to gain board. Any why would you even play Crazed Alchemist? It is pretty much useless card, which doesn't help in any way with intended aggression.
Also, when you draw them, you aren't forced to play them. It's like when you draw Acolyte of Pain - you won't play him with full hand. And finally, this card is like a better Heroic Strike, and that card is rather popular among aggro warrior decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would really put this deck under the now empty " Unique Standard Decks" tag. 

It features...unortodox choices, let's say. Getting Shield Slammed for 20 with Wraithguard is not exactly a great feeling. I also miss Shieldbearers.

28 minutes ago, positiv2 said:

If your opponent uses Fireball on your Wrathguard, you won.

Any zoo will have problems with big taunts, but only decks playing big taunts are C'thun decks (with only Twin Emperor Vek'lor and possibly Twin Emperor Vek'nilash, which means 2 big taunts total) and ramp druid, who stands no chance if you are able to gain board.

Any why would you even play Crazed Alchemist? It is pretty much useless card, which doesn't help in any way with intended aggression.

First point is incorrect for obvious reasons. Tempo (that you don't even get) is nothing when your life total is 0.

Second point is incorrect. Chillmaw, Dark Arakkoa and even Twilight Guardian or Enraged Bloodhoof Brave are all formidable and popular Taunt inclusions. With any normal iteration of Zoo they aren't problematic, that's right - but that's by virtues of Power Overwhelming exactly.

Crazed Alchemist beats Doomsayer, Twilight Guardian and Bloodhoof Brave. It's a reasonable inclusion in any creature-based strategy, up to the point of being a staple tech card.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Paracel said:

First point is incorrect for obvious reasons. Tempo (that you don't even get) is nothing when your life total is 0.

Second point is incorrect. Chillmaw, Dark Arakkoa and even Twilight Guardian or Enraged Bloodhoof Brave are all formidable and popular Taunt inclusions. With any normal iteration of Zoo they aren't problematic, that's right - but that's by virtues of Power Overwhelming exactly.

Crazed Alchemist beats Doomsayer, Twilight Guardian and Bloodhoof Brave. It's a reasonable inclusion in any creature-based strategy, up to the point of being a staple tech card.

Then why would Flame Imp see play, or why would warlocks play low curve to be forced to tap and lose health, or why does handlock want to drop to low health to drop Molten Giants? It doesn't matter if you win on 1 health or 30, you should use health as a resource.

The amount of dragon decks, let alone dragon decks with Chillmaw is rather low (talking from today's experience). There is only one viable (or played) dragon deck on ladder, and that's dragon warrior (not sure about SEA server though). So, I wouldn't worry about Twilight Guardian, and especially not about Chillmaw. And I don't think I would call a 5-health taunt a big taunt, but that is purely subjective. Also, I should have said that any zoo -that didn't draw Power Overwhelming- has problems with big taunts.

As said previously, Twilight Guardian is a rare sight (around ranks 12-10, at least). If the Bloodhoof Brave is enrages, then Crazed Alchemist won't help at all. Now, it does beat Doomsayer, but is it worth including a card to deal with it? Especially when you have less situational Ironbeak Owl?
I would call Ramp druid a minion-based strategy deck, but I see no reason to include Crazed Alchemist. Most of the minions have the health/attack distribution better than it would be after Crazed Alchemist (except for Darnassus Aspirant).

28 minutes ago, Paracel said:

Getting Shield Slammed for 20 with Wraithguard is not exactly a great feeling

Opponent having 20 armour when playing an aggro deck is bad by itself. In most cases the aggro deck player loses, so the 20 damage is just to make the game faster. Also, playing Wrathguard against warrior with 10+ armor who hasn't used his Shield Slam(s) is like playing Deathwing against priest who hasn't used his Entombs or Shadow Word: Death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, positiv2 said:

Then why would Flame Imp see play, or why would warlocks play low curve to be forced to tap and lose health, or why does handlock want to drop to low health to drop Molten Giants? It doesn't matter if you win on 1 health or 30, you should use health as a resource.

My point here is just the fact Wraithguard makes you play a very steep cost while not really lining up well against format's common threats and answers. You simply can not capltalize on its high stats efficiently enough. Wraithguard also does not stack well with Flame Imp - and that card actually beats a vast majority of its opposition. 

1 hour ago, positiv2 said:

The amount of dragon decks, let alone dragon decks with Chillmaw is rather low (talking from today's experience). There is only one viable (or played) dragon deck on ladder, and that's dragon warrior (not sure about SEA server though). So, I wouldn't worry about Twilight Guardian, and especially not about Chillmaw. And I don't think I would call a 5-health taunt a big taunt, but that is purely subjective. Also, I should have said that any zoo -that didn't draw Power Overwhelming- has problems with big taunts.

I've faced a ton of Dragon Warrior rank 19,15,10 and 5 alike. Tempo Storm placed it Tier 1 in their most recent meta snapshot, and those guys are pretty credible. Also just opened up Twitch and Sjow was playing it, as well as some other 1k+ streamers.  Personally I think this deck is one of the strongest choices right now, I'd play it myself if not 450\500 golden Warlock progress.  Chillmaw is a situational card there, but N'Zoth Rogue is also a formidable deck, and they can often discover it with Journey From Below or even maindeck it. But that's not really important to the case. 

You see, 5 and 6 health is that magical territory where Zoo starts to struggle, because simple +2 pumps fail to carry you through. That's where your Power Overwhelmings - that Retro Zoo does not play - come to the rescue. 

1 hour ago, positiv2 said:

As said previously, Twilight Guardian is a rare sight (around ranks 12-10, at least). If the Bloodhoof Brave is enrages, then Crazed Alchemist won't help at all. Now, it does beat Doomsayer, but is it worth including a card to deal with it? Especially when you have less situational Ironbeak Owl?


I would call Ramp druid a minion-based strategy deck, but I see no reason to include Crazed Alchemist. Most of the minions have the health/attack distribution better than it would be after Crazed Alchemist (except for Darnassus Aspirant).

Doomsayer is an actual problem for Zoo decks. It's really hard to handle because it forces pumps and it's still pretty much 7 life gained for them. Thank god it lost its popularity. 

Now, you say that Ironbeak Owl is a less situational card, but are you really sure? 

There is a reason our favorite bird is not common on ladder, Reddit, Twitter and in guides, while Alchemist runs rampant with his recipies. An elusive but simple thing - Silence is not as good as it used to be. Buffs and cards with powerful deathrattles like Sludge Belcher, Mad Scientist, Tirion Fordring or Ancient of War are on decline - when you silence something, you probably just getting rid of Taunt. That does not contribute to combat math, as you are a Zoo deck - fightning for board control. A 2\6 is just as problematic for you as a 2\6 Taunt, except you do slightly more damage - which is not your highest priority. 

Alchemist is cheaper, instantly affects combat math, ultimately has more targets, does not suck when it's blank and still works as a pinpoint answer to corner cases like Doomsayer. It's The Utility Card you want to play on ladder. 


I admit overgeneralizing on "any creature-based strategy", though.  All other aggresive decks have plentifuls of removal, so I guess Alchemist is relegated to Zoo for good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Paracel said:

My point here is just the fact Wraithguard makes you play a very steep cost while not really lining up well against format's common threats and answers. You simply can not capltalize on its high stats efficiently enough. Wraithguard also does not stack well with Flame Imp - and that card actually beats a vast majority of its opposition. 

Hearthstats' archetype usage says that zoo is most common deck in past 2 hours. It doesn't have that many ways to deal high damage in one attack - Power Overwhelming, huge Darkshire Councilman and Doomguard. However, you can look at it this way: Darkshire Councilman or Doomguard basically went face, but you paid 2 mana to deal 4 damage to them (and possibly extra face damage if you managed to go face with Wrathguard).
Vast majority except for Disciple of C'Thun, Arcane Missiles (50%), Arcane Blast, any 2/1 1-drop and so on. With tempo mage and C'thun decks taking 2nd and 3rd place in the aforementioned archetype usage, I probably wouldn't call it "vast majority".

11 hours ago, Paracel said:

I've faced a ton of Dragon Warrior rank 19,15,10 and 5 alike. Tempo Storm placed it Tier 1 in their most recent meta snapshot, and those guys are pretty credible. Also just opened up Twitch and Sjow was playing it, as well as some other 1k+ streamers.  Personally I think this deck is one of the strongest choices right now, I'd play it myself if not 450\500 golden Warlock progress.  Chillmaw is a situational card there, but N'Zoth Rogue is also a formidable deck, and they can often discover it with Journey From Below or even maindeck it. But that's not really important to the case. 

You see, 5 and 6 health is that magical territory where Zoo starts to struggle, because simple +2 pumps fail to carry you through. That's where your Power Overwhelmings - that Retro Zoo does not play - come to the rescue. 

I wouldn't call tempostorm "pretty credible". "Somewhat credible" seems more accurate - they had their missteps, and not only a few of them.
Strength of deck isn't defined by its popularity, as seen with pre-nerf patron. For example, Thijs is playing Astral Communion druid right now, and I doubt that it is tier 1 deck.
This deck plays Soulfire in place of Power Overwhelming. Now that is something I wouldn't do, but it is still viable choice in case your board dies or opponent plays big taunt while on 4 or less health.

11 hours ago, Paracel said:

Now, you say that Ironbeak Owl is a less situational card, but are you really sure? 

There is a reason our favorite bird is not common on ladder, Reddit, Twitter and in guides, while Alchemist runs rampant with his recipies. An elusive but simple thing - Silence is not as good as it used to be. Buffs and cards with powerful deathrattles like Sludge Belcher, Mad Scientist, Tirion Fordring or Ancient of War are on decline - when you silence something, you probably just getting rid of Taunt. That does not contribute to combat math, as you are a Zoo deck - fightning for board control. A 2\6 is just as problematic for you as a 2\6 Taunt, except you do slightly more damage - which is not your highest priority. 

Alchemist is cheaper, instantly affects combat math, ultimately has more targets, does not suck when it's blank and still works as a pinpoint answer to corner cases like Doomsayer. It's The Utility Card you want to play on ladder. 

Crazed Alchemist is currently in no IV decks (apart from adventure decks). Ironbeak Owl is in low amount of updated decks, but is still used. It is a rare sight, but is used more than Crazed Alchemist. I don't use twitter, and read only shitpost at reddit, so I can't compare Alchemist with Owl over there. Alchemist might be used in some zoo builds, and can be better than Owl in some cases, but genereally I believe that Owl is superior in zoo.
This deck is more aggressive than regular zoo, and you want those extra 4 damage. Also, if the warrior enrages the Bloodhoof (if that's the card you had in mind), you would rather deal with 2/5 without taunt, than 5/5 with taunt. Though it probably is too specific and probably rare-ish situation.
Alchemist is cheaper - he basically has extra three stats, that is true. Owl does affect the board instantly as well (enrages, buffs, taunts...). Has more targets, but does less to those extra targets than to those "common target" with owl (like 2/3 - 3/2 swap). There are situations where it is better to keep him in hand than to swap stats of a minion as he always has to target a minion (if there is one on the board). Owl deals with Doomsayer as well, except for opponent coining Doomsayer on turn 1, but that isn't that common. Alchemist does deal with him better, but you rarely include a card to deal with one specific card of the opponent (such as running Eater of Secrets to deal with MC).

 

I personally don't run either. Neither are good enough to be included imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco

      We take a look back on the first week of the KFT metagame to share everything you can do to dominate the next one.
      With the first week of Knights of the Frozen Throne behind us we are just now starting to glimpse what the upcoming meta has in store for us. It’s still far too early to claim that all the new decks and archetypes have been finely tuned, but we have learned a lot from our first week with the new cards in KFT.
      The first change we encountered in the new meta was the dominance of the dedicated control deck. Towards the end of the Un’Goro metagame the most dominant decks were almost entirely aggressive or midrange in nature, yet nearly all of the most played decks from the first week of KFT have been controlling. Everybody was very excited to try the new Death Knight cards, and since these cards have high mana costs they tended to end up in naturally controlling or midrange decks.
      Once it became obvious that nearly every deck on the ladder was big and greedy, the next few days became a battle to become even bigger and greedier. At one point while watching Dog’s stream I saw him put N'Zoth into his Control Mage deck with only two Deathrattle cards in the entire deck (Pyros and the Frozen Champions from Sindragosa) to get back from N’Zoth’s battlecry! Talk about greedy.
      As fun as it was to have a Control-dominated meta for the first few days of KFT, this kind of greed wouldn’t go unpunished for very long. Thanks to a lack of Aggro decks, the overwhelming popularity of Jade Druid, and the new cards Simulacrum and Ghastly Conjurer, a more consistent Quest Mage deck emerged as a way to punish the slow meta. As players started to gear more and more towards beating slow decks, the pendulum began to swing back towards the aggro side of things. In the past few days the number of Pirate Warriors on ladder has greatly risen, and I haven’t spotted a single Frost Lich Jaina or Uther of the Ebon Blade in over 100 games.
      Towards the end of the Un’Goro metagame no one class was vastly more dominant than the others, but the same is certainly not true for the early days of KFT. Druid has become the most popular by a wide margin. According to the current Reaper Live report a staggering 36% of the Legend meta is made up of Druid decks. Thanks in no small part to the new cards Ultimate Infestation and Spreading Plague, Druid now boasts highly competitive Midrange and Control decks to compliment the Aggro deck which was already top tier in Un’Goro.
      A major reason why all three decks are so difficult to play against is how difficult it is to mulligan against a Druid. You can never know for sure if you should be keeping cards which are strong against Jade Druid or Aggro Druid, which surely plays a part in the success of both decks. Druid might be quite strong at the moment but it is certainly not unbeatable, and according to the Reaper Live report there are multiple decks which have a positive winrate against two of three Druid builds.
      Meta Beaters
      The perfect deck for this early meta will have the defensive tools to outclass Aggro decks such as Pirate Warrior and Aggro Druid in the early game while still being fast enough to kill Jade Druid and Kazakus Priest decks before they get the chance to dominate the late game. Aggro decks make up only 25% of the current meta, which means it’s still much more important to slant your deck towards the speedy end of things so that you can beat up on the slower decks which are still popular. All of these signs point towards an aggressively slanted Midrange deck as the best choice for the current meta, and the data from Reaper Live agrees. The deck with the best winrates across the board is not a Druid deck at all, but an aggressive Midrange Murloc Paladin deck.
      Midrange Murloc Paladin
      2x Murloc Tidecaller 2x Righteous Protector 2x Vilefin Inquisitor 2x Hydrologist 2x Rockpool Hunter 2x Murloc Warleader 2x Rallying Blade 1x Stonehill Defender 1x Wickerflame Burnbristle 2x Blessing of Kings 2x Corpsetaker 2x Gentle Megasaur 1x Bolvar, Fireblood 1x Finja, the Flying Star 2x Spikeridged Steed 1x Sunkeeper Tarim 2x Bonemare 1x Tirion Fordring Shockingly, Midrange Paladin has positive matchups against every deck in the meta except for Token Shaman and Aggro Druid, but even these matchups sit at a very manageable 48%. The deck was already a strong choice in the Un’Goro meta but it picked up some exciting new toys in KFT to build upon its previous success. Defensive minions like Righteous Protector and Corpsetaker allow the deck stall aggressive decks into the midgame, where Midrange Paladin shines. A Bonemare or a Spikeridged Steed on a Skelemancer is commonly a game ending play, and all of the powerful legendary minions the deck had access to in the Un’Goro meta have gone nowhere.
      Midrange Paladin also packs an impressive number of early Murlocs which are capable of applying tons of pressure. The dream 1-2-3-4 of Murloc Tidecaller into Rockpool Hunter into Murloc Warleader into Gentle Megasaur has to potential to kill as early as turn 4 against any opponent who doesn't pack interaction for the early game . With Murloc Paladin boasting such high win rates across the board, don’t be surprised if you see Hungry Crab start popping up as the tech card of choice in the near future.
      Big Priest
      2x Forbidden Shaping 1x Silence 2x Pint-Size Potion 2x Potion of Madness 2x Shadow Visions 2x Shadow Word: Pain 2x Shadow Word: Death 1x Barnes 2x Eternal Servitude 2x Priest of the Feast 2x Shadow Word: Horror 2x Dragonfire Potion 2x Shadow Essence 1x Free From Amber 1x The Lich King 2x Obsidian Statue 1x Ysera 1x Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound In what I consider to be another big surprise, Big Priest is the only other deck with positive winrates against two of the three popular Druid decks . A brand new deck in KFT thanks to Eternal Servitude, Shadow Essence, and Obsidian Statue, the deck boasts a dominant 71% winrate against Midrange Druid and a very respectable 53% against Token Druid. Its 45% win rate against Jade Druid isn’t embarrassing either, which means this deck still has some game against the most popular deck in the format.
      Big Priest seems like a very luck-oriented deck on its surface as it features high-roll cards like Barnes and Shadow Essence to pull powerful minions from its deck at a discounted cost, yet in practice the deck is shockingly consistent. It doesn’t have any true misses off a Barnes, who himself is the only awkward card to hit off Shadow Essence. Even if it doesn’t hit one of these cards early, double Dragonfire Potion and double Pint-Size Potion plus Shadow Word: Horror allows the deck to draw out the game until they can play their huge minions naturally.
      With all that said, the deck still has a tendency to defeat itself by drawing the wrong combination of cards. It gets absolutely run over by Pirate Warrior and Quest Mage and isn’t able to run tech cards like Golakka Crawler or Dirty Rat due to the nature of Barnes and Shadow Essence. Fortunately for fans of Big Priest, these two bad matchups make up just 10% of the meta while the positive matchups for Big Priest account for roughly 40% of the meta, making Big Priest an excellent choice for the early KFT metagame.
      Tech of the Week
      The one piece of technology which has remained consistently powerful throughout the first week of KFT is The Black Knight. Thanks to the extremely widespread play of Bonemare there are almost no decks in the metagame which lack a juicy target for The Black Knight to gobble up. This Aggro Druid list which hit #1 Legend not only runs Bonemare, but also runs The Black Knight to pave the way for its cheaper minions to sneak in those last few points of damage. It doesn’t really seem to matter if your Aggro, Midrange, or Control, The Black Knight is a game winning tech card in the current meta. 
      Deck to Watch
      The success of Midrange Paladin can be attributed to the fact that it is both fast enough to go underneath the current Control decks and defensive enough to go over the top of the current Aggro decks. Any other deck which is capable of accomplishing this same feat would also be very well positioned, which makes me believe that Nostam's Midrange Hunter is poised to take off.
      2x Alleycat 2x Hungry Crab 2x Tracking 2x Crackling Razormaw 2x Golakka Crawler 2x Kindly Grandmother 2x Animal Companion 2x Bearshark 2x Eaglehorn Bow 2x Kill Command 2x Houndmaster 1x Nesting Roc 2x Tundra Rhino 1x Deathstalker Rexxar 2x Savannah Highmane 2x Bonemare This deck has all the tools it needs to blast its way through Jade Druid with the proper draw. Bearshark curves amazingly into Houndmaster, and Bonemare is like a Houndmaster on steroids. It runs a healthy curve of one and two drops to contest the board early, and pack all four crabs so it can steal some free wins off of Aggro decks. Deathstalker Rexxar seems at his absolute best in this style of deck, as he provides the deck with the card draw engine it needs to not run out of steam against controlling decks.
      I still think the list has a bit of room to improve. Hunter is currently the least played class in the entire meta which also means it is the least tested. I’m not sure that double Tundra Rhino shines in this list without Deathstalker Rexxar already in play. The deck also might be in need one more tool to outvalue opposing Midrange decks in the mid to late game, as it doesn’t pack many tools to catch up once it’s fallen behind.
      Conclusion
      Our goal with this report was to get you up to speed on the current trends in the meta and to provide you with the analysis you’ll need to stay ahead of the competition. As this was our first meta report for Hearthstone we would love to hear your feedback on what you felt worked or what you thought might have been missing. Please feel free to tell us in the comments what you found to be helpful and if there if there is anything you’d like to see in the next meta report!
      Until next time,
      Aleco
    • By Zadina

      Choose your Champion returns for the Hearthstone Global Games finals.
      Once again, as with every major Hearthstone competition hosted by Blizzard, we can choose our favourite representative and potentially win card packs! This time it's the Hearthstone Global Games finals with four teams of four people from four different countries.
      The finalists are: the United States, Ukraine, South Korea and the Czech Republic.
      Head over to this site and pick the country that you think is most likely to win. The voting will last until August 23 at 23:59 PDT. You will get a free Knights of the Frozen Throne pack just for participating in the voting. Since the Global Games are already on the semi-finals stage, you can win up to a maximum of two packs only (given that the two semi-finalists will progress to the finals and there's no progressing after that).
      The finals will take place at Gamescom on August 25. Choose wisely!
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Sindragosa guide for Knights of the Frozen Throne.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Blood Queen Lana'thel guide for Knights of the Frozen Throne.