L0rinda

hearthstone Mean Streets of Gadgetzan: Preview of Revealed Kabal Cards

12 posts in this topic

QKtjpVU.jpg

The next expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been announced, and many of the cards have been spoiled already. This first preview discusses the announced cards from the Kabal classes of Mage, Priest, and Warlock.

The Kabal are one of the three gangs in Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. Their relevance in-game is the use of tri-cast cards. Kabal cards can be played by Mage, Priest, and Warlock. Grimy Goons cards can be played by Warrior, Hunter, and Paladin. Jade Lotus cards can be played by Rogue, Druid, and Shaman.

Kabal cards:

Xx4hQxL.png

It is too early to tell how good Kabal Courier will be, but Discover tends to be far more powerful than instincts suggest. The fact it is from such a wide pool of cards might make this less strong than some other discovers however, and a 2/2 for 3 mana is very weak in general.

The custom spell from Kazakus is best explained in the video below. It involves three rounds of discover. 

Kazakus is an interesting card, and is bound to be popular with casual players. It does however look like it might be a strong playable card too. We have seen with many recent legendaries that many headline cards end up being tournament strength, and I don't see any reason for Blizzard to change this philosophy. Playing Kazakus with Reno Jackson in Reno Warlock seems like a certainty at this stage, but they will only co-exist in Standard for about four months and then Kazakus will be on his own.

Priest cards:

L8A0MYm.png

Unsurprisingly, given the hate Priest has received recently, Blizzard were eager to reveal a lot of Priest cards early. At first glance, the Kabal Talonpriest seems like an improvement on Dark Cultist, and is at least comparable. The potions seem to show that Priest is headed down a tempo based route, having the board with a Pint-Size Potion in hand could be terrific if the support is there. The Talonpriest suggests that it will be. It will be interesting to see if Priest is given a powerful 2-drop, if it is, then I feel we could see some powerful decks capable of snowballing to victory. I am going to pass on commenting on the Dragon based cards, as we do not know enough about which Dragons will be available after Standard rotates.

No Warlock cards have been spoiled at time of writing, and only one Mage card, which is pictured below.

evdIpuT.png

Manic Soulcaster is probably not good enough for inclusion in a deck. If it does find play, it might be in a deck that survives a long time, and the Soulcaster can be used to get a combo piece twice. It is one of those cards that could pop up when we have all forgotten it exists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pit fighter that lets you discover a card from your opponents deck and acts as dragon synergy activator? That looks... pretty good.

Kabal Courier looks like a good addition to renolock, no?  

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Oddlane said:

I see Manic Soulcaster and Barnes setting up some interesting situations

Yes and no. I feel like those decks where Barnes is vital (Barnes/Ysh), it does nothing. In others, it's just a small boost to your chance of getting another mob. Even then, it's just the same old Barnes RNG.

I'm excited to see how it plays out, but I don't think it's going to be a defining card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try to give my opinions on the spoiled cards and rate them, using this scale :

Spoiler

 

A : Obviously powerful, a multi-archetype staple, perhaps, a format-defining card.  (Tunnel TroggFiery War AxePiloted Shredder);

B: A decent card, your typical "bread and butter"; archetype staple; reliable niche card (Blackwing CorruptorCult SorcererBlood To IchorAcidic Swamp Ooze);

C: A mediocre or weak card that is a filler, outclassed by its peers or has a niche that's not reliable (Eater of SecretsStampeding Kodo;Stranglethorn Tiger; Infested Tauren);

D: It has seen play. Once. Something that's just really not great, but can occasionally make it in a meme deck, or via "get a random card" things. (Cone of ColdBloodsail CorsairStarfall);

F: Striclty unplayable. It exists to brick your random effect cards. (ShatterWispPurifyCaptain's Parrot).

Ratings are purely subjective, and, of course, opened up to debate. But I'll try to back them up with reasonable explainations.

One big thing to note is that I'll be giving two ratings - one for the current Standard, and one for going forward, in 2017-2018.

 

To kickstart things off - on all the triclass cards, or "Gang" cards:

Spoiler

The idea is definetly cool, but current iterations do not look great. It reminds me of multicolored cards in Magic: The Gathering, except for one huge thing. Being multicolored is a design thing that imposes strict disadvantage - a card is harder to cast because you need different types of mana. This drawback opens up space for card text to be good - and it will be balanced out in the end, because color screw is a very real thing. With those Gang cards coming in Hearthstone, design goes in a directly opposite way - being available to three classes is a strict advantage. You just can't make it good and don't stick an opportunity cost to make it fair. Also it would greatly reduce the diversity of the format. So it ends up undertuned, like it was with Inspire in TGT. 

Let's have a look on a Cabal Courier.

My main question is whether Discover on this cycle will look like "always one Mage, one Warlock and one Priest" or will it be pure RNG. Second option will render the card completely useless. A 2/2 body is just enough to make at least some relevance and get your mana investment back, and then the Discover still would be hard to make good, given the fact we're going in (sic!)the biggest Standard format we've ever had(!). I should give props to Courier though because it can be better post-rotation, when tempo will matter less and Discover will be more reliable.

Verdict : D for now, C in '17-'18.

Kazakus.

I have to shoot first here and call out for flavor loss. He says "custom spell" but it's a potion. And that's a serious issue. He doesn't even look like an alchemist! And frankly speaking, I have absolutely zero idea who is this guy - he does not look generic like some new characters do, so it leaves me wondering even more.

Now, on the card itself - we haven't seen all the variants yet, but I'm already making some safe assumptions. First of all, we can say this guy is Reno Jackson best buddy, and that is entirely true - you get the condition met, you get some flexibility and then the 5-drop slot in Reno decks is usually not clustered. Pretty much no questions he makes the 30. 

My biggest issue with Kazakus - he is not Reno Jackson (thx, Captain Obvious!). But it's a big thing - Reno is not just a payoff card with a chunk of value that you get for Highlander-style deck. Reno covers the deck's biggest issue - inconsistency - by being a safety valve in case you're getting ran over. Kazakus doesn't do that, and that may render him totally unplayable when '17-'18 rotation kicks in.

Verdict : B for now, D in '17-'18.

The good ones : Priest is alive!

Cabal Talonpriest

A variant of fan favorite Dark Cultist that could not come at a better time. Priest actually has viable targets in Twilight WhelpWyrmrest Agent, and then some new generic minions, so I'm expecting Talonpriest to be all over the place. Makeshift Deathlords incoming!

Verdict : B+ for now, B in '17-'18.

Dragonfire Potion

Lightbomb is alive and kicking. Would it be anything other than Priest, I would try to say that "pushing archetypes that hard is bad" but a desperate time requires desperate measures. It's playable even with 0 Dragons in your deck. But I should mention Dragons on the other side of the table are not exactly extinct right now.

Verdict : B+ for now, A in '17-'18.

Drakonid Operative

Pit Fighter-sized Shifting Shade Dragon? It competes with Blackwing Corruptor and Azure Drake, but going forward in Standard I could not ask for a better filler. This is the definition of "bread-and-butter" for your Dragon Priests(much like the other 5-drops mentioned are). And Discover is just the cherry on top.

VerdictB for now, B+ in '17-'18.

Pint-sized Potion

It's a fairly good combat trick that is going to be handy if you are trying to play for the board. A couple of synergies come to mind as well, so it's not going to be shelved for a long time.

Verdict : B for now, B in '17-'18.

Potion of Madness

This one is probably the most striking of the pack in terms of being undercosted and reliable. Shadow Madness saw play but it's ultimately too expensive. This little one is just as good and comes in at a bargain cost. Sign me up.

Verdict : A for now, A in '17-'18.

Manic Soulcaster

It looks like a very bad version of Shadowcaster (hence the name), except all the good things about Rogue card have been taken out. You'll forget it exists and then will be getting golden copies out of your rank 5 rewards and be frustrated. I'm not giving it F because it's still a Spider Tank.

Verdict : D for now, D in '17-'18.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drakonid Operative seems absolutely nuts. What's possibly its strongest feature though is that discover mechanic, you basically get to look inside your opponent's deck and see 3 cards! That info can be so incredibly important. You can find out specific tech cards, spot niche decklist changes, see what removal isn't in hand but still in deck etc. This card will be MVP of the entire list imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/7/2016 at 5:10 AM, YourGod said:

Let's go Priest! Time for a rebound. 

So glad to see that 3 slot filled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/7/2016 at 6:19 AM, PaasHaaS said:

Drakonid Operative seems absolutely nuts. What's possibly its strongest feature though is that discover mechanic, you basically get to look inside your opponent's deck and see 3 cards! That info can be so incredibly important. You can find out specific tech cards, spot niche decklist changes, see what removal isn't in hand but still in deck etc. This card will be MVP of the entire list imo.

Definitely gives a nice indicator of what you're facing, but I can't think of many decks where you haven't figured out the majority of the time by turn 5. Maybe if there are 2+ variants of a control deck? Even then, I feel like most of them have something to hint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Blainie said:

Definitely gives a nice indicator of what you're facing, but I can't think of many decks where you haven't figured out the majority of the time by turn 5. Maybe if there are 2+ variants of a control deck? Even then, I feel like most of them have something to hint.

Spotting which deck your opponent is playing will indeed just be confirmation a lot of the time. It will still be useful to spot some subtle differences between some decks or varieties of them though, or the spot tech cards like a harrison jones, mc tech, yogg, alex etc.  Getting a bit of a read on your opponent's hand is another big part of it though. You know that the cards you see can't be in your opponents hand. Playing this later in the game actually tells you quite a lot, as by this time they will have played at least 1 copy of a lot of their cards, so if you see certain spot removal or board clear still in there deck you know they have nothing right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, PaasHaaS said:

Getting a bit of a read on your opponent's hand is another big part of it though. You know that the cards you see can't be in your opponents hand.

I think this is definitely a better appraisal of how it could be used. I wonder if things can appear twice or if seeing two Brawls, for example, means the opponent has two brawls left in their deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      Iksar has confirmed that the Matchmaking in Legend Ranks has been changed.
      As stated in our previous article, Legendary players have been noticing that in the last few days that they have been matched with players much closer to their own rank than usual. There was some confusion regarding this, as Iksar had not been made aware of the changes, but he has now confirmed that there are definitely changes in place.
      It is hard to precisely evaluate community feeling on the the new system, especially as I personally think they're a step in the right direction, but there are some players who are not keen on the changes. RayC and Xzirez have been the two highest profile players so far to disagree with the change. The issues that people against it have can be summarised as follows: Counter-Queuing: Many top Legends do not like counter-queuing, which is where you change your deck to try to counter your opponent. With the new system meaning you can often play the same person several times in a row, counter-queuing will become an important part of the game.
      Early Legend Advantage: People opposed to the changes claim that it overly favours the players who reach Legend early on. The older system made it easier to catch up at the end of the season.
      Win Trading: Due to the increased chance of playing against the same opponent, it is now easier to cover your tracks if you lose to a friend many times in a row to boost their ranking.
      There does seem to be a majority of players who support the new system however. The ladder system has been a cause of much debate for a long time now, and these changes, alongside the recent addition of ladder floors, seem to show that at the very least, ladder is currently a high priority for Blizzard to get right.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Menagerie Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Murloc Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By L0rinda

      The Hearthstone Championship Tour continues this weekend, with the focus shifting to the Asia-Pacific region. In this article I have introduced some of the players, and listed their deck archetypes.
      The APAC region is often regarded as the weakest region, and with some justification. However, although the region lacks a little in depth, the best players are definitely world class. Not only that, but the rest of the pack is rapidly improving, and it would be very negligent to ignore the region in 2017. Staz, from The Philippines recently won the $150,000 first prize at a stacked WESG, which marked the first major tournament won by the region. The top players will be looking to keep the rest of the world on notice, with some high quality play this weekend.
      Below I have listed a few of the key players, along with notes and deck archetypes.
        CaraCute: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      CaraCute has been touted by both NeilYo and Staz as having a good chance, and since those comments were made, she has come through the Tavern Hero Qualifier to take her place in the main Swiss. She learned her trade at Guildhouse Fireside gatherings, the same Fireside gatherings where caster Jia Dee also rose through the ranks.
        Che0nsu: Jade Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      Che0nsu made his name by first winning the Last Call qualifier, and then building on that to finish top four in the World Championship at BlizzCon. 
        ChongGEr: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Reno Warrior
      ChongGer is one of the most consistent performers in the South-East Asia scene. He came fourth in the Singapore Major, third in the Thai Major, and second in the Malaysia Major, where he lost two matches in the final to a player he had already beaten in the upper bracket! He also placed consistently high in the preliminaries last year. 
         GundamFlame: Tempo Mage, Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Pirate Warrior
      GundanFlame impressed observers in the Japan Summer Championship with his understanding of aggressive play. His understanding of when to ease off the pedal, and when to go all-in, won him the national title. It is no surprise that his lineup for the Playoffs is an aggressive one.

        HandomeGuy (pictured above): Aggro Rogue, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      HandsomeGuy is regarded as the man to beat whenever he steps foot in an APAC tournament. He finished in second place in the APAC Winter Championship, and that proved to be his worst result, as he went on to win both the Spring and Summer Championships.
        Kranich: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman (shown below), Reno Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      Kranich played in both the 2014, and 2015 World Championships, finishing top four and top eight respectively. Due to this, and the fact that he was a member of Team Dignitas before they withdrew from Hearthstone, he is one of the best known APAC players in the West. He is not scared to put his own stamp on decks, his RenoLock contains Doomguard and Krul the Unshackled, while his Shaman deck is slower than most Aggro Shamans, and leans towards midrange.

        NaviOOT: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      NaviOOT has built a strong reputation on the back of relentless top 100 finishes, and a consistently popular stream. In recent months he has turned his attention more and more to the tournament scene, making the trip to the Malaysia Open, in which he placed top 8. He has also stated that he will be travelling to DreamHack Austin, which is coming up soon. He managed top four at last Winter's APAC Championship, and is a genuine contender in 2017.
       Pinpingho: Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Reno Warlock, Water Warrior
      Pinpingho finished top eight in the 2015 World Championship. He was known for being one of the strongest Shaman players, back before Shaman was regarded as a playable class, so it will be interesting to see how a does now! He qualified for two APAC Championship events in 2016, and so is no stranger to these events.
        Surrender: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      Although he is yet to have a big win, Surrender is highly regarded in the community and has numerous good results. He already had Xixo as a playtest partner, and has recently joined Counter Logic Gaming, along with Xixo and Hoej. He will be as well prepared as anyone for this event.
        Tom60229: Reno Mage, Aggro Shaman, Reno Warlock, Pirate Warrior
      One of the most accomplished players in the field, Tom60229 has shown consistent results since the dawn of Hearthstone. His most recent tournament win was the Malaysia Major, but also had good success on the 2015 ONOG Tour. His worldwide tournament experience will stand him in good stead in this event.
       
      The event begins at 3am CET on Saturday 25 February, and coverage will be on the official PlayHearthstone Twitch channel.
    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!