Aleco

Kobolds & Catacombs Set Review: Hunter

Sign in to follow this  

11 posts in this topic

8bC5b0m.jpg

Hunter picked up some exciting new commons in K&C, but how do the new Hunter Epics and Legendaries stack up?

Click here to read my other written set reviews!

My Rating System

Each card is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 on two criteria: Power and Versatility.

The Power rating reflects how much I expect a card to impact the game when played. Cards which immediately represent multiple cards worth of value (Ultimate Infestation) or have a powerful effect on the board for their mana cost (Sunkeeper Tarim) will receive high Power ratings, while cards which have a low impact on the game (Ice Breaker) or cost too much for their effect (Furnacefire Colossus) will receive Power low ratings.

The Versatility rating is intended to communicate how dependent a card is on other cards for its success. Cards can be very powerful without being versatile at all (Clutchmother Zavas), which means that many exciting and powerful cards will end up seeing very little play once the metagame is established. A high Versatility rating means a card relies very little on other cards to be good, and the more comfortable I would feel crafting that card on day one. A lower Versatility rating doesn't necessarily reflect that I expect the card to be bad, but that I wouldn't feel comfortable crafting it until it has proven itself to be a part of a competitive deck.

Flanking Strike

h1.png

Fits into: Control, Midrange, and Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
4 3

3 damage and a 3/3 for 4 mana is some serious value. It may not be able to hit face like Fire Plume Phoenix can, but Hunter has never had a problem with finding face damage anyways. I expect this card to be a powerful curve filler in Hunter decks that look to make the game go long and accrue value via Deathstalker Rexxar. It will also be an obvious include in the "Spells-Only" Hunter deck, which may or may not end up being any good. 

Cave Hydra

h2.png

Fits into: Most Hunter decks with Houndmaster

Power Versatility
3 3

Cave Hydra has a meaningful ability, a relevant minion type, and reasonable stats for its mana cost. It also comes down at the perfect time in the curve to be buffed up by Houndmaster. I don't think this card is what Face Hunter is looking for, and I also don't expect it to take Midrange Hunter to dazzling new heights. Cave Hydra will be excellent in an aggressively-slanted meta, but will be outshined by Bearshark in slower metas.

Candleshot

h3.png

Fits into: A wide variety of Aggressive Hunter decks

Power Versatility
3 4

Low-to-the-ground Hunter decks have long been looking for a powerful one drop to go along with Alleycat, and I think they found that card in Candleshot. This card isn't going to blow anyone away with its 1 power, but the 3 durability give this card a ton of flexibility. Being able to split up the damage across 3 turns should give decks that are looking to play to the board tons of favorable trades. It also does some serious work in combination with Hunter's Mark.

Wandering Monster

h4.png

Fits into: Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
2 1

This card seems far worse than Snake Trap and Venomstrike Trap in Secret Hunter, but might be a way for the Spells-Only Hunter deck to play to board on turn two. The "when an enemy attacks your hero" clause is much easier for that deck to trigger than "when an enemy attacks one of your minions".

Seeping Oozeling

h5.png

Fits into: Deathrattle Hunter

Power Versatility
2 1

This card draws some unfavorable comparisons to Savannah Highmane, as it costs the same amount of mana but has a slightly worse body. I don't think this card will be good enough to see play in generic Hunter builds, and think it's liable to copy too many underwhelming Deathrattle triggers to be effective in dedicated Deathrattle decks. If Seeping Oozeling ends up seeing any play it will be in decks which only contain high impact Deathrattle triggers, such as Cairne BloodhoofDevilsaur Egg, and Deathwing, Dragonlord.

 

Emerald Spellstone

h6.pngh6-1.pngh6-2.png

Fits into: Secret Hunter, Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
4 2

Emerald Spellstone is a serious payoff for Hunter decks that are willing to play few secrets. The Lesser version isn't an embarrassment, the normal version is excellent, and the Greater version is phenomenal. This card could do some serious work in combination with Tundra Rhino on turn 10, and may end up being the reason that Spells-Only Hunter is playable.

To My Side!

h7.png

Fits into: Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
4 1

I designed my rating system exactly for cards like this one. Make no mistakes, To My Side! has is an incredibly powerful card that you would play in nearly every Hunter deck if it always summoned two Animal Companions. All three of the Animal Companion cards are excellent for three mana, and it stand to reason that any combination of two of them is well worth an investment of one card and six mana. With that said, this card is stone-cold unplayable outside of the Spells-Only deck. Wait to craft to this one until you're sure that the Spells-Only deck has some staying power.

Crushing Walls

h8.png

Fits into: Control Hunter, Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
2 2

Crushing Walls has an undoubtedly powerful effect, but I have my doubts as to whether or not the effect is worth its high mana cost. Priest is getting Psychic Scream in K&C, another 7 mana card which shuffles all minions into the opponent's deck. I don't think the asymmetrical nature of Crushing Walls does enough to position the card as a consistent board clear. That said, I can imagine a few controlling Hunters builds which might need this card to take over the board in the late game, and it should slot nicely into the Spells-Only deck.

Rhok'delar

h9.png

Fits into: Spells-Only Hunter

Power Versatility
4 1

A compelling reason to play the Spells-Only deck, and total garbage in everything else. Next!

Kathrena Winterwisp

h10.png

Fits into: Midrange Hunter

Power Versatility
4 3

I'm higher on Kathrena than most of the Hearthstone community seems to be. She seems like a far better finisher in Midrange Hunter than King Krush or N'Zoth, the Corruptor, and I fully expect her to see a fair amount of play in Hunter decks that are looking to go to the late game with Deathstalker Rexxar. It's really not the end of the world if she grabs an Alleycat, and I don't think she necessitates a change to the way that Midrange Hunter decks are built to facilitate her Recruit ability.

Thoughts on the Class

Continuing Hunter's theme of being the most affordable class in the game, Hunter picked up three excellent commons in K&C which should bolster the beast-oriented decks that are currently seeing play on the ladder. Breaking far away from the traditional themes of Hunter, a good portion of the new Hunter cards appear to be pushing the Spells-Only archetype. If that deck is a total dud, Hunter fans will be quite disappointed with the fact that three out of four Epics and Legendaries are totally useless. It's too early to write the deck off before the set is even released, but I'm not very optimistic for it. Despite the fact that the deck seems really fun to play, pushed archetypes rarely make an impact on the competitive ladder.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot wait to try out the meme-worthy spell only hunter, the deck on the livestream didn't actually look too bad i'm really excited to get my hands on this deck with Rhok'delar, To My Side! and everything else that comes with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, leapingshadow said:

Cannot wait to try out the meme-worthy spell only hunter, the deck on the livestream didn't actually look too bad i'm really excited to get my hands on this deck with Rhok'delar, To My Side! and everything else that comes with it.

You and me both! I'm secretly hoping that I open these cards so that I don't have to craft them to play them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aleco said:

You and me both! I'm secretly hoping that I open these cards so that I don't have to craft them to play them.

Like most of Reddit I thought that To My Side! was one of the worst cards ever made in Hearthstone but on further consideration and looking at how the deck played, it's a really nice sorta mid to late game power card, especially since the companions compliment each other really nicely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kathrena Winterwisp shouldn't be played in a deck with Alleycat or any weak beast. I think the only beasts you should put in the deck must cost 8 or more. Non beasts minions and spells should fill the lower mana spots so she can pull 8-15 face damage from the deck and be the finisher that is meant to be

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Psychic Scream is especially rough on spell-only hunter.

Still, certainly gonna try it, along with Barnes-Yshaarj Hunter with the spellstones and 4-drop/removal. Or a some kind of Big Beast Hunter with Barnes-Yshaarj-Kathrena maybe. Although probably have to play snowflipper penguin in that just to annoy Hanz...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Aleco said:

A compelling reason to play the Spells-Only deck, and total garbage in everything else. Next!

The best sentence in your review :D

I still have my doubts about a spell-only hunter deck, but as others said before, the idea looks tempting enough to try, but not worth to craft the expensive cards imo.

Edited by Caldyrvan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't consider the demonstration games on last Monday's stream as anything but a fancy way of revealing new cards. Those games hardly represent what hearthstone is in reality. 

The 4 mana removal is pretty insane, as some streamer pointed out, it's the average Imp-losion without the inconsistency. As someone who played (and still play) my fair share of that card, yeah, it's pretty damn good. 

But this won't enable a spells only hunter deck. There is just no way. To be frank I think it's quite outrageous that they want to promote a no-minion hunter deck... I thought rexxar was the one who couldn't get away from his beloved beasts. An all spells mage, warlock or even priest deck would make more sense, flavour wise. They want to give hunters another play style other than aggro/midrange, I get it, but like... put some real effort into it, or don't put any at all. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, spell hunter will never be a thing at least not in standard, but who knows what the next sets will bring :D

Oh and Lock and Load would be a chance for it but it left with the last rotation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Hanz39 said:

Kathrena Winterwisp shouldn't be played in a deck with Alleycat or any weak beast. I think the only beasts you should put in the deck must cost 8 or more. Non beasts minions and spells should fill the lower mana spots so she can pull 8-15 face damage from the deck and be the finisher that is meant to be

I disagree here. You can build a deck in a way that omits cheap beasts but new legendary can work  even in a face hunter deck as a way thin your deck for Kill Command Eaglehorn Bow Leeroy Jenkins

8 mana 6\6 card with a battlecry "draw a card", and deathrattle "draw a card"  is not that far from being playable. This one not only draws them but puts them in play.

 

____________

Also, the best hunter card is that 1\3 neutral beast.

Edited by Strongpoint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco

      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s  
    • By Aleco

      This week's episode features a fresh take on a popular deck, courtesy of Casie.
      Can you guess the next move?
      Situation #22: Let's Even the Odds
      Picking up where we left off last week, we find ourselves in the middle of an odd/even matchup between Warlock and Shaman. I picked this situation partially because it was an interesting spot with many options available to us, and also because its a ladder situation I highly doubt any of my readers have encountered before:

      Commenters quickly identified several key factors about this matchup, namely that Defile and Hellfire are off the table for our opponent and that the only "board clear" available for our opponent is Despicable Dreadlord. Our opponent is more likely to have single target removal (such as Voodoo Doll) or is looking to play a demon-related 5 drop next turn in Skull of the Man'ari, Possessed Lackey, or Doomguard.
      Bozonik summed up this situation excellently in his comment from last week's thread:
      There seemed to be a consensus among commenters that "Option 1", Hero Power + Sea Giant was the line here. It puts a big nasty minion on the board, applying pressure and forcing our opponent to have Voodoo Doll. In the heat of the moment I went with "Option 2", the full clear, but after looking back on things and reading over the comments I believe Hero Power + Giant was the correct line. Despicable Dreadlord is really the only card which gives us serious trouble next turn (since our opponent won't be able to play Possessed Lackey and kill it) and this line plays around Dreadlord while applying just as much pressure as the other options.
      I was secretly hoping that the tap + Giant wasn't the correct line here (because its the most obvious one), but the obvious solution is often the correct one. If you're ever in a situation such as this where you have no idea what your opponent is up to, it's probably best to go for the "obvious" line and not get cute.
      Situation #23: Broken Mirrors
      Today's deck comes courtesy of Kevin "Casie" Eberlein, who cut the dragon package from Mind Blast Priest to turn the deck into something with much more of a combo/aggro feel to it. Many pros are pegging Mind Blast Priest to be the next "best deck in the meta" after the nerfs drop, and Casie's list has a serious advantage in the mirror match:
      Though I didn't find nearly as much success with the deck as Casie did, it did provide me with plenty of interesting situations for What's the Move! Here's the one I ended up choosing for this week's episode:

      It's turn 2, we're on The Coin, and our ladder opponent just played a Wild Pyromancer. For the purposes of this exercise, we can say that we're 100% confident our opponent is on Mind Blast Priest. However, this isn't a mirror match at all. We have Prophet Velen, Holy Smite, two copies of Holy Fire (most Mind Blast Priests run just one), and Lifedrinker in our deck, which gives us a huge advantage in late-game Anduin vs Anduin races. Knowing that we have an advantage in the late game should color our decision heavily on turn two, where have a surprising number of options available to us.
      So, what's the move?
    • By positiv2
      This thread is for comments about our Murloc Paladin.
    • By Zadina

      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?