Zadina

Ben Brode and Ben Thompson Twitter Q&A

Sign in to follow this  

7 posts in this topic

wowk7Bd.jpg

Hearthstone's Game Director (Brode) and Lead Artist (Thompson) sat down together at Gamescom and answered some questions on Twitter via video.

The two developers started with some more general questions like which is their favourite card from Knights of the Frozen Throne. Their answers were from an artistic perspective: Valeera the Hollow for Thompson and Deathstalker Rexxar for Brode (source). They also talked about Sarge, the cute mouse from the Hearth and Home short, and its presence in the Mean Streets of Gadgetzan trailer (source). In a later question, Ben Thompson picked Archmage Antonidas as his most favourite card artwork-wise (source).

Moving on to gameplay-related questions, Ben and Ben were asked about RNG in Hearthstone. Thompson thought that RNG makes Hearthstone more fun to play, with Brode agreeing with him and adding that random cards can add more skill to the game.

Someone asked for a quick update on the ladder changes that the team has been planning for a while now. Ben Brode said that there are three opportunities to improve ladder, with the team being focused on the first two: 1) reducing the grind for top players, 2) adding progression for players that are stuck at the bottom of the ladder and 3) improving winrates for new players and the overall new player experience (source).

Moreover, Brode added that they haven't considered adding Monk and Demon Hunter in Hearthstone the same way they did with Death Knight, but it could happen some day (source). When asked about new mechanics in expansions that never return, Ben Thompson observed that Deathrattle made a return in the current expansion after its introduction in Curse of Naxxramas. Ben Brode added that they bring back mechanics they like, but they also want to make room for new ideas (source). The same goes for Arena where the idea is to keep trying new things (source). Brode thought that players haven't figured out Meat Wagon and how powerful and fun it can be. He uses it with Validated Doomsayer and Devilsaur Egg (source).

The inevitable Druid question came up. Ben pointed out that Druid is strong, but KoFT is only two weeks old. They are still obviously monitoring the situation, while Ben encouraged people to read Dean Ayala's post on the state of Druid. Since we haven't covered this post (being on vacation, sorry!), I will include it below. Some interesting points: Druid is being closely monitored, while Ultimate Infestation and Spreading Plague aren't as overpowered as they seem.

Blizzard LogoIksarHS

+ Show

We cite internal statistics from time to time, but I tend to be cautious of that myself because it's very difficult to find any statistic that represents everyone. Given enough time and enough access I find that it's not difficult to display data to support almost any opinion about the metagame. At the end of the Un'Goro cycle, Hunter was actually the highest win rate class among all Hearthstone players. In fact, Hunter held the highest win rate for the a large portion of the expansion. Of course, I wouldn't say that in retrospect of Un'Goro that Hunter should have been less powerful, but that is what the data might suggest. With that in mind, here are some thoughts on some of the comments I've read in this thread.

  1. Druid surpasses in popularity the historic Undertaker Hunter.

The statistics being used for this post are for one rank over one day. The statistics we cite about Undertaker Hunter reference all Hearthstone players at all ranks over a time range of a week to a month. Druid is popular right now, but these statistics aren't comparable. If I had to guess what the most popular class within one rank of all time is, I would probably guess Mage at Rank 25 on an average day or Warrior at Legend during the Warsong Commander / Molten Giant era.

  1. Blizzard disappeared after the expansion.

As with every early metagame, we are monitoring play rates, win rates, and player sentiment on a daily basis. We hop in threads like this one fairly regularly to say exactly that, but people tend to want to know exactly whether we are or are not going to change something. We are discussing what potential changes we could make if Druid increases in popularity over time, but ~5 days of popularity is not enough to make that call at this time.

  1. The people want to know the status of a druid nerf.

We are looking at a number of Druid cards, but for a deck or archetype to reach this level of popularity this early on in an expansion is not abnormal. The population usually finds something powerful, latches onto it, then other decks that are powerful vs that archetype come onto the scene until one of them emerges as the new popular deck before the cycle continues. It's certainly possible that Druid is in fact so powerful that it prevents the normal metagame cycle from happening, but it's too early to tell. Here are some thoughts on current Druid cards. Keep in mind that these are some of the discussions we have internally, not a list of changes.

Innervate, Swipe, Wild Growth: When we changed Keeper of the Grove and Ancient of Lore, the goal was for Druids to have more interesting decisions to make when deckbuilding rather than a large group of cards to be automatically included. Even though those cards changed, there are still some other offenders of this such as Innervate or Swipe...and Wild Growth to a lesser degree. Having some powerful cards that help define what makes a class different can be good, but those cards in particular have spawned a number of internal conversations where we have been weighing the upside and downside to having each as a part of Druid for Hearthstone eternity.

Ultimate Infestation: Changing a card like Ultimate Infestation we think would have a bigger impact on player sentiment than actual play rate or win rate statistics. It's a big, flashy, cool design but it hasn't appeared to be statistically responsible for Druid power or popularity. Power level aside, having such a powerful card draw effect in Druid is something we are wary of in Druid because we wouldn't consider it part of their identity as a class. Partially for that reason and for sentiment reasons it is still part of discussions in terms of what to do with Druid should population and power level continue to rise.

Spreading Plague: Part of what keeps Druid vulnerable is their weakness to minion swarms due to a lack of powerful AoE. While we think plague is a soft version of AoE that fits the Druid flavor kit, it might shore up one of points of vulnerability more than we would have originally intended. Ideally Spreading Plague is used in heavy minion swarm metas and less so as a general inclusion in any Druid deck. Token Druid, Token Shaman, and Murloc Paladin are all showing high population in the current metagame so it's possible the meta for plague just happens to be now, but it's a card we're continuing to keep a close eye on going forward. (source)

Lastly, Ben Brode sat down with French site JudgeHype, where he talked more or less about the usual popular topics. A summary of his answers can be found below:

  • No plans for 2v2 mode yet.
  • Druid is currently being monitored. If they change cards, they would look at Innervate, Spreading Plague and Ultimate Infestation. The last one, though, has a considerably smaller winrate than Innervate or Swipe.
  • Ben doesn't think that the meta has always been dominated by aggro decks, see for example Freeze Mage, Patron Warrior and Miracle Rogue.
  • The consensus is that the current way of introducing Adventures as Missions together with Expansions is the best.
  • More seasonal events, like the Midsummer Fire Festival, are being worked on!
  • They are not working on a brand new tournament client, but on making the current client as stable and as polished as possible for eSports competitions.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still prefer adventures over full expansion, but I know it's only a matter of money/usefull cards ratio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If enough people demand another adenture, we'd probably get one.

I loved doing the class challenges and having no idea what card I was going to get, since youc an see the prizes during the actual adveture bosses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer this over the old style, I just wish Lich King was easier. I want my pack. Won't be doing it 9 times, since I don't care about the hero skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SithLordOfSnark said:

I prefer this over the old style, I just wish Lich King was easier. I want my pack. Won't be doing it 9 times, since I don't care about the hero skin.

It's pretty easy for some classes. Druid in particular is very easy. Since he removes all 3 or less cost minions in your deck at the start, you can just take a very condensed jade deck filled with junk that gets removed. Innervates, Wild Growths, Jade Idols, Jade Blossoms, Auctioneers. That might be enough on its own. I threw in a Nourish, Fendral and the rest of the Jade cards. Only use your innervates when you have auctioneer on board, and just spam jades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't think Ultimate Infestation is a problem.  I think Ultimate Infestation on turn six or seven is a problem.  Jade druid tends to be a tempo deck rather then a value deck, and they fall behind slightly early in both tempo and card advantage due to ramping so heavily.  SO what generally happens is they go for a tempo swing at some point in the mid game, by either puking out a bunch of jades, or trading their small jades + drake or ultimate infestation, swing the board in their favor, then just play jade after jade and tempo their opponent out of the game.  While ultimate infestation is very strong at all points in the game, its in that mid game where the tempo swing it provides is devastating and generally just means you get tempoed out.  Later in the game, the tempo swing isn't nearly as severe, meaning it is less problematic imo.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, SithLordOfSnark said:

I prefer this over the old style, I just wish Lich King was easier. I want my pack. Won't be doing it 9 times, since I don't care about the hero skin.

The Lich King fight it's preatty easy for a few classes here a list of the deks I used:

  • Priest (easier): 
    AAECAZ/HAgScAssI0gqStAIN+wGXAvgC5QTxBYAGyQbRCtMK1wryDPC7AqbOAgA=

    Save a Shadow Word: Pain for Maexna. Gameplay:

     

  • Druid: any version of Jade will work, you have 2 diferent aproaches, you can avoid put minions that cost 3 or less mana, or you can put trash, so you can draw your cards with more constency.

  • Shaman: 

    AAEBAaoIBJMJhBfjuwK2zQIN2wP+A9AH8AenCL8Xt2z6qgL2vQL5vwKRwQKdwgKLzgIA

    Save Devolve for phase 2, Gameplay: 

     

  • Warlock: 
    AAEBAf0GHjCKAZMB7QXOBtsG3Aa2B8QIzAj2CPMM+A2ODsIP9Q+tEPAR/RGQFcMWzxaFF9i7AsW8At28Ao/HAufLAvfNApfTAgAA
     Save Corrupting Mist for phase 2 (or can use a Twisting Nether) If you decide to use Corrupting Mist, you need a big body in the field, or a least more that 24hp (and with Reno Jackson in hand ;) ).
    Gameplay: 
  • Warrior:
    AAEBAQcG+wHUBIIOsBXOFvHTAgxLkQOiBJEG/wf7DOUPgq0C0q4CsK8CrLsCzM0CAA==
    This is a tricky one hehehe, you have a BIG combo win condition, you need use Brawl in P2, and then put a Public Defender and Kel'Thuzad, that way you had "infitnit" turns, and play your(s) Scaled Nightmare and wait till you be able to OTK him.
    Gameplay:
  • Rouge: I went for the pirate option:
    AAEBAaIHAsgDkbwCDqgFxgXUBe4G5wfGD/sPmxX5qwKStgL1uwKgvQK5vwKbyAIA
    The spels are to fill up the deck, the only one usefull are the Counterfeit Coin, and only if you can put a 2-drop in the 1st turn.
    After that, is like any other pirate deck, be agressive and try to kill him as fast as you can.
    Gameplay:
  • Hunter: "Molten gigant style" 
    AAEBAR8AD40BqAK1A5cIxQjbCYEK3ArUEemrAritAuq7Ap/CAo7DAtPNAgA=
    You need to be able to play yours Molten Giant in the first or second turn, but they arent your only win condition, bcose you also can play with Scavenging Hyena and/or Vicious Fledgling.
    And the Stitched Tracker is really useful to get extra Molten Giant/Scavenging Hyena/Vicious Fledgling (depending the ocation).
    Gameplay: 
  • Mage: Another "Molten Giant" deck
    AAEBAf0EAA/AAa4DqwTLBO0E7AW8CNwKiQ6MrALXtgLrugKYxALUzgLu0wIA
    In your hand you need to had:
    Variant1: 1x Molten Giant, 1x Kabal Lackey, 1x Duplicate
    Variant2: 2x Molten Giant, 1x Mirror Image
    Variant3: 2x Molten Giant, 1x Breath of Sindragosa
    Variant4: 1x Molten Giant, 1x Kabal Lackey, 1x Ice Block or 1x Ice Barrier

    As the Lich King are going to kill your gigants as fast as he can, you need to be able to Duplicate them.
    If you aren't able to kill him before P2, its going to be a little hard (but not imposibe) to win.
  • Paladin: 
    AAEBAZ8FBJYJ6w/pEYW4Ag36Ac4D3APIBPQFzwbdCuIR3hSKrgK7rwKBsALlywIA
    This is a dificult to play out strategy, but it can be done (I did it twice, the second time with my Arthas portrait :P ).

    You need to collect Equality, Consecreate and Barnes before the Lich King's turn 7 and not draw Majordomo. Easy right :D

    You play Barnes which draws Majordomo just before his Frostmourne turn on 7.

    You need to be able to survive a hit from his weapon then on your turn you kill your own Majordomo which gives him one then you play equality consecrate which turns him into Majordomo, removing all his armour and putting him on 8 health.

    Then you need to have 8 damage to face still left on the board or an empty board so you can hero power. If you don't have an empty board you can still hero power and hope!

Credits to:

  • Thrombin2 (Paladin, Mage)
  • xwirus (Warrior, Rogue, Warlock, Hunter, Shaman, Priest)
Edited by Demenzel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Many players - initially from Korea, but then from all regions - have received a survey about Hearthstone and the latest expansions. One of the questions of the survey asks players how likely they would be to to play the card game within the next 30 days, if there were no Blizzard sponsored tournaments.
      The question has made a lot of people nervous, given that Heroes of the Storm esports were recently axed and the game will go in maintenance mode in the near future. The climate is already heavy with the latest WoW expansion not being received that greatly and all the rumours about Activision meddling into Blizzard. The recent news about two Activision Blizzards CFOs leaving the company and Bungie (the developer of Destiny 2) jumping ship from Activision only managed to spark the rumours that things aren't going that well for Blizzard. Hearthstone also saw its game director and public face, Ben Brode, leave this year - along with other notable Hearthstone devs.
      Significant changed to the structure of the Hearthstone Championship Tour were announced less than two months ago, so Hearthstone esports have a future for 2019 at least. Of course, the conspiracy lovers immediately pointed out that HotS devs promised that HGC would continue in 2019, only to announce its cancellation less than a month afterwards.

      The full survey was shared on Reddit by u/HelixFossil89.
      It is important to put this matter into perspective without panicking. First of all, this was a single question in a 35-question survey about the game in general and Rastakhan's Rumble in particular. The conductors of the survey obviously want to get the general opinion of their playerbase on major issues. Just because they asked this particular question, it doesn't necessarily mean they are considering axing Hearthstone esports.
      Second, there is no indication that Hearthstone isn't doing well. Sure, it may have lost some players but it probably still is Blizzard's second best earner. Its competition has definitely not managed to thwart it and the latest balance changes - while they weren't exactly successful in creating a healthy meta - were received with excitement and positivity by most of the community.
      On the other hand, Blizzard has spent quite a lot of money on the Hearthstone professional scene and perhaps there is a limit of how much they can keep throwing at it. There is also the matter that even though Hearthstone has been successful as an esport, it has managed that without being taken totally seriously - even by its own players. The 2019 plans also seem a bit vague-ish, although it should be noted that the January qualifiers are well underway.
    • By Zadina
      This brand new Tavern Brawl challenges you to build a deck with cards from 2 Wild expansions and 2 Standard ones.
      Specifically, you will need to construct a deck using only cards from Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, The Witchwood and The Boomsday Project. We remind you that this month is dedicated to Wild mode with a new Wild Bundle and thematic Tavern Brawls being available.
      Newer players or players that don't have a lot of Wild cards in their collection can pick a Class and a single card and the game will autofill a deck for them with cards they don't have!
      If you don't have cards from GvG and TGT, but still want to make your own deck, Baku the Mooneater and/or Genn Greymane are your best bets. Odd Rogue and Odd Paladin are performing well and Even Shaman is also a decent choice.
      If you have all the cards needed, then it's a great opportunity to show off your Mech power. Mech Hunter and Mech Paladin are absolute beasts, with the Mechs from GvG and The Boomsday Project synergising perfectly.
      This is a very interesting Tavern Brawl, since it creates a whole new meta on its own and it satisfies the players who are asking for yearly/monthly rotations with a specific amount of random sets from all of Hearthstone's history. Sometimes, Tavern Brawls foreshadow future games modes so perhaps this is a small hint on something different being worked on!
    • By Starym
      Here comes another update, once again focusing on Arena balance as classes get the appearance rates of cards tweaked so everyone has a comparable win rate. We're seeing Hunters, Rogues and Warriors getting their rates nerfed, while Druids, Mages, Paladins, Shamans and Warlocks get theirs buffed. This is coming after the more comprehensive update last month that saw some bigger Arena changes, including the removal of Mind Control Tech.

      We're also getting changes to Rumble Run in this update, featuring better synergy for your shrine with new cards picked, boss deck adjustments and the ability to re-pick the shrine you lost with. Check out the full details below:
      January 10 (source)
      This Hearthstone update mixes Rumble Run up for a refreshing new change, while also bringing in some updates to Arena buckets together with the cessation of December 2018’s dust refund. Read on for details!
      Arena Updates
      Following our Arena update last December, we have adjusted the appearance rate of each individual card available in Arena to ensure the overall win-rate of each class remains as close as possible to our ideal of 50%.
      Hunter, Rogue, and Warrior have had the average quality of their Arena picks lowered. Druid, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Shaman, and Warlock have had the average quality of their Arena picks raised. December Update
      The dust refunds that were available following our last update in December 2018 are no longer available as of this post.
      Rumble Run Changes
      Champions, rumblers, and trolls of all sizes! We’ve watched you spend a month punching faces in the Rumble Run, and we think there’s room for some changes based on how things have gone. Here’s what’s new with the Rumble Run.
      Weighted Card Rewards We’ve increased the possibility of synergistic cards for your shrine appearing more often. One of our primary goals with this mode was to showcase the nine troll champions and have you really get to know them. We wanted you to “live the dream” of fighting in the Gurubashi Arena, and to do so, we had to make sure that each Run had its own strong theme. Adjusting the card bucket offerings for decks and re-adding bonus buckets will help strengthen that experience.
      Boss Deck Adjustments One of our design goals with the Rumble Run was to provide huge, overpowered combat. Balancing at such a high power level is a challenge. When it works, it works great. You get epic, monumental combat against overwhelming odds. But when it doesn’t work, it feels random and swingy – like when the AI pulls an overwhelming combo. And since no one likes being repeatedly hit in the face with a club, we’ve pruned some of the power from the boss decks so that your Runs will play out more moderately. We have a lot of data about which bosses have the biggest body counts, and we’ve used that to target the worst offenders. Rumble Runs are now a little easier, but more importantly, they’ll feel a little more fair.
      Shrine Selection Changes In early builds of the Rumble Run, we allowed players to pick a class and shrine before playing. What we found was that playtesters immediately picked their favorite class, gravitated to a certain shrine, and played that shrine repeatedly.
      We had wanted to encourage players to try different shrines, especially to experiment with stuff they normally wouldn’t, so we put the current random shrine drafting in place. While that helped achieve our initial goal, it removed that feeling of mastery – the ability to choose a shrine and play with it until you feel you’ve mastered it or exhausted its possibilities.
      So we want to bring that back. With this update, whenever you lose, you can expect to always be offered the shrine you just lost with. The shrine that the boss used to beat you in your last run will also be offered, per the status quo.
      Some Final Rumble Ruminations
      We always prefer to experiment, try extreme ideas, and get feedback rather than play it safe. In true troll fashion, we went big with the Rumble Run and tried some different ideas to give this expansion a unique feel and to capture the thrill of stepping into an arena against known opponents for some superpowered brutality. It’s wallop or be walloped in there, for better or for worse.
      One of the things we experimented with—and heard great feedback on—was about the earlier pack rewards for the Rumble Run. Previous Hearthstone missions awarded packs via quests for completing content. For The Boomsday Project, we gave packs out without a quest to celebrate the launch of the expansion’s missions. This time around, we front-loaded the rewards and gave players three extra packs on launch day instead of during the Rumble Run. We felt that packs might be more interesting to people during the initial weeks of the expansion.
      As many of you have pointed out, this decision just made the missions feel especially un-rewarding. It’s always more gratifying to earn packs by competing a quest, rather than just being given them. To this end, we’re adding the new quest described above, and going forward, we’ll keep this feedback in mind for the launch of new single-player content.
      We had a ton of fun making mode and really appreciate the time that many of you took to write out thoughtful feedback. Everything we learn helps make future content better.
      And now, it’s back to the Rumble Run!
    • By Zadina
      This January is dedicated to the Wild format: apart from the Wild Open qualifiers taking place this month, you can now get a card Bundle with packs from previous expansions that are not usually available.
      The Wild Bundle contains 10 packs from each of the following expansions, that have rotated out of Standard: Goblins vs Gnomes, The Grand Tournament, Whispers of the Old Gods and Mean Streets of Gadgetzan. The Bundle costs 25 Euros or 25 USD.
      If you are interested in the Wild format - or perhaps you even want to complete in it, the Wild Open qualifiers will be taking place this January.
      Lastly, most Tavern Brawls are in Wild and this will continue being the case throughout this month.
    • By Stan
      It's been a while since we last heard of Ben Brode who left Blizzard in April 2018 to form the Second Dinner game development studio. In the latest update, we learn that Brode along with former Hearthstone developers are currently working on a Marvel game and the studio received $30 million in funding from Netease in China.
      Netease is currently co-developing Diablo: Immortal with Activision Blizzard. Here's the latest press release posted on the Second Dinner website. The company now has enough funds to expand and grow beyond its five co-founders.
      They also released a video talking about exciting news in the new office.