Jump to content
FORUMS
Oxygen

Chen Meta Tier List (June 2019)

Recommended Posts

33xHrot.jpg

Our twenty-seventh Heroes of the Storm Meta Tier list for the month of June is here!

Welcome to another Icy Veins's Meta Tier List for the June 18 patch. The goal of this list is to try and detail game's current metagame state. The prime goal of such lists is to inform players regarding popular and trending team composition drafting strategies (i.e. the drafting metagame).

Using the list

Spoiler

Although tier listings are generally the product of balance, many factors come into play when discussing the relative perceived strengths of heroes, including player regions, maps, play style, skill level, and, of course, personal perception. As such, any tier list—including this very one—should never be interpreted as gospel, but rather, as a guide to better grasp what to expect with regards to typical drafting experiences. One useful application of such lists is to allow you know which heroes to look out for in terms of practice and counterplay, ultimately improving your knowledge of the game.

As stated above, tier lists are easy to mistake for gospel. As new strategies are discovered and experimented with, so changes the perception of the relative strengths of each hero. Tier lists still prove to be useful as a snapshot of player expectations in terms of drafting. Although it is generally considered preferable to focus on high tier heroes (Prime and Core tiers), it is important to note that Heroes of the Storm's wild character and map designs make it so that any given hero's tier position is prone to fluctuate depending on the situation at hand.

One classic example of such is that of Kerrigan on the Infernal Shrines map. Although we currently judge her to be a mid-tier hero, her drafting priority shoots up to first-pick or first-ban material on this specific map due to the nature of its objective. Certain heroes also synergise so well with each other that the sole fact of having the opportunity of drafting them together is generally enough to increase their potential. Tassadar and Tracer, for instance, are generally nightmarish to deal with for many. There are too many examples of these interactions to reasonably produce here, but we invite you to consult our guides to know exactly where and when each hero shines. The guides have been linked in the lists below for your convenience - just click any of the hero names to access them.

A  next to a hero's name means its tier list position has increased since the previous month whereas a  means just the opposite. Additionally, a + or - sign indicates short-to-medium term predictions (which is to say, about a month) for tier increase(s) or decrease(s), respectively. These are often updated after significant balance patches and/or when clear trends are emerging. The (ban) comment is a ban recommendation; Meta heroes should be picked and banned first, though heroes from other groups should be considered as well depending on how team compositions are shaping up.

If you're newer to the game, also consider visiting our glossary for a comprehensive list of discrete Heroes of the Storm terms.

 

Current ranked mode map rotation

 
  • Alterac Pass
  • Battlefield of Eternity
  • Cursed Hollow
  • Dragon Shire
  • Garden of Terror
  • Hanamura
  • Infernal Shrines
  • Tomb of the Spider Queen
  • Towers of Doom

 

Meta picks

Tank Bruiser Fighter Stalker Marksman Mage Support Healer
Anub'arak (ban) Ana

 

High-tier generalists

Tank Bruiser Fighter Stalker Marksman Mage Support Healer
Arthas Artanis Thrall- Zeratul Raynor (ban) Azmodan Malfurion-
E.T.C. (ban) Imperius VarianTwin Blades of Fury     Jaina   Rehgar
Diablo (ban)         Kael'thas   Tyrande
Garrosh (ban)              
Johanna              

 

Mid-tier generalists

Tank Bruiser Fighter Stalker Marksman Mage Support Healer
Mal'Ganis Dehaka (ban) Alarak+ Genji (ban) Cassia  Chromie Abathur Alexstrasza
Muradin Sonya Gazlowe Tracer (ban) Falstad Gul'dan Medivh (ban) Anduin
Stitches (ban)   Kerrigan   Fenix Junkrat Zarya Auriel
VarianTaunt   Maiev-   Greymane- Kel'Thuzad+    Brightwing
    Malthael   Hanzo (ban) Mephisto   Deckard-
    Ragnaros   Lunara Nazeebo   Kharazim
    VarianColossus Smash   Sgt.Hammer (ban) Orphea   Li Li
        Tychus Sylvanas   Lt. Morales
        Valla Zagara   Lúcio
        Zul'jin     Stukov
              Whitemane-

 

Low-tier generalists

Tank Bruiser Fighter Stalker Marksman Mage Support Healer
Blaze Chen (reworked) Murky Valeera —  Li-Ming —  — 
  D.Va The Butcher     Probius    
  Yrel            

 

Situational picks (map, team composition, or counterpick)

Tank Bruiser Fighter Stalker Marksman Mage Support Healer
Cho'gall (ban) Leoric Illidan Nova Cho'gall (ban) Tassadar Uther (ban)
Tyrael Rexxar (ban) Xul Samuro     The Lost Vikings (ban)  

 

Meta heroes define the metagame. They are very often banned or picked right away, as they generally dictate the pace of most drafts and matches.

Generalists form the core of your team and are generally picked after Meta picks have been distributed. They tend to work on most maps, and as part of and against most team compositions. Since this group includes most heroes, I elected to split it into three tiers. High-tier rankings are a result of performance (i.e. win rates) and popularity (i.e. pick and ban rates). This means that heroes with high win rates can be set in low tier; the opposite may also be true.

Situational picks shine on specific maps or as part of specific team compositions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Explanation why Leoric is situational pick and Sonya being placed above Chen?
While Sonya is good solo laner and can clear camps which Chen can't, I feel like she doesn't provide much in teamfights anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SleepySheepy said:

Interesting. Explanation why Leoric is situational pick and Sonya being placed above Chen?
While Sonya is good solo laner and can clear camps which Chen can't, I feel like she doesn't provide much in teamfights anymore.

I admittedly need a bit more data to better assess Chen. In general however, I don't find him particularly flexible in general, for the mercenary point you noted.

Leo's situational because I treat him as a counter. I don't think he "casually" works in many team compositions unlike so-called generalists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the three of them (Leo, Chen and Sonya) are similar on that they are great at solo QM play, since they are flexible heroes with decent talent diversity and good balance between surivability, pick potential and damage.

However, talking draft, I mostly agree with Oxygen. Though a reworked Chen on the right hands (with the right build) can do basically everything Sonya does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mostly was interested in Leoric because he has very good waveclear, good engage with Entomb and with 13 and 16 he can lower damage on enemy team for quite some time, which is good general thing to have.

Edited by SleepySheepy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Oxygen said:

Leo's situational because I treat him as a counter. I don't think he "casually" works in many team compositions unlike so-called generalists.

I think he can though. He's one of the best double-soaker in the game, and Entomb is a good engage for pretty much any comp. I can't find a situation where he's considered a 'deadweight' pick. 

I'd say Sonya, Chen, Artanis and even Malthael are more situational than Leo. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ShadowerDerek said:

What are those bold names mean? Are you planning to do a meta assessment for them?

I believe the bold names just mean they are the ones that moved from the last tier list.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ShadowerDerek said:

What are those bold names mean? Are you planning to do a meta assessment for them?

I should really go back to doing assessments. They were fun to write, but they got repetitive after a while. I've been thinking of some things to improve that.

Bolding was meant to help seeing changes since last month; you'll note all of them have arrows, or should, anyway. And since assessments were about the moves, that'd make sense.

Anyhow, if that's all pretty unclear and the list still sucks to read (which I think it does), I have good news: the format is changing completely next month. More than usual. In fact, we'll be caking the tier lists into the website instead of relying on me making a new forum post every time. It only took three years!

I'm also rethinking (for the 6th time?) how the list's going to be presented, content-wise. Main challenge is making more room for more nuance without overwhelming readers. Hero power varies broadly based on player skill. That's a huge problem.
 

8 hours ago, ShadowerDerek said:

I can't find a situation where he's considered a 'deadweight' pick.

As a giant skeleton, I'd say he's the best candidate for being deadweight...

All kidding aside, in general, I find I can't get solid damage on Leo against range-heavy comps. If Entomb doesn't manage to close a fight outright, his kit's lack of base crowd control hurts.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Oxygen said:

All kidding aside, in general, I find I can't get solid damage on Leo against range-heavy comps. If Entomb doesn't manage to close a fight outright, his kit's lack of base crowd control hurts.

Depends on your build.

If you're using the usual Wraith Walk build, then you shouldn't care about your own damage output. Your job is to reduce the enemies' damage, and distract the enemies so that they can't focus fire properly. Flanking is usually a good idea for any bruiser. 

By range-heavy comp you mean 3-backliners + solo-frontline comp? You can just blow the frontline up. Leo's Drain Hope is very good for that. And if you still want more damage, go for the other builds then. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ShadowerDerek said:

What are those bold names mean? Are you planning to do a meta assessment for them?

I was asking this mainly because I see Rexxar being bold for no reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/28/2019 at 10:39 PM, ShadowerDerek said:

I was asking this mainly because I see Rexxar being bold for no reason.

Only thing i see is that he added  (ban to the end of Rexxar from previous list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      Heroes' Live Designer Adam Jackson explains how the team uses internal data for balancing decisions to give players more insight into all the different areas that affect the decision-making process when making changes to a specific Hero.
      Blizzard (Source)
      Dear developers & testers,
      In your balance patches you often write notes that refer to internal data gathered by you when explaining a balance change or talents change.
      I would appreciate it if you provided an example of how the data are organized of a talent or a hero and how different categories of data are given weight to push into a change decision.
      For example if we chose illidan’s “Friend or foe” talent , and I am going to assume that data is collected from all game modes, do you have a system of point allocation depending on the rating of the player ? , Is team’s composition are taken into consideration ? Or is it just simple statistics of pick & win rates over all game modes & ranks ?
      Your answer and example will help us to better understand how you evaluate a talent or a hero before changing something & perhaps lower the ranting rates against every balance change and lower the differences in opinions between players a bit about heroes and talents balance wise.
      Thank you for your time & effort.
      I’m not going to give away everything, but I can answer this question.
      We get raw data on basically everything that’s happening in the game across all modes based on win/pick rate, as well as things like damage dealt/taken etc.
      We are able to parse through this data to look at it through many lenses. This is where raw statistics become less useful and the skill and experience of a designer come into play more so that we can draw meaningful conclusions from the data, and decide what changes we want to make based on the results.
      To get a full picture of what’s going on in the game, for example, I can and do look at things like win/loss data that’s filtered by different leagues and game modes. I can also see hero pick and ban popularity with this kind of granularity, which lets me see, for example, what the meta is looking like in the Bronze - Silver range as well as the Diamond - GM range.
      While incredibly useful, I want to emphasize that it’s not just the raw data that’s important, but also having the game knowledge and experience to make correct conclusions based on the knowledge. This is something that’s a lot more esoteric, and there are often multiple right and wrong answers, which can and often does lead to a lot of debate within the design team and with the playerbase at large.
      As an example, let’s say that you’re the designer and your job is to evaluate Samuro in the next balance patch with these facts (I made these up in my head right now because i’m at home, they are not what’s actually happening though there are truths in these statements):
      He’s currently at a 55% win rate
      He has a very low pick rate, let’s say he’s the 5th lowest pick hero in the game.
      He’s considered a highly skilled but highly rewarding hero by the bulk of the community who argues that he should deserve a relatively high win rate as a reward for being hard to play. They argue that if you nerf or remove what’s unique about him, then why would anyone play a hard hero when they can pick someone like Raynor or Lili every game and just win more often?
      Others feel he’s frustrating to play against and a different section of the community thinks he’s obviously way too strong and needs nerfs. They can and do show you videos of crazy things that he does that look and feel unfair.
      The people that play him love the unique things he can do, like swapping to clones and tricking his opponents, which is what his entire design is based on. If you decide to change these things, the likelihood of having an extremely vocal and negative and reaction from his community is very high.
      Do you make changes? If so, what do you do?
      I can guarantee you not everyone will agree with your proposed changes, which is fine and normal. A large part of being a designer is having the courage to make these kinds of calls and dealing with the fallout, even if your ideas are not always perfect. Even so, there are many cases like this and there are many times where changes need to be made. That’s essentially what we spent the bulk of our time figuring out and doing.
      Also as a side note, finding out community sentiment doesn’t come from data, and community sentiment is often a large part of the picture as well, so if you only rely on data to make changes, you’ll end up making a lot of weird changes that no one will agree with.
      As an example, Probius has always had an extremely high win rate and statistically deserves heavy nerfs. I don’t think that’d go over too well with the community ?.
      Latest Heroes of the Storm News
      Heroes of the Storm Balance Update Patch Notes: February 12th Free-to-Play Hero Rotation: Week of February 18th Heroic Deals: Week of February 18th Weekly Brawl - Lost Cavern: Week of February 21st
    • By Stan
      This week's brawl is Lost Cavern and comes with the usual ARAM rules that include shuffle pick, standard play, and no Hearthstones at spawn. A game is won by destroying the enemy Core. Play three games to earn a New Toy Chest.
      Blizzard (Source)
      This week’s brawl is Lost Cavern! It’s all-out mayhem on our single-lane battleground – Lost Cavern. Queue up, choose your Hero, and try to best to bring down the enemy Core!

      Rules:
      Shuffle pick - Choose from one of three Heroes before entering the battle. Standard play - no talent or level restrictions. The first team to destroy the enemy Core wins! Rewards:
      Complete three matches of Lost Cavern to earn a New Toy Chest! Find out more about the Heroes Brawl game mode on our Heroes Brawl site; and as always, you can find more information on this week’s Brawl by clicking the Brawl Info button at the bottom of the play screen when preparing to queue for the Brawl game mode.
    • By Stan
      The Lucky Red Envelope mount is no longer on sale and we have a new set of three Heroes available for purchase for 375 Gems in this week's sale.
      Hero Sales
      Heroes Old Price New Price Blaze 750 Gems 375 Gems Cassia 750 Gems 375 Gems Stukov 750 Gems 375 Gems Mounts
      Wonder Billie is on sale for 12,000 Gold.

      Latest Heroes of the Storm News
      Free-to-Play Hero Rotation: Week of February 18th Heroes of the Storm Balance Update Patch Notes: February 12th Weekly Brawl - Silver City: February 13th
    • By Stan
      The free Hero rotation for the week of February 18 is here.
      Free-to-Play Hero Rotation (Week of February 18)
      This week's free Hero rotation includes the following Heroes:
      Artanis Azmodan Chromie Diablo ETC Junkrat Kael'thas Kerrigan Li Li Medivh Rehgar Stukov The Butcher Zagara Latest Heroes of the Storm News
      Heroes of the Storm Balance Update Patch Notes: February 12th Weekly Brawl: Silver City - February 13th
    • By Stan
      This week's brawl is Silver City. The single-lane map comes with shuffle pick, standard play, and disabled Hearthstones. The first team to destroy the enemy Core wins. Play three games to earn a New Toy Chest.
      Don't forget to check out this week's Hero rotation, Heroic Deals, and the latest balance update notes!
      Blizzard (Source)
      This week’s Heroes Brawl is Silver City! Battle against the enemy team on this single-lane Battleground featuring a familiar design straight out of the High Heavens, Mercenary Camps ready to be swayed to your team’s favor, and tons of action. Queue up, choose your hero, and try your best to send the enemy team to the Burning Hells!
      Rules:
      Shuffle pick - Choose from one of three Heroes before entering the battle. Standard play - no talent or level restrictions. The first team to destroy the enemy Core wins! Rewards:
      Complete three matches of the Silver City Brawl to earn a New Toy Chest! Find out more about the Heroes Brawl game mode on our Heroes Brawl site; and as always, you can find more information on this week’s Brawl by clicking the Brawl Info button at the bottom of the play screen when preparing to queue for the Brawl game mode.
×
×
  • Create New...